flash wrote:
My nephew had 2 pit bulls and both were friendly as could be. They weren't raised to be mean but his home owners insurance still went through the roof.
My insurance company (Allstate) has never asked about my dogs.
I think that's discrimination myself.
archie bunker wrote:
My insurance company (Allstate) has never asked about my dogs.
I think that's discrimination myself.
If the breed is legal their owners shouldn't be penalized...
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
If the breed is legal their owners shouldn't be penalized...
Insurance doesn't work that way.
Bad Bob wrote:
Insurance doesn't work that way.
And smokers get the same coverage as everyone in Canada
Bad Bob wrote:
Insurance doesn't work that way.
The area that I live in has a pretty big rattlesnake population. Should my insurance be higher in case someone gets bitten on my property?
Insurance,Government.... I don't see a lot of difference. Both will bend ya over and break it off in ya.
JoyV wrote:
That is mostly true. But some breeds or types are more reactive by nature or have inherited higher prey drives. While some gentle giants would be very difficult to make aggressive even if that was your goal.
For instance, many terriers have been known to be more reactive with dog aggression just under the surface. The American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT) is actually less so than many terriers, yet its size and strength make it far more dangerous IF it is aggressive than the Cairn Terrier even if the latter were far more aggressive. One breed I have known of no individuals in which were fully trustworthy is the Cane Corso (pronounced CA nay COR so) And they are far larger and more powerful than APBTs. But if breeders select for less aggression, over time they may become one of the gentle giants.
I have had three different Cane Corsos lunge at dogs I am training as guide dogs over the past few years. And at a UKC dog show there was a Cane Corso which I was told was gentle and totally trustworthy. It seemed to be the case as the day progressed
until while being walked by its owner it suddenly pulled away from her and attacked a Standard Poodle who was being primped on a g***ming table. The Cane Corso shook it like a rag doll. At another show a group of 5 APBTs busted out of their RV and attacked me and two of my German Shepherd pups. (I was the only one hurt as I tried to protect my pups while several people charged in to help) But since I have worked with many APBTs who were friendly, calm, and gentle; I don't blame the breed. But it isn't just how they are raised. Some bloodlines are more prone to aggression than others, as are some breeds.
I have been a guide dog trainer since 1968. And have trained many service dogs since 1980. And pet dogs as well as offering free dog classes to 4Hers.
That is mostly true. But some breeds or types are... (
show quote)
Here are a couple of Cane Corsos
2 guys were walking along when they seen a dog laying there licking himself. One guy said Man I wish I could do that to which the other guy replied He looks like a pretty friendly dog but you'd better pet him first.
JoyV wrote:
Here are a couple of Cane Corsos
My daughter has one that's about 8 months old now. She also has an American Bulldog that is an absolute truck!
She had the ears clipped on the Cane Corso, and I don't like that, but it's not my business. He is a sweet, huge, goofy bundle of slobber.
He is very well disciplined, and behaved for a pup his age.
I just don't like his ears.
Ive always thought that you can kind of read a dog by their ears. Like with a horse.
Having them cropped leaves nothing there.
Just my opinion.
archie bunker wrote:
My daughter has one that's about 8 months old now. She also has an American Bulldog that is an absolute truck!
She had the ears clipped on the Cane Corso, and I don't like that, but it's not my business. He is a sweet, huge, goofy bundle of slobber.
He is very well disciplined, and behaved for a pup his age.
I just don't like his ears.
Ive always thought that you can kind of read a dog by their ears. Like with a horse.
Having them cropped leaves nothing there.
Just my opinion.
My daughter has one that's about 8 months old now.... (
show quote)
Yes it is easier to read a dog with intact ears. When cropped, especially close cropped like the Corso, you need to watch the muscles surrounding the ears.
I think cropping is cruel.
flash wrote:
I think cropping is cruel.
I wouldn't call it cruel, but I'm not a fan.
archie bunker wrote:
My daughter has one that's about 8 months old now. She also has an American Bulldog that is an absolute truck!
She had the ears clipped on the Cane Corso, and I don't like that, but it's not my business. He is a sweet, huge, goofy bundle of slobber.
He is very well disciplined, and behaved for a pup his age.
I just don't like his ears.
Ive always thought that you can kind of read a dog by their ears. Like with a horse.
Having them cropped leaves nothing there.
Just my opinion.
My daughter has one that's about 8 months old now.... (
show quote)
At 8 months old, the Corso is a pup in early adolescence. They don't reach full maturity till about 3 years of age. If she isn't already doing any training with him, I'd suggest doing so while he is still young enough to be easily molded. The behavior of a puppy will often change with maturity. Assuming he will remain so well behaved without any work, is a risk. If she is already doing so, great.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.