One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
My question:
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
Feb 16, 2019 06:40:27   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
PaulPisces wrote:
Islam is not dangerous in and of itself.
Like all relogions dependent on an interpretation of holy texts it can become dangerous when its core values get abused. This happened to Christianity during the Inquisition.

It is not necessarily ideology that gets us in trouble, it's the folks who practice it.


I support your position, "It is not necessarily ideology that gets us in trouble, it's the folks who practice it."

Reply
Feb 16, 2019 07:33:13   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
padremike wrote:
Are you familiar how Islam was formed and how it grew out of that beginning?


Padre, could not the exact same claim be made on the creation of the Jewish state whose early history is defined by the terrorist groups described in the post "Judaism - The Progressive Except Palestine Problem" page 2, and also on https://rense.com/general21/pastz*****t.htm:

Funny, reading the opinion of the posts on this topic reminds me of the parable of the blind men who have never come across an elephant before and who learn and conceptualize what the elephant is like by touching it. Since each one touches and feels a different part of the elephant, their conceptualization is formed by their own experience. Isn't that what we are doing here?

If you were the American Indian, 1946 Palestinian, or Moorish 711 Spanish Muslim, your historical perspective would be far different from the early European or Jewish settlers.

It's a shame that we often focus on who is in the right, and who is responsible for this or that. Which religion is peaceful, and which is not.

Examples can be offered both supporting or refuting claims on both sides.

What is important now, is that we try to keep an open mind, and treat each other as we ourselves wish to be treated.

Reply
Feb 16, 2019 07:40:11   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
ACP45 wrote:
Padre, could not the exact same claim be made on the creation of the Jewish state whose early history is defined by the terrorist groups described in the post "Judaism - The Progressive Except Palestine Problem" page 2, and also on https://rense.com/general21/pastz*****t.htm:

Funny, reading the opinion of the posts on this topic reminds me of the parable of the blind men who have never come across an elephant before and who learn and conceptualize what the elephant is like by touching it. Since each one touches and feels a different part of the elephant, their conceptualization is formed by their own experience. Isn't that what we are doing here?

If you were the American Indian, 1946 Palestinian, or Moorish 711 Spanish Muslim, your historical perspective would be far different from the early European or Jewish settlers.

It's a shame that we often focus on who is in the right, and who is responsible for this or that. Which religion is peaceful, and which is not.

Examples can be offered both supporting or refuting claims on both sides.

What is important now, is that we try to keep an open mind, and treat each other as we ourselves wish to be treated.
Padre, could not the exact same claim be made on t... (show quote)




Superb...


Reply
 
 
Feb 16, 2019 08:33:43   #
L8erToots
 
PaulPisces wrote:
Islam is not dangerous in and of itself.
Like all relogions dependent on an interpretation of holy texts it can become dangerous when its core values get abused. This happened to Christianity during the Inquisition.

It is not necessarily ideology that gets us in trouble, it's the folks who practice it.
The problem Paul is that unlike Christianity and Judaism, there is no interpretation allowed in the Koran and the laws and traditions followed and accepted today (even by liberal Muslims) are the Hadiths that haven't changed since Muhammad spoke them. A friend with his degree in world history and world religions explained it to me and this is pretty close to what he said.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Hadith

Refugees didn't come here to assimilate or because they are escaping Sharia Law...they came here to escape war and bombings and death in the country they love. Their culture, justice system and core beliefs will never be compatible with America's Constitution and will always cause strife and conflict here and if you read Vattel's Law of Nations you'll find that going back to Grecian times and before, no Nation has ever been required to allow immigrants, even for asylum purposes, to enter and cause disruption as the Muslims and many other immigrants have (because it destroys that Nation).

Reply
Feb 16, 2019 08:45:07   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
L8erToots wrote:
The problem Paul is that unlike Christianity and Judaism, there is no interpretation allowed in the Koran and the laws and traditions followed and accepted today (even by liberal Muslims) are the Hadiths that haven't changed since Muhammad spoke them. A friend with his degree in world history and world religions explained it to me and this is pretty close to what he said.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Hadith

Refugees didn't come here to assimilate or because they are escaping Sharia Law...they came here to escape war and bombings and death in the country they love. Their culture, justice system and core beliefs will never be compatible with America's Constitution and will always cause strife and conflict here and if you read Vattel's Law of Nations you'll find that going back to Grecian times and before, no Nation has ever been required to allow immigrants, even for asylum purposes, to enter and cause disruption as the Muslims and many other immigrants have (because it destroys that Nation).
The problem Paul is that unlike Christianity and J... (show quote)


While I agree adamently with the second part of your statement, I find the first part far too generalized and atypical...
While there are Wuhabists who rate the Hadith as equal to the Koran, the majority of Muslims would never make that error...
And as for the Koran not allowing interpretation, try reading the works of Mohammed Shahrur...
Most Muslims interpret the Koran as readily as a Christian interprets the Bible...

