One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
donaled trump ended his presidency last night
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 15 next>>
Jan 9, 2019 16:26:03   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
really trump is being sued for not following it



proud republican wrote:
GOP is following Constitution, you Rats on the other hand ...i have no idea what you follow....Maybe BS, thats why you people stink so much...

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 16:43:10   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
If you think the latest Supreme Court Judge is far right you show your ignorance. He interprets the Constitution strictly. I'm sure you've never read one of his opinions. Now lecture the rest of us on the Constitution. On a positive note you didn't misspell Constitution.
Lonewolf wrote:
do you want a supreme court that rules the way you think the constitution should read and not how it was meant to be interpreted!
I'm guessing the GOP thinks their smarter than the founders and want to rewrite it to suit there way of thinking!

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 17:00:44   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
Didn't say anyone was far right the point I was making there are those who would try to pick judges who might rule differently on past rulings!



JFlorio wrote:
If you think the latest Supreme Court Judge is far right you show your ignorance. He interprets the Constitution strictly. I'm sure you've never read one of his opinions. Now lecture the rest of us on the Constitution. On a positive note you didn't misspell Constitution.

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 18:04:15   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
If the the Constitution can be amended laws can be changed. Usually you libs prefer to ignore them.
Lonewolf wrote:
Didn't say anyone was far right the point I was making there are those who would try to pick judges who might rule differently on past rulings!

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 19:13:25   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
Its your side stacking the court to over throw row vs wade



JFlorio wrote:
If the the Constitution can be amended laws can be changed. Usually you libs prefer to ignore them.

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 19:56:58   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
Every side tries to stack the court. Your side wants to so they can get rid of the 2nd amenmant.
Lonewolf wrote:
Its your side stacking the court to over throw row vs wade

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 21:12:06   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
Most dems i know cary so you know that's not happening



JFlorio wrote:
Every side tries to stack the court. Your side wants to so they can get rid of the 2nd amenmant.

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 21:39:34   #
Comment
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Taking a whole 8 minutes of prime time to spread more fake news and cooked border numbers all of which the American people have fact checked and found him lying about!
2 years over 8000 lies and counting who could believe anything he says!
On the bright side, they took his mike before he could fully explain to the American people that Afganistan invaded Russia.
and no matter what our intelligence says the Saudi crown prince is innocent!
Just as he sided with Putin in Helsinki


Wake up Dude, your dreaming.

| Reply
Jan 9, 2019 22:32:01   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
Actually I don’t. Two more ultra libs on the Court and they will go after the 2nd amendment.
Lonewolf wrote:
Most dems i know cary so you know that's not happening

| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 06:27:09   #
TommyRadd (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Its your side stacking the court to over throw row vs wade


I’ve got news for you: Row vs Wade isn’t part of the constitution.

A baby with a heartbeat isn’t a mere blob, it’s a life, and that’s a biological fact. Snuffing out a human life is called murder. Murdering an innocent life in order to remove responsibility from sex is not a guaranteed “right”, but, protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the foundation of our Constitutional Republic.

So for all your appearances of being pro-Constitutional, you’ve completely missed the whole point of it and set yourself in opposition to its core principles!

HYPOCRITE!!! MURDERER!!! Baby Killer!!! People who justify murder under the pretext of law are the worst, because they have no conscience!

| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 07:55:33   #
jimpack123
 
JFlorio wrote:
Do you believe these clowns. His presidency is over? Plain stupid. Won't be saying that when he makes his third Supreme court nominee. Even if he did resign, get impeached whatever, do they think Pence is going to nominate another Ginsberg?


she will not retire till dec of 2020 at the earliest

| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 08:30:45   #
Pennylynn (a regular here)
 
There is nothing in the Constitution about abortion being a "right."
In the 1960s was a time of 'make love, not war' and sexual promiscuity was at such a level it make prostitution almost obsolete. With having many partners as often as possible produced an unwanted issue, other than STDs... unwanted children. From the end of WWII... until roe vs wade, live births in the US remained at about 23 to every 1,000 women (currently we are below 13 per 1,000). But, during WWII, women found themselves with careers... more important things to do that made them happy and having a baby was limiting. Many states had laws against abortion and this made some women unhappy. So they sued... the SCOUTS were under pressure... uphold the states' rights or bend to the very vocal, and tax paying, Democrats.

