One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Kavanugh done. New info.
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Sep 23, 2018 23:30:17   #
truthiness
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
We, the American people, convicted hilliar of treasons and murder. We know what she did and how she rode the biggest protection s**m in the history of justice.
We v**ed her out. Yuge sentence for hilliar. It's for life.

....
Very strange view of justice and sentence for a "conviction" of 'hilliar' for 'treasons and murder.' Strange that the legitimate courts were never asked to rule on the serious crimes that you accuse her of and that Dropout Gowdy and his committee after spending millions of tax-payer funds found nothing to accuse her of much less convict.
You did not v**e her out; your minority of the American people just never v**ed her in. She is not a felon today, but your friends Lynch, Manafort, Gates, Papadopoulus, Pinedo, Van der Zwaan, and Cohen are convicted felons today and will be serving real "yuge" sentences (some 'yuger' than others) as determined by the legitimate court systems that you are trying to pack.

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 00:11:48   #
Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Your talking to the party of roy Moore of course they would sacrifice their daughters and sons . After All kavanugh is trumps get out of jail free card!


That's how I look at it!

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 09:46:04   #
Mikeyavelli
 
t***hiness wrote:
....
Very strange view of justice and sentence for a "conviction" of 'hilliar' for 'treasons and murder.' Strange that the legitimate courts were never asked to rule on the serious crimes that you accuse her of and that Dropout Gowdy and his committee after spending millions of tax-payer funds found nothing to accuse her of much less convict.
You did not v**e her out; your minority of the American people just never v**ed her in. She is not a felon today, but your friends Lynch, Manafort, Gates, Papadopoulus, Pinedo, Van der Zwaan, and Cohen are convicted felons today and will be serving real "yuge" sentences (some 'yuger' than others) as determined by the legitimate court systems that you are trying to pack.
.... br Very strange view of justice and sentence ... (show quote)


The fix was in when obama realized that he had a another term or two if he cut a deal with hilliar. Obama would make it look legit, hilliar would be exonerated, washed of her treasons, made electable again, and certainly win the e******n. But she was no longer her own candidate. She was obama's third term, why, the Great Obama would even help her by moving in close to her so that she would dance to his every whistle. Better than jail for hilliar, and she took the offer and changed her whole campaign platform. The justice bureaus worked it all out, and the fixes were in.
Hilliar never has been tried by an honest judge or jury. Hilliar is guilty of every crime too numerous to list, but you know all of them too.
It's a double crime, hilliar's and the judicial system that will not prosecute her, or any clinton cabal member.
Now we have a good chance to do it. New judge, new jury, same crimes.

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 09:50:27   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
t***hiness wrote:
....
Very strange view of justice and sentence for a "conviction" of 'hilliar' for 'treasons and murder.' Strange that the legitimate courts were never asked to rule on the serious crimes that you accuse her of and that Dropout Gowdy and his committee after spending millions of tax-payer funds found nothing to accuse her of much less convict.
You did not v**e her out; your minority of the American people just never v**ed her in. She is not a felon today, but your friends Lynch, Manafort, Gates, Papadopoulus, Pinedo, Van der Zwaan, and Cohen are convicted felons today and will be serving real "yuge" sentences (some 'yuger' than others) as determined by the legitimate court systems that you are trying to pack.
.... br Very strange view of justice and sentence ... (show quote)


Potential Criminals (Obama Swamp/Justice department) did not indict the Clintons.
That may change, as the swamp gets drained.

Hillary the Scandals
http://youtu.be/BYKAzJcU-DA

http://republicbroadcasting.org/shoutcast/shoutcast.html
Republic Broadcasting Network: http://republicbroadcasting.org/
For those that can handle the t***h; RBN Live ONLINE!

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 14:25:38   #
truthiness
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
The fix was in when obama realized that he had a another term or two if he cut a deal with hilliar. Obama would make it look legit, hilliar would be exonerated, washed of her treasons, made electable again, and certainly win the e******n. But she was no longer her own candidate. She was obama's third term, why, the Great Obama would even help her by moving in close to her so that she would dance to his every whistle. Better than jail for hilliar, and she took the offer and changed her whole campaign platform. The justice bureaus worked it all out, and the fixes were in.
Hilliar never has been tried by an honest judge or jury. Hilliar is guilty of every crime too numerous to list, but you know all of them too.
It's a double crime, hilliar's and the judicial system that will not prosecute her, or any clinton cabal member.
Now we have a good chance to do it. New judge, new jury, same crimes.
The fix was in when obama realized that he had a a... (show quote)

...
Your position, if I understand it, is 'innocent until proven guilty.' No court has found Hillary guilty. So by your standard, that you apply to Kavanaugh, is that Hillary is not guilty. All we ask, Mikey, is that you apply the same criteria to everyone--by your standard of equal protection UNDER THE LAW it is the American thing to do.

