Civil war??
Apr 13, 2018 12:50:04 #
an opinion
not necessarily mine
Two or more sides disagree on who runs the country. And they can’t settle the question through e******ns because they don’t even agree that e******ns are how you decide who’s in charge.
That’s the basic issue here. Who decides who runs the country? When you h**e each other but accept the e******n results, you have a country. When you stop accepting e******n results, you have a countdown to a civil war.
The Mueller investigation is about removing President Trump from office and overturning the results of an e******n. We all know that. But it’s not the first time they’ve done this. The first time a Republican president was elected this century, they said he didn’t really win. The Supreme Court gave him the e******n. There’s a pattern here.
What do sure odds of the Democrats rejecting the next Republican president really mean? It means they don’t accept the results of any e******n that they don’t win. It means they don’t believe that t***sfers of power in this country are determined by e******ns.
That’s a civil war.
There’s no shooting. At least not unless you count the attempt to k**l a bunch of Republicans at a charity baseball game practice. But the Democrats have rejected our system of government.
This isn’t dissent. It’s not disagreement. You can h**e the other party. You can think they’re the worst thing that ever happened to the country. But then you work harder to win the next e******n. When you consistently reject the results of e******ns that you don’t win, what you want is a dictatorship.
Your very own dictatorship.
The only legitimate exercise of power in this country, according to Democrats, is its own. Whenever Republicans exercise power, it’s inherently illegitimate. The Democrats lost Congress. They lost the White House. So what did they do? They began trying to run the country through Federal judges and bureaucrats. Every time that a Federal judge issues an order saying that the President of the United States can’t scratch his own back without his say so, that’s the civil war.
Our system of government is based on the constitution, but that’s not the system that runs this country. The Democrat's system is that any part of government that it runs gets total and unlimited power over the country.
If the Democrats are in the White House, then the president can do anything. And I mean anything. He can have his own amnesty for i*****l a***ns. He can fine you for not having health insurance. His power is unlimited. He’s a dictator.
But when Republicans get into the White House, suddenly the President can’t do anything. He isn’t even allowed to undo the i*****l a***n amnesty that his predecessor illegally invented. A Democrat in the White House has “discretion” to completely decide every aspect of immigration policy. A Republican doesn’t even have the “discretion” to reverse him. That’s how the game is played. That’s how our country is run. Sad but true, although the left hasn’t yet won that particular fight.
When a Democrat is in the White House, states aren’t even allowed to enforce i*********n l*w. But when a Republican is in the White House, states can create their own i*********n l*ws. Under Obama, a state wasn’t allowed to go to the bathroom without asking permission. But under Trump, Jerry Brown can go around saying that California is an independent republic and sign treaties with other countries.
The Constitution has something to say about that.
Whether it’s Federal or State, Executive, Legislative or Judiciary, the left moves power around to run the country. If it controls an institution, then that institution is suddenly the supreme power in the land. This is what I call a moving dictatorship.
Donald Trump has caused the Shadow Government to come out of hiding: Professional government is a guild. Like medieval guilds. You can’t serve in if you’re not a member. If you haven’t been indoctrinated into its arcane rituals. If you aren’t in the club. And Trump isn’t in the club. He brought in a bunch of people who aren’t in the club with him.
Now we’re seeing what the pros do when amateurs try to walk in on them. They spy on them, they investigate them and they send them to jail. They use the tools of power to bring them down.
That’s not a free country.
It’s not a free country when FBI agents who support Hillary take out an “insurance policy” against Trump winning the e******n. It’s not a free country when Obama officials engage in massive unmasking of the opposition. It’s not a free country when the media responds to the other guy winning by trying to ban the conservative media that supported him from social media. It’s not a free country when all of the above collude together to overturn an e******n because the guy who wasn’t supposed to win won.
Have no doubt, we’re in a civil war between conservative volunteer government and a l*****t Democrat professional government.
That is how WARS START from within.
not necessarily mine
Two or more sides disagree on who runs the country. And they can’t settle the question through e******ns because they don’t even agree that e******ns are how you decide who’s in charge.
That’s the basic issue here. Who decides who runs the country? When you h**e each other but accept the e******n results, you have a country. When you stop accepting e******n results, you have a countdown to a civil war.
The Mueller investigation is about removing President Trump from office and overturning the results of an e******n. We all know that. But it’s not the first time they’ve done this. The first time a Republican president was elected this century, they said he didn’t really win. The Supreme Court gave him the e******n. There’s a pattern here.
What do sure odds of the Democrats rejecting the next Republican president really mean? It means they don’t accept the results of any e******n that they don’t win. It means they don’t believe that t***sfers of power in this country are determined by e******ns.
That’s a civil war.
There’s no shooting. At least not unless you count the attempt to k**l a bunch of Republicans at a charity baseball game practice. But the Democrats have rejected our system of government.
This isn’t dissent. It’s not disagreement. You can h**e the other party. You can think they’re the worst thing that ever happened to the country. But then you work harder to win the next e******n. When you consistently reject the results of e******ns that you don’t win, what you want is a dictatorship.
