One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Your welcome Trump supporters
Page <<first <prev 9 of 25 next> last>>
Nov 9, 2018 10:37:09   #
Seth
 
Morgan wrote:
We, the party(s)s for the people and not corporations, are fighting an uphill battle due to who we are actually fighting and it isn't a party. Now, to be clear it is not about who we're fighting against but who we're fighting for, and it is for the people. We are fighting the plutocrats to prevent them from turning us into an oligarchy. This is why they have Trump campaigning so hard against the Democrats and slandering an entire party every day, almost half the people in the US.

Why this is an almost impossible fight is due to the control of money the corporate plutocrats have over our economy, not to mention the Federal Reserve. They have the valve to our economy.

Seein the difference of intention within the parties is proven by seeing how the middle class grows under a democratic administration and shrinks under a Republicans. Right now Trump has been on the continued rise of our economy left by Obama, by his deregulations and allowing Corporations to go unchecked and The corporations will expand to support their party and try to prove to the public it is because of the Republican party in charge, their end result goal is to stay in control in the government, hence the precursor to a f*****t government.

We are the true patriots and yes proud of it. This type of ugly slandered against other Americans originated from the right, all in the attempt from fear manipulations to divert others from joining the Democratic Party. Now THAT is Anti-American.
We, the party(s)s for the people and not corporati... (show quote)


How is it that the MSM assaults Trump on a daily basis and they are a "fair and balanced press," yet when Trump defends himself he's campaigning against all that's good in the world?

You people are so one-sided and the pity of it is that for you actual logic and common sense flow like water off a duck's back.

Reply
Nov 9, 2018 11:43:04   #
son of witless
 
Morgan wrote:
We, the party(s)s for the people and not corporations, are fighting an uphill battle due to who we are actually fighting and it isn't a party. Now, to be clear it is not about who we're fighting against but who we're fighting for, and it is for the people. We are fighting the plutocrats to prevent them from turning us into an oligarchy. This is why they have Trump campaigning so hard against the Democrats and slandering an entire party every day, almost half the people in the US.

Why this is an almost impossible fight is due to the control of money the corporate plutocrats have over our economy, not to mention the Federal Reserve. They have the valve to our economy.

Seein the difference of intention within the parties is proven by seeing how the middle class grows under a democratic administration and shrinks under a Republicans. Right now Trump has been on the continued rise of our economy left by Obama, by his deregulations and allowing Corporations to go unchecked and The corporations will expand to support their party and try to prove to the public it is because of the Republican party in charge, their end result goal is to stay in control in the government, hence the precursor to a f*****t government.

We are the true patriots and yes proud of it. This type of ugly slandered against other Americans originated from the right, all in the attempt from fear manipulations to divert others from joining the Democratic Party. Now THAT is Anti-American.
We, the party(s)s for the people and not corporati... (show quote)



You say a lot of things that you cannot prove. Example, you say that the middle class grows during Democrat Administrations. Okay.

Under Obama the wealth gap continued to increase between rich and poor.

https://www.businessinsider.com/why-ine******y-is-rising-under-obama-2012-11

Reply
Nov 9, 2018 11:51:33   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
son of witless wrote:
You say a lot of things that you cannot prove. Example, you say that the middle class grows during Democrat Administrations. Okay.

Under Obama the wealth gap continued to increase between rich and poor.

https://www.businessinsider.com/why-ine******y-is-rising-under-obama-2012-11


Sure did with me Witless, thank you Obama.

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2018 11:58:32   #
son of witless
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Sure did with me Witless, thank you Obama.


You are the rich, so of course you loved Obama. I am trying to close the gap between you rich white liberal retired guys and me, a right wing white working class corporate s***e. If you reentered the work force you would find that Donald Jobs. Trump is your bestest friend. The job market is ever so slowly providing opportunity for those of us not yet sitting on our behinds and counting our dividends.

Reply
Nov 9, 2018 12:00:02   #
Robert Harrington
 
Seth wrote:
Miss Guide? I don't believe I know her.


