Why would Trump believe the “f**e news” “failing” NYT about Rosenstein? The answer is simple!
He wants to fire Rosenstein to protect himself and end the Mueller Probe. All of a sudden he is a believer in anonymous sources and a media outlet he says, "This is why the F**e News Media has become the Enemy of the People. So bad for America!"
He continued: "Some members of the media are very Angry at the F**e Story in the New York Times. They actually called to complain and apologize - a big step forward. From the day I announced, the Times has been F**e News, and with their d********g new Board Member, it will only get worse!"
Does he sound confident in what they report? No. If he uses this expose by the NYT to fire Rosenstein, what is he saying? NYT is not f**e news? He has an excuse to do what he has wanted to do for a while? Rosenstein gone could end the "witch hunt" he h**es.
Rosenstein said the story is inaccurate. Will Trump suddenly find the "failing" "f**e news" NYT somehow accurate?
rumitoid wrote:
He wants to fire Rosenstein to protect himself and end the Mueller Probe. All of a sudden he is a believer in anonymous sources and a media outlet he says, "This is why the F**e News Media has become the Enemy of the People. So bad for America!"
He continued: "Some members of the media are very Angry at the F**e Story in the New York Times. They actually called to complain and apologize - a big step forward. From the day I announced, the Times has been F**e News, and with their d********g new Board Member, it will only get worse!"
Does he sound confident in what they report? No. If he uses this expose by the NYT to fire Rosenstein, what is he saying? NYT is not f**e news? He has an excuse to do what he has wanted to do for a while? Rosenstein gone could end the "witch hunt" he h**es.
Rosenstein said the story is inaccurate. Will Trump suddenly find the "failing" "f**e news" NYT somehow accurate?
He wants to fire Rosenstein to protect himself and... (
show quote)
He is NOT gonna fire Rosenstein...He knows its a trap!!!.....
proud republican wrote:
He is NOT gonna fire Rosenstein...He knows its a trap!!!.....
Okay, we will see. I have to ask, if he does, what then?
rumitoid wrote:
He wants to fire Rosenstein to protect himself and end the Mueller Probe. All of a sudden he is a believer in anonymous sources and a media outlet he says, "This is why the F**e News Media has become the Enemy of the People. So bad for America!"
He continued: "Some members of the media are very Angry at the F**e Story in the New York Times. They actually called to complain and apologize - a big step forward. From the day I announced, the Times has been F**e News, and with their d********g new Board Member, it will only get worse!"
Does he sound confident in what they report? No. If he uses this expose by the NYT to fire Rosenstein, what is he saying? NYT is not f**e news? He has an excuse to do what he has wanted to do for a while? Rosenstein gone could end the "witch hunt" he h**es.
Rosenstein said the story is inaccurate. Will Trump suddenly find the "failing" "f**e news" NYT somehow accurate?
He wants to fire Rosenstein to protect himself and... (
show quote)
Rosenstein will be forced to resign by the stuff that has been and will be declassified. Watch.
proud republican wrote:
He is NOT gonna fire Rosenstein...He knows its a trap!!!.....
He won't have to. And did you know the number three (close) position in the FBI will be open? The person occupying it now was a temp whose time expired 2 days ago. Obama holdout. Betcha Trump knows it too.
BigMike wrote:
Rosenstein will be forced to resign by the stuff that has been and will be declassified. Watch.
Is this a "deep state" Republican c**p to end the Mueller investigation? If Trump has repeatedly made the NYT to be "f**e news," why trust it now? Why not accept Rosenstein's denials? Trump has time and time again rejected all that the NYT has reported, disputing every adverse comment about him as lies. It would seem very, very odd for the president to take that's paper word.
rumitoid wrote:
Is this a "deep state" Republican c**p to end the Mueller investigation? If Trump has repeatedly made the NYT to be "f**e news," why trust it now? Why not accept Rosenstein's denials? Trump has time and time again rejected all that the NYT has reported, disputing every adverse comment about him as lies. It would seem very, very odd for the president to take that's paper word.
Are you saying the Times is reporting f**e news about rottenstein?
byronglimish wrote:
Are you saying the Times is reporting f**e news about rottenstein?
Maybe, but more importantly if Trump does not trust the NYT, why should he fire Rosenstein?
rumitoid wrote:
Maybe, but more importantly if Trump does not trust the NYT, why should he fire Rosenstein?
