Why do Democrats and Republicans see Kavanaugh in such different ways? (Page 7): Here is a link to day 1..... His wife is setting behind him but his daughters were not there.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

Here is a link to day 1..... His wife is setting behind him but his daughters were not there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GM8oZMC2zo

Day 2; again his wife sits behind him but his daughters were not there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MkyxSyUf9o

Day 3; again his wife sits behind him, but his daughters were not there: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3moNqaj1HI

Day 4; there are no close up videos of Justice Kavanaugh. So, is it possible that you saw his daughters on this day.... perhaps: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhXGQiD5g_M

Day 5; again wife sits behind him, but his daughters were not there:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JfHyfkvmH0

It was not until his was sworn in did his entire family join him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GfOuJyzP6k

Singularity wrote:

I saw the two little daughters there, at the hearings, first day.

I understand the ceremonies at the swearing in. I am and have been asking about the HEARING meetings that went on for days.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Pennylynn wrote:

Here is a link to day 1..... His wife is setting b... (show quote)

It is good that the daughters did not witness all the lying going on with the Democrats.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

I agree. It is bad enough that other kids will have heard about this and taunt them with the nasty things claimed. Imagine if they had sat in on the Ford testimony. In the end, I am happy that the FBI did a thorough investigation (number 7) and he was sworn in.

eagleye13 wrote:

It is good that the daughters did not witness all the lying going on with the Democrats.

Singularity

See how wrong one can be while being certain they are right?

https://www.romper.com/p/does-brett-kavanaugh-have-kids-the-supreme-court-nominees-daughters-were-at-his-confirmation-hearing-11767691

Does Brett Kavanaugh Have Kids?

The Supreme Court Nominee's Daughters Were At His Confirmation Hearing
By Gillian Walters

President Donald Trump's pick to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court, 53-year-old Brett Kavanaugh, is in the midst of his confirmation hearings. The intensive process kicked off on Tuesday, leading to increased public interest in Kavanaugh's professional and personal life. And one of the questions people have concerns whether Brett Kavanaugh has kids. Some might be surprised to learn that the politician brought his two daughters to his first confirmation hearing.

Trump announced Kavanaugh's nomination in July during a press event that the circuit judge to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit attended alongside his wife, Ashley Estes Kavanaugh, and his two daughters, 13-year-old Margaret and 10-year-old Liza, according to ABC News. The girls seemed excited about their dad's professional development in photos from the announcement, a sentiment Kavanaugh confirmed in his opening remarks during day one of his confirmation hearing.

"At the White House on the night of the announcement, the President and Mrs. Trump were very gracious to my daughters, my wife, and my parents. My family will always cherish that night — or as my daughter Liza calls it, her debut on national television," Kavanaugh said to the Senate Judiciary Committee, according to CNN.

Considering the girls enjoyed the White House visit, Kavanaugh probably thought it would be as equally as thrilling for the pair to attend one of his confirmation hearings. If you caught the first hearing on Tuesday, there's a good chance you spotted Liza and Margaret seated behind their dad in the front row of the hearing room.

Although it's understandable that Kavanaugh wanted his daughters to witness this professional milestone, some may wonder if the venue was appropriate given the controversy surrounding his nomination. Many citizens are understandably frustrated with Trump's choice due to Kavanaugh's concerning views regarding a******n rights and gun safety, while others believe the nomination is unjust in light of what happened with President Barack Obama's Supreme Court pick, Judge Merrick Garland.

Given the long list of grievances people have with Kavanaugh, it's not surprising protesters showed up en masse on Tuesday and Wednesday to voice their opinions. And since this discontent has been well-publicized in the months following Kavanaugh's nomination, it's fair to wonder why he decided to bring his children to the hearings. It goes without saying Kavanaugh's kids have nothing to do with his judicial record or personal views, after all.

Liza and Margaret left the first confirmation hearing early and did not attend day two, HuffPost reporter Sara Boboltz shared. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina blasted the scene Liza and Margaret witnessed, lamenting on Tuesday, according to ABC News: "I just wish if we could have a hearing where the nominee's kids could show up. Is that asking too much?"

Graham echoed this sentiment on Wednesday, telling Kavanaugh, according to ABC7NY: "I want your daughters to know that what happened yesterday is unique to the times that we live in."

Of course, some might argue Graham picked an interesting time to bemoan America's fraught political climate given the other pressing examples of this issue, while others would assert his ongoing defense of Trump's words and actions encourages the decisiveness he supposedly loathes.

Although Liza and Margaret's attendance at the hearing was overshadowed by controversy, there was one moment when Kavanaugh got to discuss life with his girls. He said in his opening remarks, according to CNN:

For the past seven years, I have coached my daughters' basketball teams. I love coaching. All the girls I have coached are awesome. And special congratulations to the girls on this year's sixth-grade CYO championship team: Anna, Quinn, Kelsey, Ceane, Chloe, Alex, Ava, Sophia, and Margaret. I love helping the girls grow into confident players. I know that confidence on the basketball court t***slates into confidence in other aspects of life. Title Nine helped make girls' and women's sports equal, and I see that law's legacy every night when I walk into my house as my daughters are getting back from lacrosse, or basketball, or hockey practice ...