Ms Guide to you sir.

Reply
Nov 9, 2018 12:34:11   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
Seth wrote:
You mean, it will take years to run jobs back out of the country, put millions of people back on unemployment, utterly redestroy consumer confidence and make the border a veritable Autoban of foreigners racing into the country to drop anchor babies, sell narcotics, rape, steal, k**l, drain the social services system, create mayhem, steal jobs (under the table), sending more hundreds of millions of dollars out of our economy via remittance incomes to the "folks back home" and commit terrorist acts?

What patriots you people are. You should really be proud to call yourselves Americans with a straight face.
You mean, it will take years to run jobs back out ... (show quote)



Great response Seth. But he is one that will never realize the t***h as to what is happening in this country since Obama lost his position of control and no Democrat could retain that control.

Reply
Nov 9, 2018 12:51:43   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
son of witless wrote:
You are the rich, so of course you loved Obama. I am trying to close the gap between you rich white liberal retired guys and me, a right wing white working class corporate s***e. If you reentered the work force you would find that Donald Jobs. Trump is your bestest friend. The job market is ever so slowly providing opportunity for those of us not yet sitting on our behinds and counting our dividends.
You are the rich, so of course you loved Obama. I ... (show quote)


Witless I thought you told me you made a lot of money in the Obama stock market.

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2018 12:52:52   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Morgan wrote:
Arch is tired of hearing about Gerrymandering, when gerrymandering is stealing away our fair democracy, why would that not bother an American I have no idea? We probably have had the Senate stolen away from the real majority of the v**e. I'm sure you understand. Gerrymandering has never been a good thing, it has always been an unjust tool, for party manipulation and it should be wiped out completely, and in the long run, this is for the sake of both parties. First action the Dems should do in the house in order to secure a fairer v****g process in 2020.
Arch is tired of hearing about Gerrymandering, whe... (show quote)


I am tired of hearing about gerrymandering.
Both parties have, and do do it, but it only seems to become a major issue when democrats lose e******ns.
I would rather do away with parties, pacs, corporate money, media bias, and just have people, supported by people running on their own ideas, qualifications, and merits. A pipe dream, I know.
I go on what I observe, and experience in life, not what I'm told is true. And from my observations, and experiences, I truly believe that American politics, and possibly America herself is fkd.
It's the money, plain , and simple. And I see it worse from the left, who wants complete control. I don't know anyone on the right who wants to dictate, or censor speech, or thought. Or wants to tell you what your kids should be forced to learn at school, or what they can eat, say, do, or think to be accepted.
I'm damn sick, and tired of being told that I don't have American values, and that I'm not a patriotic American because I don't want your 30 year old boy who thinks he's a girl in the bathroom with my wife, daughter, or granddaughters, or that wetbacks bringing drugs across the border that can k**l the if they make a bad choice, or not believing everybody should get a trophy makes me against a strong America.

I am a Texan, and you "patriots" can kiss my ass if you think you can dictate to me what my values will be!!

Reply
Nov 9, 2018 13:00:03   #
Fit2BTied Loc: Texas
 
archie bunker wrote:
I am tired of hearing about gerrymandering.
Both parties have, and do do it, but it only seems to become a major issue when democrats lose e******ns.
I would rather do away with parties, pacs, corporate money, media bias, and just have people, supported by people running on their own ideas, qualifications, and merits. A pipe dream, I know.
I go on what I observe, and experience in life, not what I'm told is true. And from my observations, and experiences, I truly believe that American politics, and possibly America herself is fkd.
It's the money, plain , and simple. And I see it worse from the left, who wants complete control. I don't know anyone on the right who wants to dictate, or censor speech, or thought. Or wants to tell you what your kids should be forced to learn at school, or what they can eat, say, do, or think to be accepted.
I'm damn sick, and tired of being told that I don't have American values, and that I'm not a patriotic American because I don't want your 30 year old boy who thinks he's a girl in the bathroom with my wife, daughter, or granddaughters, or that wetbacks bringing drugs across the border that can k**l the if they make a bad choice, or not believing everybody should get a trophy makes me against a strong America.