Your very own dictatorship.
The only legitimate exercise of power in this country, according to Democrats, is its own. Whenever Republicans exercise power, it’s inherently illegitimate. The Democrats lost Congress. They lost the White House. So what did they do? They began trying to run the country through Federal judges and bureaucrats. Every time that a Federal judge issues an order saying that the President of the United States can’t scratch his own back without his say so, that’s the civil war.
Our system of government is based on the constitution, but that’s not the system that runs this country. The Democrat's system is that any part of government that it runs gets total and unlimited power over the country.
If the Democrats are in the White House, then the president can do anything. And I mean anything. He can have his own amnesty for i*****l a***ns. He can fine you for not having health insurance. His power is unlimited. He’s a dictator.
But when Republicans get into the White House, suddenly the President can’t do anything. He isn’t even allowed to undo the i*****l a***n amnesty that his predecessor illegally invented. A Democrat in the White House has “discretion” to completely decide every aspect of immigration policy. A Republican doesn’t even have the “discretion” to reverse him. That’s how the game is played. That’s how our country is run. Sad but true, although the left hasn’t yet won that particular fight.
When a Democrat is in the White House, states aren’t even allowed to enforce i*********n l*w. But when a Republican is in the White House, states can create their own i*********n l*ws. Under Obama, a state wasn’t allowed to go to the bathroom without asking permission. But under Trump, Jerry Brown can go around saying that California is an independent republic and sign treaties with other countries.
The Constitution has something to say about that.
Whether it’s Federal or State, Executive, Legislative or Judiciary, the left moves power around to run the country. If it controls an institution, then that institution is suddenly the supreme power in the land. This is what I call a moving dictatorship.
Donald Trump has caused the Shadow Government to come out of hiding: Professional government is a guild. Like medieval guilds. You can’t serve in if you’re not a member. If you haven’t been indoctrinated into its arcane rituals. If you aren’t in the club. And Trump isn’t in the club. He brought in a bunch of people who aren’t in the club with him.
Now we’re seeing what the pros do when amateurs try to walk in on them. They spy on them, they investigate them and they send them to jail. They use the tools of power to bring them down.
That’s not a free country.
It’s not a free country when FBI agents who support Hillary take out an “insurance policy” against Trump winning the e******n. It’s not a free country when Obama officials engage in massive unmasking of the opposition. It’s not a free country when the media responds to the other guy winning by trying to ban the conservative media that supported him from social media. It’s not a free country when all of the above collude together to overturn an e******n because the guy who wasn’t supposed to win won.
Have no doubt, we’re in a civil war between conservative volunteer government and a l*****t Democrat professional government.
That is how WARS START from within.
Apr 13, 2018 13:02:36 #
badbobby wrote:
an opinion br not necessarily mine br br br Two ... (show quote)
An excellent post, and a whole lot of t***h to it.
Apr 13, 2018 13:25:09 #
badbobby wrote:
an opinion br not necessarily mine br br br Two ... (show quote)
I'm surprised DJT can get anything done with all the 'flack' he's getting.
Apr 13, 2018 13:48:51 #
badbobby wrote:
an opinion br not necessarily mine br br br Two ... (show quote)
Amen and Amen you nailed badbobby but the left will fight us tooth and nail on it. I hope that it can be resolved without blood shed but my faith is waning at present whether we can get out of this with out a fight of some kind.
Apr 13, 2018 13:54:35 #
badbobby wrote:
an opinion br not necessarily mine br br br Two ... (show quote)
A Higher Loyalty
Author: James Comey
The interesting thing about that title is what it reveals about the author; he elects himself to judge an e******n. His 'loyalty' is to his ideology, not to the Constitutional process of orderly t***sitional government.
Apr 13, 2018 17:22:17 #
working class stiff
Loc: N. Carolina
"Two or more sides disagree on who runs the country. And they can’t settle the question through e******ns because they don’t even agree that e******ns are how you decide who’s in charge.
That’s the basic issue here. Who decides who runs the country? When you h**e each other but accept the e******n results, you have a country. When you stop accepting e******n results, you have a countdown to a civil war."
Since the last two Republican Presidents did not win a majority when first elected, it seems strange to me to accuse the Democrats (or liberals) of not accepting e******n results.
The folks who are constantly threatening 'civil war' is the right wing.
I wonder if the President loses his re-e******n bid will he accept the result. He already said he would accept the 2016 e******n results only if he won.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/donald-trump-accept-e******n-230098
And then you have to wonder will his backers accept a losing e******n result in 2020.
Glass houses and stones come to mind when considering this opinion.
That’s the basic issue here. Who decides who runs the country? When you h**e each other but accept the e******n results, you have a country. When you stop accepting e******n results, you have a countdown to a civil war."
Since the last two Republican Presidents did not win a majority when first elected, it seems strange to me to accuse the Democrats (or liberals) of not accepting e******n results.
The folks who are constantly threatening 'civil war' is the right wing.
