Democrat Leader Says In God We Trust Is Offensive!
May 9, 2018 13:10:58 #
drlarrygino wrote:
The demonrat senators should be forced to wear shi... (show quote)
Not only all of the above, the i***ts should be forced to read all of the bills they support and will v**e for as elected officials. They are charlatans that think they are America’s gift to the American People. Nancy Pelosi fits this mode very well.
May 9, 2018 14:30:44 #
[quote=bahmer]DEMOCRAT LEADER SAYS ‘IN GOD WE TRUST… IS OFFENSIVE’!
Gary DeMar GARY DEMAR MAY 8, 2018 450 VIEWS
Two Democrat state senators from Minnesota – Scott Dibble and John Marty – are opposed to a bill asking schools to display a poster with the words “In God We Trust.”
Dibble and Marty are afraid that some students might be offended. In fact, Marty said on the State Senate floor, “The money in my wallet has to say, ‘In God We Trust.’ I think that’s offensive.’”
Like clockwork, an atheist group “claim[s] the posters would violate the separation of church and state…. ‘It’s not the state’s business, and it’s not the school’s business, to be taking sides in this very personal decision,’ August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists said.”
There’s no such constitutional prohibition. In fact, the Minnesota Constitution mentions God:
We, the people of the state of Minnesota, grateful to God for our civil and religious liberty, and desiring to perpetuate its blessings and secure the same to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution.
The First Amendment is addressed to Congress to protect the states on the topic of religion.
Why not make posters of the Preamble to the Minnesota constitution and place them in all the classrooms? That would shut them up or force them to change the Constitution and the other 49 state Constitutions.
The following email was sent to me in response to an article I wrote about Michael Newdow, the lawyer who has been trying to use the courts to remove “In God We Trust” from our nation’s currency and “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.
It’s typical of the way atheists think.
Dear Mr. DeMar,
You wrote: Following Newdow’s logic, e******y means that America should be officially atheistic. Of course, Newdow would claim that taking “In God We Trust” off U.S. currency is not atheism; it’s neutrality. If God is not acknowledged by our government, then the government is atheistic. Atheism is defined as “no God” (a=no + theos=God).
By that logic, it seems to me that the roads, paper, desks, and all the other objects used by government (except, of course, things such as our money) are atheistic as well. After all, none of those things have “In God We Trust” on them.
So, too, I imagine are the shoes you wear, the toothpaste you use, and the children you bore (when they first arrived, at least).
So, I just wanted to say that we Atheists (who embrace all of our fellow humans) are glad to have you among us.
Here was my response to the letter writer that applies equally well to the two state senators from Minnesota and August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists and atheists in general.
Newdow has taken an action to remove “In God We Trust,” not because he believes that it’s not necessary, but that it’s a fiction, and governments should not be involved in promoting fiction. By this action, he claims to be “neutral.” He is not being neutral…[/quote]
And with the responses from those two, many believe they are the ones that are offensive.
Gary DeMar GARY DEMAR MAY 8, 2018 450 VIEWS
Two Democrat state senators from Minnesota – Scott Dibble and John Marty – are opposed to a bill asking schools to display a poster with the words “In God We Trust.”
Dibble and Marty are afraid that some students might be offended. In fact, Marty said on the State Senate floor, “The money in my wallet has to say, ‘In God We Trust.’ I think that’s offensive.’”
Like clockwork, an atheist group “claim[s] the posters would violate the separation of church and state…. ‘It’s not the state’s business, and it’s not the school’s business, to be taking sides in this very personal decision,’ August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists said.”
There’s no such constitutional prohibition. In fact, the Minnesota Constitution mentions God:
We, the people of the state of Minnesota, grateful to God for our civil and religious liberty, and desiring to perpetuate its blessings and secure the same to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution.
The First Amendment is addressed to Congress to protect the states on the topic of religion.
Why not make posters of the Preamble to the Minnesota constitution and place them in all the classrooms? That would shut them up or force them to change the Constitution and the other 49 state Constitutions.
