One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Civil war??
Page <<first <prev 8 of 9 next>
Apr 15, 2018 17:35:01   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
archie bunker wrote:
I've turned him in to the UN for gassing his own people, but they allow the suffering to continue!

If the rest of the world only knew.....

I'd keep an eye out for incoming missiles, Arch. Get out while you can

Reply
Apr 15, 2018 17:40:11   #
emarine
 
archie bunker wrote:
I've turned him in to the UN for gassing his own people, but they allow the suffering to continue!

If the rest of the world only knew.....




Not the UN Arch... they're worthless & with all the Muslim influence lately they will probably just eat your pup... then you will have to by another couch... Cheerios are way cheaper short term...

Reply
Apr 15, 2018 18:19:22   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Morgan wrote:
Hey Arch, last time we spoke you were thinking of adopting another, how'd that go?


Haven't found the right one yet.

Reply
 
 
Apr 15, 2018 18:26:42   #
badbobby Loc: texas
 
archie bunker wrote:
Haven't found the right one yet.


nice lookin lil lap dog there Arch
does he do tricks?

Reply
Apr 15, 2018 19:47:38   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
badbobby wrote:
nice lookin lil lap dog there Arch
does he do tricks?


Oh, he'll sit, shake, lay down, stay, heel, roll over for a treat alright.
I figure every breath he takes is a treat. The Mrs., and I kinda get sideways on that one.

Reply
Apr 15, 2018 19:51:08   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
slatten49 wrote:
I'd keep an eye out for incoming missiles, Arch. Get out while you can


I'm a little more worried about getting my cods stepped on when he tries to jump in the bed!
I just don't take 70 lbs there like I used to!

Reply
Apr 15, 2018 19:57:49   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
archie bunker wrote:
I'm a little more worried about getting my cods stepped on when he tries to jump in the bed!
I just don't take 70 lbs there like I used to!

As you get older, Arch, you'll find a lot of things ain't what they "used to" be.

Reply
 
 
Apr 15, 2018 20:02:59   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
slatten49 wrote:
As you get older, Arch, you'll find a lot of things ain't what they "used to" be.


I'm glad I can always count on you for encouraging words about my future decrepitness!

Reply
Apr 15, 2018 20:21:49   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
archie bunker wrote:
I'm glad I can always count on you for encouraging words about my future decrepitness!

I'm always here for ya', Arch. That's what friends are for

BTW, view our fellow Texan and American Hero on my new thread..."A True Texan & American Hero on 'What's My Line,' 1955."

Reply
Apr 15, 2018 21:24:55   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
working class stiff wrote:
So is that the only thing you are worried about?
bahmer

Actually, no. Since the title of the thread is Civil War??, and since you asked, I do not understand at all why those on the right think they would win an actual civil war. Since it is the job of the US government to protect the American people, how would the right win? Do you think the US military will help the right to attack all us 'Marxist/c*******ts'? How would you get the armed forces to attack or corral half the v****g age population?
Or would it just be marauding m*****as engaged in extra-judicial activities?
I also think the right is making a mistake in assuming it would win a civil war. The economic resources of the coasts and urban areas would nullify any advantage the rural areas have in weaponry.
While a civil war 2.0 would be just as tragic as the original (and therefore should not be wished for), it is not a given that the right would win.
So is that the only thing you are worried about? b... (show quote)


So you think the East Coast would win that war by "shooting" all those economic advantages at us to keep our guns silenced. Sometimes I have to wonder about you foolish lefties and this is certainly one of them. I'll take one of my guns against a handful of cash any day. Get some rational thought running through your mind just got the hell of it.

Reply
Apr 15, 2018 21:33:17   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
woodguru wrote:
A dispute about a precinct would have changed the e*******l, supreme court decided it (not their place) and it was later acknowledged that the supreme court got it wrong and the recount issue would have prevailed in Gore's favor. Stole an e******n, the supreme court.


Woody, where were you back then? The Florida Supreme Court was behind all that crap and the h*****g chads caused all that trouble. At lease 6 publications did a recount in Florida, one of them being the al Times of New York and every one of them found that 'Gore sure enough lost that e******n. Maybe you need to check up on what they found.

You can't always just use what you think you saw back then, or what some other liberal saw. You do know that the military people from Florida failed to have their v**es counted, but of course, we all knew they would v**e Bush and that is why their v**es were called late. Oh chit oh deer did the libs fail that test.

Reply
 
 
Apr 15, 2018 21:35:49   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
archie bunker wrote:
Unbelievable!
My, my, aren't you a piece of work!?


Woody sure is a piece of work, Arch. He does some wonders with things from Kos and Media Matters.

Reply
Apr 16, 2018 11:06:37   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
oldroy wrote:
So you think the East Coast would win that war by "shooting" all those economic advantages at us to keep our guns silenced. Sometimes I have to wonder about you foolish lefties and this is certainly one of them. I'll take one of my guns against a handful of cash any day. Get some rational thought running through your mind just got the hell of it.


You obviously did not read what I actually wrote. Never said the East Coast would win (and btw, the West Coast and other areas should be included). I raised the issues of what role the federal government and military would play, the economic advantages the urban areas have and others. You ignored all those issues.

Of course you jumped right in with your 'my guns are gonna win' , which is the whole argument I raised questions about. I pointed out that it's not a foregone conclusion that the right would win.