I am a Texan, and you "patriots" can kiss my ass if you think you can dictate to me what my values will be!!
I am tired of hearing about gerrymandering. br Bo... (show quote)
Caroll O'Conner could not have said it better, my Friend.

Reply
Nov 9, 2018 14:03:11   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
OUTRAGE! “Rampant fraud” uncovered in 2018 e******n [video]

http://click2.thehornnews.com/t/Ag/iDc/AAEjzA/-e8/AAG8DQ/ABgAsQ/AQ/-Wl9

An army of political lawyers are descending on both Florida and Arizona — and Florida Gov. Rick Scott says there’s evidence of “rampant fraud” that should be concerning to every American.

Scott, whose lead in his senatorial race has shrunk to a razor-thin margin, has asked for investigators to probe why two heavily Democratic counties in Florida have reportedly both “found” tens of thousands of extra v**es… over two days after the 2018 midterm e******n finished.



One of these places, Broward County, was described by The Miami Herald as one of “the most controversial e******ns department” in Florida.

What concerned citizens and Republican officials have uncovered in the past two days is shocking.

On Thursday, footage of poll workers illegally t***sferring thousands of b****ts from their personal vehicles into the back of rental trucks, with no legal oversight, surfaced.

Critics wondered if these b****ts were on their way to be destroyed… or replaced.

Airforceone wrote:
Democrats just saved your SS and Medicare

We can now expose your cult leader for his corruption with televised investigation where this people will be put under oath and not in a back room.

We will find out exactly what Trump did with the Kavanaugh investigation.

The Muellar investigation will be saved.

We will find out exactly what the Trump crime family has been spending our tax dollars on for family expenses.

The Russian investigation will begin and people will be required to testify under oath. His children will be called to testify and they will be required to answer and please Trump children don’t lie or you end up in jail.

Trump will be unable to continue to lie without being held accountable. We will now have a more t***sparent government. Republicans will not be able to block testimony to protect the freak.
Democrats just saved your SS and Medicare br br W... (show quote)


https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/1060575611868114944

Reply
Nov 9, 2018 14:18:07   #
Geo
 
Idaho wrote:
Trump is about to declassify the FISA warrants and the unethical use of power the Mueller has exercised of the people he has persecuted to keep them quiet.

Just wait until the Uranium One documents are declassified - 11 Nov? - and Mueller‒s corrupt role in that is exposed to the light of day.

This will be fun to watch!




My God, are there still people out there that believe this stuff? How is it possible that the facts evade these people for so long? Is it because their only news source is Fox news?
Truly amazing and scary that someone will construct a lie, and when the target wants to believe it, it becomes the t***h to them for the rest of their life.

AMERICA
The Alternative 'Russia Scandal'
November 6, 201710:44 AM ET
Greg Myre - 2016 - square
GREG MYRE

Facebook
Twitter

President Trump and his supporters claim that in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to the Clinton Foundation, Hillary Clinton supported the 2010 sale of a mining company that gave Russia control of U.S. uranium supplies.
Craig Ruttle/AP
According to President Trump, some Republicans in Congress and conservative media outlets, the Russia scandal is heating up.

No, not that one.

It's an alternative Russia scandal. And the claims go like this:

As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton approved the 2010 sale of a mining company to Russia. This gave the Russians control of 20 percent of U.S. uranium and placed U.S. national security at risk. In return, the Clinton Foundation received $145 million in pledges and donations.

Trump made this allegation during the 2016 campaign and again in an Oct. 19 tweet.


Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
Uranium deal to Russia, with Clinton help and Obama Administration knowledge, is the biggest story that F**e Media doesn't want to follow!

113K
4:17 AM - Oct 19, 2017
Twitter Ads info and privacy
63.8K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
In the face of repeated fact checks, the president's claims have not withstood scrutiny. The president's critics call them part of an effort to divert attention from Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

But because the story keeps surfacing and key Republicans are calling for hearings, here is a closer look.