The following email was sent to me in response to an article I wrote about Michael Newdow, the lawyer who has been trying to use the courts to remove “In God We Trust” from our nation’s currency and “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.
It’s typical of the way atheists think.
Dear Mr. DeMar,
You wrote: Following Newdow’s logic, e******y means that America should be officially atheistic. Of course, Newdow would claim that taking “In God We Trust” off U.S. currency is not atheism; it’s neutrality. If God is not acknowledged by our government, then the government is atheistic. Atheism is defined as “no God” (a=no + theos=God).
By that logic, it seems to me that the roads, paper, desks, and all the other objects used by government (except, of course, things such as our money) are atheistic as well. After all, none of those things have “In God We Trust” on them.
So, too, I imagine are the shoes you wear, the toothpaste you use, and the children you bore (when they first arrived, at least).
So, I just wanted to say that we Atheists (who embrace all of our fellow humans) are glad to have you among us.
Here was my response to the letter writer that applies equally well to the two state senators from Minnesota and August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists and atheists in general.
Newdow has taken an action to remove “In God We Trust,” not because he believes that it’s not necessary, but that it’s a fiction, and governments should not be involved in promoting fiction. By this action, he claims to be “neutral.” He is not being neutral…[/quote]
And with the responses from those two, many believe they are the ones that are offensive.
May 10, 2018 00:05:52 #
oldroy
Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
Louie27 wrote:
And with the responses from those two, many believe they are the ones that are offensive.
I certainly believe those two are very offensive and would really like to see them send me $5000 before they leave in search of the atheist country they want to live in. I would even share some of their money with them to pay their way out of our nation. I would even be glad to take a baseball bat to that damned Newdow if it would make him feel better.
Atheists are so very sad and just don't belong here anymore.
May 10, 2018 00:07:42 #
[quote=bahmer]DEMOCRAT LEADER SAYS ‘IN GOD WE TRUST… IS OFFENSIVE’!
Gary DeMar GARY DEMAR MAY 8, 2018 450 VIEWS
Two Democrat state senators from Minnesota – Scott Dibble and John Marty – are opposed to a bill asking schools to display a poster with the words “In God We Trust.”
Dibble and Marty are afraid that some students might be offended. In fact, Marty said on the State Senate floor, “The money in my wallet has to say, ‘In God We Trust.’ I think that’s offensive.’”
Like clockwork, an atheist group “claim[s] the posters would violate the separation of church and state…. ‘It’s not the state’s business, and it’s not the school’s business, to be taking sides in this very personal decision,’ August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists said.”
There’s no such constitutional prohibition. In fact, the Minnesota Constitution mentions God:
We, the people of the state of Minnesota, grateful to God for our civil and religious liberty, and desiring to perpetuate its blessings and secure the same to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution.
The First Amendment is addressed to Congress to protect the states on the topic of religion.
Why not make posters of the Preamble to the Minnesota constitution and place them in all the classrooms? That would shut them up or force them to change the Constitution and the other 49 state Constitutions.
The following email was sent to me in response to an article I wrote about Michael Newdow, the lawyer who has been trying to use the courts to remove “In God We Trust” from our nation’s currency and “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.
It’s typical of the way atheists think.
Dear Mr. DeMar,
You wrote: Following Newdow’s logic, e******y means that America should be officially atheistic. Of course, Newdow would claim that taking “In God We Trust” off U.S. currency is not atheism; it’s neutrality. If God is not acknowledged by our government, then the government is atheistic. Atheism is defined as “no God” (a=no + theos=God).
By that logic, it seems to me that the roads, paper, desks, and all the other objects used by government (except, of course, things such as our money) are atheistic as well. After all, none of those things have “In God We Trust” on them.
So, too, I imagine are the shoes you wear, the toothpaste you use, and the children you bore (when they first arrived, at least).
So, I just wanted to say that we Atheists (who embrace all of our fellow humans) are glad to have you among us.
