I'm sorry deb but it isn't "us". It isn't my law or your law. A******n law is straight out of an unwelcome foreigner (Satan's) law book. Does that sound unhinged? Of course it does to those who have no conscience capable of comprehending good and evil, right from wrong, moral absolutes! S***ery was a mere misdemeanor compared to the dismembering of a child in the womb, sucking it out in pieces, and then tossing it in the sewage system or sold for cosmetic ingredients. We fought a war over s***ery huh? I believe the death toll was around 400,000 for a little over 3 million s***es. What should the cost be for the k*****g of over 60 million unborn children? S***ery for them would have at least meant life. But like the ancient pagan Greeks said the a******n advocates today also say, "The unexamined life is not worth living." Really?

Individuals can be forgiven for a******n. I'm not certain nations can. We deserve punishment at least equal to this sin. To the question how could we have prevented a******n? I would respond with the question how should we have responded to any foreign entity invading our nation for the sole purpose of k*****g 60 plus million our children and continuing to do so every day? You witnessed the violence the left caused during the Kavansugh hearings for the single issue of protecting a woman's so called "right" to murder her unborn child. The awful t***h is there is no longer any horror so great as to get the majority of passive American people to do anything but wring their hands, complain little and sigh. I've led and marched in many a******n protest and memorial events. I've written hundreds of letters. It was all dross!

The Supreme Court has codified the right for people to act irresponsible and the people love it! We need to tear down the Statue of Liberty and erect The Statue of Responsibility because both liberty and life are denied dead children.

No, no dear, I did not take it as an admonishment at all. I felt your sincere and genuine grief, horror and pain. I cannot hardly stand it and breathe at the same time myself. I was saying that it is not you, it is not me and millions of others. What can we do about it? This weekend there was a huge march for life in DC in which a group of Catholic high school students participated and wore MAGA hats. What one story do we continue to hear? R****m. MAGA hats replaced KKK hoods. "Lo the poor Indian" etc. Nothing about a child's right to life.

I haven't seen anything to support the rhetorical notion that it has anything to do with "right up to birth".

It fully supports a******n laws as they exist right now, which all have term limit points. I personally think they are excessively long, but when the right makes women jump through the hurdles and delays trying to make it as hard as possible, shorter terms can prevent a wanted a******n.

You support red states being able to pass their own laws, well here you go, liberal states offsetting hardcore restrictive states...if you don't like liberal laws move out of the state and find one that reflects your beliefs. We are headed toward christian versus atheist states the way christians think they have a right to "practice" their religious beliefs.

I haven't seen anything to support the rhetorical notion that it has anything to do with "right up to birth".

It fully supports a******n laws as they exist right now, which all have term limit points. I personally think they are excessively long, but when the right makes women jump through the hurdles and delays trying to make it as hard as possible, shorter terms can prevent a wanted a******n.

You support red states being able to pass their own laws, well here you go, liberal states offsetting hardcore restrictive states...if you don't like liberal laws move out of the state and find one that reflects your beliefs. We are headed toward christian versus atheist states the way christians think they have a right to "practice" their religious beliefs.

It does make some exceptions that will allow a late term a******n under certain life threatening situations, but those exceptions existed before that particular bill as well.

If it was put to me, end one life to save another or risk losing both, the decisions would likely be a very tough and tragic decision that I would want to discuss ALL possible options and weigh ALL likely outcomes thoroughly BEFORE making the decision, but it is likely I would favor one saved over a potential none saved scenario.

If that is NOT the case, no life is threatened, there are alternatives that one can choose, adoption. Put the child up for adoption and you won't have to raise the child.

It does make some exceptions that will allow a late term a******n under certain life threatening situations, but those exceptions existed before that particular bill as well.

If it was put to me, end one life to save another or risk losing both, the decisions would likely be a very tough and tragic decision that I would want to discuss ALL possible options and weigh ALL likely outcomes thoroughly BEFORE making the decision, but it is likely I would favor one saved over a potential none saved scenario.

If that is NOT the case, no life is threatened, there are alternatives that one can choose, adoption. Put the child up for adoption and you won't have to raise the child.