https://www.yahoo.com/news/republicans-wanted-t***h-kavanaugh-subpoena-163321342.html

There’s one person Christine Blasey Ford says was in the room when she was allegedly sexually assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh while they were in high school ― and he appears to publicly back Kavanaugh’s denial that any sexual assault took place.
Yet Republicans are adamant about not calling conservative writer Mark Judge to testify at a hearing set for Monday, resisting Democrats’ demands for additional witnesses, beyond Blasey and Kavanaugh ― even though Judge has backed the Supreme Court nominee’s claim that the accusation is false.
Wait, what!?
It’s the kind of testimony you’d think the White House and Senate Republicans would be eager to have. More than that, why wouldn’t Judge, a classmate and friend of Kavanaugh’s during his years at Georgetown Prep in Maryland, himself want to help clear his old high school buddy’s name?
Judge responded after being contacted by reporters by telling The New Yorker on Friday that he had “no recollection” of any such assault. Later that day, he told The Weekly Standard the accusation is “absolutely nuts,” and claimed, “I never saw Brett act that way.”Still, Judge wrote a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday in which he stated he had no intention of cooperating with the committee in any way, while reiterating he had “no memory” of the incident Blasey described.
Here’s Judge’s chance to come to the aid of Kavananah, whom he proudly referred to in a Facebook update shortly after his school chum was nominated to the Supreme Court in July (quipping that Kavanaugh has “the same hair as the night I met him” in 1981). But he’s completely backing away. Why?
That the question has to be asked at all is the reason why Judge, as well as others who were present at the party Blasey described, must be subpoenaed by the Judiciary Committee to testify.
Judge may repeat under oath that he has “no memory” of any sexual assault by Kavanaugh. But he can also be asked questions about Kavanaugh’s behavior in high school, including his drinking habits and partying (Blasey said both Kavanaugh and Judge were drunk during the alleged assault) and whether he and Kavanaugh drank so much in those days that they might not remember a sexual assault-----MORE------

This isn't a civil case, and Kavanaugh basically has to be able to prove convincingly that he didn't do this, not leave it with a bunch of his witnesses that say they can't remember.

Kavanaugh is under a much more serious cloud of proof that he has perjured himself in past confirmation hearings as well, and would likely be facing impeachment from his current bench for that.

If he is confirmed it will be in a "soon to be impeached" capacity, especially if he is a dissenting voice against laws.

Well Bob, it looks to me like you are in full support of this "accusation" against Kavinaugh, which is so obviously bogus, and gamesmanship by the democrat party, and you seem to give it your full support.

This, to me, anyway is an attempt to completely destroy him, no matter how lame it may be.
Why? Because he was nominated by Trump?
Does he deserve to have his career, life, and family destroyed for accepting that nomination, which is the honor of a lifetime for a man of his caliber?
Do his children deserve that just because he sired them, and Trump nominated him?

Could this all be a tactic by the democrats to scare away anyone Trump might nominate because they don't want to put their family through this kind of shenanigans?

What the democrats are doing to this man, and his family for political reasons is wrong on too many levels to list, and you appear to support it.

What other conclusion can I draw?