Why would Trump believe the “f**e news” “failing” NYT about Rosenstein? The answer is simple! (Page 2): You are experiencing TDS, nothing rational will compute in your limited analysis...

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

rumitoid wrote:

Do you read? Sorry, ignoring that "giving up requested documents he's sitting on" will jeopardize operatives in the field as well as those sources that depend upon anonymity, the most prominent sources for all investigations. Justice or the FBI do not take these voices as proof but uses these sources to find solid evidence.

You are experiencing TDS, nothing rational will compute in your limited analysis of the President.
You, like many other politically bewildered souls have lost the capacity to behold t***h.
Myself being opposite of your kind who lack greatly in dicernment are not led by the nose. Rottenstein is DIRTY. When Hillary was secretary of state, the murderess caused 18 - 20 spies to be k**led, by using a unsecured server.
The material that Rottenstein is withholding doesn't carry that risk..even the intelligence agencies say that the real problem with releasing the documents, is it will put a negative perception on the Mueller probe. What that means, is they have t***h to hide.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO

rumitoid wrote:

Will Trump suddenly find the "failing" "f**e news" NYT somehow accurate?

I'm not sure this is the right question to ask 'toid'. My question would be;

Has the NYT finally returned to sanity and honest, t***hful objective reporting?

Considering the number of inaccurate (lies) the NYT has had to retract during the previous 22 months;

NY Times issues 6 retractions on Melania Trump feature story. http://video.foxnews.com/v/4533203604001/?#sp=show-clips,
https://dailycaller.com/2017/08/29/new-york-times-corrects-five-trump-charlottesville-reports/,
https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/new-york-times-forced-to-retract-longstanding-lie-about-russian-hacking-aa3fedb191ac,
https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/03/07/new-york-times-humiliating-correction-hit-piece-trump-tax-cuts/,
https://consortiumnews.com/2017/06/29/nyt-finally-retracts-russia-gate-canard/

These are just a smattering of retractions the NYT has had to issue regarding the Trump Administration, his family and policies. T***h be told, I could fill 6 pages on OPP of her retractions.

Could it be 'The Grey Lady' has finally come to her senses and has decided to live up to her motto; "All the News That's Fit to Print", and abandoned her f**e news lying hyperbole that has cost her readership, subscriptions, and stature in the journalistic community with their liberal tainted reporting about Trump? Time will tell.

rumitoid

byronglimish wrote:

You are experiencing TDS, nothing rational will co... (show quote)

Please! Show any reliable source that supports Hillary got 18-20 spies k**led "by using a unsecured server." And if you are so discerning, learn how to spell discernment (not "dicernment"). If you cannot even discern your own mistakes, best not to look for those in others.

rumitoid

Jakebrake wrote:

I'm not sure this is the right question to ask 'to... (show quote)

That was the question I asked with this thread.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

rumitoid wrote:

Please! Show any reliable source that supports Hillary got 18-20 spies k**led "by using a unsecured server." And if you are so discerning, learn how to spell discernment (not "dicernment"). If you cannot even discern your own mistakes, best not to look for those in others.

Your spelling might be better than mine, but your situational awareness is zilch.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

rumitoid wrote:

Is this a "deep state" Republican c**p to end the Mueller investigation? If Trump has repeatedly made the NYT to be "f**e news," why trust it now? Why not accept Rosenstein's denials? Trump has time and time again rejected all that the NYT has reported, disputing every adverse comment about him as lies. It would seem very, very odd for the president to take that's paper word.

I don't care what you call it. I'm just saying what is going to happen.

How do you know Trump isn't lying about taking the NYT word for it?

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

byronglimish wrote:

Your spelling might be better than mine, but your situational awareness is zilch.

That's not fair! If he knows who he is, where he is and what day it is he should get a 3, at least.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

BigMike wrote:

That's not fair! If he knows who he is, where he is and what day it is he should get a 3, at least.

I'm even willing to go along with that, at two out of three.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

rumitoid wrote:

Wow, fascinating the mind of political conspiracies. A Rosenstein-t***her?

Not a conspiracy, screwtape, a documented fact. The NYT is the clearing house for leaks designed to o*******w a duly elected president and destroy our justice system and our American way of life. The paper trail on this clandestine treasonous subterfuge is emerging from the liberal progressive cess pool.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Blade_Runner wrote:

Not a conspiracy, screwtape, a documented fact. The NYT is the clearing house for leaks designed to o*******w a duly elected president and destroy our justice system and our American way of life. The paper trail on this clandestine treasonous subterfuge is emerging from the liberal progressive cess pool.

Screwtape!

"My dear Wormwood..."

BigMike Loc: yerington nv