One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Mom Gets BUSTED & JAILED In Front Of Her Kids For Calling A T***sWoman A Man Via Twitter
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 12, 2019 21:51:43   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Mom Gets BUSTED & JAILED In Front Of Her Kids For Calling A T***sWoman A Man Via Twitter

Written by K. Walker on February 12, 2019



Remember how the left insisted that it was ‘fearmongering’ to say that people would be punished for stating biological t***hs? Yeah, about that…

The rapid shift from relying on objective, biological science to subjective, ‘g****r theory’ is causing some pretty big problems.

Advocates for embracing t*********r identity are pushing back against anyone that dares to question their ideology and in the United Kingdom, they’re now using the law to strong-arm people into submission.

Suffolk police issued a warning to a 74-year old woman who was criticizing the G****r Recognition Act which would allow anyone to legally change their identity without any medical evidence. Margaret Nelson was concerned that these changes could put women at risk. The police have since apologized for their handling of the matter.


A man in Northern England was investigated by the police for retweeting an ‘anti-t***s’ limerick. It was apparently a ‘h**e’ limerick.

Watch the BBC report about Harry Miller’s interaction with police over the limerick:

Both of those cases should make you grateful for the Free Speech that is enjoyed in America today. But this next one might just have you kissing the Bill of Rights.

Kate Scottow, 38, from Hitchin, Hertfordshire was arrested and detained for seven hours for ‘misg****ring’ a t*********r woman online. Scottow was arrested in front of her two children.


The non-crime she was being investigated for was ‘deadnaming’ — referring to a t*********r person by the name that they were given at birth. T***s activists liken this to the ‘erasure’ of the t*********r person’s existence. Which is kind of weird, because that’s literally what they’re doing to their biological history.

The 38-year-old, from Hitchin, Hertfordshire, had her photograph, DNA and fingerprints taken and remains under investigation.

More than two months after her arrest on December 1, she has had neither her mobile phone or laptop returned, which she says is hampering her studies for a Masters in forensic psychology.

Scottow went public with her experience on an online forum.

Writing on online forum Mumsnet, Mrs Scottow – who has also been served with a court order that bans her from referring to her accuser as a man – claimed: ‘I was arrested in my home by three officers, with my autistic ten-year-old daughter and breastfed 20-month-old son present.

‘I was then detained for seven hours in a cell with no sanitary products (which I said I needed) before being interviewed then later released under investigation … I was arrested for harassment and malicious communications because I called someone out and misg****red them on Twitter.’

Stephanie Hayden, the t*********r activist that reported Scottow to the authorities, has done the same thing to sitcom writer and television producer, Graham Linehan, after he allegedly ‘deadnamed’ Hayden on Twitter. West Yorkshire Police gave Linehan a verbal harassment warning. (By the way, Linehan is a lefty and the creator of the fantastic British comedy, The IT Crowd, which you should really check out if you haven’t already.)
Stephanie Hayden

High Court documents state that Scottow is accused of engaging in a ‘campaign of targeted harassment’ against Hayden, allegedly motivated by her ‘status as a t*********r woman.’ The papers claim that a ‘toxic’ debate occurred online about allowing people to ‘self-identify’ as another g****r, Scottow allegedly tweeted ‘defamatory’ messages about Hayden.

She is also alleged to have used accounts in two names to ‘harass, defame, and publish derogatory and defamatory tweets’ about Miss Hayden, including referring to her as male, stating she was ‘r****t, xenophobic and a crook’ and mocking her as a ‘f**e lawyer’.

Mrs Scottow denied harassing or defaming Miss Hayden and said she holds a ‘genuine and reasonable belief’ that a human ‘cannot practically speaking change sex’, but Deputy Judge Jason Coppel QC issued an interim injunction that bans her from posting any personal information about Miss Hayden on social media, ‘referencing her as a man’ or linking her to her ‘former male identity’.



Scottow has been gagged from speaking about an issue that she wants to discuss as a woman that would directly affect her and her daughter in female-only spaces.

What is fascinating is that the vilifying of so-called TERFs — which means any woman that questions that g****r self-identification could be used by nefarious individuals to target women — is often done by b********l m**es.

Feminists are bitterly divided on the t*********r issue — and I don’t understand why. If feminists claim that there is a ‘patriarchy’ where men oppress women, would not the peak of that oppression be men who claim to be women and demand that biological women identify themselves as ‘cis-women’? I think so.

