Mom Gets BUSTED & JAILED In Front Of Her Kids For Calling A T***sWoman A Man Via Twitter

Written by K. Walker on February 12, 2019



Remember how the left insisted that it was ‘fearmongering’ to say that people would be punished for stating biological t***hs? Yeah, about that…

The rapid shift from relying on objective, biological science to subjective, ‘g****r theory’ is causing some pretty big problems.

Advocates for embracing t*********r identity are pushing back against anyone that dares to question their ideology and in the United Kingdom, they’re now using the law to strong-arm people into submission.

Suffolk police issued a warning to a 74-year old woman who was criticizing the G****r Recognition Act which would allow anyone to legally change their identity without any medical evidence. Margaret Nelson was concerned that these changes could put women at risk. The police have since apologized for their handling of the matter.


A man in Northern England was investigated by the police for retweeting an ‘anti-t***s’ limerick. It was apparently a ‘h**e’ limerick.

Watch the BBC report about Harry Miller’s interaction with police over the limerick:

Both of those cases should make you grateful for the Free Speech that is enjoyed in America today. But this next one might just have you kissing the Bill of Rights.

Kate Scottow, 38, from Hitchin, Hertfordshire was arrested and detained for seven hours for ‘misg****ring’ a t*********r woman online. Scottow was arrested in front of her two children.


The non-crime she was being investigated for was ‘deadnaming’ — referring to a t*********r person by the name that they were given at birth. T***s activists liken this to the ‘erasure’ of the t*********r person’s existence. Which is kind of weird, because that’s literally what they’re doing to their biological history.

The 38-year-old, from Hitchin, Hertfordshire, had her photograph, DNA and fingerprints taken and remains under investigation.

More than two months after her arrest on December 1, she has had neither her mobile phone or laptop returned, which she says is hampering her studies for a Masters in forensic psychology.

Scottow went public with her experience on an online forum.

Writing on online forum Mumsnet, Mrs Scottow – who has also been served with a court order that bans her from referring to her accuser as a man – claimed: ‘I was arrested in my home by three officers, with my autistic ten-year-old daughter and breastfed 20-month-old son present.

‘I was then detained for seven hours in a cell with no sanitary products (which I said I needed) before being interviewed then later released under investigation … I was arrested for harassment and malicious communications because I called someone out and misg****red them on Twitter.’

Stephanie Hayden, the t*********r activist that reported Scottow to the authorities, has done the same thing to sitcom writer and television producer, Graham Linehan, after he allegedly ‘deadnamed’ Hayden on Twitter. West Yorkshire Police gave Linehan a verbal harassment warning. (By the way, Linehan is a lefty and the creator of the fantastic British comedy, The IT Crowd, which you should really check out if you haven’t already.)
Stephanie Hayden

High Court documents state that Scottow is accused of engaging in a ‘campaign of targeted harassment’ against Hayden, allegedly motivated by her ‘status as a t*********r woman.’ The papers claim that a ‘toxic’ debate occurred online about allowing people to ‘self-identify’ as another g****r, Scottow allegedly tweeted ‘defamatory’ messages about Hayden.

She is also alleged to have used accounts in two names to ‘harass, defame, and publish derogatory and defamatory tweets’ about Miss Hayden, including referring to her as male, stating she was ‘r****t, xenophobic and a crook’ and mocking her as a ‘f**e lawyer’.

Mrs Scottow denied harassing or defaming Miss Hayden and said she holds a ‘genuine and reasonable belief’ that a human ‘cannot practically speaking change sex’, but Deputy Judge Jason Coppel QC issued an interim injunction that bans her from posting any personal information about Miss Hayden on social media, ‘referencing her as a man’ or linking her to her ‘former male identity’.



Scottow has been gagged from speaking about an issue that she wants to discuss as a woman that would directly affect her and her daughter in female-only spaces.

What is fascinating is that the vilifying of so-called TERFs — which means any woman that questions that g****r self-identification could be used by nefarious individuals to target women — is often done by b********l m**es.

Feminists are bitterly divided on the t*********r issue — and I don’t understand why. If feminists claim that there is a ‘patriarchy’ where men oppress women, would not the peak of that oppression be men who claim to be women and demand that biological women identify themselves as ‘cis-women’? I think so.

I think we do need to have compassion for people that are legitimately struggling with such a basic part of their identity. You know, it’d be nice if they weren’t a-holes as we share our thoughts and try to hash out the legal and social ramifications of the rapid push for full acceptance, no questions asked, from the t*********r activists.

At the same time, the rapid spike in people that are identifying as t*********r is troubling and cannot simply be attributable to more ‘tolerance’ on the issue. It’s a serious issue that we need to be able to discuss openly, and we can’t do that if one side is weilding the power of the state to silence any critique.

Jailing people for their thoughts isn’t a world I want to live in.

Good morning.The answer would be no. The scripture is found in Luke 20:27-40

27 Then came to him certain of the Sadducees, which deny that there is any resurrection; and they asked him,

28 Saying, Master, Moses wrote unto us, If any man's brother die, having a wife, and he die without children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.

29 There were therefore seven brethren: and the first took a wife, and died without children.

30 And the second took her to wife, and he died childless.

31 And the third took her; and in like manner the seven also: and they left no children, and died.

32 Last of all the woman died also.

33 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife of them is she? for seven had her to wife.

34 And Jesus answering said unto them, The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage:

35 But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage:

36 Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection.

37 Now that the dead are raised, even Moses shewed at the bush, when he calleth the Lord the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.

38 For he is not a God of the dead, but of the living: for all live unto him.

39 Then certain of the scribes answering said, Master, thou hast well said.

40 And after that they durst not ask him any question at all.

As you can see, there is no "given in marriage" in heaven, but why? This is only my opinion; because there is no g****r and therefore no desire for carnal things. The marriage bed is honorable but still is carnality. There will be no need of carnal things, or need for alcohol, or tobacco, and especially money.