You are no one to talk about others' lack of rationality if you can't follow a simple line of reasoning.

Reply
Apr 16, 2018 11:14:23   #
trucksterbud
 
badbobby wrote:
an opinion
not necessarily mine


Two or more sides disagree on who runs the country. And they can’t settle the question through e******ns because they don’t even agree that e******ns are how you decide who’s in charge.



That’s the basic issue here. Who decides who runs the country? When you h**e each other but accept the e******n results, you have a country. When you stop accepting e******n results, you have a countdown to a civil war.



The Mueller investigation is about removing President Trump from office and overturning the results of an e******n. We all know that. But it’s not the first time they’ve done this. The first time a Republican president was elected this century, they said he didn’t really win. The Supreme Court gave him the e******n. There’s a pattern here.



What do sure odds of the Democrats rejecting the next Republican president really mean? It means they don’t accept the results of any e******n that they don’t win. It means they don’t believe that t***sfers of power in this country are determined by e******ns.



That’s a civil war.



There’s no shooting. At least not unless you count the attempt to k**l a bunch of Republicans at a charity baseball game practice. But the Democrats have rejected our system of government.



This isn’t dissent. It’s not disagreement. You can h**e the other party. You can think they’re the worst thing that ever happened to the country. But then you work harder to win the next e******n. When you consistently reject the results of e******ns that you don’t win, what you want is a dictatorship.



Your very own dictatorship.



The only legitimate exercise of power in this country, according to Democrats, is its own. Whenever Republicans exercise power, it’s inherently illegitimate. The Democrats lost Congress. They lost the White House. So what did they do? They began trying to run the country through Federal judges and bureaucrats. Every time that a Federal judge issues an order saying that the President of the United States can’t scratch his own back without his say so, that’s the civil war.



Our system of government is based on the constitution, but that’s not the system that runs this country. The Democrat's system is that any part of government that it runs gets total and unlimited power over the country.



If the Democrats are in the White House, then the president can do anything. And I mean anything. He can have his own amnesty for i*****l a***ns. He can fine you for not having health insurance. His power is unlimited. He’s a dictator.



But when Republicans get into the White House, suddenly the President can’t do anything. He isn’t even allowed to undo the i*****l a***n amnesty that his predecessor illegally invented. A Democrat in the White House has “discretion” to completely decide every aspect of immigration policy. A Republican doesn’t even have the “discretion” to reverse him. That’s how the game is played. That’s how our country is run. Sad but true, although the left hasn’t yet won that particular fight.



When a Democrat is in the White House, states aren’t even allowed to enforce i*********n l*w. But when a Republican is in the White House, states can create their own i*********n l*ws. Under Obama, a state wasn’t allowed to go to the bathroom without asking permission. But under Trump, Jerry Brown can go around saying that California is an independent republic and sign treaties with other countries.



The Constitution has something to say about that.



Whether it’s Federal or State, Executive, Legislative or Judiciary, the left moves power around to run the country. If it controls an institution, then that institution is suddenly the supreme power in the land. This is what I call a moving dictatorship.



Donald Trump has caused the Shadow Government to come out of hiding: Professional government is a guild. Like medieval guilds. You can’t serve in if you’re not a member. If you haven’t been indoctrinated into its arcane rituals. If you aren’t in the club. And Trump isn’t in the club. He brought in a bunch of people who aren’t in the club with him.



Now we’re seeing what the pros do when amateurs try to walk in on them. They spy on them, they investigate them and they send them to jail. They use the tools of power to bring them down.



That’s not a free country.



It’s not a free country when FBI agents who support Hillary take out an “insurance policy” against Trump winning the e******n. It’s not a free country when Obama officials engage in massive unmasking of the opposition. It’s not a free country when the media responds to the other guy winning by trying to ban the conservative media that supported him from social media. It’s not a free country when all of the above collude together to overturn an e******n because the guy who wasn’t supposed to win won.



Have no doubt, we’re in a civil war between conservative volunteer government and a l*****t Democrat professional government.



That is how WARS START from within.
an opinion br not necessarily mine br br br Two ... (show quote)


Yes and all quite true. But the left is so encroached in their Saul Alinsky programming, the only way to end it is to take them out. Remember here, the USA is a Republic. Not a democracy.. And we need to include ALL qualified candidates - democrat, republican, independent - in the e******n process.

Reply
Apr 16, 2018 11:21:04   #
trucksterbud
 
JW wrote:
A Higher Loyalty

Author: James Comey


The interesting thing about that title is what it reveals about the author; he elects himself to judge an e******n. His 'loyalty' is to his ideology, not to the Constitutional process of orderly t***sitional government.


Just by writing his book, Comey violated his "Oath of Office" and his agreement to keep any / all information secret or under wraps for 7 years...

He is now guilty of slander - on a sitting President. He is now guilty of - by his own words - Breach of Trust, as he made several comments indicating how and why certain decisions were made exonerating Clinton and her crimes. And he - Comey - inadvertantly also just incriminated himself. So, if Trump wants to take Comey down, its gonna be a hard fall. Comey seems to feel he is above the law. Of course, this exact mindset is what the ENTIRE Democrappic party feels like in this day and age. They all seem to feel they are above the law..................

Also, IF Comey was a valid head of the FBI at his time there, he would have outed the 11 million or so "Ghost" v**ers who just happened to v**e Democrat.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 9 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.