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 14:29:52   #
truthiness
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Potential Criminals (Obama Swamp/Justice department) did not indict the Clintons.
That may change, as the swamp gets drained.

Hillary the Scandals
http://youtu.be/BYKAzJcU-DA

http://republicbroadcasting.org/shoutcast/shoutcast.html
Republic Broadcasting Network: http://republicbroadcasting.org/
For those that can handle the t***h; RBN Live ONLINE!

....
Your position, if I understand it, is 'innocent until proven guilty.' No court has found Hillary guilty. So by your standard, that you apply to Kavanaugh, is that Hillary is not guilty. All we ask, Eye13, is that you apply the same criteria to everyone--by your standard of equal protection UNDER THE LAW it is the American thing to do.

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 14:34:49   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
t***hiness wrote:
...
Your position, if I understand it, is 'innocent until proven guilty.' No court has found Hillary guilty. So by your standard, that you apply to Kavanaugh, is that Hillary is not guilty. All we ask, Mikey, is that you apply the same criteria to everyone--by your standard of equal protection UNDER THE LAW it is the American thing to do.


OK. Fair enough. Are you going to complain about Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court when he hasn't been charged, indicted, or convicted of anything?

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 14:35:34   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
t***hiness wrote:
....
Your position, if I understand it, is 'innocent until proven guilty.' No court has found Hillary guilty. So by your standard, that you apply to Kavanaugh, is that Hillary is not guilty. All we ask, Eye13, is that you apply the same criteria to everyone--by your standard of equal protection UNDER THE LAW it is the American thing to do.


There is sooo much info out on the Clintons. Crooks to not indict crooks.
The swampy Obama justice department needs to be drained in order for a cleaning/indictments to take place.

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 16:44:17   #
Mikeyavelli
 
t***hiness wrote:
...
Your position, if I understand it, is 'innocent until proven guilty.' No court has found Hillary guilty. So by your standard, that you apply to Kavanaugh, is that Hillary is not guilty. All we ask, Mikey, is that you apply the same criteria to everyone--by your standard of equal protection UNDER THE LAW it is the American thing to do.


Hilliar's guilty, Kavanaugh isn't. Simple as that. Hilliar had a fixed investigation, Kavanaugh has a well funded smear campaign against him.

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 18:09:12   #
debeda
 
archie bunker wrote:
OK. Fair enough. Are you going to complain about Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court when he hasn't been charged, indicted, or convicted of anything?


Good comeback, Archie. Probably too logical tho.

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 18:09:42   #
debeda
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Hilliar's guilty, Kavanaugh isn't. Simple as that. Hilliar had a fixed investigation, Kavanaugh has a well funded smear campaign against him.



Reply
Sep 25, 2018 01:47:10   #
truthiness
 
archie bunker wrote:
OK. Fair enough. Are you going to complain about Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court when he hasn't been charged, indicted, or convicted of anything?

...
Kavanaugh deserves a fair, complete hearing just like anyone else. I am not complaining about Hillary's treatment; I am not a Clinton fan at all--did not v**e for her (or Trump). I am just pointing out the discrepancy in Mikey's position that rings to me of hypocrisy, which I really don't like.

Reply
Sep 25, 2018 01:56:40   #
truthiness
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Hilliar's guilty, Kavanaugh isn't. Simple as that. Hilliar had a fixed investigation, Kavanaugh has a well funded smear campaign against him.

...
How could it have been a 'fixed' investigation when it was done by Dropout Gowdy and a republican majority committee?
"Hillair's guilty, Kavanaugh isn't." As usual no facts and a Gowdy committee that could no indict. Where/who are the "swamp" republicans that allowed this to happen?

Reply
Sep 25, 2018 02:06:48   #
truthiness
 
eagleye13 wrote:
There is sooo much info out on the Clintons. Crooks to not indict crooks.
The swampy Obama justice department needs to be drained in order for a cleaning/indictments to take place.

....
It was the republican Gowdy committee that could not indict Clinton after several tries. How about listing some of the "sooo much info" that has been proved in court instead of the usual conspiratorial generalities that have no legal proof. We expect better from you, eagleye13 than these well-worn accusations that have no proof.

Reply
Sep 25, 2018 08:53:18   #
Mikeyavelli
 
t***hiness wrote:
....
It was the republican Gowdy committee that could not indict Clinton after several tries. How about listing some of the "sooo much info" that has been proved in court instead of the usual conspiratorial generalities that have no legal proof. We expect better from you, eagleye13 than these well-worn accusations that have no proof.

If hilliar were tried today, she'd be guilty of treasons and profiting from foreign governments through her clinton foundation. The crimes were there, the courage to prosecute wasn't. And yes, I am disappointed in Trey Gowdy. He quit under pressure, unlike Jim Jordan or Donald Trump.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.