Claim: Clinton played a key role in helping Russia gain control of U.S. uranium supplies.

The Russian state nuclear company, Rosatom, bought Canadian mining company Uranium One in 2010. Uranium One had, and still has, uranium mining rights in the United States.

Article continues after this message from our sponsor

For that reason, President Barack Obama's administration had to approve the deal. In a unanimous v**e, nine U.S. government departments and agencies signed off. All are part of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States and included Clinton's State Department.

By all accounts, she was not actively involved. One of her deputies handled the matter, which was not considered controversial because uranium is widely bought and sold around the world for a range of purposes, from nuclear power plant fuel to medical treatments and research.

"It's a commercial market; it's a global market. Companies get bought and sold. Some of the companies that do the buying are controlled by foreign governments," said Matthew Bunn, who heads the Project on Managing the Atom, a nuclear policy research group at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government. "That's the world we live in. It's a totally normal purchase."

Claim: Uranium One controls 20 percent of the U.S. uranium supply.

At the time of the 2010 sale, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimated that Uranium One held the rights to about 20 percent of U.S. uranium in the ground. But this figure is misleading.

The Washington Post reports that it is also outdated. It was based on uranium production capacity in 2010, which has since greatly expanded. Uranium One's share of mining rights is now far less than 20 percent of the U.S. total.

What is more, the U.S. is a tiny player in the world uranium market. The U.S. produced 1,126 tons of uranium last year out of global production of more than 62,000 tons, according to the World Nuclear Association. So U.S. production is less than 2 percent of the global total.

Uranium One produces a small and dwindling amount of that U.S. figure. Last year, it mined just 23 tons in the U.S. — about 2 percent of the small U.S. production.

Think of Uranium One's share as 2 percent of 2 percent. Or 0.04 percent of world production.

Some of Uranium One's U.S. uranium has gone to Canada and Europe, according to The Hill newspaper. But there is no evidence that any of it has gone to Russia.

Rosatom's more likely motivation for purchasing Uranium One was to gain access to the company's far larger uranium production in Canada and in Kazakhstan, which borders Russia.

Claim: U.S. national security has been put at risk.

Neither the U.S. nor Russia needs highly enriched uranium for nuclear weapons. The countries have more than 4,000 deployed or stockpiled weapons each, far more than the rest of the world combined. Both still have leftover stockpiles of highly enriched uranium that date to the Cold War.

"Both the United States and Russia, for some time, have had self-imposed moratoria on the production of weapons-grade nuclear material," said Kingston Reif, director of disarmament at the Arms Control Association in Washington, D.C. "Despite this, both the United States and Russia remain awash in highly-enriched uranium."

Under a program known as Megatons to Megawatts, Russia reduced its excess by dismantling nuclear weapons and sending the blended-down uranium to U.S. nuclear power plants.

"About 10 percent of U.S. electricity was coming from dismantled Russian nuclear warheads that used to be pointed at the United States," said Bunn, who worked on this issue at the White House during President Bill Clinton's administration.

That program expired in 2013, though Russia still sells uranium to U.S. nuclear plants.

Claim: The Clinton Foundation received $145 million in pledges and donations in exchange for the State Department's support of the Russian deal.

Author Peter Schweizer, who worked with Steve Bannon at Breitbart News, first made this claim in a 2015 book called Clinton Cash.

The New York Times said it used Schweizer's work to conduct its own investigation.

PolitiFact also looked into the matter and questioned the $145 million figure, noting that most of the donations and pledges came from Canadian businessman Frank Giustra, a friend of Bill Clinton. They were together in Kazakhstan in 2005, on a trip during which Giustra signed a major mining deal with that country, the Times reported.

Two years later, in 2007, Giustra merged his mining company with Uranium One and then sold his shares the same year. This was three years before the Russians bought the company, so it's not clear how Giustra would have benefited from the 2010 deal.

