Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
The ruling had to do with the Panama Canal Zone, where McCain was born. The SCOTUS ruled in US v Wong Kim Ark 1898, that any child born to someone domiciled within the US was a birth citizen. The thing is, domiciled as it was defined in 1898 meant maintaining a permanent legal residence. No wetback trespassing on US soil, or even someone here legally on a temporary visa qualifies. Nor does a diplomat, which is how Muthana's father was listed when she was born. The only people who qualify under this ruling are citizens and permanent legal residents. This bulls**t quasi-legal practice of extending birth citizenship to the children of wetbacks is actually a violation of the intent of the 14th Amendment. At the time it was passed, subject to the jurisdiction in the words of the men who wrote the Amendment, meant "not owing allegiance to anyone else." Wetbacks cannot legally v**e, or pay taxes, or work here, or be drafted or serve on juries. Ergo, they are not subject to the jurisdiction as intended by the authors of the Amendment.
The ruling had to do with the Panama Canal Zone, w... (
show quote)
The represenatives working at rhe United Nations [B]owed their allegiance to the country they represented not to America.
The illegal criminal aliens have not become Nationalized citizens and sworn allegiance to America, as required by law.
Therefore their children assume their parents allegations to what ever country they came from. Once their parents become Nationalized American citizens and sware allegiance to America then and only then do the children become natural born American citizen's.
That is what the Immigration Service in New Orleans told me and three immigrants I sponsored and they became nationalized citizens and even their children became Nationalized citizens. None were born in America but one is.on the way then it will automatically become a natural born citizen.
🇺🇸 God bless America and President Trump.