One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
I know its a weather event, but still!
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Feb 1, 2019 01:49:15   #
Seth
 
eagleye13 wrote:
A keeper!!!!
"I will tell you upfront, that all of the attachments below except the very last one are all pontificators of what they want people to believe. They are not scientists, as you will learn, if you take time to view them.
The last one goes through the actual scientific process to come to their conclusions. By far, nothing is settled science. Personally, my money is on God, just keeping things on balance. His matrix of answers is called the Bible. A book that explains all this stuff so some people will actually know where to look to find the T***h.

Even though some will not proceed to read, I ask that you do for your own peace of mind.

Actually, the difference among scientists on weather and c*****e c****e relates directly to how much money government of Al Gore's buddies were willing to pay to launch the most destructive tax the democrats had thought of so far.
By memory, but fairly close.
The original survey was sent to 31,000 climate scientists to determine their collective thoughts on if it is changing towards catastrophe. 1000's did not respond, but out of about 3000 responses, the poll takers took 97 that said catastrophe a coming and 3 that did not agree. Thus 97% said yes to c*****e c****e caused by man and it was immediate need to launch the "Carbon Tax" on Americans. They then proceeded to accept government grants in the millions. In 2011 I met their executive group enjoying an extended vacation in Belize. After treating them to many drinks, several told the story of how they were paid to tell the story.

The one thing democrats are good at, is making hard working Americans unable to afford something and then offering welfare to maintain a poverty existence. Great and recent example of that was both Hillary and Obama attempting to shut down coal mining in WVa, PA, and Ohio and give $30 million for retraining and food stamps on a credit card.

The fact is, when scientists reach a consensus, then science on c*****e c****e is settled. Consensus means 100% agree and have the facts to back it up.

No where in the world, have scientists agreed. However, if you talk about governments, the liberals and socialists of the world agree, unless f****l f**l is the over whelming part of their economy.

https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus.htm summary of original studies

Follow up studies as people began to understand the cost to everyone's daily lives.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/klaus-martin-schulte-consensus.htm

And to wrap it up a 10 minute video published by this left wing organization attempting to get the "deniers" as wackos and thus reap 100's of Billions of dollars for the few that push "Carbon tax" and dupe the sheeple to blindly follow under fear of earth extinction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=159&v=Py2XVILHUjQ

And finally, if one is really interested in knowing the t***h, the next link will guide you through the process of being able to pontificate on c*****e c****e. And, most likely, any of you with fear of death from warming, you will be set at ease and Al Gore will continue to be someone lost in history. But true democrat liberals will continue to find the ones to be sheeples and hope to reach a v****g majority for their master plan of socialism for all except themselves.

https://www.prageru.com/playlists/what-science-reveals-about-c*****e-c****e?gclid=Cj0KCQiA1sriBRD-ARIsABYdwwHLnVurTbu1E5pQHKf1n7kkcDhTzLaJvL_5SqctPqw1yjgRfq-lkygaAko_EALw_wcB " - CodyCoonhound
A keeper!!!! br "I will tell you upfront, tha... (show quote)


And on the g*******t (including the UN) level, as under Obama, manufacturers and refiners in developed nations were taxed and regulated out of their countries to outsource more, creating jobs and government revenues in underdeveloped third world s**tholes, leaving large scale unemployment in their wake.

This was intended by the Paris Accords to "spread the wealth" from productive to nonproductive countries, socialism on an international level not unlike welfare.

That "anthropogenic c*****e c****e" s**m cost millions of workers in the U.S. and Europe their livelihoods, and it was planned that way.

When Trump said, "I'm the president of Pittsburgh, not the president of Paris" and withdrew the U.S. from that con job it couldn't have come soon enough.

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 06:34:18   #
JoyV
 
Seth wrote:
And on the g*******t (including the UN) level, as under Obama, manufacturers and refiners in developed nations were taxed and regulated out of their countries to outsource more, creating jobs and government revenues in underdeveloped third world s**tholes, leaving large scale unemployment in their wake.

This was intended by the Paris Accords to "spread the wealth" from productive to nonproductive countries, socialism on an international level not unlike welfare.

That "anthropogenic c*****e c****e" s**m cost millions of workers in the U.S. and Europe their livelihoods, and it was planned that way.

When Trump said, "I'm the president of Pittsburgh, not the president of Paris" and withdrew the U.S. from that con job it couldn't have come soon enough.
And on the g*******t (including the UN) level, as... (show quote)


And the money we would have been obligated to give to countries like China and India, would not even have had to be spent on lowering carbon emissions. It could be spent on anything, up to and including building more coal fired plants which INCREASE carbon emissions.

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 09:37:21   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
JoyV wrote:
And the money we would have been obligated to give to countries like China and India, would not even have had to be spent on lowering carbon emissions. It could be spent on anything, up to and including building more coal fired plants which INCREASE carbon emissions.


CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) emissions are good. Plants use it as food for their Oxygen production in photosynthesis.
God planned it that way.

CO (Carbon Monoxide) is a pollutant.
Work on that.
The auto industry did.

BTW; do they still teach basic biology in high School?

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2019 09:38:48   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Seth wrote:
And on the g*******t (including the UN) level, as under Obama, manufacturers and refiners in developed nations were taxed and regulated out of their countries to outsource more, creating jobs and government revenues in underdeveloped third world s**tholes, leaving large scale unemployment in their wake.

This was intended by the Paris Accords to "spread the wealth" from productive to nonproductive countries, socialism on an international level not unlike welfare.