My daughters Margaret and Liza will be in and out of this hearing room over the next few days. In the time since you last saw them at the White House, I am pleased to report that Margaret has gotten her braces off and has turned 13. Margaret is the sweetest girl you'll ever know. As for Liza, well, I tell her every night that no one gives a better hug than Liza Kavanaugh.
Although it's interesting to hear these anecdotes about Liza and Margaret, it's probably best Kavanaugh keeps them out of the spotlight for now. These confirmation hearings should be about Kavanaugh's record and competency only, and citizens have the right to express their concern regarding these issues without admonishment from conservative politicians.

End article.

Singularity

Singularity wrote:

See how wrong one can be while being certain they ... (show quote)

I'm certain to just be talking to myself with this point, so I'm just straight up quote replying to myself.

This is why unsupported faith is a BAD way to believe s**t (s**t=P**********lly vetted common usage vocabulary choice.) If you assure yourself your claim is correct without rational evidence, or based on fallacious evidence, then dismiss any claim to the contrary due to that prejudice, why, you could stop being curious and never know you were WRONG.

Singularity

eagleye13 wrote:

It is good that the daughters did not witness all the lying going on with the Democrats.

FOS

=FALSE ONGOING STORY

Singularity

Pennylynn wrote:

I agree. It is bad enough that other kids will have heard about this and taunt them with the nasty things claimed. Imagine if they had sat in on the Ford testimony. In the end, I am happy that the FBI did a thorough investigation (number 7) and he was sworn in.

Your move. Prove Rumitoid wrong and show some character, as I've seen you do any number of times before.

Idaho

Singularity wrote:

See how wrong one can be while being certain they ... (show quote)

Good grief - did you even read what you quoted - since you answer your own question there.

K brought his whole family on the first day. I’m sure he had no idea the unpleasant surprise the protesters had lined up for him that first day - INSIDE the senate chambers.

K was not controversial - it wouldn’t have mattered which candidate from the short list would have gone forward - the Dem’s playbook would have had a special nasty surprise lined up for each of them.

Nasty, Nasty Dems - I hope a conservative Government can root them out of the agencies and out of the Departments and the bureauracracy and make it so no socialists/c*******ts can ever infest this country again.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Singularity wrote:

Your move. Prove Rumitoid wrong and show some character, as I've seen you do any number of times before.

If the Kavanaugh children were there during the lying, they will forever know how the Democrats can't be trusted to tell the t***h, and how corrupt the party is.

Singularity

Idaho wrote:

Good grief - did you even read what you quoted - s... (show quote)

duh.

My questions were centered around the children, and whether my recollection of HAVING SEEN THEM THERE VIA NEWS REPORT was correct or mistaken, and a concern about the effect on them.

And whether it is commonly expected or unique that one would bring one's young children to that part of the proceedings.

Would the out of order protesters be expected to have known the children could be present?

Would Kavenaugh have expected that type atmosphere and have been able to decide ahead of time to appropriately protect them?

I'm googling and reading more. Because I don't all the know the answers and I'm curious.

It seems less constructive to b***h ("I moved on her like a B***h. She was married!" = p**********l seal of approval vocab) about bygones without a clear standard and plan for the future, than to thoughtfully evaluate a situation and flow constructively with solutions.

Singularity

eagleye13 wrote:

If the Kavanaugh children were there during the lying, they will forever know how the Democrats can't be trusted to tell the t***h, and how corrupt the party is.

They would have a lot to process on both sides of the gap.

Their father's alleged numerous perjured statements. His paranoid right wing conspiracy garble, crying about calendars, pitiful knowledge of common slang and injudicious temperament? (It was a prepared speech.)

Or the Professor whose entire testimony was portrayed as a mistaken impression of a drunk 15 year old s**t too stupid to remember her way home?

I've heard him referred to as "Just Ass Kavenaugh." Not something a daughter should have to decode about her Daddy.

But he says his daughter Liza prays for "the Lady." Could we all step back from our agendas and appreciate the wisdom from the mouth of a babe?

Howsoever we treat the least of those fellow humans we encounter on our way, by that we should be rightly judged.

I support Justice Liza Kavenaugh for her temperament and wisdom.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

I stand corrected. I watched the video, but did not see them ergo I thought they did not attend.
They did attend for 1 hour of the first day and was escorted out after hecklers began their show.

Singularity wrote:

Your move. Prove Rumitoid wrong and show some character, as I've seen you do any number of times before.

Singularity

Pennylynn wrote:

I stand corrected. I watched the video, but did not see them ergo I thought they did not attend.
They did attend for 1 hour of the first day and was escorted out after hecklers began their show.

I watched the beginning of your link for the first day and note it started abruptly in mid sentence.

Thank you for your patience, I remember being touched by his description of Liza as capable of giving the world's best hugs in one of his statements and flashed on a memory of her smiling face in the Senate Hearings Chamber.

I did not have clear recall of how she had got there, when she left or whether she ever returned. And I only had zero beers, lol!

Understandable you wouldn't believe me.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

I tend to watch the video and failed to read what the media has written. My apologies again. Under ordinary circumstances, I would encourage youngsters to attend government hearings to allow them a better understanding of how the government functions. But, in light of how vile protesters have become, I am beginning to reconsider my opinion.

Singularity wrote:

I watched the beginning of your link for the first... (show quote)

Singularity

Idaho wrote:

The children were not there for the senate hearings, the wife was. If my man were essentially 'on trial' for a crime he did not commit, as part of a partisan smear campaign, wild horses would not have kept me from being anywhere but at his side.

Yeah, good luck keeping a saddle on that stallion of yours.

But, since you really weren't shy about your error, don't you think your correction should be as forthright and open?