One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Suspected Chemical Weapon Attack "Total Nonsense" Says Ron Paul
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Apr 13, 2018 18:30:24   #
Radiance3
 
buffalo wrote:
Radiance, how does/can China present such military/defense threat to the US when they will spend in 2018 US$174.5 BILLION compared to the US spending of over $1 TRILLION on military/defense? Could it be that the war drums you are hearing are from the propaganda machine that the US controls.

The real threat you and the rest of the US sheople are not being told is the threat China posses to the petrodollar and the loss of its hegemony in the global economy. You can partially thank America's crushing debt caused by US continual, illegal, unConstitutional, immoral warmongering to beneift big oil and the military industrial complex.
Radiance, how does/can China present such military... (show quote)

================
buffalo, if you are an ally of China, be aware that China is deceptive. It is a c*******t country, not honest and portrays deceptive info as it advances its power around the globe. You must understand that the living standard in China is different than the US. China has very cheap labor, even underage children are taken advantage of.

C*******t China has already expanded worldwide its tentacles as proven to taking over strategic control of the Spratly Islands both for the purpose of military encroachment and for its commercial ambitions throughout the Pacific. It is called monopoly. The countries owning those valuable islands Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Vietnam, have been bullied. China had taken land from the Spratly almost 3200 acres and in addition China has built at the Spratly almost 10,000 acres of land for their military installation.

China is dangerous. it has been stealing the US Intellectual Properties for many years now. China sends 350,000 Chinese to study in the US to steal and copy any technological inventions of the US. Then they imitate them, building greater military assets.

China is a clever and deceptive country that could not be trusted.

Reply
Apr 14, 2018 00:12:15   #
king hall Loc: Tucson,AZ.
 
buffalo wrote:
Radiance, how does/can China present such military/defense threat to the US when they will spend in 2018 US$174.5 BILLION compared to the US spending of over $1 TRILLION on military/defense? Could it be that the war drums you are hearing are from the propaganda machine that the US controls.

The real threat you and the rest of the US sheople are not being told is the threat China posses to the petrodollar and the loss of its hegemony in the global economy. You can partially thank America's crushing debt caused by US continual, illegal, unConstitutional, immoral warmongering to beneift big oil and the military industrial complex.
Radiance, how does/can China present such military... (show quote)


You might think about brushing up on the Petro-dollar and its definitive relation with China's economy.

Reply
Apr 14, 2018 04:33:29   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
king hall wrote:
You might think about brushing up on the Petro-dollar and its definitive relation with China's economy.


LOL! I have posted many times about the petrodollar, its hegemony with respect to being the global reserve currency, and how the US will even go to war to protect that petrodollar hegemony as the world's reserve currency. Think Iraq and Saddam, think Libya and Gaddahfi...

For a good perspective:

http://katehon.com/article/oil-wars-accurate-summary-us-led-interventions-middle-east-21st-century

Reply
Apr 14, 2018 04:35:56   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
buffalo wrote:
Those who h**e us are already coming here because of the destruction we have ravaged on their countries. Look what is happening in Europe because of the violence and destruction in those "immigrants" home lands.So they bring their brand of barbarism and violence with them. Do you think Iraq or Afghanistan posed a threat to the US? How about Libya? Or do you think that "evil" Assad and Syria are a threat to mainland USA?

In each of those countries listed above where the US has invaded militarily a vacuum was created that allowed for even more evil forces to take over.
It is a LIE that the US military is making the world a safer place. US military intervention makes the military industrial corporations and their Wall Street banksters BILLIONS. War is a racket!

What I think the US needs to do is STOP all immigration for at least 5 years and get the hell out of the middle east.
Those who h**e us are already coming here because ... (show quote)
Do you mean those same subhuman cockroaches who, when the United States was 14 years old, hijacked our sailing ships, captured and ens***ed American sailors, and forced our 3rd president to send our navy to kick their ass?

Are you referring to those same goat raping scumbags who, in 1970 hijacked two American planes and one Swiss airliner, all bound from Europe to the United States, to punish the United States for supporting Israel. The Pan Am, TWA and Swissair planes were blown up on the ground in Jordan and Egypt.

Or the Iranian radical students who, in 1979 seized the U.S. embassy in Tehran, taking 66 hostages. 14 were later released. The remaining 52 were freed after 444 days on the day of President Reagan’s inauguration?

Or the same camel jockeys, who in 1982 kidnapped thirty Americans and other Western hostages in Lebanon, k**led some of them, allowed some to die in captivity, and released the rest? Terry Anderson was held for 2,454 days.

Or, the Muslim bastards who, in 1983 drove a truck bomb into the Marine barracks at Beirut airport, k*****g 241 Marines, and minutes later drove a truck bomb into the West Beirut barracks of French paratroopers, k*****g 58 of them?

Or, the r*****ds who, in 1988 blew up a N.Y.-bound Pan-Am Boeing 747 over Lockerbie, Scotland, k*****g all 259 aboard and 11 on the ground. Passengers included 35 Syracuse University students and many U.S. military personnel. Libya formally admitted responsibility 15 years later (Aug. 2003) and offered $2.7 billion compensation to victims’ families.