Here was my response to the letter writer that applies equally well to the two state senators from Minnesota and August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists and atheists in general.
Newdow has taken an action to remove “In God We Trust,” not because he believes that it’s not necessary, but that it’s a fiction, and governments should not be involved in promoting fiction. By this action, he claims to be “neutral.” He is not being neutral…[/quote]
When is the left gonna get tired of being "offended" about every dang thing and start attending to their jobs
Lefty politicians- start representing things that are GOOD for your constituents instead of a far left ideology that many of your constituents find weird at best and insane at worst.
Lefty bias news (the alphabets) - start reporting news on the national level. Stop channeling the National Enquirer.
Educators - start educating. Encourage critical thought and stop insisting on PC culture talking points and narrative.
And the list goes on. This is all so outrageous and exhausting. And downright dumb. I guess everyone who immigrates, sneaks in illegally or is brought in as a refugee has the right to respect for their culture and mores. And those of us that were born here have NO right to get respect for our culture and mores. Our right is to pay taxes to an ever more greedy and out of touch government. To give them more money to hold us up with ever more BS. Aaargh.
Gary DeMar GARY DEMAR MAY 8, 2018 450 VIEWS
Two Democrat state senators from Minnesota – Scott Dibble and John Marty – are opposed to a bill asking schools to display a poster with the words “In God We Trust.”
Dibble and Marty are afraid that some students might be offended. In fact, Marty said on the State Senate floor, “The money in my wallet has to say, ‘In God We Trust.’ I think that’s offensive.’”
Like clockwork, an atheist group “claim[s] the posters would violate the separation of church and state…. ‘It’s not the state’s business, and it’s not the school’s business, to be taking sides in this very personal decision,’ August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists said.”
There’s no such constitutional prohibition. In fact, the Minnesota Constitution mentions God:
We, the people of the state of Minnesota, grateful to God for our civil and religious liberty, and desiring to perpetuate its blessings and secure the same to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution.
The First Amendment is addressed to Congress to protect the states on the topic of religion.
Why not make posters of the Preamble to the Minnesota constitution and place them in all the classrooms? That would shut them up or force them to change the Constitution and the other 49 state Constitutions.
The following email was sent to me in response to an article I wrote about Michael Newdow, the lawyer who has been trying to use the courts to remove “In God We Trust” from our nation’s currency and “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.
It’s typical of the way atheists think.
Dear Mr. DeMar,
You wrote: Following Newdow’s logic, e******y means that America should be officially atheistic. Of course, Newdow would claim that taking “In God We Trust” off U.S. currency is not atheism; it’s neutrality. If God is not acknowledged by our government, then the government is atheistic. Atheism is defined as “no God” (a=no + theos=God).
By that logic, it seems to me that the roads, paper, desks, and all the other objects used by government (except, of course, things such as our money) are atheistic as well. After all, none of those things have “In God We Trust” on them.
So, too, I imagine are the shoes you wear, the toothpaste you use, and the children you bore (when they first arrived, at least).
So, I just wanted to say that we Atheists (who embrace all of our fellow humans) are glad to have you among us.
Here was my response to the letter writer that applies equally well to the two state senators from Minnesota and August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists and atheists in general.
Newdow has taken an action to remove “In God We Trust,” not because he believes that it’s not necessary, but that it’s a fiction, and governments should not be involved in promoting fiction. By this action, he claims to be “neutral.” He is not being neutral…[/quote]
When is the left gonna get tired of being "offended" about every dang thing and start attending to their jobs
Lefty politicians- start representing things that are GOOD for your constituents instead of a far left ideology that many of your constituents find weird at best and insane at worst.
Lefty bias news (the alphabets) - start reporting news on the national level. Stop channeling the National Enquirer.
Educators - start educating. Encourage critical thought and stop insisting on PC culture talking points and narrative.