Reply
Feb 16, 2019 09:52:06   #
Bcon
 
L8erToots wrote:
The problem Paul is that unlike Christianity and Judaism, there is no interpretation allowed in the Koran and the laws and traditions followed and accepted today (even by liberal Muslims) are the Hadiths that haven't changed since Muhammad spoke them. A friend with his degree in world history and world religions explained it to me and this is pretty close to what he said.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Hadith

Refugees didn't come here to assimilate or because they are escaping Sharia Law...they came here to escape war and bombings and death in the country they love. Their culture, justice system and core beliefs will never be compatible with America's Constitution and will always cause strife and conflict here and if you read Vattel's Law of Nations you'll find that going back to Grecian times and before, no Nation has ever been required to allow immigrants, even for asylum purposes, to enter and cause disruption as the Muslims and many other immigrants have (because it destroys that Nation).
The problem Paul is that unlike Christianity and J... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 16, 2019 11:49:53   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
The invaded Canaan, k**led all of the native people, burned their cities to the ground, slaughtered/stole their livestock, took the virgins as wives and established themselves as God's Chosen People... Right?


You are thinking of the Hebrews. The Muslims took the livestock as wives.

Reply
 
 
Feb 16, 2019 11:52:09   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
You are thinking of the Hebrews. The Muslims took the livestock as wives.


That got a smile and a laugh...

Here's one for you...



Reply
Feb 16, 2019 13:02:51   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
You are thinking of the Hebrews. The Muslims took the livestock as wives.


Thank ewe! I knew there was something askew there I couldn't quite place what it was. Now I remember.

Reply
Feb 16, 2019 13:34:25   #
PaulPisces Loc: San Francisco
 
ACP45 wrote:
Padre, could not the exact same claim be made on the creation of the Jewish state whose early history is defined by the terrorist groups described in the post "Judaism - The Progressive Except Palestine Problem" page 2, and also on https://rense.com/general21/pastz*****t.htm:

Funny, reading the opinion of the posts on this topic reminds me of the parable of the blind men who have never come across an elephant before and who learn and conceptualize what the elephant is like by touching it. Since each one touches and feels a different part of the elephant, their conceptualization is formed by their own experience. Isn't that what we are doing here?

If you were the American Indian, 1946 Palestinian, or Moorish 711 Spanish Muslim, your historical perspective would be far different from the early European or Jewish settlers.

It's a shame that we often focus on who is in the right, and who is responsible for this or that. Which religion is peaceful, and which is not.

Examples can be offered both supporting or refuting claims on both sides.

What is important now, is that we try to keep an open mind, and treat each other as we ourselves wish to be treated.
Padre, could not the exact same claim be made on t... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 16, 2019 18:54:38   #
maryjane
 
Bcon wrote:
If Islam is so dangerous we fight it in Syria, etc. why do we allow Muslims to move here and serve in our government?


Damn good question! But the answer is that the USA has become a weak, foolish nation, wanting to be loved by the world and willing to sacrifice anything to please the world, including willingly allow itself to be used, abused and exploited by third world cesspit nations and their people.

Reply
 
 
Feb 16, 2019 19:21:56   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
maryjane wrote:
Damn good question! But the answer is that the USA has become a weak, foolish nation, wanting to be loved by the world and willing to sacrifice anything to please the world, including willingly allow itself to be used, abused and exploited by third world cesspit nations and their people.


And lest we forget one lasting effect of the religion of peace, I can easily remember when there was no need for TSA agents working at all our airports and their equivalent at airports in every civilized nation in the world. Remember? We should not become immune as to why those Agents are there.

Reply
Feb 16, 2019 19:25:22   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Suppose it depends how one looks at it...
Homo Sapiens have trouble playing Nice with each other...
Had the natives had superior technology and come to Europe it would have been similar...

We sure do like finding reasons to justify k*****g one another...



Wars are fought to be won (unless you have obama as president) and the losers must assimilate according to the dictates of the Victor.
Always will be war. It advances humanity by the efforts to make better weapons than your enemy.
Airplanes developed out of war, despite the objections of Halexandria Obamio-Castrio, aka, She Guevara.

Reply
Feb 16, 2019 19:26:11   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
padremike wrote:
And lest we forget one lasting effect of the religion of peace, I can easily remember when there was no need for TSA agents working at all our airports and their equivalent at airports in every civilized nation in the world. Remember? We should not become immune as to why those Agents are there.


Didn't the UK have agents in tbeir airports back in the sixties (or further)...
Was it to stop all the Muslim terrists from Northern Ireland?

Reply
Feb 16, 2019 19:27:07   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Wars are fought to be won (unless you have obama as president) and the losers must assimilate according to the dictates of the Victor.
Always will be war. It advances humanity by the efforts to make better weapons than your enemy.
Airplanes developed out of war, despite the objections of Halexandria Obamio-Castrio, aka, She Guevara.


Remember that when the Muslims come for you Mikey..
Assimulate quickly...

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.