One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Revoke my security clearance, too, Mr. President, by Naval Admiral William H. McRaven
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
Aug 21, 2018 20:56:22   #
debeda
 
debeda wrote:
I think she means to say regressive. What the profs like to call conservatives. Or she's referring to the recessive gene that appears to have been activated in dems forcing them to live in their ids.


Progs not profs......

Reply
Aug 21, 2018 21:03:24   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Morgan wrote:
So if polls are false, I take it that includes what you just posted? As far as Rasmussen polls, among pollsters, Rasmussen has consistently published higher approval ratings for Trump than its peers that track p**********l job approval among Americans.
His numbers hadn’t hit the 50 percent-mark since late April, according to Rasmussen’s approval index history.

Rasmussen’s numbers are atypical of the polls that have surveyed Trump’s approval ratings. The next-closest results were still pretty far from 50 percent.

An Economist/YouGov poll of 1,500 registered v**ers from June 11-13 showed 42 percent approval. A June 9-15 Survey Monkey poll of adults showed 43 percent. Gallup, which polls all adults on a three-day rolling basis, most recently showed 39 percent approval. But yeah it all means nothing.
So if polls are false, I take it that includes wha... (show quote)


You accuse me of copy and past while mine was my own opinion with no such pasting of anything as you did here.. You cherry picked your copy and paste no less leaving out the rest of the article..
That is if this is article you used??

From Politifact:

President Donald Trump opened his first Father's Day as president with a bright-and-early boast about his poll numbers.
"The new Rasmussen Poll, one of the most accurate in the 2016 E******n, just out with a Trump 50% Approval Rating. That's higher than O's #'s!"

Rasmussen Reports retweeted the president's message (and so did more than 21,000 other accounts) despite some questionable logic.
Trump cherry-picked his data.
Among pollsters, Rasmussen has consistently published higher approval ratings for Trump than its peers that track p**********l job approval among Americans.
Its June 13-15 poll of 1,500 likely v**ers did show 50 percent job approval for Trump, with a sampling margin of error of 3 percent.
His numbers hadn't hit the 50 percent-mark since late April, according to Rasmussen's approval index history.
Rasmussen's numbers are atypical of the polls that have surveyed Trump's approval ratings. The next-closest results were still pretty far from 50 percent.
An Economist/YouGov poll of 1,500 registered v**ers from June 11-13 showed 42 percent approval. A June 9-15 Survey Monkey poll of adults showed 43 percent. Gallup, which polls all adults on a three-day rolling basis, most recently showed 39 percent approval.
When you look at polling more broadly, Rasmussen really sticks out.
The RealClearPolitics.com average of polls from May 30-June 17 shows 40 percent job approval -- a full 10 percentage points lower than the rate Trump touted in his tweet. FiveThirtyEight performs a similar comprehensive reflection of polling data, and it came in even lower -- 38.7 percent approval (and 55.4 percent disapproval) by Trump's 150th day in office.
Obama ratings weren't as low at this point in his presidency..

Somewhat different isn’t it??

https://sicem365.com/forums/7/topics/30511/replies/782453#782453

Reply
Aug 21, 2018 21:06:33   #
debeda
 
lindajoy wrote:
You accuse me of copy and past while mine was my own opinion with no such pasting of anything as you did here.. You cherry picked your copy and paste no less leaving out the rest of the article..
That is if this is article you used??

From Politifact:

President Donald Trump opened his first Father's Day as president with a bright-and-early boast about his poll numbers.
"The new Rasmussen Poll, one of the most accurate in the 2016 E******n, just out with a Trump 50% Approval Rating. That's higher than O's #'s!"

Rasmussen Reports retweeted the president's message (and so did more than 21,000 other accounts) despite some questionable logic.
Trump cherry-picked his data.
Among pollsters, Rasmussen has consistently published higher approval ratings for Trump than its peers that track p**********l job approval among Americans.
Its June 13-15 poll of 1,500 likely v**ers did show 50 percent job approval for Trump, with a sampling margin of error of 3 percent.
His numbers hadn't hit the 50 percent-mark since late April, according to Rasmussen's approval index history.
Rasmussen's numbers are atypical of the polls that have surveyed Trump's approval ratings. The next-closest results were still pretty far from 50 percent.
An Economist/YouGov poll of 1,500 registered v**ers from June 11-13 showed 42 percent approval. A June 9-15 Survey Monkey poll of adults showed 43 percent. Gallup, which polls all adults on a three-day rolling basis, most recently showed 39 percent approval.
When you look at polling more broadly, Rasmussen really sticks out.
The RealClearPolitics.com average of polls from May 30-June 17 shows 40 percent job approval -- a full 10 percentage points lower than the rate Trump touted in his tweet. FiveThirtyEight performs a similar comprehensive reflection of polling data, and it came in even lower -- 38.7 percent approval (and 55.4 percent disapproval) by Trump's 150th day in office.
Obama ratings weren't as low at this point in his presidency..

