bmac32 wrote:
I really don't care one way or the other but if he's so for free speech wonder why he blocked me?
Then he speaketh with forked tongue.
I'd have to say several are full of untrue stories.
eagleye13 wrote:
Nick is a liberal.
He blocked liberals?
I know he is out of touch on many subjects.
Confused also?
bmac32 wrote:
I really don't care one way or the other but if he's so for free speech wonder why he blocked me?
When Did I block you.. I've never blocked anybody ?
eagleye13 wrote:
Nickolai blocked you?
I've never blocked any body
eagleye13 wrote:
Nick is a liberal.
He blocked liberals?
I know he is out of touch on many subjects.
Confused also?
Confused I am not Ignorant ? That's possible --for it is not possible for any one to know all things
Figured that would be your line, tried three lap tops over a two day period, you and several other left wingers had me blocked. You believe in free speech only when things go your way.
Nickolai wrote:
When Did I block you.. I've never blocked anybody ?
This has been running for a few days and I am curious, who is going to join Kevyn and send PMs to Admin asking for the block capability to be removed? I will start. I will not join him in his effort.
Bad Bob wrote:
I did
Don't you wish you could block this ? ........... Boob ?
I figured you and one other would.....
Bad Bob wrote:
I did
Nickolai wrote:
I've never blocked any body
Nickolie, What did you find out about Feinsteins staffer Dan Jones??
You never got back to me.
If you checked his story out, you learned something new.
But then again it's kind of hard to deny that Feinstein was oblivious.
I'll understand if you don't feel that Rachel would want you to acknowledge who Dan Jones is.
Kevyn wrote:
I had nothing to do with the ability to block posts and I have never blocked posts by anyone regardless their level of ignorance, h**efulness or inaccuracies.
Are you a masochist, Kevie?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.