So, baring a specific Constitutional Right to kill an unborn child... the SCOUTS decided that it was a matter of "privacy." Although the Constitution does not guarantee anyone the right to privacy. But, they decided if they stood on their head, stuck out their tongue and crossed their eyes they could almost see privacy built into the Constitution. You see the "right" that Blackmun and the rest of the majority claimed to discover, right to privacy chief among them, was apparently unknown to the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment. At the time that Amendment was passed in 1868 there were laws against abortion in 36 states, including the very Texas law that the Court was now striking down. There apparently was no question concerning the validity of this provision or of any of the other state statutes when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted. The only conclusion possible from this history is that the drafters did not intend to have the Fourteenth Amendment withdraw from the States the power to legislate with respect to this matter.

In the end, Roe v Wade had many problems.... there was no plaintiff, the Constitution does not guarantee a right to privacy.... and the 14th Amendment did not/does not apply because abortion was not a consideration when it was framed. The SCOUTS in 1973 simply made up meaning and inserted their personal preferences when deciding Roe v. Wade. An interesting, Norma McCorvey, the roe portion of the case never had an abortion and regretted her part in having this law passed. Finally, the right to life, which is Constitutional, was never considered in favor of sparing a child's life. For all that think that an embryo is nothing more than cells... science has confirmed that group of cells is human and that group of cells as early as 6 weeks in gestation feels pain. It is science... not religion or man made law... it is a fact.

So Tommy, although we came to the same conclusions from opposite directions.... you are absolutely right. I challenge anyone to find in the Constitution the right to Privacy.... which was the foundation of the roe v. wade.

TommyRadd wrote:
I’ve got news for you: Row vs Wade isn’t part of the constitution.

A baby with a heartbeat isn’t a mere blob, it’s a life, and that’s a biological fact. Snuffing out a human life is called murder. Murdering an innocent life in order to remove responsibility from sex is not a guaranteed “right”, but, protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the foundation of our Constitutional Republic.

So for all your appearances of being pro-Constitutional, you’ve completely missed the whole point of it and set yourself in opposition to its core principles!

HYPOCRITE!!! MURDERER!!! Baby Killer!!! People who justify murder under the pretext of law are the worst, because they have no conscience!
I’ve got news for you: Row vs Wade isn’t part of t... (show quote)

| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 08:47:14   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
It's been ruled constitional




TommyRadd wrote:
I’ve got news for you: Row vs Wade isn’t part of the constitution.

A baby with a heartbeat isn’t a mere blob, it’s a life, and that’s a biological fact. Snuffing out a human life is called murder. Murdering an innocent life in order to remove responsibility from sex is not a guaranteed “right”, but, protecting life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is the foundation of our Constitutional Republic.

So for all your appearances of being pro-Constitutional, you’ve completely missed the whole point of it and set yourself in opposition to its core principles!

HYPOCRITE!!! MURDERER!!! Baby Killer!!! People who justify murder under the pretext of law are the worst, because they have no conscience!
I’ve got news for you: Row vs Wade isn’t part of t... (show quote)

| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 08:55:25   #
lindajoy (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
do you want a supreme court that rules the way you think the constitution should read and not how it was meant to be interpreted!
I'm guessing the GOP thinks their smarter than the founders and want to rewrite it to suit there way of thinking!


No, wolf, they do not want to rewrite the Constitution, that falls squarely on the shoulders of the democrats that constantly attack it and want to eliminate it not just change it ...
Think the first and second amendments as examples~~~

| Reply
Jan 10, 2019 09:00:46   #
Pennylynn (a regular here)
 
Slavery was once ruled Constitutional also... does that make it undebatable or necessarily a justifiable ruling?

Lonewolf wrote:
It's been ruled constitional

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 15 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.