One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
donaled trump ended his presidency last night
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 next>>
Jan 12, 2019 23:59:07   #
kankune
 
slatten49 wrote:
You might want to read my posts again, as I wrote those taking their oath traditionally raise their right hands to do so, while setting their left hands on the Bible or Constitution. You had written that a Muslim senator had sworn in on the Qu'ran. I had asked who that was, as I believe there are none. The three I mentioned are all U.S. House Representatives, one each from Michigan, Minnesota and Indiana.


Sorry Slat. I misunderstood..I believe it was the one from Mn. The one that called our President a mother trucker....I cant imagine any of them swearing in on the Bible. But I will check to make sure.

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 00:04:56   #
slatten49 (a regular here)
 
kankune wrote:
Sorry Slat. I misunderstood..I believe it was the one from Mn. The one that called our President a mother trucker....I cant imagine any of them swearing in on the Bible. But I will check to make sure.

Not a problem, as I just wanted to set the record straight.

On your last, we agree. I believe, but not sure, that all three of them swore in on the Koran/Qu'ran.

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 02:49:33   #
TommyRadd (a regular here)
 
Iamdjchrys wrote:
Circular logic. And FYI, the Bible is not the be-all and end-all of the human condition. It is no more, or less, credible than the Qu'ran.




Perhaps if the point I was making was attempting to prove the Christian God true and the Islamic one false, you may have a point. But I wasn’t.

What I showed was simply how certain beliefs and practices of the two religions could be compared by their actions, implying they could be discerned even from the outside looking in. And I offered my statements regarding the Qu’ran as questions, not assumptions of circularly based and assumed fact.

For you to then deny those observations on no other basis than that you don’t believe, would be much closer to your (evil, invalidating) circular logic accusation...in my humble opinion. Which would reinforce another one of my observations- that liberals are hypocrites.

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 02:58:50   #
TommyRadd (a regular here)
 
kankune wrote:
Smokin post Pennylynn...keep em comin!!


Same from me for both of you in this thread!

Too bad there isn’t a simple thumbs up button here.

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 07:15:31   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
Which would you have them do swear in on a book they believe to be holy or a book you deam to be holy?
The reality is if they swear on a Bible you would say they tricked us as they don't believe in it.
In all cases they lose!

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 07:55:50   #
TommyRadd (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Which would you have them do swear in on a book they believe to be holy or a book you deam to be holy?
The reality is if they swear on a Bible you would say they tricked us as they don't believe in it.
In all cases they lose!




Easy: Swear on the Constitution

Which would you rather, people who are dedicated, in their hearts, to upholding the Constitution or those who seek office to change it (ie “fundamentally change America”)? Those kinds of words are the words of traitors, not devotees and defenders of our Constitution. (And those who applaud and support fundamentally changing our Constitution by the politicians they elect are just as much the traitors.)

So, any politicians who get in office to change the Constitution, regardless of what they “swear in on” are tricksters according to your own logic, because all of those types swear to uphold the Constitution but then ignore it. Thanks for exposing and realizing that tricksters are immoral, because that is the root of the problem!

“By your words are you justified or condemned.” - Jesus Christ, paraphrased.

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 08:02:06   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
Trump ignores it and is being sued for it
The constitution was meant to be changed as needed that's why we have admendments



TommyRadd wrote:
Easy: Swear on the Constitution

Which would you rather, people who are dedicated, in their hearts, to upholding the Constitution or those who seek office to change it (ie “fundamentally change America”)? Those kinds of words are the words of traitors, not devotees and defenders of our Constitution. (And those who applaud and support fundamentally changing our Constitution by the politicians they elect are just as much the traitors.)

So, any politicians who get in office to change the Constitution, regardless of what they “swear in on” are tricksters according to your own logic, because all of those types swear to uphold the Constitution but then ignore it. Thanks for exposing and realizing that tricksters are immoral, because that is the root of the problem!

“By your words are you justified or condemned.” - Jesus Christ, paraphrased.
Easy: Swear on the Constitution br br Which woul... (show quote)

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 08:39:38   #
TommyRadd (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Trump ignores it and is being sued for it
The constitution was meant to be changed as needed that's why we have admendments


Amended and fundamentally changed aren’t the same thing.

You may as well admit you’re against the principles of the Constitution and bill of rights if you think it needs to be fundamentally changed. Traitor!

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 08:58:20   #
Iamdjchrys
 
byronglimish wrote:
You are an atheist?


No. But I do believe that all societies, past, present and future, have (and do, and will) worship(ped) a Higher Power, a Creator, and one manifestation is no more or less valid than another.

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 09:01:04   #
Lonewolf (a regular here)
 
I never said that ass wipe



TommyRadd wrote:
Amended and fundamentally changed aren’t the same thing.

You may as well admit you’re against the principles of the Constitution and bill of rights if you think it needs to be fundamentally changed. Traitor!

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 09:20:08   #
TommyRadd (a regular here)
 
Lonewolf wrote:
I never said that ass wipe


You did by hitting the “Quote Reply” button, because that is what you were directly refuting. If you weren’t then YOU should have made the distinction.

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 09:45:53   #
byronglimish (a regular here)
 
Iamdjchrys wrote:
No. But I do believe that all societies, past, present and future, have (and do, and will) worship(ped) a Higher Power, a Creator, and one manifestation is no more or less valid than another.


I can appreciate your religious tolerance.

Some societies worshipped a higher power (in their minds) named Moloch.

An Ammonite fire god.

They worshipped by sacrificing babies and sexual worship to the god Ashtoreth, Molochs sidekick.

Even the Israelites fell into this abominable practice at one time.

I don't accept these worshippers of death and sex as good.

To me there is only one Almighty Creator.

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 11:55:47   #
Nuclearian
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Taking a whole 8 minutes of prime time to spread more fake news and cooked border numbers all of which the American people have fact checked and found him lying about!
2 years over 8000 lies and counting who could believe anything he says!
On the bright side, they took his mike before he could fully explain to the American people that Afganistan invaded Russia.
and no matter what our intelligence says the Saudi crown prince is innocent!
Just as he sided with Putin in Helsinki


Brainwashed, is what you are. You idiots keep saying this, and nothing has ever been proven. Do you like supporting the Nazi Party? Your Nazis have colluded with the Russians; Obama and Hitlery. Trump has not. In TRUE Nazi propaganda practice, you accuse others of what YOU are yourselves.

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 11:58:16   #
Nuclearian
 
woodguru wrote:
His presidency is already over, it's just a long process when the right refuses to accept the facts.

Declaring a state of emergency when there isn't one will be his end...I'll bet white house counsel is strongly advising that he not go there.


The "State of Emergency" are your Nazi friends making up BS! Only a fool, or a lying Nazi propagandist would think everything is great at the border. Of course, you watching the Propaganda arm of the Nazicrat party will give you no news of that. They would just prefer to keep you ignorant.

| Reply
Jan 13, 2019 11:59:07   #
Nuclearian
 
woodguru wrote:
Imagine a republican centrist like...Garland? How about putting real judges that don't bring any bias to the law?


Obastard wanted him. So you know he was a communist also.

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.