The h**e has always come from right wingers..

What is your point about building golf (gold) courses??

It is the hope of anyone who build a golf course that people will play on it..

I do not build h**e. I have built a few things I feel good about. but who cares but me and mine?

the orange thing has kept his favor with his base by pushing the h**e button. H**e non-w****s, H**e immigrants.

H**e paying your taxes, h**e the school system, H**e the legitimate media.

H**e anyone and anything which criticizes trump.

While he keeps you close with urges to h**e, he empties your pockets of the few remaining bits of wealth and power the middle class has..

If this were a simple matter of the 1860s, there wouldn’t be much of a story here. However, the reason the Democrats want their r****t past hidden is that, as William Faulkner might have said, it’s not even past.
Moving beyond Reconstruction, the Democrats were behind the resurgence of the Klan in the early 20th century. In fact, the 1924 Democrat National Convention attracted such a heavy pro-Klan element it was called the “Klanbake”; a “picnic” of 20,000 Klansmen in New Jersey met to protest the “clownvention in Jew York” and threw baseballs at an effigy of Al Smith, a Catholic front-runner for the nomination.
Speaking of the KKK, during his time in the White House, Democrat President Woodrow Wilson organized a special screening of the pro-Klan movie “Birth of a Nation.” “It is like writing history with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true,” Wilson said of the film, which featured rapacious black men who specifically targeted white women, black legislators putting their feet on their desks and eating fried chicken, and “justifiable” lynchings of African-Americans.
It’s perhaps unsurprising that T.F. Dixon Jr., who wrote the novel the film was based on, said in a letter that, “The real purpose of my film was to revolutionize Northern sentiments by a presentation of history that would t***sform every man in the audience into a good Democrat.”
And speaking of “good Democrats,” let’s take former Sen. Robert Byrd, Hillary Clinton’s self-described “mentor.” Byrd founded a chapter of the KKK back in West Virginia (then repeatedly lied about the depth of his involvement), filibustered the Civil Rights Act and v**ed against Thurgood Marshall’s nomination to the Supreme Court. As late as 2001 was talking about “white n******” on national television.
Byrd may be dead now, but as Dinesh D’Souza explains, the plantation mentality of the Democrats is alive and well:
Much like they did in rural areas in the pre-1970s South, the modern Democrats treat America’s urban areas as their own private fiefdom. They may not claim to be “for the white man” anymore — in fact, far from it. That doesn’t mean they’ve done anything to give minority communities greater economic opportunity, though. They just want the v**es, and identity politics turns people out.
A popular phrase in Democrat circles nowadays is “demographics is destiny” — the belief that by pandering to minority groups, they’ll end up becoming an unstoppable force as those groups grow. The merits of this approach are debatable, of course, but the one thing that’s clear is that demographics have always been destiny for the Democrats.
This was just as true when they were whipping up white r****ts against African-Americans as it is now, as their analysts and politicos carve up America into neat little racial slices that can be pitted against each other for e*******l gain. Who’re the r****ts again, now?
For over 100 years the Democrats in Congress have v**ed overwhelmingly to keep the b****s in chains. They v**ed to block the b****s from v****g, they v**ed to never give them citizenship, the list goes on and on. Seems your schooling was remiss in America history, could that be your not an American?

If this were a simple matter of the 1860s, there wouldn’t be much of a story here. However, the reason the Democrats want their r****t past hidden is that, as William Faulkner might have said, it’s not even past.
Moving beyond Reconstruction, the Democrats were behind the resurgence of the Klan in the early 20th century. In fact, the 1924 Democrat National Convention attracted such a heavy pro-Klan element it was called the “Klanbake”; a “picnic” of 20,000 Klansmen in New Jersey met to protest the “clownvention in Jew York” and threw baseballs at an effigy of Al Smith, a Catholic front-runner for the nomination.
Speaking of the KKK, during his time in the White House, Democrat President Woodrow Wilson organized a special screening of the pro-Klan movie “Birth of a Nation.” “It is like writing history with lightning, and my only regret is that it is all so terribly true,” Wilson said of the film, which featured rapacious black men who specifically targeted white women, black legislators putting their feet on their desks and eating fried chicken, and “justifiable” lynchings of African-Americans.
It’s perhaps unsurprising that T.F. Dixon Jr., who wrote the novel the film was based on, said in a letter that, “The real purpose of my film was to revolutionize Northern sentiments by a presentation of history that would t***sform every man in the audience into a good Democrat.”
And speaking of “good Democrats,” let’s take former Sen. Robert Byrd, Hillary Clinton’s self-described “mentor.” Byrd founded a chapter of the KKK back in West Virginia (then repeatedly lied about the depth of his involvement), filibustered the Civil Rights Act and v**ed against Thurgood Marshall’s nomination to the Supreme Court. As late as 2001 was talking about “white n******” on national television.
Byrd may be dead now, but as Dinesh D’Souza explains, the plantation mentality of the Democrats is alive and well:
Much like they did in rural areas in the pre-1970s South, the modern Democrats treat America’s urban areas as their own private fiefdom. They may not claim to be “for the white man” anymore — in fact, far from it. That doesn’t mean they’ve done anything to give minority communities greater economic opportunity, though. They just want the v**es, and identity politics turns people out.
A popular phrase in Democrat circles nowadays is “demographics is destiny” — the belief that by pandering to minority groups, they’ll end up becoming an unstoppable force as those groups grow. The merits of this approach are debatable, of course, but the one thing that’s clear is that demographics have always been destiny for the Democrats.
This was just as true when they were whipping up white r****ts against African-Americans as it is now, as their analysts and politicos carve up America into neat little racial slices that can be pitted against each other for e*******l gain. Who’re the r****ts again, now?
For over 100 years the Democrats in Congress have v**ed overwhelmingly to keep the b****s in chains. They v**ed to block the b****s from v****g, they v**ed to never give them citizenship, the list goes on and on. Seems your schooling was remiss in America history, could that be your not an American?