Somewhat different isn’t it??

https://sicem365.com/forums/7/topics/30511/replies/782453#782453
You accuse me of copy and past while mine was my o... (show quote)


Yep. Most dems think they can dominate discussions by spin doctoring and lying by omission. It's how they create their narratives, which they then repeat over and over and over again until they believe themselves.

Reply
 
 
Aug 21, 2018 21:22:22   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
debeda wrote:
I think she means to say regressive. What the profs like to call conservatives. Or she's referring to the recessive gene that appears to have been activated in dems forcing them to live in their ids.


With Morgan you never know, thus I ask specifically.. No misunderstanding that way..

Must say you got me lol’ing with your closing......

Reply
Aug 21, 2018 21:28:43   #
debeda
 
lindajoy wrote:
With Morgan you never know, thus I ask specifically.. No misunderstanding that way..

Must say you got me lol’ing with your closing......



Reply
Aug 21, 2018 22:00:04   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
debeda wrote:
Yep. Most dems think they can dominate discussions by spin doctoring and lying by omission. It's how they create their narratives, which they then repeat over and over and over again until they believe themselves.


Have to agree they do believe if repeated enough eventually it will catch on.. Isn’t it nice that “we don’t catch on.”

Reply
Aug 21, 2018 22:03:12   #
debeda
 
lindajoy wrote:
Have to agree they do believe if repeated enough eventually it will catch on.. Isn’t it nice that “we don’t catch on.”


Yep Some people are more resistant to suggestion thanothers

Reply
 
 
Aug 22, 2018 17:54:25   #
Morgan
 
lindajoy wrote:
Yes, using the Rasmussen poll was just an example of how polls, regardless of whom is doing the polling has different conclusions..

Also there is no cut and paste in my post to you.. All my opinion not someone else telling me what I believe...


I didn't say you did, so I didn't accuse you anything or of doing now, I said... please don't. You often don't read carefully then accuse me if misleading you, just as in this post, and why when possible I avoid posting to you.

Reply
Aug 22, 2018 18:15:22   #
Morgan
 
debeda wrote:
Yep. Most dems think they can dominate discussions by spin doctoring and lying by omission. It's how they create their narratives, which they then repeat over and over and over again until they believe themselves.


Looks like you're getting the parties mixed up again, should I play a video on Trump repeating himself over and over...and over...an.... all we have to do is start from his campaign. Spin doctoring and lying or should we say those pesky alternative facts, the sign of the new GOP.

Reply
Aug 22, 2018 19:09:13   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Morgan wrote:
I didn't say you did, so I didn't accuse you anything or of doing now, I said... please don't. You often don't read carefully then accuse me if misleading you, just as in this post, and why when possible I avoid posting to you.


Then I took your comment here incorrectly when I read it as implying my post was copy and paste.. For that I do apologize..

Unfortunately long and ardorous post are necessary... You have many of them often enough..
You said:
“maybe you should research f*****m a little bit, which does not mean for you to post back a long arduous cut and paste back to me, not necessary, I am very familiar, especially where it was born. “

Not posting back and forth to each other is one option yet another would be to simply not be so defensive of each others posts.. No reason why we can’t concentrate on that instead, right??

Reply
Aug 22, 2018 20:06:19   #
debeda
 
Morgan wrote:
Looks like you're getting the parties mixed up again, should I play a video on Trump repeating himself over and over...and over...an.... all we have to do is start from his campaign. Spin doctoring and lying or should we say those pesky alternative facts, the sign of the new GOP.


Perhaps they're using the tactics the left has been using for at least the past 50 years then

Reply
 
 
Aug 22, 2018 23:33:02   #
Morgan
 
debeda wrote:
Perhaps they're using the tactics the left has been using for at least the past 50 years then


That is funny coming from a righty

Reply
Aug 22, 2018 23:33:42   #
Morgan
 
lindajoy wrote:
Then I took your comment here incorrectly when I read it as implying my post was copy and paste.. For that I do apologize..

Unfortunately long and ardorous post are necessary... You have many of them often enough..
You said:
“maybe you should research f*****m a little bit, which does not mean for you to post back a long arduous cut and paste back to me, not necessary, I am very familiar, especially where it was born. “

Not posting back and forth to each other is one option yet another would be to simply not be so defensive of each others posts.. No reason why we can’t concentrate on that instead, right??
Then I took your comment here incorrectly when I r... (show quote)



Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.