oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Which of your far left sites did you take this one from. Once again I have to tell you to tell us where you got your story from since you obviously didn't write most of it.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Did you get this pile of Pelosi from Newsbout or from Stormy Daniels' new attempt to expose Trump?

I would like to know since I had never heard off Newsbout before.

Have you ever seen the cartoons that talk about the woman who accused Clinton of raping her by saying she was a whore attended by a picture holding up Stormy Daniels as something other than the whore she is?

moldyoldy

Here are lots of choices for you to pick from.

https://www.bing.com/search?q=stormy+danielle+book&form=EDNTHT&mkt=en-us&httpsmsn=1&refig=51f891ab179b497cbfad010e2a7403a2&sp=-1&pq=stormy+&sc=8-7&qs=n&sk=&cvid=51f891ab179b497cbfad010e2a7403a2

bdamage Loc: My Bunker

It's gonna get real on Thursday for sure.

bdamage Loc: My Bunker

Yeah....the Stormy scumbag lawyer is now jumping on the bandwagon.

It's officially a circus.

Avenatti says he represents woman with ‘credible information’ about Kavanaugh
By Chris Perez
September 23, 2018
https://nypost.com/2018/09/23/avenatti-says-he-represents-woman-with-credible-information-about-kavanaugh/?utm_source=facebook_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons

What a friggin' joke!

moldyoldy

Maybe the judge belongs in the same boat as Clinton and Trump.

bdamage Loc: My Bunker

Maybe you need to change up those meds....they seem to no longer be working for you to keep somewhat sane.

moldyoldy

You are the one who claims brain damage as your name.

bdamage Loc: My Bunker

Oh really?

This is more reason for your med change....your hallucinations.

So you see the word "rain" after the "b"?

How quaint.

moldyoldy

It is obvious from your posts.

bdamage Loc: My Bunker

Only obvious to the brain-dead proggies who all seem to be on the same hypnotizing control drug.

Hope that works out fer ya moldy.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

Game-Changer: Journalist Uncovers Devastating Contradiction to WaPo’s Ford Story
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/author/benjamin-dekraker/?ff_source=push&ff_medium=conservativetribune&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2018-09-24
The controversy surrounding Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is exploding … but at the same time, details from his accuser are imploding.
At the center of the firestorm is a claim by University of Palo Alto Professor Christine Blasey Ford that the widely respected federal judge groped her at a drunken party nearly 40 years ago. Her memory of the alleged incident is hazy at best, and it looks increasingly unlikely that the incident happened as she said.
Still, The Washington Post knows a scoop when it sees one. Eager to jump on the story, the newspaper published an article on Sept. 16 that seemed to side with Ford, or at least treat her scandalous claim as credible.
On Saturday, however, well-known journalist Kimberley Strassel of The Wall Street Journal tore into The Post’s story. In a series of thought-provoking tweets on her Twitter account, Strassel pointed out a big problem with the anti-Kavanaugh story … and at the very least, it leaves serious questions for the newspaper to answer.
Strassel explained that The Washington Post story that torpedoed Kavanaugh’s confirmation has a major inaccuracy at its core, and that the newspaper’s explanation for this error makes no sense.
In notes from the family therapist to whom Ford described the alleged assault in 2012, there are four boys mentioned as being involved in the incident, which, if true, happened when the Supreme Court nominee was just 17.
However, Ford claimed that those notes were actually wrong — which is exactly what The Post told its readers:
“The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room,” The Post reported.
However, Strassel reported that she’d obtained an email written by Emma Brown, the reporter who wrote the story, to alleged witness Mark Judge. The email was written the day The Post story appeared.
The email describes a different makeup of the party — it was not four boys, as The Post reported. It was three boys and two girls.


2) The email wants a comment from him. The subsequent story would reveal Christine Ford's name, and give details of the supposed "assault."

3) One part of the email to Judge reads: "In addition to Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge, whom she called acquaintances she knew from past socializing, she recalls that her friend Leland (last name then was Ingham, now Keyser) was at the house and a friend of the boys named PJ."


So, according to Strassel, what Brown wrote in an email to Judge was different from the account presented in The Post’s story. The Post reporter was writing one thing in an email, and something different in the newspaper for the public.
“Wait, say what?” declared Strassel on Twitter. “WaPo reports publicly that Ford says it was ‘four boys,’ even after WaPo reporter tells Judge that Ford had told her it was three boys and a girl.”


Replying to @KimStrassel
5) "The notes say four boys were involved, a discrepancy Ford says was an error on the therapist’s part. Ford said there were four boys at the party but only two in the room.”

6) Wait, say what? WaPo reports publicly that Ford says it was "four boys,"even after WaPo reporter tells Judge that Ford had told her it was three boys and a girl.
11:47 PM - Sep 22, 2018

And that, Strassel wrote on Twitter, is a “huge problem” for Ford’s credbility, as well as the credibility of The Washington Post.
“This was just a week ago, and we have Ford giving two different accounts of who was present,” Strassel continued. “Four boys. No, three boys, one girl. Either way, therapist notes from 2012 definitively say four boys, which Ford didn’t dispute. But now… a girl!”
l
6) Wait, say what? WaPo reports publicly that Ford says it was "four boys,"even after WaPo reporter tells Judge that Ford had told her it was three boys and a girl.

7) So first, huge problem: This was just a week ago, and we have Ford giving two different accounts of who was present. Four boys. No, three boys, one girl. Either way, therapist notes from 2012 definitively say four boys, which Ford didn't dispute. But now... a girl!....
(Go to link)
https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/author/benjamin-dekraker/?ff_source=push&ff_medium=conservativetribune&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2018-09-24

“She has lived in the DC area a long time. The paper had no trouble tracking down the other two men (btw, who also denied such party). And why not publish Keyser’s name? It published the other men’s names,” Strassel pointed out.
Strassel quoted the update from The Post that contained another damning fact: “Before her name became public, Ford told The Post she did not think Keyser would remember the party because nothing remarkable had happened there, as far as Keyser was aware.”
9) What, you can't find Keyser? She has lived in the DC area a long time. The paper had no trouble tracking down the other two men (btw, who also denied such party). And why not publish Keyser's name? It published the other men's names.
And that is huge.
“That is WaPo admitting that it had the name, and had Ford’s response to what would clearly be a Keyser denial, but NEVER PUT IT OUT THERE,” posted Strassel. “Again, why? A lot of people have a lot questions to answer.”

Here’s the bottom line: Even if media outlets like The Washington Post weren’t tripping over themselves to bring down Kavanaugh without doing due diligence, the accuser’s claims contradict themselves, and the coverage of the story is not making that clear…

moldyoldy

Did not Judge say that there was no party and they were not there? How many stupid stories are you going to put out there.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

"Did not Judge say that there was no party and they were not there? How many stupid stories are you going to put out there." - moldyoldy

Just responding to contradictory f**e stories you and others put out, moldy.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

It all reminds me of a Star Trek, "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me!"