One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Even Libertarians Admit Medicare for All Would Save Trillions
Page <prev 2 of 12 next> last>>
Aug 1, 2018 13:51:16   #
Lonewolf
 
this is how we stand on the quality of care compared to the rest of the world

https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/quality-u-s-healthcare-system-compare-countries/#item-hospital-admissions-preventable-diseases-frequent-u-s-comparable-countries

Reply
Aug 1, 2018 14:29:25   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
I have five doctors in my family. The score is presently 3 to 2 for private versus Medicare for all. They all agree on shortages (already occurring) and wait times increasing.
buffalo wrote:
J, I know you know that my brother is a medical doctor and has been for 30 years. He says that with the corporatization of medicine that there will be a shortage of doctors in the next decade. Doctors are now having to play the corporate political bulls**t instead of practicing medicine. This is especially true in hospitals but also else where. Even here at our corporate owned local hospitals doctors are leaving because non-medical administrative personnel are demanding doctors to follow corporate protocol.

Only 1% of doctors do not participate in Medicare and Medicaid and 42% of those are psychiatrists. Go figure...

The way the system was before and even the system after the ACA is unsustainable.
J, I know you know that my brother is a medical do... (show quote)

Reply
Aug 1, 2018 14:46:41   #
Crayons Loc: St Jo, Texas
 
I dare anyone to tell me how spending over 32 Trillion(thats with a T)over a Ten Year period
will save us money...It's a giant S**m...the program would be robbed and pillaged worse than it already is.

Or like Ross Perot would say "All you'll hear is a Giant Suckin Sound"

Reply
 
 
Aug 1, 2018 14:53:32   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
vernon wrote:
I started paying medicare at its inception (1965 I think).I have paid into it ever since,I pay 400 A quarter and my wife also pays 400 a quarter and that is until death.Now I assume that the 15% that are on medicare do the same.Now you say that when you put the other 85% on medicare that haven't been paying anything are not going to cost us a bundle.I say it will bust medicare and just wind up stabbing the seniors the back and ruining their coverage.You Talk about adding 30 million,well what about the other 300 million.
you just want pie in the sky and you don't have any idea about what it will cost.Trump is doing something about these sot of problems now by his instituting the jobs program and teaching people how to take care of them selves.
You don't realize that these billionaires are not interested in anything but them selves.They want one world government with themselves at the upper end of the ladder.
You should realize after aca how expensive that was and how many lies they told to get it the govt can't handle anything that size.
I started paying medicare at its inception (1965 I... (show quote)


Trump is teaching people how to take care of themselves? Is he teaching them to doctor themselves? We're not talking about jobs, we're talking about health CARE.

Vern, over 120 MILLION elderly, poor, disabled and children are covered by Medicare, Medicaid or both.

The ACA was just a gift to the private, for profit health INSURANCE corporations that rape the US health CARE system of $600 BILLION annually.

http://www.healthcommentary.org/2017/04/26/non-real-work-eliminating-private-health-insurers-primary-coverage/

http://www.publicintegrity.org/2015/08/17/17863/health-insurers-working-system-pad-their-profits

Reply
Aug 1, 2018 15:12:51   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Super Dave wrote:
1. Where did you hear it.
2. America has better care than France
3. France has 1*6 as many people as America, and America pays over 3 Trillion. France is covering 1*6 the people for almost the same price.
4. Do you feel silly yet?


No, the US does NOT have better care than France. In fact 15 countries have better health CARE than the US both in outcome and life expectancy.

http://www.formosapost.com/15-countries-with-better-healthcare-than-the-united-states/

I know, next you will tell me to move to one of those countries. But I would rather work here to make the US system better for ALL.

France spends less than 1/2 PER PERSON on health CARE than the US spends PER PERSON. Do you understand that?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/03/13/the-real-reason-the-u-s-spends-twice-as-much-on-health-care-as-other-wealthy-countries/?utm_term=.d2938981cfc6

Do you feel ignorant now?

Reply
Aug 1, 2018 19:54:41   #
vernon
 
buffalo wrote:
No, the US does NOT have better care than France. In fact 15 countries have better health CARE than the US both in outcome and life expectancy.

http://www.formosapost.com/15-countries-with-better-healthcare-than-the-united-states/

I know, next you will tell me to move to one of those countries. But I would rather work here to make the US system better for ALL.

