One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
No More Same Sex Cakes, Pizzas, Or Ice Cream Cones
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jun 5, 2018 11:50:03   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
kemmer wrote:
Cool your jets, r****d; the SCOTUS ruling applies ONLY to that religious nut baker, NOT to any other business claiming their nasty religion approves of them demonizing other American citizens.
As These Two Little F*****ts Wanted To Do To The Baker
By Forcing Him To Condone Their Twisted Carnal Perversions

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 12:05:47   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Lonewolf wrote:
A lot to do about nothing will bakers now ask if you comited adultery or have you ever lied God says all sin is equal and the punishment is death.
He also commanded us to love our neighbor which the baker failed to do.


Please wake up. The couple entered "his" business and could have purchased anything already prepared on his shelves. He would have made them a cake until they "voluntarily" informed him it "had to" celebrate a same-sex marriage. That's when he referred them to others. He, as a Christian, already knew we are all sinners. He was specifically targeted because they knew he was a Christian. One out of one die, the punishment for sin has already been in force since Adam and Eve. The baker "didn't exhibit h**e" in any shape, form, or fashion. Only the "intolerant" gay couple did that. Wh**ever your source of news and information is, you need to change it.
All sin isn't equal, you missed the one about cursing the Holy Spirit, and there are other sins with adjectives preceding them showing some are worse than others. The entire Bible is about Jesus, Yahshua, and Salvation which resolves the sin problem. The baker was living his faith.

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 12:25:24   #
Lonewolf
 
I don't believe they were targeted for all I know they were the only bakery in town or simply refused thinking the news story would help busineess.
One thing they did to was to pass judgement on them!


quote=Peewee]Please wake up. The couple entered "his" business and could have purchased anything already prepared on his shelves. He would have made them a cake until they "voluntarily" informed him it "had to" celebrate a same-sex marriage. That's when he referred them to others. He, as a Christian, already knew we are all sinners. He was specifically targeted because they knew he was a Christian. One out of one die, the punishment for sin has already been in force since Adam and Eve. The baker "didn't exhibit h**e" in any shape, form, or fashion. Only the "intolerant" gay couple did that. Wh**ever your source of news and information is, you need to change it.
All sin isn't equal, you missed the one about cursing the Holy Spirit, and there are other sins with adjectives preceding them showing some are worse than others. The entire Bible is about Jesus, Yahshua, and Salvation which resolves the sin problem. The baker was living his faith.[/quote]

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2018 13:36:00   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Lonewolf wrote:
I don't believe they were targeted for all I know they were the only bakery in town or simply refused thinking the news story would help busineess.
One thing they did to was to pass judgement on them!


quote=Peewee]Please wake up. The couple entered "his" business and could have purchased anything already prepared on his shelves. He would have made them a cake until they "voluntarily" informed him it "had to" celebrate a same-sex marriage. That's when he referred them to others. He, as a Christian, already knew we are all sinners. He was specifically targeted because they knew he was a Christian. One out of one die, the punishment for sin has already been in force since Adam and Eve. The baker "didn't exhibit h**e" in any shape, form, or fashion. Only the "intolerant" gay couple did that. Wh**ever your source of news and information is, you need to change it.
All sin isn't equal, you missed the one about cursing the Holy Spirit, and there are other sins with adjectives preceding them showing some are worse than others. The entire Bible is about Jesus, Yahshua, and Salvation which resolves the sin problem. The baker was living his faith.
I don't believe they were targeted for all I know ... (show quote)
[/quote]

You said it all when you said, "for all I know".

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 15:12:45   #
Lonewolf
 
that's the Christian way



Peewee wrote:
You said it all when you said, "for all I know".

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 15:17:10   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Lonewolf wrote:
that's the Christian way


Do you train yourself so as to not have a sense of humor? Geez, Louise.

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 15:24:21   #
Lonewolf
 
no buddy just having fun have you come across any more videos on the location of the temple and is the excavation across from where the temple really was Solomons palace




Peewee wrote:
Do you train yourself so as to not have a sense of humor? Geez, Louise.

