One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
No More Same Sex Cakes, Pizzas, Or Ice Cream Cones
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Jun 4, 2018 22:09:06   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
The United States Supreme Court Ruled Today 7-2 In Favor Of Colorado Baker

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/04/supreme-court-rules-against-gay-wedding-exemptions/1052989001/

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented

This Is Not To Say
Gays, Etc.'s Can Be Discriminated Against Or Refused Service
When Seeking Other Goods And Services In An Open Market
This Ruling Only Applies (So Far) To The Creation Of Same-Sex Wedding Accessories

The Phillips' Have Been Equated To Perpetrators Of The Holocaust

The Holocaust And Hitler Hyperbole Is Seriously Out Of Hand

Reply
Jun 4, 2018 22:37:15   #
Sicilianthing
 
karpenter wrote:
The United States Supreme Court Ruled Today 7-2 In Favor Of Colorado Baker

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/04/supreme-court-rules-against-gay-wedding-exemptions/1052989001/

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented

This Is Not To Say
Gays, Etc.'s Can Be Discriminated Against Or Refused Service
When Seeking Other Goods And Services In An Open Market
This Ruling Only Applies (So Far) To The Creation Of Same-Sex Wedding Accessories

The Phillips' Have Been Equated To Perpetrators Of The Holocaust

The Holocaust And Hitler Hyperbole Is Seriously Out Of Hand
The United States Supreme Court Ruled Today 7-2 In... (show quote)


>>>>

wooo Hooooo awesome !

Too bad fairyflamers

Itโ€™s about time SCOTUS ruled in the right direction

Next up ...

Good Bye Political Correctness

Reply
Jun 4, 2018 23:51:24   #
Dr. Evil Loc: In Your Face
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

wooo Hooooo awesome !

Too bad fairyflamers

Itโ€™s about time SCOTUS ruled in the right direction

Next up ...

Good Bye Political Correctness

๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘the rump rangers and carpet munchers finally get what they deserve---NOTHING.

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2018 00:00:33   #
Sicilianthing
 
Dr. Evil wrote:
๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘the rump rangers and carpet munchers finally get what they deserve---NOTHING.


>>>>

This fight is just starting to hit main stream people whoโ€™ve been moderating and ignoring it for decades, now theyโ€™ve going to be forced to reckon with it like many other issues of our time.

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 00:05:22   #
EmilyD
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

This fight is just starting to hit main stream people whoโ€™ve been moderating and ignoring it for decades, now theyโ€™ve going to be forced to reckon with it like many other issues of our time.


The Trump administration backed this all the way. That slippery slope of gayism just hit a huge bump.

Today a precedent has been set. It is a good day.

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 00:08:32   #
Sicilianthing
 
EmilyD wrote:
The Trump administration backed this all the way. That slippery slope of gayism just hit a huge bump.

Today a precedent has been set. It is a good day.


>>>>

Indeed

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 00:13:26   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
karpenter wrote:
The United States Supreme Court Ruled Today 7-2 In Favor Of Colorado Baker

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/04/supreme-court-rules-against-gay-wedding-exemptions/1052989001/

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented

This Is Not To Say
Gays, Etc.'s Can Be Discriminated Against Or Refused Service
When Seeking Other Goods And Services In An Open Market
This Ruling Only Applies (So Far) To The Creation Of Same-Sex Wedding Accessories

The Phillips' Have Been Equated To Perpetrators Of The Holocaust

The Holocaust And Hitler Hyperbole Is Seriously Out Of Hand
The United States Supreme Court Ruled Today 7-2 In... (show quote)


The ruling is for Religious liberties .. As it should have been.. It was never discrimination by the baker, it was religious objection..He is just as much entitled to his belief as any one else is to theirs..

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2018 01:01:47   #
EmilyD
 
lindajoy wrote:
The ruling is for Religious liberties .. As it should have been.. It was never discrimination by the baker, it was religious objection..He is just as much entitled to his belief as any one else is to theirs..


Exactly. This is a precedent that will go down in history. (Thank God!)

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 05:11:17   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
Amazingly
The MSM Sources Are Calling '7-2' A Narrow Margin Ruling

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 08:50:53   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
karpenter wrote:
The United States Supreme Court Ruled Today 7-2 In Favor Of Colorado Baker

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/04/supreme-court-rules-against-gay-wedding-exemptions/1052989001/

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented

This Is Not To Say
Gays, Etc.'s Can Be Discriminated Against Or Refused Service
When Seeking Other Goods And Services In An Open Market
This Ruling Only Applies (So Far) To The Creation Of Same-Sex Wedding Accessories

The Phillips' Have Been Equated To Perpetrators Of The Holocaust

The Holocaust And Hitler Hyperbole Is Seriously Out Of Hand
The United States Supreme Court Ruled Today 7-2 In... (show quote)


I knew this would happen, so did Ginsberg. The ruling did NOT give business owners the right to refuse service to anyone, it merely confirmed a lower court ruling that the Colorado commission violated that States Constitution. The same ruling ALSO reaffirmed that discrimination for ANY reason is un-Constitutional, and recognized that there will be many more such cases. The same opinion stated that the L**T community are entitled to live free from discrimination and actions that diminish their dignity.

It would have helped if you had examined the whole ruling and not jumped to conclusions.

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 10:38:48   #
Lonewolf
 
A lot to do about nothing will bakers now ask if you comited adultery or have you ever lied God says all sin is equal and the punishment is death.
He also commanded us to love our neighbor which the baker failed to do.

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2018 11:22:13   #
Sicilianthing
 
karpenter wrote:
Amazingly
The MSM Sources Are Calling '7-2' A Narrow Margin Ruling


>>>>

yeah, thatโ€™s the one that really caught me

Narrow ?

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 11:23:13   #
Sicilianthing
 
lpnmajor wrote:
I knew this would happen, so did Ginsberg. The ruling did NOT give business owners the right to refuse service to anyone, it merely confirmed a lower court ruling that the Colorado commission violated that States Constitution. The same ruling ALSO reaffirmed that discrimination for ANY reason is un-Constitutional, and recognized that there will be many more such cases. The same opinion stated that the L**T community are entitled to live free from discrimination and actions that diminish their dignity.

It would have helped if you had examined the whole ruling and not jumped to conclusions.
I knew this would happen, so did Ginsberg. The rul... (show quote)


>>>>

What dignity is there in UN Natural Sex Acts ?

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 11:36:04   #
karpenter Loc: Headin' Fer Da Hills !!
 
lpnmajor wrote:
It would have helped if you had examined the whole ruling and not jumped to conclusions.
I Did Read It
But You Can't Even Read My Brief Comments In The OP
---Without Jumping To Conclusions

I Understand The Point Of The Ruling Very Clearly

Reply
Jun 5, 2018 11:41:42   #
kemmer
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

wooo Hooooo awesome !

Too bad fairyflamers

Itโ€™s about time SCOTUS ruled in the right direction

Next up ...

Good Bye Political Correctness

Cool your jets, r****d; the SCOTUS ruling applies ONLY to that religious nut baker, NOT to any other business claiming their nasty religion approves of them demonizing other American citizens.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.