Nancy and Chuck are spanked and put in a corner by daddy...
Dec 13, 2018 01:03:12 #
Are you kidding me? These 2 swamp monsters have both been in office for over 20 years. What have they accomplished that actually helps citizens.
Wonder why Congress has an approval rate of only 11%. They are all Corrupt Gas Bags who are only looking out for themselves.
Wonder why Congress has an approval rate of only 11%. They are all Corrupt Gas Bags who are only looking out for themselves.
Dec 13, 2018 01:05:00 #
Dec 13, 2018 01:34:08 #
EmilyD wrote:
Trump's playing with the press again, and N and C are looking like fools....MAGA
https://youtu.be/-guwyA8wxVQ
WE WANT THE WALL!!! GO TRUMP!
https://youtu.be/-guwyA8wxVQ
WE WANT THE WALL!!! GO TRUMP!
One, it's clear that we each have a different view of what a spanking is and who administered it and two he said they he has great Republican support for the wall where if that were true he wouldn't need to ask Chuck and Nancy for anything. The t***h is, it's republican's who won't fund the wall which begs the question of why should Democrats fund what Republicans refuse to do so? Spanking indeed...
Dec 13, 2018 09:25:56 #
DogLover99 wrote:
Are you kidding me? These 2 swamp monsters have both been in office for over 20 years. What have they accomplished that actually helps citizens.
Wonder why Congress has an approval rate of only 11%. They are all Corrupt Gas Bags who are only looking out for themselves.
Wonder why Congress has an approval rate of only 11%. They are all Corrupt Gas Bags who are only looking out for themselves.
Dec 13, 2018 17:41:58 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
...I*****l i*******ts cost more than they contribute to our economy. I*****l i*********n costs the American taxpayers $116 billion per year, if a border wall was built for $10 billion and it reduced i*****l i*********n by just 10%, the wall would pay for itself in one year.
Source of data?
Besides, if we block i*****l i*******ts, who will milk Devin Nunes' cows in Iowa?
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a23471864/devin-nunes-family-farm-iowa-california/
Dec 13, 2018 21:31:13 #
debeda wrote:
Lolololololololhahahahahaha can always count on you for a smile, Kankune 
Thx Deb...sometimes I can throw a good zinger in there. Haaaah!
Dec 13, 2018 22:18:13 #
PeterS wrote:
One, it's clear that we each have a different view of what a spanking is and who administered it and two he said they he has great Republican support for the wall where if that were true he wouldn't need to ask Chuck and Nancy for anything. The t***h is, it's republican's who won't fund the wall which begs the question of why should Democrats fund what Republicans refuse to do so? Spanking indeed...
Nancy said repeatedly that the President does not have the necessary Republican v**es to pass the bill for paying $5 billon for the wall. The Republican leader of the House seems to verify this as he said he will not bring the bill funding the wall up for a v**e.
Dec 14, 2018 22:29:52 #
vernon wrote:
You don't know what your talking about.Those citiz... (show quote)
Or they are over eager for illegal v**es.
Dec 14, 2018 22:30:19 #
at41 wrote:
Nancy said repeatedly that the President does not have the necessary Republican v**es to pass the bill for paying $5 billon for the wall. The Republican leader of the House seems to verify this as he said he will not bring the bill funding the wall up for a v**e.
RINOs at work again.
Dec 15, 2018 05:50:21 #
Blade_Runner wrote:
I*****l i*******ts cost more than they contribute to our economy. I*****l i*********n costs the American taxpayers $116 billion per year, if a border wall was built for $10 billion and it reduced i*****l i*********n by just 10%, the wall would pay for itself in one year.
How do i*****l i*******ts cost 116 billion dollars? The highest expenses would be medical and education but those would be offset by the property taxes and sales taxes they pay so their expense would be no higher than anyone else legal or illegal.
And no, the wall won't pay for itself in a year. The expense you are quoting for the 12 million i*****l i*******ts estimated by conservatives to be already here not for those who cross the border yearly. According to the border patrol, they have an 81% success rate in apprehending or turning back i*****l i*******ts and as of 2017 there were 303 thousand apprehended so only 80 thousand would have managed to cross successfully. According to your FAIR study, they cost $6,940 each so the total cost would be 555 million. Now again, that's only if you study is correct.
Another thing is that we haven't discussed is the cost of expelling 12 million people both logistically and what it would do to the economy. Contrary to what most conservatives believe the vast majority of i*****l i*******ts are gainfully employed so the question begged is how are we going to fill all those jobs that are vacated and assuming that we can what will that do to wages and to inflation in this country? And here is another way to look at it: our economy is 19.400 trillion so the cost of i*****l i*********n is (19.400/116) = 0.60% so why do we want to risk upsetting our economy when the cost of i*****l i*********n is so small and the actual cost of expelling them would be so high?
https://www.npr.org/2018/06/22/622246815/unauthorized-immigration-in-three-graphs
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-trump-mexico-wall/how-many-people-currently-cross/
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.