TrueAmerican

Yeah from a l*****t liberal expert who says there's a real good chance she might maybe possible be less than 1% native American more than likely ha ha ha ha ha

TrueAmerican

okie don

It's on FOX news today.
Cherokee Nation here in Oklahoma says DNA test Useless in their opinion.
Cherokee Nation not accepting evidence for tribal affiliation.

mongo Loc: TEXAS

You obviously believe what makes you feel good. Her test results came out to .09 percent, which means...
she has the same results that any european would have. And it seems that you skimmed over the fact that
the test results where compared to Mexican and Colombian D.N.A., not Native American Indian D.N.A..
You sir are pathetic!

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

I think petey made a bigger fool of himself than usual.

Seth

I like the timing here: on the same day the Cherokee nation's leadership denounces Pocahontas Warren's claims, Stormy Daniels' case against Trump is dismissed and she's ordered to pay all President Trump's legal fees.

All in all, not a good day for shysters and frauds.

Add the Kavanaugh confirmation to the mix, not a good MONTH for "liars from the left"®.

CounterRevolutionary

Why the Democrats fear Kavanaugh?

Here is the explanation:


If the new Supreme Court overturns the Chevron Defernece Doctrine we will eliminate 90% of the 600 federal bureaucracies and $2 trillion dollars they annually usurp in the congressional budget. Judge Kavanaugh gives the Supreme court the necessary 5/4 conservative majority to eliminate the Democrat's biggest weapon, the Chevron Deference Doctrine that has stripped Congress of its lawmaking authority:

Chevron deference (doctrine) - B****tpedia
https://b****tpedia.org/Chevron_deference_(doctrine)

"Chevron deference, or Chevron doctrine, is an administrative law principle that compels federal courts to defer to a federal agency's interpretation of an ambiguous or unclear statute that Congress delegated to the agency to administer. The principle derives its name from the 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.[1]

"Though it has been applied inconsistently across cases, justices had been reluctant to formally indicate any desire to formally abandon the doctrine. However, since 2015, “[i]f one counts King v. Burwell, all nine justices have at least once signed an opinion explicitly holding that Chevron should not apply in a situation where the administrative law textbooks would previously have said that it must apply.”

"The Trump administration has been open about its desire to nominate judicial appointees who are, according to a March 2018 New York Times article, "dev**ed to a legal doctrine that challenges the broad power federal agencies have to interpret laws and enforce regulations, often without being subject to judicial oversight." The criteria were first applied when nominating Justice Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court. Gorsuch's rulings have been critical of the Chevron doctrine. His opposition to Chevron has made him the model for Trump administration judicial appointments.[2]

"What is Chevron deference?
Chevron deference is a doctrine of judicial deference that compels federal courts, in reviewing a federal government agency's action, to defer to the agency’s construction of a statute that Congress directed the agency to administer. The original, two-step Chevron process was first outlined in the 1984 U.S. Supreme Court opinion for Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc..."