I think we do need to have compassion for people that are legitimately struggling with such a basic part of their identity. You know, it’d be nice if they weren’t a-holes as we share our thoughts and try to hash out the legal and social ramifications of the rapid push for full acceptance, no questions asked, from the t*********r activists.

At the same time, the rapid spike in people that are identifying as t*********r is troubling and cannot simply be attributable to more ‘tolerance’ on the issue. It’s a serious issue that we need to be able to discuss openly, and we can’t do that if one side is weilding the power of the state to silence any critique.

Jailing people for their thoughts isn’t a world I want to live in.

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 21:58:06   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Mom Gets BUSTED & JAILED In Front Of Her Kids For Calling A T***sWoman A Man Via Twitter

Written by K. Walker on February 12, 2019



Remember how the left insisted that it was ‘fearmongering’ to say that people would be punished for stating biological t***hs? Yeah, about that…

The rapid shift from relying on objective, biological science to subjective, ‘g****r theory’ is causing some pretty big problems.

Advocates for embracing t*********r identity are pushing back against anyone that dares to question their ideology and in the United Kingdom, they’re now using the law to strong-arm people into submission.

Suffolk police issued a warning to a 74-year old woman who was criticizing the G****r Recognition Act which would allow anyone to legally change their identity without any medical evidence. Margaret Nelson was concerned that these changes could put women at risk. The police have since apologized for their handling of the matter.


A man in Northern England was investigated by the police for retweeting an ‘anti-t***s’ limerick. It was apparently a ‘h**e’ limerick.

Watch the BBC report about Harry Miller’s interaction with police over the limerick:

Both of those cases should make you grateful for the Free Speech that is enjoyed in America today. But this next one might just have you kissing the Bill of Rights.

Kate Scottow, 38, from Hitchin, Hertfordshire was arrested and detained for seven hours for ‘misg****ring’ a t*********r woman online. Scottow was arrested in front of her two children.


The non-crime she was being investigated for was ‘deadnaming’ — referring to a t*********r person by the name that they were given at birth. T***s activists liken this to the ‘erasure’ of the t*********r person’s existence. Which is kind of weird, because that’s literally what they’re doing to their biological history.

The 38-year-old, from Hitchin, Hertfordshire, had her photograph, DNA and fingerprints taken and remains under investigation.

More than two months after her arrest on December 1, she has had neither her mobile phone or laptop returned, which she says is hampering her studies for a Masters in forensic psychology.

Scottow went public with her experience on an online forum.

Writing on online forum Mumsnet, Mrs Scottow – who has also been served with a court order that bans her from referring to her accuser as a man – claimed: ‘I was arrested in my home by three officers, with my autistic ten-year-old daughter and breastfed 20-month-old son present.

‘I was then detained for seven hours in a cell with no sanitary products (which I said I needed) before being interviewed then later released under investigation … I was arrested for harassment and malicious communications because I called someone out and misg****red them on Twitter.’

Stephanie Hayden, the t*********r activist that reported Scottow to the authorities, has done the same thing to sitcom writer and television producer, Graham Linehan, after he allegedly ‘deadnamed’ Hayden on Twitter. West Yorkshire Police gave Linehan a verbal harassment warning. (By the way, Linehan is a lefty and the creator of the fantastic British comedy, The IT Crowd, which you should really check out if you haven’t already.)
Stephanie Hayden

High Court documents state that Scottow is accused of engaging in a ‘campaign of targeted harassment’ against Hayden, allegedly motivated by her ‘status as a t*********r woman.’ The papers claim that a ‘toxic’ debate occurred online about allowing people to ‘self-identify’ as another g****r, Scottow allegedly tweeted ‘defamatory’ messages about Hayden.

She is also alleged to have used accounts in two names to ‘harass, defame, and publish derogatory and defamatory tweets’ about Miss Hayden, including referring to her as male, stating she was ‘r****t, xenophobic and a crook’ and mocking her as a ‘f**e lawyer’.

Mrs Scottow denied harassing or defaming Miss Hayden and said she holds a ‘genuine and reasonable belief’ that a human ‘cannot practically speaking change sex’, but Deputy Judge Jason Coppel QC issued an interim injunction that bans her from posting any personal information about Miss Hayden on social media, ‘referencing her as a man’ or linking her to her ‘former male identity’.



Scottow has been gagged from speaking about an issue that she wants to discuss as a woman that would directly affect her and her daughter in female-only spaces.

What is fascinating is that the vilifying of so-called TERFs — which means any woman that questions that g****r self-identification could be used by nefarious individuals to target women — is often done by b********l m**es.