Giustra noted this in a 2015 statement in which he sharply criticized the Times for suggesting that his work with the Clintons was in pursuit of a business favor.

"I am extremely proud of the work that we have done" with the Clintons, he said. "I plan to continue that work long after the harsh glare of this week's media stories has faded."

Aside from Giustra, PolitiFact said its reporting could confirm about $4 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation from Uranium One investors in the years just before and after the 2010 Russian deal.

The Clinton Foundation supports a wide variety of humanitarian projects around the world.

This episode raises the familiar scenario of overlap between the Clinton's private dealings and public actions and the potential for conflicts of interest. Yet a number of Clinton critics and news organizations have looked into the matter and have not presented evidence of wrongdoing.

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2018 14:22:19   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
OUTRAGE! “Rampant fraud” uncovered in 2018 e******n [video]

http://click2.thehornnews.com/t/Ag/iDc/AAEjzA/-e8/AAG8DQ/ABgAsQ/AQ/-Wl9

An army of political lawyers are descending on both Florida and Arizona — and Florida Gov. Rick Scott says there’s evidence of “rampant fraud” that should be concerning to every American.

Scott, whose lead in his senatorial race has shrunk to a razor-thin margin, has asked for investigators to probe why two heavily Democratic counties in Florida have reportedly both “found” tens of thousands of extra v**es… over two days after the 2018 midterm e******n finished.

Geo wrote:
My God, are there still people out there that believe this stuff? How is it possible that the facts evade these people for so long? Is it because their only news source is Fox news?
Truly amazing and scary that someone will construct a lie, and when the target wants to believe it, it becomes the t***h to them for the rest of their life.

AMERICA
The Alternative 'Russia Scandal'
November 6, 201710:44 AM ET
Greg Myre - 2016 - square
GREG MYRE

Facebook
Twitter

President Trump and his supporters claim that in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to the Clinton Foundation, Hillary Clinton supported the 2010 sale of a mining company that gave Russia control of U.S. uranium supplies.
Craig Ruttle/AP
According to President Trump, some Republicans in Congress and conservative media outlets, the Russia scandal is heating up.

No, not that one.

It's an alternative Russia scandal. And the claims go like this:

As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton approved the 2010 sale of a mining company to Russia. This gave the Russians control of 20 percent of U.S. uranium and placed U.S. national security at risk. In return, the Clinton Foundation received $145 million in pledges and donations.

Trump made this allegation during the 2016 campaign and again in an Oct. 19 tweet.


Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
Uranium deal to Russia, with Clinton help and Obama Administration knowledge, is the biggest story that F**e Media doesn't want to follow!

113K
4:17 AM - Oct 19, 2017
Twitter Ads info and privacy
63.8K people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
In the face of repeated fact checks, the president's claims have not withstood scrutiny. The president's critics call them part of an effort to divert attention from Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

But because the story keeps surfacing and key Republicans are calling for hearings, here is a closer look.

Claim: Clinton played a key role in helping Russia gain control of U.S. uranium supplies.

The Russian state nuclear company, Rosatom, bought Canadian mining company Uranium One in 2010. Uranium One had, and still has, uranium mining rights in the United States.

Article continues after this message from our sponsor

For that reason, President Barack Obama's administration had to approve the deal. In a unanimous v**e, nine U.S. government departments and agencies signed off. All are part of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States and included Clinton's State Department.

By all accounts, she was not actively involved. One of her deputies handled the matter, which was not considered controversial because uranium is widely bought and sold around the world for a range of purposes, from nuclear power plant fuel to medical treatments and research.

"It's a commercial market; it's a global market. Companies get bought and sold. Some of the companies that do the buying are controlled by foreign governments," said Matthew Bunn, who heads the Project on Managing the Atom, a nuclear policy research group at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government. "That's the world we live in. It's a totally normal purchase."

Claim: Uranium One controls 20 percent of the U.S. uranium supply.

At the time of the 2010 sale, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimated that Uranium One held the rights to about 20 percent of U.S. uranium in the ground. But this figure is misleading.