Rottenstein has been and still is obstructing justice.
There is "nothing" that would jeopardize national security by giving up requested documents he's sitting on... I do believe his best move is to resign. You people kept pushing the false narrative about the President firing Lurch Meuller too. Mueller should have been indicted years back for framing one mafia family to cover a murder by a different one.
Trump rails about f**e news then has no problem with the source when he likes the message...
something wrong with that right there
byronglimish wrote:
Rottenstein has been and still is obstructing justice.
There is "nothing" that would jeopardize national security by giving up requested documents he's sitting on... I do believe his best move is to resign. You people kept pushing the false narrative about the President firing Lurch Meuller too. Mueller should have been indicted years back for framing one mafia family to cover a murder by a different one.
Do you read? Sorry, ignoring that "giving up requested documents he's sitting on" will jeopardize operatives in the field as well as those sources that depend upon anonymity, the most prominent sources for all investigations. Justice or the FBI do not take these voices as proof but uses these sources to find solid evidence.
woodguru wrote:
Trump rails about f**e news then has no problem with the source when he likes the message...
something wrong with that right there
Not really. The NYT has published something Trump has been saying for months. Why would he disagree now?
The NYT is starting to agree with Trump and so will a lot of other news media very soon.
rumitoid wrote:
Maybe, but more importantly if Trump does not trust the NYT, why should he fire Rosenstein?
No one with a brain in their head trusts the NYT. If you had done your homework instead of letting the leftstream media lead you around by your dik, you would know that someone in the DOJ leaked that story to the NYT in one more effort to entrap president Trump. It was a set-up to goad Trump into firing Rosenstein before the mid-term e******n which would be a monumental mistake. I have no doubt that president Trump is well aware of the lib prog trickery, he's had to deal with it since day one. The kicker is the contemporaneous (leaked) memo on the conversation in which Rosenstein made the comment about wearing a wire came from none other than Deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe.
Another layer of the onion has been peeled off. Oh, you should hear the real story.
Mark Levin served as the Chief of Staff for AG Ed Meese--8 years in the WH. Mark has excellent contacts in the top levels of government and he is long time friends with a senior journalist at NYT. On his radio show today, Mark peeled off that layer of the rotten onion and it was stunning. In a word, Deputy FBI director McCabe was so pissed off at Trump for firing his bosom buddy Comey that he badgered the living crap out of Rosenstein, actually coerced him into appointing another of Comey's buds as special counsel--Robert "Gestapo" Mueller. How about that incestuous bulls**t?
And Sunday night on Life, Liberty and Levin, Fox 10pm eastern, 7pm Pacific, Mark is going to present a documented and verified history of how the lib progs in congress thoroughly corrupted the judicial confirmation process.
Blade_Runner wrote:
No one with a brain in their head trusts the NYT. If you had done your homework instead of letting the leftstream media lead you around by your dik, you would know that someone in the DOJ leaked that story to the NYT in one more effort to entrap president Trump. It was a set-up to goad Trump into firing Rosenstein before the mid-term e******n which would be a monumental mistake. I have no doubt that president Trump is well aware of the lib prog trickery, he's had to deal with it since day one. The kicker is the contemporaneous (leaked) memo on the conversation in which Rosenstein made the comment about wearing a wire came from none other than Deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe.
Another layer of the onion has been peeled off. Oh, you should hear the real story.
Mark Levin served as the Chief of Staff for AG Ed Meese--8 years in the WH. Mark has excellent contacts in the top levels of government and he is long time friends with a senior journalist at NYT. On his radio show today, Mark peeled off that layer of the rotten onion and it was stunning. In a word, Deputy FBI director McCabe was so pissed off at Trump for firing his bosom buddy Comey that he badgered the living crap out of Rosenstein, actually coerced him into appointing another of Comey's buds as special counsel--Robert "Gestapo" Mueller. How about that incestuous bulls**t?
And Sunday night on Life, Liberty and Levin, Fox 10pm eastern, 7pm Pacific, Mark is going to present a documented and verified history of how the lib progs in congress thoroughly corrupted the judicial confirmation process.
No one with a brain in their head trusts the NYT. ... (
show quote)
Wow, fascinating the mind of political conspiracies. A Rosenstein-t***her?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.