And the list goes on. This is all so outrageous and exhausting. And downright dumb. I guess everyone who immigrates, sneaks in illegally or is brought in as a refugee has the right to respect for their culture and mores. And those of us that were born here have NO right to get respect for our culture and mores. Our right is to pay taxes to an ever more greedy and out of touch government. To give them more money to hold us up with ever more BS. Aaargh.
May 10, 2018 00:08:51 #
When is the left gonna get tired of being "offended" about every dang thing and start attending to their jobs
Lefty politicians- start representing things that are GOOD for your constituents instead of a far left ideology that many of your constituents find weird at best and insane at worst.
Lefty bias news (the alphabets) - start reporting news on the national level. Stop channeling the National Enquirer.
Educators - start educating. Encourage critical thought and stop insisting on PC culture talking points and narrative.
And the list goes on. This is all so outrageous and exhausting. And downright dumb. I guess everyone who immigrates, sneaks in illegally or is brought in as a refugee has the right to respect for their culture and mores. And those of us that were born here have NO right to get respect for our culture and mores. Our right is to pay taxes to an ever more greedy and out of touch government. To give them more money to hold us up with ever more BS. Aaargh.
Lefty politicians- start representing things that are GOOD for your constituents instead of a far left ideology that many of your constituents find weird at best and insane at worst.
Lefty bias news (the alphabets) - start reporting news on the national level. Stop channeling the National Enquirer.
Educators - start educating. Encourage critical thought and stop insisting on PC culture talking points and narrative.
And the list goes on. This is all so outrageous and exhausting. And downright dumb. I guess everyone who immigrates, sneaks in illegally or is brought in as a refugee has the right to respect for their culture and mores. And those of us that were born here have NO right to get respect for our culture and mores. Our right is to pay taxes to an ever more greedy and out of touch government. To give them more money to hold us up with ever more BS. Aaargh.
May 10, 2018 00:09:49 #
oldroy wrote:
I certainly believe those two are very offensive and would really like to see them send me $5000 before they leave in search of the atheist country they want to live in. I would even share some of their money with them to pay their way out of our nation. I would even be glad to take a baseball bat to that damned Newdow if it would make him feel better.
Atheists are so very sad and just don't belong here anymore.
Atheists are so very sad and just don't belong here anymore.
May 10, 2018 00:43:30 #
[quote=bahmer]DEMOCRAT LEADER SAYS ‘IN GOD WE TRUST… IS OFFENSIVE’!
Gary DeMar GARY DEMAR MAY 8, 2018 450 VIEWS
Two Democrat state senators from Minnesota – Scott Dibble and John Marty – are opposed to a bill asking schools to display a poster with the words “In God We Trust.”
Dibble and Marty are afraid that some students might be offended. In fact, Marty said on the State Senate floor, “The money in my wallet has to say, ‘In God We Trust.’ I think that’s offensive.’”
Like clockwork, an atheist group “claim[s] the posters would violate the separation of church and state…. ‘It’s not the state’s business, and it’s not the school’s business, to be taking sides in this very personal decision,’ August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists said.”
There’s no such constitutional prohibition. In fact, the Minnesota Constitution mentions God:
We, the people of the state of Minnesota, grateful to God for our civil and religious liberty, and desiring to perpetuate its blessings and secure the same to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution.
The First Amendment is addressed to Congress to protect the states on the topic of religion.
Why not make posters of the Preamble to the Minnesota constitution and place them in all the classrooms? That would shut them up or force them to change the Constitution and the other 49 state Constitutions.
The following email was sent to me in response to an article I wrote about Michael Newdow, the lawyer who has been trying to use the courts to remove “In God We Trust” from our nation’s currency and “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.
It’s typical of the way atheists think.
Dear Mr. DeMar,
You wrote: Following Newdow’s logic, e******y means that America should be officially atheistic. Of course, Newdow would claim that taking “In God We Trust” off U.S. currency is not atheism; it’s neutrality. If God is not acknowledged by our government, then the government is atheistic. Atheism is defined as “no God” (a=no + theos=God).