France spends less than 1/2 PER PERSON on health CARE than the US spends PER PERSON. Do you understand that?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/03/13/the-real-reason-the-u-s-spends-twice-as-much-on-health-care-as-other-wealthy-countries/?utm_term=.d2938981cfc6

Do you feel ignorant now?
No, the US does NOT have better care than France. ... (show quote)


No I feel for your ignorance

Reply
Aug 1, 2018 20:19:07   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
vernon wrote:
I started paying medicare at its inception (1965 I think).I have paid into it ever since,I pay 400 A quarter and my wife also pays 400 a quarter and that is until death.Now I assume that the 15% that are on medicare do the same.Now you say that when you put the other 85% on medicare that haven't been paying anything are not going to cost us a bundle.I say it will bust medicare and just wind up stabbing the seniors the back and ruining their coverage.You Talk about adding 30 million,well what about the other 300 million.
you just want pie in the sky and you don't have any idea about what it will cost.Trump is doing something about these sot of problems now by his instituting the jobs program and teaching people how to take care of them selves.
You don't realize that these billionaires are not interested in anything but them selves.They want one world government with themselves at the upper end of the ladder.
You should realize after aca how expensive that was and how many lies they told to get it the govt can't handle anything that size.
I started paying medicare at its inception (1965 I... (show quote)


You mean ignorant statements like those?

Reply
 
 
Aug 2, 2018 09:35:38   #
debeda
 
buffalo wrote:
In 2016 France spent $4600 per capita and everyone is covered for their health CARE. The US in 2016 spent $9892 per capita with private, for profit health INSURANCE corporations extracting $600 BILLION or roughly $500 per person in profits that went to NO ONE"S health CARE while 30 MILLION remain uninsured.

It is ashamed that we don't eliminate profit extracting private health INSURANCE corporations, save 95% of households money and provide health care for man, woman and child US citizen.

It would NOT be free. As the article stated, "rather than paying premiums, deductibles, and co-pays for health care, people will instead pay a tax that is, on average, a bit less than they currently pay into the health care system and, for those on lower incomes, a lot less."
In 2016 France spent $4600 per capita and everyone... (show quote)


Back in the 90s when the Clintons were working on this I asked the question of some of the brain trusts who were for it if they could afford an additional 25% or so in taxes coming out of their pay checks. This would be another program to decimate the middle class and working poor. The only other way to do it would be to DRASTICALLY lower medical costs with the attendant drop in quality of care. Then only the rich could afford good medical care. And all these studies and assessments are pure crap if you forget about "impact on the government " and look at impact on the working individual.

Reply
Aug 2, 2018 10:08:52   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
debeda wrote:
Back in the 90s when the Clintons were working on this I asked the question of some of the brain trusts who were for it if they could afford an additional 25% or so in taxes coming out of their pay checks. This would be another program to decimate the middle class and working poor. The only other way to do it would be to DRASTICALLY lower medical costs with the attendant drop in quality of care. Then only the rich could afford good medical care. And all these studies and assessments are pure crap if you forget about "impact on the government " and look at impact on the working individual.
Back in the 90s when the Clintons were working on ... (show quote)


Your first erroneous assumption is that it would require 25% in additional taxes. But even if it did require 25% more in taxes, (tax the unearned incomes of dividends and capital gains of the rich) by eliminating ridiculously high premiums to private, for profit health INSURANCE corporations the high deductibles, along with high co-pays most house holds and businesses would still save money. The impact would be that everyone would have access to quality medical care without the fear of going without medical care or going bankrupt.

Reply
Aug 2, 2018 10:18:25   #
debeda
 
buffalo wrote:
Your first erroneous assumption is that it would require 25% in additional taxes. But even if it did require 25% more in taxes, (tax the unearned incomes of dividends and capital gains of the rich) by eliminating ridiculously high premiums to private, for profit health INSURANCE corporations the high deductibles, along with high co-pays most house holds and businesses would still save money. The impact would be that everyone would have access to quality medical care without the fear of going without medical care or going bankrupt.
Your first erroneous assumption is that it would r... (show quote)


Uh huh. EVERYONE doesn't work. So EVERYONE doesn't pay in. So EVERYONE that works would be paying for a minimum of 5 and probably more like 10 plus non workers. It's the law of large numbers. The government itself generates no money. That's us. Taxes. The government only knows how to spend, most often profligately. I'd be all about this if it would work without penalizing so many. But it won't.

Reply
Aug 2, 2018 10:25:43   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
buffalo wrote:
No, the US does NOT have better care than France. In fact 15 countries have better health CARE than the US both in outcome and life expectancy.

http://www.formosapost.com/15-countries-with-better-healthcare-than-the-united-states/

I know, next you will tell me to move to one of those countries. But I would rather work here to make the US system better for ALL.