Feminists are bitterly divided on the t*********r issue — and I don’t understand why. If feminists claim that there is a ‘patriarchy’ where men oppress women, would not the peak of that oppression be men who claim to be women and demand that biological women identify themselves as ‘cis-women’? I think so.

I think we do need to have compassion for people that are legitimately struggling with such a basic part of their identity. You know, it’d be nice if they weren’t a-holes as we share our thoughts and try to hash out the legal and social ramifications of the rapid push for full acceptance, no questions asked, from the t*********r activists.

At the same time, the rapid spike in people that are identifying as t*********r is troubling and cannot simply be attributable to more ‘tolerance’ on the issue. It’s a serious issue that we need to be able to discuss openly, and we can’t do that if one side is weilding the power of the state to silence any critique.

Jailing people for their thoughts isn’t a world I want to live in.
Mom Gets BUSTED & JAILED In Front Of Her Kids ... (show quote)




Simply Satanic!

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 21:59:15   #
teabag09
 
It's not getting far from having to just take people out including police. Mike
no propaganda please wrote:
Mom Gets BUSTED & JAILED In Front Of Her Kids For Calling A T***sWoman A Man Via Twitter

Written by K. Walker on February 12, 2019



Remember how the left insisted that it was ‘fearmongering’ to say that people would be punished for stating biological t***hs? Yeah, about that…

The rapid shift from relying on objective, biological science to subjective, ‘g****r theory’ is causing some pretty big problems.

Advocates for embracing t*********r identity are pushing back against anyone that dares to question their ideology and in the United Kingdom, they’re now using the law to strong-arm people into submission.

Suffolk police issued a warning to a 74-year old woman who was criticizing the G****r Recognition Act which would allow anyone to legally change their identity without any medical evidence. Margaret Nelson was concerned that these changes could put women at risk. The police have since apologized for their handling of the matter.


A man in Northern England was investigated by the police for retweeting an ‘anti-t***s’ limerick. It was apparently a ‘h**e’ limerick.

Watch the BBC report about Harry Miller’s interaction with police over the limerick:

Both of those cases should make you grateful for the Free Speech that is enjoyed in America today. But this next one might just have you kissing the Bill of Rights.

Kate Scottow, 38, from Hitchin, Hertfordshire was arrested and detained for seven hours for ‘misg****ring’ a t*********r woman online. Scottow was arrested in front of her two children.


The non-crime she was being investigated for was ‘deadnaming’ — referring to a t*********r person by the name that they were given at birth. T***s activists liken this to the ‘erasure’ of the t*********r person’s existence. Which is kind of weird, because that’s literally what they’re doing to their biological history.

The 38-year-old, from Hitchin, Hertfordshire, had her photograph, DNA and fingerprints taken and remains under investigation.

More than two months after her arrest on December 1, she has had neither her mobile phone or laptop returned, which she says is hampering her studies for a Masters in forensic psychology.

Scottow went public with her experience on an online forum.

Writing on online forum Mumsnet, Mrs Scottow – who has also been served with a court order that bans her from referring to her accuser as a man – claimed: ‘I was arrested in my home by three officers, with my autistic ten-year-old daughter and breastfed 20-month-old son present.

‘I was then detained for seven hours in a cell with no sanitary products (which I said I needed) before being interviewed then later released under investigation … I was arrested for harassment and malicious communications because I called someone out and misg****red them on Twitter.’

Stephanie Hayden, the t*********r activist that reported Scottow to the authorities, has done the same thing to sitcom writer and television producer, Graham Linehan, after he allegedly ‘deadnamed’ Hayden on Twitter. West Yorkshire Police gave Linehan a verbal harassment warning. (By the way, Linehan is a lefty and the creator of the fantastic British comedy, The IT Crowd, which you should really check out if you haven’t already.)
Stephanie Hayden

High Court documents state that Scottow is accused of engaging in a ‘campaign of targeted harassment’ against Hayden, allegedly motivated by her ‘status as a t*********r woman.’ The papers claim that a ‘toxic’ debate occurred online about allowing people to ‘self-identify’ as another g****r, Scottow allegedly tweeted ‘defamatory’ messages about Hayden.

She is also alleged to have used accounts in two names to ‘harass, defame, and publish derogatory and defamatory tweets’ about Miss Hayden, including referring to her as male, stating she was ‘r****t, xenophobic and a crook’ and mocking her as a ‘f**e lawyer’.

