One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Refusing to ask a question, is not an answer to the question you didn't ask
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jul 18, 2018 18:13:19   #
acknowledgeurma
 
Idaho wrote:
@ acknowledge - “Do you have any idea of how many different v****g machines are used in the US? How many different people are involved in checking the validity of the machines' results?”

That’s the point - you actually don’t need to rig machines right across the country - a few key areas will do. Spiking a few key checking teams will also do. When the source of the machines is a known bad actor, v****g machines should be considered suspect. There are many ways to start cutting out v***r f***d.
@ acknowledge - “Do you have any idea of how many ... (show quote)

I think you are possibly still deluding yourself by slapping another simple label (a few key areas) on a complex problem.
How few?
What are the key areas?
What would it take to spike the checking teams?
How do you get your r****d machines into key areas?
How big would your team of conspirators need to be to accomplish the mission?
What steps would be necessary to avoid detection?
And so many more...

Just from a cost benefit standpoint rigging v****g machines to win a POTUS e******n doesn't make sense.

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 18:31:27   #
woodguru
 
EconomistDon wrote:
You have a very valid point LP -- we can never know. In the same logic, we can not know the impact of v***r f***d and millions of i*****l a***ns v****g. Democrats successfully shut down Trump's investigation into v***r f***d, probably because they knew the outcome would hurt their cause. And we cannot measure the impact of the liberal-biased mainstream media who harped on Trump and idolized Hillary throughout the campaign. We can only take measures to avoid the interference during future e******ns.
You have a very valid point LP -- we can never kno... (show quote)


That's a FOX position, that got shut down because there was nothing there in the way of "i*****l a***ns" v****g. By the way, this entity that was supposed to be about v***r f***d wasn't interested in determining anything about e******n f***d, just the one thing which actually didn't exist.
Meanwhile there was extensive Russian hacking and meddling, and the extent it was done could have easily influenced the three key states that swung on 70,000 v**es, which is nothing.

Go to a popular v**e determination that splits the e*******l of the state along the lines of the popular, and Trump would have lost badly as should be reflected by the popular v**e.

And why do we still have some states clinging to v****g computers and machines that have proven to be easy to manipulate v**es? Strange these are red states that refuse to recount or upgrade systems to reliable systems that have hard backup that can be easily recounted.

Reply
Jul 18, 2018 21:23:22   #
acknowledgeurma
 
woodguru wrote:
That's a FOX position, that got shut down because there was nothing there in the way of "i*****l a***ns" v****g. By the way, this entity that was supposed to be about v***r f***d wasn't interested in determining anything about e******n f***d, just the one thing which actually didn't exist.
Meanwhile there was extensive Russian hacking and meddling, and the extent it was done could have easily influenced the three key states that swung on 70,000 v**es, which is nothing.

Go to a popular v**e determination that splits the e*******l of the state along the lines of the popular, and Trump would have lost badly as should be reflected by the popular v**e.

And why do we still have some states clinging to v****g computers and machines that have proven to be easy to manipulate v**es? Strange these are red states that refuse to recount or upgrade systems to reliable systems that have hard backup that can be easily recounted.
That's a FOX position, that got shut down because ... (show quote)

I wouldn't read too much into many red states not having hard backup. It's probably just cheaper.

Reply
 
 
Jul 19, 2018 00:16:59   #
JW
 
woodguru wrote:
That's a FOX position, that got shut down because there was nothing there in the way of "i*****l a***ns" v****g. By the way, this entity that was supposed to be about v***r f***d wasn't interested in determining anything about e******n f***d, just the one thing which actually didn't exist.
Meanwhile there was extensive Russian hacking and meddling, and the extent it was done could have easily influenced the three key states that swung on 70,000 v**es, which is nothing.

Go to a popular v**e determination that splits the e*******l of the state along the lines of the popular, and Trump would have lost badly as should be reflected by the popular v**e.

And why do we still have some states clinging to v****g computers and machines that have proven to be easy to manipulate v**es? Strange these are red states that refuse to recount or upgrade systems to reliable systems that have hard backup that can be easily recounted.
That's a FOX position, that got shut down because ... (show quote)


If you know anything about computer tabulations, you know that none of them are trustworthy. The only trustworthy b****t is the one using ink and a permanent single copy... and that too can be gotten around by anyone with access to them.

