One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Why smart people (scientists) don't v**e republican
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
May 2, 2014 16:28:12   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Serenity54321 wrote:
I assume then, Brian, the computer you are using runs on oxygen?

Electricity is the most polluting energy source there is. Until Democrats can replace electricity, all I can do is reduce, reuse, and recycle.

Unless you plan to live off the grid.



If Brian is using it, perhaps it runs on hot air.

Reply
May 2, 2014 18:59:45   #
astrolite
 
Neal wrote:
Are you the liar MrEd, or have you some sort of fetish that compels you to repeat lies? "90% of scientists claim c*****e c****e is a h**x"??? THIS IS A LIE!!!


Actually it is about 96% of legitimate scientists say there is no human connection to weather change! That means seasons too! G****l w*****g and "C*****e C****e" are s**ms to give control of our lives to the eco-wackos! And of course enrich them!

Reply
May 2, 2014 19:45:17   #
Lena
 
And those eco wackos work for the govt and right now have the rights to your water.

Reply
 
 
May 2, 2014 21:07:58   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Vacaman wrote:
Why did the ICAC Explode after a complete maroon like Al Gore come up with a stirring movie? By what standard do a scientist that promote fear of global disaster throughout made warming go by? Answer is none by their own! This is why the models have been altered ten to twelve times in the last several years alone. Basic science from 101 tells us that theories must be challenged to be validated, yet we have some 10800 ninnys trying to blow smoke up your ass and tell you it is healthy. They don't use true science and when they do and start to look at the real causes for c*****e c****e and sun cycles, and esplane why other rocks in our universe have shown the same exact increase in temperature as earth then I'll believe the crap. Fact is that CFC's and Methane are absolutley causing more damage than CO2 but lets not talk real science, lets spew BS and make be pathological about our own human greatness!
Typos due to my over intelegent iPhone.
Why did the ICAC Explode after a complete maroon l... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
May 2, 2014 21:56:16   #
Vacaman
 
RetNavyCWO wrote:
There are probably a lot of things. It's pretty clear that we have pumped a lot of CO2 in the atmosphere since we industrialized a hundred years ago. Sea level has risen about a foot in the last hundred years, and it will keep rising if we don't stop adding to the CO2 in the atmosphere. Every president from Richard Nixon through Bill Clinton understood that man has contributed to g****l w*****g/c*****e c****e (wh**ever you prefer to call it). I saw excerpts of speeches from each president since then saying so in a new documentary titled (I think) "Years of Living Dangerously" that recently started on SHOWTIME on Wednesday evenings. Deniers of g****l w*****g (oil and gas industries and the Republican politicians who are beholden to them) only started their denials about 15 years ago.

The first step, I would think, would be to wean ourselves off of f****l f**ls. The real value to America, I think, would be to lead the world in developing alternative sources of energy. Right now, we have nothing to offer the world. America's economic dominance started with being the world's provider of cotton and tobacco. We don't manufacture anything to offer the world anymore. Our business leaders took their plants to China, India, and other Far Eastern countries. America's needs something to offer the world. G***n e****y of all types seems to offer lots of new possibilities for American businesses. I would like to see this developed.

Does that answer your question?
There are probably a lot of things. It's pretty c... (show quote)


Taken from the national geographic society on oceans;

Scientific research indicates sea levels worldwide have been rising at a rate of 0.14 inches (3.5 millimeters) per year since the early 1990s. The trend, linked to g****l w*****g, puts thousands of coastal cities, like Venice, Italy,and even whole islands at risk of being claimed by the ocean.

I agree that it would be great if we could all drive less polluting vehicles, or zero polluting vehicles. Electric vehicles are fine if you don't charge from the grid. Solar has chemical issue to manufacture them and we will have huge issue in twenty years or so when the efficiency is close to zero and we need to dispose if them.
I included the paragraph because it doesn't add up to even close to a foot of sea rise. 24x.14 inches equals about 3 3/8 inches which still probably a stretch. Also I seriously doubt it has to do with ice/ polar cap melt, considering we have had record growth of the polar caps for over a decade running.
So where did the extra water come from?
I would guess that even at the minuscule amount of warming we have experience has cause the massive amount of water that has always been here to expand ever so slightly.

Reply
May 2, 2014 21:59:48   #
Lena
 
http://www.newsmax.com/US/George-Will-global-warming-climate/2014/04/28/id/568147/?ns_mail_uid=63339120&ns_mail_job=1566859_04282014&promo_code=bbaulzyf
The answers you seek grasshopper! G****l w*****g is a socialist s**m to gain govt. control of resources

Reply
May 3, 2014 08:22:33   #
astrolite
 
Lena wrote:
And those eco wackos work for the govt and right now have the rights to your water.


Some of them, probably the most radical, But it looks like the GOVERNMENT WORKS FOR THEM.....NOT US! ALL being C*******T NOW!

Reply
 
 
May 3, 2014 08:48:04   #
astrolite
 
Vacaman wrote:
Taken from the national geographic society on oceans;

Scientific research indicates sea levels worldwide have been rising at a rate of 0.14 inches (3.5 millimeters) per year since the early 1990s. The trend, linked to g****l w*****g, puts thousands of coastal cities, like Venice, Italy,and even whole islands at risk of being claimed by the ocean.