That "anthropogenic c*****e c****e" s**m cost millions of workers in the U.S. and Europe their livelihoods, and it was planned that way.

When Trump said, "I'm the president of Pittsburgh, not the president of Paris" and withdrew the U.S. from that con job it couldn't have come soon enough.
And on the g*******t (including the UN) level, as... (show quote)


When Trump said, "I'm the president of Pittsburgh, not the president of Paris" and withdrew the U.S. from that con job it couldn't have come soon enough.
Exactly!!!!

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 10:09:04   #
debeda
 
Seth wrote:
And on the g*******t (including the UN) level, as under Obama, manufacturers and refiners in developed nations were taxed and regulated out of their countries to outsource more, creating jobs and government revenues in underdeveloped third world s**tholes, leaving large scale unemployment in their wake.

This was intended by the Paris Accords to "spread the wealth" from productive to nonproductive countries, socialism on an international level not unlike welfare.

That "anthropogenic c*****e c****e" s**m cost millions of workers in the U.S. and Europe their livelihoods, and it was planned that way.

When Trump said, "I'm the president of Pittsburgh, not the president of Paris" and withdrew the U.S. from that con job it couldn't have come soon enough.
And on the g*******t (including the UN) level, as... (show quote)


I couldn't agree more!!!

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 15:23:29   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
JoyV wrote:
And the money we would have been obligated to give to countries like China and India, would not even have had to be spent on lowering carbon emissions. It could be spent on anything, up to and including building more coal fired plants which INCREASE carbon emissions.


Oh come on! WE can trust China and India to use the money to reduce their production!! To hurt their people! To needlessly strain their world!!!!

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 15:29:03   #
cSc61 Loc: Austin
 
Seth wrote:
This was intended by the Paris Accords to "spread the wealth" from productive to nonproductive countries, socialism on an international level not unlike welfare.


Let's not forget the large slice of pie the administers of the plan would naturally need to keep for themselves.

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2019 15:44:19   #
Gatsby
 
cSc61 wrote:
And had you worked to get yourself out of the 5th grade, you would have learned the effect grand solar miniamas and maximas have on our planet. Instead you choose to believe in fairy-tales because your Uncle Al tells you they're true.


(Warning: Sarcastic Content)

Perhaps the coming solar minimum should be named the "Gore Minimum"??????????

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 16:24:12   #
debeda
 
cSc61 wrote:
Let's not forget the large slice of pie the administers of the plan would naturally need to keep for themselves.


Well of course. They work SO hard, after all

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 06:31:31   #
Morgan
 
Kevyn wrote:
The difference between weather and climate can be understood and explained by the average fifth grade student. Weather is a single isolated event where climate is the overall condition. Think of it this way, if someone is normally calm kind and mild mannered this is how we define and understand their personality. If they loose their temper one afternoon that incident doesn’t change who they are.


A perfect analogy, thanks Kev

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 08:46:07   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Morgan wrote:
A perfect analogy, thanks Kev


HA!
It's still weather.
The word is in the definition of "climate".

weath·er

/ˈweT͟Hər/
noun

noun: weather
1. the state of the atmosphere at a place and time as regards heat, dryness, sunshine, wind, rain, etc.


cli·mate

/ˈklīmit/

noun

noun: climate; plural noun: climates

the weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period.

I do admit, "Baby it's COLD outside"!

Now that's friggin' cold!
Now that's friggin' cold!...

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2019 12:15:27   #
jeff smith
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Incoming record cold in the north and northeast; a big "winter vortex." But here's the point. For one, it's just a matter of time until someone says it's caused by g****l w*****g, assumed to be of man made cause. Second, it's record cold, ok!?? And so, if the l*****ts who promote man caused c*****e c****e for other "weather events" like storms, fires and what not, then I guess I and those who can actually think and reason outside of being told what to think, can say this cold must prove there is no warming!
Incoming record cold in the north and northeast; a... (show quote)


nope. I saw an article the other day which blames the cold front that sent the extreme cold on "G****L W*****G" they say it is a warm flow of air that split the polar cold air at the north pole. this is their reason that the frigid weather was pushed down so far. all I can say is well welcome to the weather I knew as a child growing up. maybe we are getting back to "normal weather"

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 12:42:14   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
jeff smith wrote:
nope. I saw an article the other day which blames the cold front that sent the extreme cold on "G****L W*****G" they say it is a warm flow of air that split the polar cold air at the north pole. this is their reason that the frigid weather was pushed down so far. all I can say is well welcome to the weather I knew as a child growing up. maybe we are getting back to "normal weather"


Exactly.

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 13:31:25   #
Seth
 
jeff smith wrote:
nope. I saw an article the other day which blames the cold front that sent the extreme cold on "G****L W*****G" they say it is a warm flow of air that split the polar cold air at the north pole. this is their reason that the frigid weather was pushed down so far. all I can say is well welcome to the weather I knew as a child growing up. maybe we are getting back to "normal weather"


Yeah, I remember, going to grade school in the early 1960s, when it already felt like winter. So, liberals' g****l w*****g uproar for this approximately 20th year of g****l c*****g notwithstanding, things should be back to normal in a few short years.

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 13:48:48   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Gatsby wrote:
(Warning: Sarcastic Content)

Perhaps the coming solar minimum should be named the "Gore Minimum"??????????


Punxsutawney Phil said this morning that 6 more weeks of Al Gore is not enough.
Send Al Gore to the North Pole permanently; as the local weatherman.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.