The Washington Post reports that it is also outdated. It was based on uranium production capacity in 2010, which has since greatly expanded. Uranium One's share of mining rights is now far less than 20 percent of the U.S. total.

What is more, the U.S. is a tiny player in the world uranium market. The U.S. produced 1,126 tons of uranium last year out of global production of more than 62,000 tons, according to the World Nuclear Association. So U.S. production is less than 2 percent of the global total.

Uranium One produces a small and dwindling amount of that U.S. figure. Last year, it mined just 23 tons in the U.S. — about 2 percent of the small U.S. production.

Think of Uranium One's share as 2 percent of 2 percent. Or 0.04 percent of world production.

Some of Uranium One's U.S. uranium has gone to Canada and Europe, according to The Hill newspaper. But there is no evidence that any of it has gone to Russia.

Rosatom's more likely motivation for purchasing Uranium One was to gain access to the company's far larger uranium production in Canada and in Kazakhstan, which borders Russia.

Claim: U.S. national security has been put at risk.

Neither the U.S. nor Russia needs highly enriched uranium for nuclear weapons. The countries have more than 4,000 deployed or stockpiled weapons each, far more than the rest of the world combined. Both still have leftover stockpiles of highly enriched uranium that date to the Cold War.

"Both the United States and Russia, for some time, have had self-imposed moratoria on the production of weapons-grade nuclear material," said Kingston Reif, director of disarmament at the Arms Control Association in Washington, D.C. "Despite this, both the United States and Russia remain awash in highly-enriched uranium."

Under a program known as Megatons to Megawatts, Russia reduced its excess by dismantling nuclear weapons and sending the blended-down uranium to U.S. nuclear power plants.

"About 10 percent of U.S. electricity was coming from dismantled Russian nuclear warheads that used to be pointed at the United States," said Bunn, who worked on this issue at the White House during President Bill Clinton's administration.

That program expired in 2013, though Russia still sells uranium to U.S. nuclear plants.

Claim: The Clinton Foundation received $145 million in pledges and donations in exchange for the State Department's support of the Russian deal.

Author Peter Schweizer, who worked with Steve Bannon at Breitbart News, first made this claim in a 2015 book called Clinton Cash.

The New York Times said it used Schweizer's work to conduct its own investigation.

PolitiFact also looked into the matter and questioned the $145 million figure, noting that most of the donations and pledges came from Canadian businessman Frank Giustra, a friend of Bill Clinton. They were together in Kazakhstan in 2005, on a trip during which Giustra signed a major mining deal with that country, the Times reported.

Two years later, in 2007, Giustra merged his mining company with Uranium One and then sold his shares the same year. This was three years before the Russians bought the company, so it's not clear how Giustra would have benefited from the 2010 deal.

Giustra noted this in a 2015 statement in which he sharply criticized the Times for suggesting that his work with the Clintons was in pursuit of a business favor.

"I am extremely proud of the work that we have done" with the Clintons, he said. "I plan to continue that work long after the harsh glare of this week's media stories has faded."

Aside from Giustra, PolitiFact said its reporting could confirm about $4 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation from Uranium One investors in the years just before and after the 2010 Russian deal.

The Clinton Foundation supports a wide variety of humanitarian projects around the world.

This episode raises the familiar scenario of overlap between the Clinton's private dealings and public actions and the potential for conflicts of interest. Yet a number of Clinton critics and news organizations have looked into the matter and have not presented evidence of wrongdoing.
My God, are there still people out there that beli... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 9, 2018 16:22:06   #
Seth
 
Robert Harrington wrote:
Ms Guide to you sir.


-- "Sorry, ma'am "

Reply
Nov 9, 2018 16:24:19   #
Seth
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Witless I thought you told me you made a lot of money in the Obama stock market.


The only way to do that would've been with a lot of short positions.

Reply
Nov 9, 2018 16:27:44   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Seth wrote:
The only way to do that would've been with a lot of short positions.


I'm terrified of midgets! Especially in "positions"!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 25 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.