I agree that it would be great if we could all drive less polluting vehicles, or zero polluting vehicles. Electric vehicles are fine if you don't charge from the grid. Solar has chemical issue to manufacture them and we will have huge issue in twenty years or so when the efficiency is close to zero and we need to dispose if them.
I included the paragraph because it doesn't add up to even close to a foot of sea rise. 24x.14 inches equals about 3 3/8 inches which still probably a stretch. Also I seriously doubt it has to do with ice/ polar cap melt, considering we have had record growth of the polar caps for over a decade running.
So where did the extra water come from?
I would guess that even at the minuscule amount of warming we have experience has cause the massive amount of water that has always been here to expand ever so slightly.
Taken from the national geographic society on ocea... (show quote)


You are right! You have seen through the s**m! And used the secret that liberals don't have "COMMON SENSE". And did you notice that for the last 3 years National Geographic has REQUIRED ALL THEIR CONTRIBUTORS TO PUT IN A PLUG FOR G****L W*****G ??? No matter what the subject, they REQUIRE the propaganda woven into the narrative. Write a story about a native festival in Peru, and you must add a comment "that it wouldn't be held any more because of G****l W*****g"!!! And a story about starving in Siberia, (which would become productive farmland if G****l W*****g was real) and you must say that G****l W*****g will destroy the habitat for millions of reindeer. I just read around the liberal lies! One interesting fact, Russian scientists have proven it's not warming, but cooling that's coming, and as most of their country is arctic tundra and forest, they are worried, they have been making pr********ns for Global Winter, notice how they wanted and took the Crimea, their most fertile farmland! They were smart enough to get rid of C*******m too! But our liberals still think it will work! With them on top of course!

Reply
May 3, 2014 09:02:40   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Lena wrote:
http://www.newsmax.com/US/George-Will-global-warming-climate/2014/04/28/id/568147/?ns_mail_uid=63339120&ns_mail_job=1566859_04282014&promo_code=bbaulzyf
The answers you seek grasshopper! G****l w*****g is a socialist s**m to gain govt. control of resources


Lena,

Thanks for the post. Great having you on this forum. while I don't always agree with you, you are always civil and well spoken. Welcome

Reply
May 3, 2014 13:19:07   #
RetNavyCWO Loc: VA suburb of DC
 
Lena wrote:
http://www.newsmax.com/US/George-Will-global-warming-climate/2014/04/28/id/568147/?ns_mail_uid=63339120&ns_mail_job=1566859_04282014&promo_code=bbaulzyf
The answers you seek grasshopper! G****l w*****g is a socialist s**m to gain govt. control of resources


Of course, the wealthy owners of coal and oil companies, who stand to lose their riches if alternative energy sources are developed, have nothing to do with c*****e c****e deniers. Got it.

Reply
May 3, 2014 13:33:56   #
Lena
 
Vice versa too! You cannot b reached. Remember this when your poor and hungry

Reply
 
 
May 3, 2014 14:01:14   #
Neal
 
Lena wrote:
No one will be able to pay taxes or wages once we become totaly dependant on government. Socialism doesnt work. All other concerns should be secondary to the fact that, as a nation born by God, we follow evil and choose laziness over hard work.


". . . as a nation born by God . . ."

Judging by what you write and how you write it, you're one of the unfortunates whose religion has burned their brains out.

If you think this is an unfair impression, I'll be happy to read your defense - if it's sensible.

Reply
May 3, 2014 16:42:56   #
Vacaman
 
RetNavyCWO wrote:
Of course, the wealthy owners of coal and oil companies, who stand to lose their riches if alternative energy sources are developed, have nothing to do with c*****e c****e deniers. Got it.


Are you serious? Can we say investors ? Alternative energy has been discovered implemented and abolished in the name of investors not environment or e******y. Fact is that we are producing mire oil per day than all of OPEC and we are exporting more than we consume. So why don't all of you go after the customer just like owners of big oil. Why don't you fly over to India or China and preach you views? All you liberals need to stop whining and start changing, start at your house and your car and your place if work. Then like I said before go to the real poluters and complain to their governments.

Reply
May 4, 2014 22:18:07   #
allosaur
 
I am a basically independent who used to sometimes v**e Democrat on the local level at least 10 years ago. On the p**********l level,the last Democrat v**ed for was Carter. One time. Realized Carter was a huge mistake and v**ed for Reagan. As fast as Reagan won, the Iranians released all those American hostages. They did not wait for Reagan to get into office. I gladly v**ed for Reagan again.
Now it has devolved into being repeatedly forced to v**e Republican for the lesser of two evils. Last two times it was either the RINO or the Demonrat C*******t, who has called the Constitution he swore to defend a "list of negatives."

Reply
May 4, 2014 22:24:53   #
astrolite
 
RetNavyCWO wrote:
Of course, the wealthy owners of coal and oil companies, who stand to lose their riches if alternative energy sources are developed, have nothing to do with c*****e c****e deniers. Got it.


Do you have a separate key on your computer that prints "Denier"??

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.