France spends less than 1/2 PER PERSON on health CARE than the US spends PER PERSON. Do you understand that?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/03/13/the-real-reason-the-u-s-spends-twice-as-much-on-health-care-as-other-wealthy-countries/?utm_term=.d2938981cfc6

Do you feel ignorant now?
No, the US does NOT have better care than France. ... (show quote)
BS. There is no better healthcare than the US.

Socialist healthcare plans ration care by necessity, usually to the elderly. My friend's mother died because she was denied treatment in Italy, based on her age. The autopsy confirmed this as a fact.

Socialism is a corrupt politician's wet dream, but it will necessarily lower healthcare for the citizens.

Reply
 
 
Aug 2, 2018 10:26:43   #
debeda
 
Super Dave wrote:
BS. There is no better healthcare than the US.

Socialist healthcare plans ration care by necessity, usually to the elderly. My friend's mother died because she was denied treatment in Italy, based on her age. The autopsy confirmed this as a fact.

Socialism is a corrupt politician's wet dream, but it will necessarily lower healthcare for the citizens.




Reply
Aug 2, 2018 10:32:31   #
boofhead
 
debeda wrote:
Back in the 90s when the Clintons were working on this I asked the question of some of the brain trusts who were for it if they could afford an additional 25% or so in taxes coming out of their pay checks. This would be another program to decimate the middle class and working poor. The only other way to do it would be to DRASTICALLY lower medical costs with the attendant drop in quality of care. Then only the rich could afford good medical care. And all these studies and assessments are pure crap if you forget about "impact on the government " and look at impact on the working individual.
Back in the 90s when the Clintons were working on ... (show quote)


I h**e to break your bubble but only the rich can afford good medical care now.

If you have health care through your employer and you get sick you LOSE your health care when you LOSE your job. You can buy COBRA insurance it costs the same as your employer health care but it is not subsidized. Guess how much good health care costs? $2000 to $4000 premiums alone PER MONTH, not including copays, deductibles and so on. Do you have that sort of money lying around? I sure don't.

If you pay less than that, it is because it is subsidized. Either by the employer or the government (which means by ME through my taxes). If it is subsidized by your employer that is YOUR money he is using to do so. Otherwise he would pay it to you as salary. If it is by the taxpayer it is still YOUR money that is being used. That is what taxes are: YOUR MONEY (at least it is if you pay taxes).

If my taxes were doubled to pay for Medicare it would save me nearly $6000 a year because the premiums I pay are so high and even then the real cost of my premiums is artificial because my employer pays 75% of my personal premium (nothing for my family) which is a type of tax because if he did not pay that he would give it to me as salary so the real cost saving to me would be $22,000 per year just on premiums alone.

Don't belive the hype, don't believe what any politician tells you. Don't believe the Press or the talk radio agenda-pushers; do the math yourself. The present system is insanely expensive. The medical costs are the real reason for the expensive system we have that is demonstrably worse than almost any other developed country as well as being expensive. It is driven by GREED.

Reply
Aug 2, 2018 10:39:09   #
boofhead
 
Super Dave wrote:
BS. There is no better healthcare than the US.

Socialist healthcare plans ration care by necessity, usually to the elderly. My friend's mother died because she was denied treatment in Italy, based on her age. The autopsy confirmed this as a fact.

Socialism is a corrupt politician's wet dream, but it will necessarily lower healthcare for the citizens.


I have family living in a country with single payer health care and what they get is superior in every way (all measurable statistics as well as personal experience) to what I get here in the US and is almost free to them. NOBODY goes bankrupt there for medical costs but here that is the major cause for bankruptcy.

Those are facts.

Many people here in the US are denied health care because of costs. Even if you have good health care, the deductibles, out of pocket, copays, denial of service and other costs will drive you bankrupt and if you are the one with the health care and you get sick and cannot work, your entire family could become destitute.

If you support the present system which is built on GREED you are uninformed and living in denial.

Reply
Aug 2, 2018 11:05:29   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
You are correct. This is not Medicare for all. It would be Medicaid for all.
debeda wrote:
Uh huh. EVERYONE doesn't work. So EVERYONE doesn't pay in. So EVERYONE that works would be paying for a minimum of 5 and probably more like 10 plus non workers. It's the law of large numbers. The government itself generates no money. That's us. Taxes. The government only knows how to spend, most often profligately. I'd be all about this if it would work without penalizing so many. But it won't.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.