TexaCan wrote:
I have not spent any time researching my church history.
Some Historical Wisdom:
Deep In History: Breaking through the Myth’s of Christian History
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-139582-1.html a. ”To be “Deep In History” is to understanding the meaning of history and to understand it’s relevance to our present day lives."
Dr. Kenneth Howell
b. ”To be Deep in History, “To be deep in history, is to cease to be Protestant.”
Cardinal John Henry Newman
TexCan, I called karpenter or jack sequim wa, foolish, I did-not call them or you a fool.
(Note) The word distinction.
Why are you so anti-Catholic and miserable ?
Please be candid and tell me something, that I don't already know, about your Calvinistic Christian upbringing, because I have some meaningful and poignant questions to ask you.
Other than attending your baptist Church meetings and reading the Bible. e.g. Biblical Self-Interpretation . . . where is your theology degree ?
And now, it's time to break-out, and use your Protestant scholarly history degree ?
1. Do you, and can you, truly and prayerfully understand John's Revelation's imagery and symbology ? The Apocalypse, "or End of the World ?
Here are two questions for you, think hard and answer, truthfully.
Read the article and go to the URL website links and read them all before answering.
Because countless scholars and learned theologians through the centuries and in present modern-times, have not been unable to explain the "End times" through Saint John's Revelations and Church teachings.
a. The Apocalypse of Saint John's prophetic description in his 1st century words, and symbology ?
Could you explain in our modern day explaining this imagery and prophetic writings ? And his prophetic description of "Mary Mother of God."
b. Could you explain the Book of Enoch 5,000 B.C year ago. In our modern day, explaining this imagery and prophetic writings if you had these visions?
The book of Enoch, prophetic description of the battle of the angels. 1/3 of the Angel's fell from the sky . . . to earth ? This is origins of Lucifer and his minions on Earth.
Enoch 40:7-9
Book of Enoch prophecies
https://hannahmichaels.wordpress.com/2013/04/11/book-of-enoch- prophecies/
The Book of Enoch - Pseudepigrapha, Apocrypha and Sacred Writings
www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/1enoch_all.html As far as the Virgin Mary word depiction, from Saint John Revelation's biblical symbolism.
a. St. John was talking about "Mary the Mother of God," being the woman
being described by Saint John.
b. And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed in the sun, with
the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head.
Rev. 12 1
c. And may refer to rare celestial signs of the Feast of Trumpets in 2 BC,
1832, and 2017, which herald the future birth of her son.
As Saint John, listened to Jesus's command while dying on the "Cross." Saint Mary snd Saint John stood at the foot of the "Cross," and St. John accepted and adopted Mary as his Mother, and ultimately became the Churches Mother . . .
TexCan, What utter disrespectful religious sacrilege, "The Mother of God." What vile thoughts that come's forth from you, all your simple-minded Protestant thoughts.
2. For information and URL links (See Below) regarding the December 1531 A.D. "cactus-Tilma painting" and miracle image of "Our Lady of Guadeloupe."
a. Regarding the Aztec religious colors and symbology, from the Crown on her head, to the stars on her cloak, the musical notes of the stars, the photographic imagery in both or her eyes, the Aztec virginity style, her pregnancy dress style, the image of the moon and serpent below her feet. And the miraculous protection from the 1917 bomb explosion ?
b. The actual painting, that defies any scientific description and survivability of this 470 year defying Christian and Biblical iconic painting.
c. There are no scientific, or man-made explanations for this image of "Mary" to the Aztec Mexican people and the scientific existence to survive 470 years.
"Our Lady of Guadeloupe.” Internet URL links.
a. Our Lady of Guadalupe Documentary - Amazing Scientific Analysis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lA5NUHqC88&frags=pl%2Cwn b. Science Sees What Mary Saw From Juan Diegos Tilma
https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/culture/catho...
c. Miracles Our Lady Guadalupe - Michael Journal
https://www.michaeljournal.org/juvdm/enseignements...
d. Our Lady Of Guadalupe - Catholic News Agency
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/saint/our-lady-...
