mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

Looks like I hit a nerve. Usually happens when a LIAR can't refute someone else.

I've never insulted you, I've merely been pointing out your gross ignorance and spiritual blindness.

Maybe I should report you to Admin for hurling expletives and insulting me.

Morgan

Simply amazing, and yet predictable, tell me do you think to call someone a Deluded Moron not to be an insult? You said that to me after accusing me, and I quote "The only way that g****l w*****g alarmists like you Morgan can deal with the opposition is to bully, belittle, marginalize, name-call, etc. There is no discussion or debate. " This from you is what is a lie, YOU are the LIAR!

Not to mention... " You're full of sh*t!"... coming from a person who wants a debate. Honestly... This is what you guys do when you want to win the argument, attack the person. These are opinion pieces, I am not inclined to buy the conspiracies that float around your head, put out by the radical propaganda mechine. Think what you will, I'll not be discussing it with you any further. I can give a rats ass what you choose to think or believe.

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

And THIS was a friendly salutation?

Morgan

Go back and see when I posted that, it was after your deluded moron comment, maybe you can explain to me how people, as yourself, are so unaware of what you say, that you don't even realize when you're insulting?

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

Actually what I said was what a deluded maroon adding that you are very deeply indoctrinated.. Because yours was a deluded maroonic statement making three years sound like a century. And you came unglued saying, and I quote, "...you old buffoon...F~u I'm s**k of your insults, you are such a complete i***t, take a hike ...with your pussy." I added on a subsequent post that I've never insulted you, I've merely been pointing out your gross ignorance and spiritual blindness. Of course you can't refute anything I've posted. All you comment on are my observations and not the facts I've posted or even comments I've made based on your "facts." But of course your opinions are "facts" and my facts are opinions. Like i said...what a maroon. Can't refute anything.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Nice use of the word maroon. It has its own life without such negative connotation. I heard it first being used by Bugs Bunny.

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

That's where I first heard it. The young whippersnappers on here never get the reference.

Morgan

What a complete and utter liar you are, you're under the delusion(like so many liars) that you think you are so schooled fooling people and as always the only one you fool is yourself. Your INSULT, (which to this right sighted Opp found to be fine to do) was taken EXACTLY how it was intended. Trying to wiggle now will only prove you a coward. You want to throw the insult then runaway by pretending you never did it, perfect... what a man.

I can just as easily point out your gross ignorance and unequivocal spiritual blindness but it is all worthless opinion now isn't it.

I refuted everything but typical from the right all you do is close your eyes and ears. You and your party clutch onto your money so afraid to lose a dime never ever thinking of the greater good, it just isn't in your makeup or stature. So you will go on tearing down democracy, the USA and the earth all for YOUR greater good, and that's it in a nutshell.

Before you call someone a moron, you should do some self-reflection because you don't see who you're a s***e to. My endeavor is to keep the earth clean, your is to keep money in your pocket and to the polluters/profiteers, that is not a person of value. But I hope calling someone a maroon because they disagree with you makes your ego feel better. Off you go now.

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

I quoted my EXACT words...cut and paste.

You've really lost it with your anger because you can't refute my observations. Like this one...

Here's MY "study."

[/quote]

Morgan

This is your study, a cut and paste picture with an unproven statement or link? And you call me a maroon, amazing.
Here is a real study:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825214000956
An assessment of the two longest tide-gauges records (Sydney, 1886–2010; Fremantle, 1897–2010) shows that the rate of rise has been non-linear in nature with both records showing large rates of rise around the 1940s, relatively stable RMSLs between 1960 and 1990 and an increased rate of rise from the early 1990s.

Acknowledgements

Altimeter data was provided by NASA, CNES, NOAA and EUMETSAT. The altimeter data used was validated with support by the Australian Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS), established by the Australian Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) and the Super Science Initiative. We would like to thank Simon Williams (National Oceanography Centre Liverpool, UK) for the CATS software. We would also like to thank Professor Ian Gordon and Dr Sue Finch (Statistical Consulting Centre, University of Melbourne), and other reviewers for their review comments and advice. A workshop, hosted to bring together the team to write this paper, was funded by Office of Environment and Heritage, New South Wales.