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2018 15:52:42   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Lonewolf wrote:
no buddy just having fun have you come across any more videos on the location of the temple and is the excavation across from where the temple really was Solomons palace


Why is my warning light flashing then? No, the latest best video I've seen is still Bob Carnuke's. It wasn't Solomon's temple, it was the remains of David's palace. They know that because of all the royal official clay seals that survived which had names found in the Bible during David's reign. The Gihon Springs area is still the best logical site since it existed prior to Rome controlling the area. The only water on the Temple Mount is via aqueducts and cisterns, not living water. Every stone of Solomon's temple was torn down so it could not be what they call the Temple Mount. If, the New Testament is also the inspired word of God as is the Old Testament/Torah. All I can say is there is a whole lot of digging going on in that area and it's very restricted. Much more than when Carnuke made his video.
The Sanhedrin and orthodox have to decide how they are going to control or spin the evidence, but they will have to decide soon.
https://youtu.be/zKqDx3RDCos

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 15:58:24   #
Sicilianthing
 
kemmer wrote:
Cool your jets, r****d; the SCOTUS ruling applies ONLY to that religious nut baker, NOT to any other business claiming their nasty religion approves of them demonizing other American citizens.


>>>>

Who Cares
Ph**K em’ all...
Game Over and it’s just a start of the actual reversals and throttling the left lunacy is going to be getting going forward...

The Jolly
Jack Off
Circle Jerkers
Free For all is OVER !

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 17:20:42   #
bahmer
 
karpenter wrote:
The United States Supreme Court Ruled Today 7-2 In Favor Of Colorado Baker

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/04/supreme-court-rules-against-gay-wedding-exemptions/1052989001/

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented

This Is Not To Say
Gays, Etc.'s Can Be Discriminated Against Or Refused Service
When Seeking Other Goods And Services In An Open Market
This Ruling Only Applies (So Far) To The Creation Of Same-Sex Wedding Accessories

The Phillips' Have Been Equated To Perpetrators Of The Holocaust

The Holocaust And Hitler Hyperbole Is Seriously Out Of Hand
The United States Supreme Court Ruled Today 7-2 In... (show quote)


I thought that they may have been the two that dissented but wasn't sure the only other one that it could have been would be Elana Kagan.

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 18:21:34   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
bahmer wrote:
I thought that they may have been the two that dissented but wasn't sure the only other one that it could have been would be Elana Kagan.
Surprising Kagan Didn't Dissent, Wasn't It ??

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2018 18:26:09   #
bahmer
 
karpenter wrote:
Surprising, Wasn't It ??


Ginsburg surprised me the most because of the closeness that she had with Justice Antonin Scalia. They did attend operas together and even though they were opposites they got along.

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 20:49:14   #
Ricktloml
 
karpenter wrote:
As These Two Little F*****ts Wanted To Do To The Baker
By Forcing Him To Condone Their Twisted Carnal Perversions


I had heard these two homosexuals shopped around for a Christian baker to target, and that's EXACTLY what many of these cases are about. Before the Supreme Court took it upon themselves to redefine marriage, this issue was raised, of course homosexuals expressed f**e outrage than anyone would even suggest that they would target Christians, "they just wanted to live and let live", as soon as they perceived they had the power to ruin anyone who disagreed with them, of course they did what everyone knew they planned to do in the first place.

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 21:21:56   #
Sicilianthing
 
bahmer wrote:
Ginsburg surprised me the most because of the closeness that she had with Justice Antonin Scalia. They did attend operas together and even though they were opposites they got along.


>>>>

She’s another WHACKED out T*****r who shouldn’t be on any bench.

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 22:06:01   #
Dr. Evil Loc: In Your Face
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

She’s another WHACKED out T*****r who shouldn’t be on any bench.


Maybe a park bench, b***h is asleep half the time anyway.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.