One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A tough choice for Republicans
Page <<first <prev 13 of 13
Sep 21, 2018 19:29:35   #
Nickolai
 
binid wrote:
This is a straw man argument. You have zero proof that Kavanaugh's confirmation would lose republicans the e******n. The left has done this too many times to take it seriously. Where was this woman 35 years ago? Its the dems who are going to lose big over this. People aren't dumb.





Dream on!!

Reply
Sep 21, 2018 19:38:58   #
woodguru
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
So to you as long as it is a Republican accusations are enough to condemn, even without proof. You dd not feel that way abut the rapist Clinton being President. Is there no end to your hypocrisy?


Actually I know a lot of people that felt like I did, I didn't care one bit about a blowjob (which is a damn sight different than forced sex), but when he lied I thought he should be impeached...

you see, I'm of the opinion that certain kinds of lies to the american people are not okay....

You know, the ones like I don't know anything about a non disclosure agreement or her being paid $130k...and then finding out yes he did.

We need to be able to trust the word of a president when they are asked direct questions, we need to know we can take it as facts. The only thing we know about this president is that hes probably lying.

Reply
Sep 21, 2018 19:39:48   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Bad Bob wrote:
No I call trump a lying adulterer conman POS.


I wonder what people think and say about you?

Reply
 
 
Sep 21, 2018 19:51:02   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
woodguru wrote:
Actually I know a lot of people that felt like I did, I didn't care one bit about a blowjob (which is a damn sight different than forced sex), but when he lied I thought he should be impeached...

you see, I'm of the opinion that certain kinds of lies to the american people are not okay....

You know, the ones like I don't know anything about a non disclosure agreement or her being paid $130k...and then finding out yes he did.

We need to be able to trust the word of a president when they are asked direct questions, we need to know we can take it as facts. The only thing we know about this president is that hes probably lying.
Actually I know a lot of people that felt like I d... (show quote)



Reply
Sep 21, 2018 19:54:18   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
padremike wrote:
I wonder what people think and say about you?


They will say I don't care for a lying POS. Or religious wackos.

Reply
Sep 21, 2018 20:16:53   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Bad Bob wrote:
They will say I don't care for a lying POS. Or religious wackos.


Really? That is a devastating self analysis. I might have suggested you are out of balance and misinformed, but not a liar or a religious wacko. I asked YOU what people would say about YOU? I suppose you know yourself better than we do. It's an honest start towards rehabilitation. I congratulate your courage.

Reply
Sep 21, 2018 21:15:30   #
Mikeyavelli
 
binid wrote:
This is a straw man argument. You have zero proof that Kavanaugh's confirmation would lose republicans the e******n. The left has done this too many times to take it seriously. Where was this woman 35 years ago? Its the dems who are going to lose big over this. People aren't dumb.


She turns out to be a pootawna.
Her year book picture is nude.

Reply
 
 
Sep 22, 2018 18:15:35   #
Abel
 
Nicki, you would make a super poster child for the proverbial well-fed Christmas Turkey.

Nickolai wrote:
Facing a public relations debacle, Senate Republicans have come up with a surefire compromise to win confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court: Instead of simply dismissing the sexual assault accusation lodged against their nominee, they will pretend to investigate -- and only then rubber-stamp him. "The FBI investigation of Judge Kavanaugh is closed," Grassley said, adding later, "We've got two people involved, and two people ought to be able to present their stories, and then we'll have to be the jury." He specifically excluded any testimony from Mark Judge, a friend of Kavanaugh identified by Ford as present in the room when the alleged incident occurred.
Facing a public relations debacle, Senate Republic... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 22, 2018 18:23:31   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Abel wrote:
Nicki, you would make a super poster child for the proverbial well-fed Christmas Turkey.


Even the best Texas marinade, and BBQ rub couldn't make it taste good.
I think I'll have the ham. Thanks, anyway.

Reply
Sep 22, 2018 18:42:06   #
Abel
 
You're right about the s**tty flavor of this one specific bird, but the turkey fries might be far enough from the micro-cephalic brain that they might still be good. A good ham from one of our many Chinese pork producers could also be a reasonable choice, but I'd look for one of the few, and getting more difficult to find, smaller pork producers that haven't been bought out by the Chinese yet for a better USA quality. In pork production, "Product of the USA" doesn't mean the same thing that it used to.

archie bunker wrote:
Even the best Texas marinade, and BBQ rub couldn't make it taste good.
I think I'll have the ham. Thanks, anyway.

Reply
Sep 22, 2018 19:20:31   #
Trooper745 Loc: Carolina
 
Nickolai wrote:
All that is good in society from anti trust laws,........ to the interstate high way system ect (sic) is thanks to progressives.


You do realize that the Sherman Antitrust act was written by a REPUBLICAN, Sen. John Sherman (R–OH), and co-authored by a REPUBLICAN, Sen. George F. Hoar (R-MA). It was passed by a REPUBLICAN Senate in 1890, and signed into law under a REPUBLICAN POTUS, Benjamin Harrison. Where do you get the crap that DEMOCRATS had anything to do with antitrust laws?

Interstate highways were championed by REPUBLICAN POTUS Dwight Eisenhower. Ya, know, if stupidity could be cured, we could completely abolish the Democratic Party!!!!

Reply
 
 
Sep 22, 2018 20:31:57   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Trooper745 wrote:
You do realize that the Sherman Antitrust act was written by a REPUBLICAN, Sen. John Sherman (R–OH), and co-authored by a REPUBLICAN, Sen. George F. Hoar (R-MA). It was passed by a REPUBLICAN Senate in 1890, and signed into law under a REPUBLICAN POTUS, Benjamin Harrison. Where do you get the crap that DEMOCRATS had anything to do with antitrust laws?

Interstate highways were championed by REPUBLICAN POTUS Dwight Eisenhower. Ya, know, if stupidity could be cured, we could completely abolish the Democratic Party!!!!
You do realize that the Sherman Antitrust act was ... (show quote)


"You do realize that the Sherman Antitrust act was written by a REPUBLICAN, Sen. John Sherman (R–OH), and co-authored by a REPUBLICAN, Sen. George F. Hoar (R-MA). It was passed by a REPUBLICAN Senate in 1890, and signed into law under a REPUBLICAN POTUS, Benjamin Harrison. Where do you get the crap that DEMOCRATS had anything to do with antitrust laws?

Interstate highways were championed by REPUBLICAN POTUS Dwight Eisenhower. Ya, know, if stupidity could be cured, we could completely abolish the Democratic Party!!!" - Trooper745

Yep

Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 13
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.