What Accounts for the Varying Rates of Sea Level Rise in Different Locations?

as for the local variations. It is true that some places—such as the East Coast of the United States and the eastern Gulf Coast off Florida, for instance—are experiencing higher than average rates of sea level rise. Two major factors account for these sea-level hotspots: local topography and changes in ocean currents. Depending on local geological factors, land in some coastal areas is actually slightly sinking, or “subsiding” as scientists describe it. This localized phenomenon can occur for a variety of reasons, but this natural settling of land can increase the rate of sea level rise in certain coastal regions. This is happening, for example in the Gulf region, where subsiding land is allowing the ocean to penetrate further inland.

Equally important is the role of ocean currents. As the oceans warm globally, currents in many places can shift, resulting in changes that either tend to pull water away from the shore or pull it in. Along the East Coast, changes in the path and strength of ocean currents are contributing to faster-than-average sea level rise.

Scientists have been closely studying so-called "king tides"—the highest measured tides over the course of the year in a given local area. As we have already seen from storm surges during Superstorm Sandy, for instance, sea level rise accompanied by storms is already having a destructive and devastating effect on some coastal regions. King tides present communities with challenges but they also help force these communities to prepare because king tides offer a preview of sea level rise to come. Given the current pace of sea level rise, the water level reached now during a king tide will eventually become the water level reached at high tide on an average day.
http://www.ucsusa.org/publications/ask/2013/sea-level-rise.html#.W9i2xjEpDbg

In their Conclusion:

A large part of the inter-annual and decadal variability in sea level around the whole coast of Australia is coherent and highly correlated with the Southern Oscillation Index and can be represented by a single EOF. Removing this coherent variability from both tide-gauge and altimetry records around Australia significantly reduces uncertainties of sea-level trends with more uniformity in regional trends than previously reported. An assessment of the two longest tide-gauges records (Sydney, 1886–2010; Fremantle, 1897–2010) shows that the rate of rise has been non-linear in nature with both records showing large rates of rise around the 1940s, relatively stable RMSLs between 1960 and 1990 and an increased rate of rise from the early 1990s. From 1966 to 2010, when there is good coverage of most of the Australian coastline, the average Australian relative rate of rise is slower than the global mean prior to about 1985, but the mean Australian OVMSL rate from tide gauges is close to the global mean. Since 1993, MSL trends are considerably higher than the global mean around Northern Australian and similar to the global mean around southern Australia. Higher sea-level trends in northern Australia are largely associated with natural climate variability.
Even after attempts to remove the effects of this natural variability, trends around most of Australia, show an increased rate of rise from the early 1990s, consistent with global mean trends.

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

You ARE a maroon. You didn't catch the sarcasm that reveals your bulls**t. First it was we're going to freeze, then it was g****l w*****g, then it was c*****e c****e. What bulls**t "title" are you going to come up with next.

Like I've said, all this is a gigantic scheme at wealth distribution and the destruction of capitalism. THE U.N. ADMITS IT! You do realize that at a news conference in 2015 Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on C*****e C****e admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism. She was quoted as saying, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.”

The earth's average temperature rose by 0.68 °C (1.23 °F) in the LAST CENTURY!. And you’re saying we only have twelve years to prevent ALMOST DOUBLING what’s happened in the last century. What a bunch of bulls**t. That the author of your original report is the UN Intergovernmental Panel on C*****e C****e (IPCC) is the first indicator. I'll repeat for those with eyes to see, this is one cog in The Goal of the New World Order:

One World Government
One World Leader
One World Religion
One World Currency

I’m sorry that you’re too spiritually blind and a maroon to see that Morgan.

Morgan

Let's just face it you don't have the capacity to grasp the differences in c*****e c****e and g****l w*****g, nor the differences between weather and climate, and what are the different variables and why. Since you don't understand you simply deny it and call bulls**t and me names, this coming from the man who said he wanted a debate. Rest assured we all realize a debate is not something you want or can handle. I'm done with you, there isn't one good reason to carry on with you.

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

That's the second time you've said that. Will you mean it, just like all your other BS, this time?

mwdegutis Loc: Illinois

Hey Morgan, is this why we have 12 years to limit c*****e c****e catastrophe warns world’s leading climate scientists?

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/the-united-nations-wants-a-one-world-government-in-less-than-twelve-years?utm_content=buffer3eaf8&utm_medium=WCEA%2BBuffer&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=WCEA

Carol Kelly

Seems to hit the nail on the head. Morgan needs to pay attention. All this demand for a New World Order seems to ring a little bell in the back of my mind. The UN needs to pack up and go away. I think it has something to do with the AntiChrist.