Mrs Scottow denied harassing or defaming Miss Hayden and said she holds a ‘genuine and reasonable belief’ that a human ‘cannot practically speaking change sex’, but Deputy Judge Jason Coppel QC issued an interim injunction that bans her from posting any personal information about Miss Hayden on social media, ‘referencing her as a man’ or linking her to her ‘former male identity’.



Scottow has been gagged from speaking about an issue that she wants to discuss as a woman that would directly affect her and her daughter in female-only spaces.

What is fascinating is that the vilifying of so-called TERFs — which means any woman that questions that g****r self-identification could be used by nefarious individuals to target women — is often done by b********l m**es.

Feminists are bitterly divided on the t*********r issue — and I don’t understand why. If feminists claim that there is a ‘patriarchy’ where men oppress women, would not the peak of that oppression be men who claim to be women and demand that biological women identify themselves as ‘cis-women’? I think so.

I think we do need to have compassion for people that are legitimately struggling with such a basic part of their identity. You know, it’d be nice if they weren’t a-holes as we share our thoughts and try to hash out the legal and social ramifications of the rapid push for full acceptance, no questions asked, from the t*********r activists.

At the same time, the rapid spike in people that are identifying as t*********r is troubling and cannot simply be attributable to more ‘tolerance’ on the issue. It’s a serious issue that we need to be able to discuss openly, and we can’t do that if one side is weilding the power of the state to silence any critique.

Jailing people for their thoughts isn’t a world I want to live in.
Mom Gets BUSTED & JAILED In Front Of Her Kids ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2019 21:59:45   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
I am guilty of mis-g****ring numerous members of the OPP...

My apologies to any who I have triggered...

It was (mostly) by accident...

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 22:01:07   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
byronglimish wrote:
Simply Satanic!


Hi...

Hope you are well today...

Query:
Do souls have g****r?

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 22:24:30   #
Hadenough
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Mom Gets BUSTED & JAILED In Front Of Her Kids For Calling A T***sWoman A Man Via Twitter

Written by K. Walker on February 12, 2019



Remember how the left insisted that it was ‘fearmongering’ to say that people would be punished for stating biological t***hs? Yeah, about that…

The rapid shift from relying on objective, biological science to subjective, ‘g****r theory’ is causing some pretty big problems.

Advocates for embracing t*********r identity are pushing back against anyone that dares to question their ideology and in the United Kingdom, they’re now using the law to strong-arm people into submission.

Suffolk police issued a warning to a 74-year old woman who was criticizing the G****r Recognition Act which would allow anyone to legally change their identity without any medical evidence. Margaret Nelson was concerned that these changes could put women at risk. The police have since apologized for their handling of the matter.


A man in Northern England was investigated by the police for retweeting an ‘anti-t***s’ limerick. It was apparently a ‘h**e’ limerick.

Watch the BBC report about Harry Miller’s interaction with police over the limerick:

Both of those cases should make you grateful for the Free Speech that is enjoyed in America today. But this next one might just have you kissing the Bill of Rights.

Kate Scottow, 38, from Hitchin, Hertfordshire was arrested and detained for seven hours for ‘misg****ring’ a t*********r woman online. Scottow was arrested in front of her two children.


The non-crime she was being investigated for was ‘deadnaming’ — referring to a t*********r person by the name that they were given at birth. T***s activists liken this to the ‘erasure’ of the t*********r person’s existence. Which is kind of weird, because that’s literally what they’re doing to their biological history.

The 38-year-old, from Hitchin, Hertfordshire, had her photograph, DNA and fingerprints taken and remains under investigation.

More than two months after her arrest on December 1, she has had neither her mobile phone or laptop returned, which she says is hampering her studies for a Masters in forensic psychology.

Scottow went public with her experience on an online forum.

Writing on online forum Mumsnet, Mrs Scottow – who has also been served with a court order that bans her from referring to her accuser as a man – claimed: ‘I was arrested in my home by three officers, with my autistic ten-year-old daughter and breastfed 20-month-old son present.

‘I was then detained for seven hours in a cell with no sanitary products (which I said I needed) before being interviewed then later released under investigation … I was arrested for harassment and malicious communications because I called someone out and misg****red them on Twitter.’