By that logic, it seems to me that the roads, paper, desks, and all the other objects used by government (except, of course, things such as our money) are atheistic as well. After all, none of those things have “In God We Trust” on them.
So, too, I imagine are the shoes you wear, the toothpaste you use, and the children you bore (when they first arrived, at least).
So, I just wanted to say that we Atheists (who embrace all of our fellow humans) are glad to have you among us.
Here was my response to the letter writer that applies equally well to the two state senators from Minnesota and August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists and atheists in general.
Newdow has taken an action to remove “In God We Trust,” not because he believes that it’s not necessary, but that it’s a fiction, and governments should not be involved in promoting fiction. By this action, he claims to be “neutral.” He is not being neutral…[/quote]
==================
Under Obama, Democrats and the Left, have been changing America to its radical ideology, the Alinsky Style. Their people are the following: The MSM, i*****l a***ns, from Mexico, South and Central America, the Muslim terrorists, and Muslim refugees, Muslims in the US from all other parts of the world now demand that America must follow and obey them. Obama has been changing the US for Islam, his religion of peace. Obama has been removing Christianity in the US, and replaced with Islam, his religion of peace.
--------------
Under president Trump, US must change its policy towards aliens, legal, illegal, Muslim refugees, Muslim terrorists:
* to follow, comply, and obey the rule of law in the United States, and obey the constitution.
*Those aliens who come to the US must be required to learn and speak English.
*Must be required to learn and respect the culture of the United States.
*Must NOT be allowed to destroy Christian symbols, and must respect the religion of Christianity even if they have different one.
*Must obey, respect, and follow the constitution of the United States.
*Must respect and learn the history of the United States.
*Must work, and must NOT be allowed to handout.
*Must NOT demand that their culture to be followed.
*Must NOT be allowed to deliver their anchor babies.
*Must be law abiding, obey all the rules, laws of the United States.
*Must NOT commit any kinds of criminal acts towards the American people.
* Must not sell drugs/use drugs and poison the American people.
Gary DeMar GARY DEMAR MAY 8, 2018 450 VIEWS
Two Democrat state senators from Minnesota – Scott Dibble and John Marty – are opposed to a bill asking schools to display a poster with the words “In God We Trust.”
Dibble and Marty are afraid that some students might be offended. In fact, Marty said on the State Senate floor, “The money in my wallet has to say, ‘In God We Trust.’ I think that’s offensive.’”
Like clockwork, an atheist group “claim[s] the posters would violate the separation of church and state…. ‘It’s not the state’s business, and it’s not the school’s business, to be taking sides in this very personal decision,’ August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists said.”
There’s no such constitutional prohibition. In fact, the Minnesota Constitution mentions God:
We, the people of the state of Minnesota, grateful to God for our civil and religious liberty, and desiring to perpetuate its blessings and secure the same to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution.
The First Amendment is addressed to Congress to protect the states on the topic of religion.
Why not make posters of the Preamble to the Minnesota constitution and place them in all the classrooms? That would shut them up or force them to change the Constitution and the other 49 state Constitutions.
The following email was sent to me in response to an article I wrote about Michael Newdow, the lawyer who has been trying to use the courts to remove “In God We Trust” from our nation’s currency and “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance.
It’s typical of the way atheists think.
Dear Mr. DeMar,
You wrote: Following Newdow’s logic, e******y means that America should be officially atheistic. Of course, Newdow would claim that taking “In God We Trust” off U.S. currency is not atheism; it’s neutrality. If God is not acknowledged by our government, then the government is atheistic. Atheism is defined as “no God” (a=no + theos=God).
By that logic, it seems to me that the roads, paper, desks, and all the other objects used by government (except, of course, things such as our money) are atheistic as well. After all, none of those things have “In God We Trust” on them.
So, too, I imagine are the shoes you wear, the toothpaste you use, and the children you bore (when they first arrived, at least).
So, I just wanted to say that we Atheists (who embrace all of our fellow humans) are glad to have you among us.