Reply
Jul 19, 2018 00:28:05   #
EconomistDon
 
woodguru wrote:
That's a FOX position, that got shut down because there was nothing there in the way of "i*****l a***ns" v****g. By the way, this entity that was supposed to be about v***r f***d wasn't interested in determining anything about e******n f***d, just the one thing which actually didn't exist.
Meanwhile there was extensive Russian hacking and meddling, and the extent it was done could have easily influenced the three key states that swung on 70,000 v**es, which is nothing.

Go to a popular v**e determination that splits the e*******l of the state along the lines of the popular, and Trump would have lost badly as should be reflected by the popular v**e.

And why do we still have some states clinging to v****g computers and machines that have proven to be easy to manipulate v**es? Strange these are red states that refuse to recount or upgrade systems to reliable systems that have hard backup that can be easily recounted.
That's a FOX position, that got shut down because ... (show quote)


I don't think California is a "red" state. That is where many of the r****d v****g machines were found. They were r****d to give Hillary the win over Bernie. We don't know if the problem was fixed before the General E******n, probably not. Turns out that 17 percent of the v****g machines across America were owned by a Clinton Foundation company. It would be interesting to know how many of those machines were in key states.

But at this point, it doesn't matter. The right man won. America is becoming great again.

Reply
Jul 19, 2018 04:14:00   #
debeda
 
EconomistDon wrote:
I don't think California is a "red" state. That is where many of the r****d v****g machines were found. They were r****d to give Hillary the win over Bernie. We don't know if the problem was fixed before the General E******n, probably not. Turns out that 17 percent of the v****g machines across America were owned by a Clinton Foundation company. It would be interesting to know how many of those machines were in key states.

But at this point, it doesn't matter. The right man won. America is becoming great again.
I don't think California is a "red" stat... (show quote)



Reply
Jul 19, 2018 05:33:48   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Obama works for the Muslims, Hillary works for the Rothschilds, Trump works for us. The end.

Reply
 
 
Jul 19, 2018 05:38:09   #
debeda
 
Peewee wrote:
Obama works for the Muslims, Hillary works for the Rothschilds, Trump works for us. The end.


PERFECT summation!!

Reply
Jul 19, 2018 06:54:12   #
Idaho
 
In the U.K. security clearances have to be renewed every 5 years and run with the individuals employment. So if they change employers, it expires.

Something like that should be implemented in the US. Also, it might be an idea to put a ceiling limit on security clearances on a per agency basis. That would reduce the amount of documents classified because of the scarcity of resources able to handle them.

Another limitation might be to make all classifications expire on a rolling basis with an onerous process to reclassify - say requiring to go in front of a governance committee. Anything that makes compliance time consuming and onerous would tend to reduce volumes of classified documents - first because trivial stuff would be too much trouble to bother with and second because it would be harder to weaponise.

Reply
Jul 19, 2018 07:46:57   #
snowbear37 Loc: MA.
 
Idaho wrote:
Now here’s a question - why were the Dems so confident about a Hillary win? So confident that the black hats in the alphabet agencies were so careless in the use of agency phones, emails etc? Overconfidence? They never thought it would matter because Hillary would fix it? Were they so confident because of the Soros supplied v****g machines that would give a Hillary win regardless?

Did ‘someone’ in fact pull an even more secret operation and ‘un-rig’ enough of the v****g machines so that the American people got a true v**e and elected Trump? Would that be enough to set off the Hillary hysteria? Why do you suppose the Dems are so keen to misdirect attention from examining the premise of no v**er machine tampering?

The reason I ask these questions is because that line of thinking explains the previous government and media reaction in much more simple terms. Occam’s Razor - always look for the simplest explanation. It’s much more likely to be the correct one.

That just leaves the dilemma of who r****d the v****g machines, and who unr****d them? The simplest answer is the one closest to home. You don’t need to look at complex foreign operations. How about a battle between white hats and black hat within the alphabet agencies themselves or between the alphabet agencies and the military?

I have no inside information, just commenting on appearances from the outside.
Now here’s a question - why were the Dems so confi... (show quote)


It also may be a clue to how Obama got elected for a second term.