I wonder if the President loses his re-e******n bid will he accept the result. He already said he would accept the 2016 e******n results only if he won.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/donald-trump-accept-e******n-230098
And then you have to wonder will his backers accept a losing e******n result in 2020.
Glass houses and stones come to mind when considering this opinion.
Apr 13, 2018 17:34:12 #
working class stiff wrote:
"Two or more sides disagree on who runs the c... (show quote)
T***p w*n the e*******l college. In case you didn't realize it yet that is the way that we v**e in this country. The first one that was contested was between Bush and Gore and the Supreme Court settled that one. Remember hangin chads and all that rot. Trump over HIllary Clinton was won by Trump winning the necessary v**e of the e*******l college and had nothing to do with total v**es at all.
Apr 13, 2018 17:50:34 #
working class stiff
Loc: N. Carolina
bahmer wrote:
T***p w*n the e*******l college. In case you didn't realize it yet that is the way that we v**e in this country. The first one that was contested was between Bush and Gore and the Supreme Court settled that one. Remember hangin chads and all that rot. Trump over HIllary Clinton was won by Trump winning the necessary v**e of the e*******l college and had nothing to do with total v**es at all.
I know he won the e*******l college. That is why he is President.
Your response does not go to the two points I raised....
-since Dems have accepted two e******ns where their candidate won the popular v**e but lost the Presidency why raise the issue of whether Dems would not accept the result?
-the question I raised was exactly the same....would the right wing (especially the President) accept a defeat? His 2016 e******n rhetoric does not bode well on that score.
Apr 13, 2018 17:54:23 #
badbobby wrote:
an opinion br not necessarily mine br br br Two ... (show quote)
I just sent this out to my email list I thought it was exceptional if that is OK.
Apr 13, 2018 17:55:19 #
working class stiff wrote:
I know he won the e*******l college. That is why he is President.
Your response does not go to the two points I raised....
-since Dems have accepted two e******ns where their candidate won the popular v**e but lost the Presidency why raise the issue of whether Dems would not accept the result?
-the question I raised was exactly the same....would the right wing (especially the President) accept a defeat? His 2016 e******n rhetoric does not bode well on that score.
Your response does not go to the two points I raised....
-since Dems have accepted two e******ns where their candidate won the popular v**e but lost the Presidency why raise the issue of whether Dems would not accept the result?
-the question I raised was exactly the same....would the right wing (especially the President) accept a defeat? His 2016 e******n rhetoric does not bode well on that score.
Tell me what two e******ns that you are referring to.
Apr 13, 2018 18:05:05 #
working class stiff
Loc: N. Carolina
bahmer wrote:
Tell me what two e******ns that you are referring to.
2000 and 2016
Apr 13, 2018 18:15:42 #
bahmer wrote:
I just sent this out to my email list I thought it was exceptional if that is OK.
wasn't mine bahm
I was just the messenger
Apr 13, 2018 18:15:47 #
working class stiff wrote:
2000 and 2016
The 2000 p**********l e******n was between George W. Bush and Al Gore. George W. Bush got 271 e*******l college v**es and Al Gore received
266 e*******l college v**e. In 2016 p**********l e******n Donald T***p w*n the e*******l college 304 to Hillary Rodham Clinton 227 e*******l college v**es. So what is your question or contention?
Apr 13, 2018 18:35:59 #
working class stiff
Loc: N. Carolina
bahmer wrote:
The 2000 p**********l e******n was between George W. Bush and Al Gore. George W. Bush got 271 e*******l college v**es and Al Gore received
266 e*******l college v**e. In 2016 p**********l e******n Donald T***p w*n the e*******l college 304 to Hillary Rodham Clinton 227 e*******l college v**es. So what is your question or contention?
266 e*******l college v**e. In 2016 p**********l e******n Donald T***p w*n the e*******l college 304 to Hillary Rodham Clinton 227 e*******l college v**es. So what is your question or contention?
I don't have a question. My contention is that it is not true to accuse Dems or liberals of not accepting e******n results . It's a fantasy, as the 2000 and 2016 e******ns show. Further, it was the current President who waffled in 2016 about accepting the results of the e******n.
Apr 13, 2018 18:52:19 #
working class stiff wrote:
I don't have a question. My contention is that it is not true to accuse Dems or liberals of not accepting e******n results . It's a fantasy, as the 2000 and 2016 e******ns show. Further, it was the current President who waffled in 2016 about accepting the results of the e******n.
He was also very shrewd. He has been a New Yorker all of his life and is well aware of e******ns involving democrats as we are aware here in Illinois as well. We con't accuse the democrats of c***ting but we do have an exorbitant amount of dead people v****g in Cook County. That has been the case ever since I was able to v**e until this very day. It was joked that Joe Kennedy faxed John F. Kennedy and told him to buy any more v**es he would buy him the e******n but he didn't want to buy him a landslide. A joke maybe and maybe not. The democrats are noted for winning at all costs and doing wh**ever it takes to win and e******n legal or not. It wqsa this kind of knowledge that could have trapped Donald Trump somehow and someway and having dealt with the mob and democrats you hedge your remarks is all. So is that the only thing you are worried about?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.