Here was my response to the letter writer that applies equally well to the two state senators from Minnesota and August Berkshire of Minnesota Atheists and atheists in general.
Newdow has taken an action to remove “In God We Trust,” not because he believes that it’s not necessary, but that it’s a fiction, and governments should not be involved in promoting fiction. By this action, he claims to be “neutral.” He is not being neutral…[/quote]
==================
Under Obama, Democrats and the Left, have been changing America to its radical ideology, the Alinsky Style. Their people are the following: The MSM, i*****l a***ns, from Mexico, South and Central America, the Muslim terrorists, and Muslim refugees, Muslims in the US from all other parts of the world now demand that America must follow and obey them. Obama has been changing the US for Islam, his religion of peace. Obama has been removing Christianity in the US, and replaced with Islam, his religion of peace.
--------------
Under president Trump, US must change its policy towards aliens, legal, illegal, Muslim refugees, Muslim terrorists:
* to follow, comply, and obey the rule of law in the United States, and obey the constitution.
*Those aliens who come to the US must be required to learn and speak English.
*Must be required to learn and respect the culture of the United States.
*Must NOT be allowed to destroy Christian symbols, and must respect the religion of Christianity even if they have different one.
*Must obey, respect, and follow the constitution of the United States.
*Must respect and learn the history of the United States.
*Must work, and must NOT be allowed to handout.
*Must NOT demand that their culture to be followed.
*Must NOT be allowed to deliver their anchor babies.
*Must be law abiding, obey all the rules, laws of the United States.
*Must NOT commit any kinds of criminal acts towards the American people.
* Must not sell drugs/use drugs and poison the American people.
May 10, 2018 08:21:28 #
May 10, 2018 11:29:15 #
America 1
Loc: South Miami
Radiance3 wrote:
================== br Under Obama, Democrats and t... (show quote)
Could it be that Congress adopt this plan?
To think something that made sense would be of interest, likely not.
Too busy making bank deposits.
May 10, 2018 12:18:40 #
Bad Bob
Loc: Virginia
Radiance3 wrote:
================== br Under Obama, Democrats and t... (show quote)
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-130239-1.html
What do you say Radiance3? Any more lies?
May 10, 2018 12:55:04 #
Bad Bob wrote:
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-130239-1.html
What do you say Radiance3? Any more lies?
What do you say Radiance3? Any more lies?
================
There is nothing credible from your mouth bad bob. Your MSM reporters, where you presented the F**E STUFF, busy manufacturing lies including your whore Stormy. That's the only thing they could produce, evil, lies, and obnoxious smell of the l*****ts and democrats.
May 10, 2018 12:56:01 #
Bad Bob wrote:
http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-130239-1.html
What do you say Radiance3? Any more lies?
What do you say Radiance3? Any more lies?
================
There is nothing credible from your mouth bad bob. Your MSM reporters, where you presented the F**E STUFF, busy manufacturing lies including your whore Stormy. That's the only thing they could produce, evil, lies, and obnoxious smell of the l*****ts and democrats.
May 10, 2018 14:40:12 #
Bad Bob
Loc: Virginia
Radiance3 wrote:
================
There is nothing credible from your mouth bad bob. Your MSM reporters, where you presented the F**E STUFF, busy manufacturing lies including your whore Stormy. That's the only thing they could produce, evil, lies, and obnoxious smell of the l*****ts and democrats.
There is nothing credible from your mouth bad bob. Your MSM reporters, where you presented the F**E STUFF, busy manufacturing lies including your whore Stormy. That's the only thing they could produce, evil, lies, and obnoxious smell of the l*****ts and democrats.
Are they working for Satan?
May 10, 2018 18:04:03 #
May 10, 2018 18:08:59 #
Radiance3 wrote:
==============
That is where you are going.
That is where you are going.
That is why a lot of them are atheists because if there is no God then there is no devil or Satan. That way they are home free in their eyes that is. After the Lord returns and the judgement starts it will be a different story.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.