Reply
Jul 19, 2018 07:53:42   #
acknowledgeurma
 
EconomistDon wrote:
I don't think California is a "red" state. That is where many of the r****d v****g machines were found. They were r****d to give Hillary the win over Bernie. We don't know if the problem was fixed before the General E******n, probably not. Turns out that 17 percent of the v****g machines across America were owned by a Clinton Foundation company. It would be interesting to know how many of those machines were in key states.

But at this point, it doesn't matter. The right man won. America is becoming great again.
I don't think California is a "red" stat... (show quote)

So I googled, "17 percent of the v****g machines across America were owned by a Clinton Foundation company" and found:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/george-soros-controls-smartmatic-v****g-machines-in-16-states/
And:
https://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/debunking-v**er-fraud-myth

For those who don't trust snopes see:
https://www.factcheck.org/2018/03/meme-falsely-claims-exposed-snopes-com/

As far as "The right man won." That certainly seems the case from Putin's point of view.

Reply
 
 
Jul 19, 2018 07:58:51   #
acknowledgeurma
 
Idaho wrote:
In the U.K. security clearances have to be renewed every 5 years and run with the individuals employment. So if they change employers, it expires.

Something like that should be implemented in the US. Also, it might be an idea to put a ceiling limit on security clearances on a per agency basis. That would reduce the amount of documents classified because of the scarcity of resources able to handle them.

Another limitation might be to make all classifications expire on a rolling basis with an onerous process to reclassify - say requiring to go in front of a governance committee. Anything that makes compliance time consuming and onerous would tend to reduce volumes of classified documents - first because trivial stuff would be too much trouble to bother with and second because it would be harder to weaponise.
In the U.K. security clearances have to be renewed... (show quote)

I suspect you have little to no experience with what it takes to get and maintain a security clearance in the US.

Reply
Jul 19, 2018 09:43:34   #
Idaho
 
Maybe - I think the v****g public has all it needs to know about security clearances after watching that CIA jackass on the congressional hearings and that deep state people walk out of alphabet agencies and still restrain their clearances.

Do Comey, Clinton, Brennan, Clapper still hold clearances? What a farce.

Reply
Jul 19, 2018 09:54:15   #
EconomistDon
 
acknowledgeurma wrote:
So I googled, "17 percent of the v****g machines across America were owned by a Clinton Foundation company" and found:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/george-soros-controls-smartmatic-v****g-machines-in-16-states/
And:
https://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/debunking-v**er-fraud-myth

For those who don't trust snopes see:
https://www.factcheck.org/2018/03/meme-falsely-claims-exposed-snopes-com/

As far as "The right man won." That certainly seems the case from Putin's point of view.
So I googled, "17 percent of the v****g machi... (show quote)


Thank you for recognizing Putin's point of view. We do not want to fight with the second most powerful nation on the planet. I don't care what John McCain or his Military Industrial Complex pals think, war is not good, especially with Russia. I am grateful that Trump understands the golden rule -- Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

I searched, but did not find the information on the Clinton Foundation company that owns 17 percent of v****g machines. They are not Soros.
Anyhow, the 2016 complaints were not from Republicans, they were from your Democrat pals. In California, exit poles were showing Bernie Sanders ahead of Hillary, while the v****g machines had Hillary well ahead. When Bernie supporters complained about it, the exit poles were shut down. They fixed that problem -- right?

https://www.change.org/p/bernie-sanders-outlaw-r****d-v****g-machines-3e8071c8-376d-48db-956f-acc6694c124e
https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/16/clinton-does-best-where-v****g-machines-flunk-hacking-tests-hillary-clinton-vs-bernie-sanders-e******n-f***d-allegations/

BTW, I don't care what factcheck says about Snopes. They reek of liberal bias.

Reply
Jul 19, 2018 12:05:53   #
woodguru
 
JW wrote:
If you know anything about computer tabulations, you know that none of them are trustworthy. The only trustworthy b****t is the one using ink and a permanent single copy... and that too can be gotten around by anyone with access to them.


There are many degrees of insecure, and there is no reason to have a system that isn't at a top echelon of security versus the old that has been proven to be insecure, and then there is the i***tic notion that there is no way to do a recount? The only reason for insisting on maintaining a system like that is because they are using and depending on fraud. Those who don't want fraud have no problems with systems that make it virtually impossible.

So you sidestep the question I bring up, why aren't we doing everything possible to prevent cyber attacks? The fact is Trump's admin is doing virtually nothing.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.