Jesus does-not teach or instruct, “Sola Scriptura.” This is “Man-Made.”
I. Here's is the fatal flaw, in all "reformist Protestant thinking," doctrinal, theology, and personal self-interpretational, new-age enlightened Protestant thinking.
a, Where in the Bible, Old and New Testament does it "Teach the Protestant doctrine of "Scripture Alone" ? ? ? . . . "NO WHERE . . . IN the BIBLE . . .
b. I dare YOU, and your fellow Protestant's, to come up with a plausible answer, to my question ? And find a Biblical Scriptural passages, that explains "Sola Scriptura."
c. Where is your hidden away "Secret-Knowledge," from the dark hidden recesses of the Bible, Old and New Testament Books, Chapter and verse in their Protestant Bibles, that's
because "Sola Scriptura" is:
1. "It's" a "Man-Made" doctrinal, theology concept." I repeat, It's not taught by Jesus Christ, His Apostles, Early Church Fathers, Popes Bishops, Priests, Deacons and Laity.
Sola Scriptura is a misnomer a mistake, misstatement, misconception, or misunderstanding, a flat-earth depiction and an erroneous Protestant conclusion . . . ?
The doctrine of Sola Scriptura.
1. “The whole counsel of God, concerning all things necessary for his own glory, man’s salvation, faith, and life, is either expressly set down in scripture, or by good and necessary consequence may be deduced from scripture: unto which nothing at any time is to be added, whether by new revelations of the Spirit, or traditions of men.”
Westminster Confession of Faith
2. The Reformers believed that Scripture alone was the only infallible source for revelation and, therefore, the Scripture alone was the primary source available for instruction on all matters of faith and practice. They believed that tradition, while valuable, could be misleading and fallible.
In short, Protestants rejected the idea that the Church needed a second infallible source of revelation (Tradition) along with an infallible interpreter (Magisterium) that would tell them what to believe. The Scriptures needed to be in the hands of every man so that every man could wrestle with and build a theology that was truly their own.
Here are the problems associated with the doctrine and theology of Sola Scriptura.
The fallacy, the "Straw-Man" ("Sola Scriptura": the belief that the Scripture alone is the final and only infallible source for matters of faith and practice.)
Think long and hard at this question and the detrimental and the disastrous effects of thousands Church denomination in the USA and throughout the world, self-biblical-interpretations.
1. But Luther did the unthinkable. He read the Scriptures for himself. He did not seek to confirm the traditions which he was taught (for these had caused him great fear); he sought to understand the Scriptures on their own terms. Thus came the doctrine of sola Scriptura. The Scripture was not there to conform to the traditions, but to create the new traditions. Nor did Luther have the manuscripts the, "Didache," Describing the Mass, baptism, the Eucharist, Sacraments and how the Catholic Community in the first century practice their faith?
a.
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-139479-1.htmlb. Free.
https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04779a.htm2. Thus began the Reformation. Thus began the time when people took the Scriptures and interpreted them for themselves. Thus began the time when men and women, clergy and layperson, learned and unlearned all had common access to the Word of God. Thus ended the outsourcing of theology . .
3. Evangelicals must be on guard of recreating an outsourcing system under the guise of sola Scriptura. Many Protestants since the Reformation have simply created their own catechisms, creeds, and confessions and expect their people to agree with the details contained therein. And this is the reason why we have 33,000 thousand Protestant denomination Churches. In one hundred years after the beginning of the reformation there were over 100 Protestant denomination Churches continued fractional churches, doctrine and theology.
4. This was the case with Martin Luther, the Augustinian monk, who lived in constant fear of God’s wrath. But Luther did the unthinkable . . . he read the Scriptures for himself. In his reading, he did not seek to confirm the traditions which he was taught (for these had caused him great fear); he sought to understand the Scriptures on their own terms. Thus came the doctrine of sola Scriptura. The Scripture was not there to conform to the traditions, but to create the new Church traditions.
5. Luther understood the risk of putting a Bible in every man’s hands. He understood the danger. But he believed it was worth the risk, believing that the commoner of his day could interpret the Bible better than many in the “scholars” of the Church in Rome.