Stephanie Hayden, the t*********r activist that reported Scottow to the authorities, has done the same thing to sitcom writer and television producer, Graham Linehan, after he allegedly ‘deadnamed’ Hayden on Twitter. West Yorkshire Police gave Linehan a verbal harassment warning. (By the way, Linehan is a lefty and the creator of the fantastic British comedy, The IT Crowd, which you should really check out if you haven’t already.)
Stephanie Hayden

High Court documents state that Scottow is accused of engaging in a ‘campaign of targeted harassment’ against Hayden, allegedly motivated by her ‘status as a t*********r woman.’ The papers claim that a ‘toxic’ debate occurred online about allowing people to ‘self-identify’ as another g****r, Scottow allegedly tweeted ‘defamatory’ messages about Hayden.

She is also alleged to have used accounts in two names to ‘harass, defame, and publish derogatory and defamatory tweets’ about Miss Hayden, including referring to her as male, stating she was ‘r****t, xenophobic and a crook’ and mocking her as a ‘f**e lawyer’.

Mrs Scottow denied harassing or defaming Miss Hayden and said she holds a ‘genuine and reasonable belief’ that a human ‘cannot practically speaking change sex’, but Deputy Judge Jason Coppel QC issued an interim injunction that bans her from posting any personal information about Miss Hayden on social media, ‘referencing her as a man’ or linking her to her ‘former male identity’.



Scottow has been gagged from speaking about an issue that she wants to discuss as a woman that would directly affect her and her daughter in female-only spaces.

What is fascinating is that the vilifying of so-called TERFs — which means any woman that questions that g****r self-identification could be used by nefarious individuals to target women — is often done by b********l m**es.

Feminists are bitterly divided on the t*********r issue — and I don’t understand why. If feminists claim that there is a ‘patriarchy’ where men oppress women, would not the peak of that oppression be men who claim to be women and demand that biological women identify themselves as ‘cis-women’? I think so.

I think we do need to have compassion for people that are legitimately struggling with such a basic part of their identity. You know, it’d be nice if they weren’t a-holes as we share our thoughts and try to hash out the legal and social ramifications of the rapid push for full acceptance, no questions asked, from the t*********r activists.

At the same time, the rapid spike in people that are identifying as t*********r is troubling and cannot simply be attributable to more ‘tolerance’ on the issue. It’s a serious issue that we need to be able to discuss openly, and we can’t do that if one side is weilding the power of the state to silence any critique.

Jailing people for their thoughts isn’t a world I want to live in.
Mom Gets BUSTED & JAILED In Front Of Her Kids ... (show quote)


Thank God we’re not in England, I’d have to be careful when addressing kevie, peters, and airfartone. Oh well.

MAGA

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 22:54:17   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Hi...

Hope you are well today...

Query:
Do souls have g****r?


Between masculine and feminine, yes, there is a difference.

Reply
 
 
Feb 12, 2019 23:14:28   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
byronglimish wrote:
Between masculine and feminine, yes, there is a difference.


Interesting....
I have always considered souls to be without g****r...

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 23:23:44   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Interesting....
I have always considered souls to be without g****r...


Genesis 6: 1-4..angels are souls.

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 23:44:04   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
byronglimish wrote:
Genesis 6: 1-4..angels are souls.


Angels perhaps have g****r...

I don't think they are the same as souls...

Angels were created before man...

Reply
Feb 12, 2019 23:52:54   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Angels perhaps have g****r...

I don't think they are the same as souls...

Angels were created before man...


Lucifer was perfect in all his ways until his soul was corrupted.

It seems that angels have both corporeal and spirit, look at the angels who ate dinner with Lot.

Reply
 
 
Feb 13, 2019 00:09:44   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
byronglimish wrote:
Lucifer was perfect in all his ways until his soul was corrupted.

It seems that angels have both corporeal and spirit, look at the angels who ate dinner with Lot.


Agreed...
Angels have souls...

Disagree...
Angels are souls...


Query:
Does God have a g****r?


Side note:
I truly enjoy talking with you...

Reply
Feb 13, 2019 00:14:22   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Agreed...
Angels have souls...

Disagree...
Angels are souls...


Query:
Does God have a g****r?


Side note:
I truly enjoy talking with you...




All through the scriptures the Creator is defined as the Ultimate Masculine.

Its been fun and I'm going to bed down, a day of snowplowing tomorrow.

Reply
Feb 13, 2019 00:18:16   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
byronglimish wrote:
All through the scriptures the Creator is defined as the Ultimate Masculine.

Its been fun and I'm going to bed down, a day of snowplowing tomorrow.


Take care...

To be continued

Reply
Feb 13, 2019 12:23:40   #
F.D.R.
 
This is positively absurd. I just thought of something, IF the t*********r is biologically 'non-existent' could he/she/it be k**led by someone without being charged since they no longer existed at the time??

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.