Kevyn

What would he pardon her for? She has not been either charged with or convicted of anything.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

You have an incomplete sentence. You forgot to say "yet" at the end of your last sentence. I accept your thanks for clarifying your comment.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Why would trump even consider pardoning Hillary at all??

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

Read the first chapter of Ruth.

What you don’t seem to factor in is the effects of all our politicians getting away with their evil deeds. It just breeds more disdain for our laws and our way of life. People given places of honor should and must be held to the highest standards of honor and integrity, particularly in regards to their actions toward the American people. Meaning, I’m not nearly as concerned about Trump’s alleged indiscretions with women as I am HRC’s issues with Uranium One, B******i, classified emails, Haitian relief scandal, and on and on the list goes.

We the people deserve open accountability from our elected officials - those who have voluntarily taken positions in levels of government. We do not have royals who are forced into those positions. Most often, if not always these days, our politicians are the ones who seek these respected positions. That being the case, they should expect to be treated as leaving their obscurity behind. They made that choice.

To not hold these people accountable would establish an absolutely horrible precedence and put our leaders absolutely above the laws they presume to exercise over the rest of us commoners.

This issue, therefore, is at the very heartbeat of the survival of our country and its unique exceptionalism!

I couldn’t disagree more against pardoning unrepentant politicians (or clergy). If they are ever pardoned, they should also be immediately stripped of the right to EVER work in positions of government in any capacity whatsoever!

sisboombaa

Please pardon me for being so bold as to respond to your seven questions.

Q: Sooth or inflame passions that divide?
A: Inflamed passions can't get worse.

Q: Would Hillary accept a pardon from the pres?
A: Of course but it will bother her to admit he did something right.

Q: How would dems react?
A: Who cares.

Q: How would media react?
A: They would love it.

Q: How would GOP react?
A: The rhinos would love, the conservatives would h**e.

Q: How would Trump supporter's react?
A: A supporter would cease to be a supporter.

Q: Have you gone over the edge?
A: How the heck would I know.

I trust I have been civil as requested, if not, please pardon me.

green apples Loc: Scottsdale, Az

Lonewolf......7 is the number of "completion". Maybe now is the time. And she hasn't been found guilty of anything because she hasn't had the trial yet. In America (still) you are "innocent until PROVEN guilty". (well...usually!! haha...lots of people still claim OJ is innocent!) She can't run or hide....so her trial is inevitable. The evidence is still pouring in! She has worked her way into a real corner....her only escape might be suicide. Maybe she could do that the same way so many who have opposed her have committed suicide! (yah, shur!! LOL)
And YOU didn't put Trump in office and YOU won't take him down!
And Hillary will get her trail...When it's time.....it will be done. But it's going to be a much bigger take-down than just HRC! MUCH BIGGER!!

old marine Loc: America home of the brave

Now with a majority In the Senate there is the possibility of charges being brought. It takes a 2/3 majority to convict.

Before with only a 50-49 v**e there is no way for a conviction. If tried and found not guilty then the Double Jeopardy law kicks in.

I hope they break it down into several indictments because it only takes one charge. All fall under the treason act.

The good thing is there is no statutory of limitations. it could be 10 years before charges are brought.

bahmer

NO

mongo Loc: TEXAS

I don't see a problem with offering her a pardon, as long
as it's offered after she is hung for treason!

SEMPER FI

Gatsby

Gatsby

No pardon needed, when no offense committed. Thanks for responding with answers, instead of more questions.

Bcon

Before there is my talk of a pardon, a very thorough investigation of the numerous crimes that could be attributed to Hillary should be looked into. Why wasn’t the murder of Seth Rich investigated? There are many cases of people that were going to testify against the Clintons that mysteriously died in one way or the other. Typical of this is the many suicides that occurred. It is an impossible suicide to die with a bullet or bullets in the back of the head. If Trump wee topardonhereithout a very thorough check I believe he would be ostracized by many of his loyal followers.

Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI

Congress dose not have the power to put any one in jail.
They may refer it to a court of law.

To convict a person of a crime a case as to be presented before a court of law.
If you feel Hillary should be put be for a court of law for her crimes some one has to bring the case before a court of law.
Trump would not do that because it will only set a precedence that could be use against him.
I am all for t***sparency in government & in life in general as an important issue.

But I am with you with this being done.
A precedence may be needed.
What & how should it all be done.

For the time being if we could just clean up the short comings with in government active today would be a good step.
If after that we wish to go back We just need to say what for & how far back we would like to go.
History has shown use that much that could be looked at as criminal activity in government has been over looked.

The important gain we really are seeking is to just stop more from taking place.

truthiness

...
As usual, apples to oranges.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

wow, you are nuts..

Get her for what????