Or, the Muslim suicidal punks who, in 1996 detonated a truck bomb outside Khobar Towers military complex in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, k*****g 19 American servicemen and injuring hundreds of others. 13 Saudis and a Lebanese, all members of the Iranian sponsored Islamic militant group, Hezbollah, were indicted on charges relating to the attack in June 2001.

Or, the rotten towelheads, who in 1998 detonated truck bombs almost simultaneously near 2 U.S. embassies in, Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, k*****g 224 (213 in Kenya and 11 in Tanzania) and injuring about 4,500. 4 men connected with al-Qaeda, 2 of whom had received training at al-Qaeda camps inside Afghanistan, were convicted of the k*****gs in May 2001 and later sentenced to life in prison. A federal grand jury had indicted 22 men in connection with the attacks, including Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden, who remained at large.

Or, the camel humpers in Aden, Yemen, linked to Osama bin Laden, or members of al-Qaeda terrorist network, who, in 2000, floated a skiff loaded with explosives alongside the USS Cole, smiled and waved at the sailors, then detonated the bomb, damn near sank the ship and k**led 17 US sailors.

I could go on, the list is long, but let's try this? The Greatest Murder Machine in History

Are these the evil sand worms you are weeping over? Are these subhumans worth your tears?

Islamic militants have been slaughtering people all over the world for a long long time, and you blame America?

Amazon sells Qurans and prayer rugs fairly cheap, if you don't have yours yet, go for it.

Reply
Apr 14, 2018 04:54:26   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Do you mean those same subhuman cockroaches who, when the United States was 14 years old, hijacked our sailing ships, captured and ens***ed American sailors, and forced our 3rd president to send our navy to kick their ass?

Are you referring to those same goat raping scumbags who, in 1970 hijacked two American planes and one Swiss airliner, all bound from Europe to the United States, to punish the United States for supporting Israel. The Pan Am, TWA and Swissair planes were blown up on the ground in Jordan and Egypt.

Or the Iranian radical students who, in 1979 seized the U.S. embassy in Tehran, taking 66 hostages. 14 were later released. The remaining 52 were freed after 444 days on the day of President Reagan’s inauguration?

Or the same camel jockeys, who in 1982 kidnapped thirty Americans and other Western hostages in Lebanon, k**led some of them, allowed some to die in captivity, and released the rest? Terry Anderson was held for 2,454 days.

Or, the Muslim bastards who, in 1983 drove a truck bomb into the Marine barracks at Beirut airport, k*****g 241 Marines, and minutes later drove a truck bomb into the West Beirut barracks of French paratroopers, k*****g 58 of them?

Or, the r*****ds who, in 1988 blew up a N.Y.-bound Pan-Am Boeing 747 over Lockerbie, Scotland, k*****g all 259 aboard and 11 on the ground. Passengers included 35 Syracuse University students and many U.S. military personnel. Libya formally admitted responsibility 15 years later (Aug. 2003) and offered $2.7 billion compensation to victims’ families.

Or, the Muslim suicidal punks who, in 1996 detonated a truck bomb outside Khobar Towers military complex in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, k*****g 19 American servicemen and injuring hundreds of others. 13 Saudis and a Lebanese, all members of the Iranian sponsored Islamic militant group, Hezbollah, were indicted on charges relating to the attack in June 2001.

Or, the rotten towelheads, who in 1998 detonated truck bombs almost simultaneously near 2 U.S. embassies in, Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, k*****g 224 (213 in Kenya and 11 in Tanzania) and injuring about 4,500. 4 men connected with al-Qaeda, 2 of whom had received training at al-Qaeda camps inside Afghanistan, were convicted of the k*****gs in May 2001 and later sentenced to life in prison. A federal grand jury had indicted 22 men in connection with the attacks, including Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden, who remained at large.

Or, the camel humpers in Aden, Yemen, linked to Osama bin Laden, or members of al-Qaeda terrorist network, who, in 2000, floated a skiff loaded with explosives alongside the USS Cole, smiled and waved at the sailors, then detonated the bomb, damn near sank the ship and k**led 17 US sailors.

I could go on, the list is long, but let's try this? The Greatest Murder Machine in History

Are these the evil sand worms you are weeping over? Are these subhumans worth your tears?

Islamic militants have been slaughtering people all over the world for a long long time, and you blame America?

Amazon sells Qurans and prayer rugs fairly cheap, if you don't have yours yet, go for it.
Do you mean those same subhuman cockroaches who, w... (show quote)


First off, you can kiss my ass for assuming I am weeping over anything mooslime. Secondly, how many of those attacks you referenced took place on US soil? The so-called “War on Terror” has been a thinly veiled excuse from the start, with the US having been a major state sponsor of terrorism for decades – most recently by fueling the rise of ISIS (or one of the many other names for it) in Iraq and Syria.

You need to stop believing the propaganda of the US media.

Reply
Apr 14, 2018 05:03:40   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
buffalo wrote:
First off, you can kiss my ass for assuming I am weeping over anything mooslime. Secondly, how many of those attacks you referenced took place on US soil? The so-called “War on Terror” has been a thinly veiled excuse from the start, with the US having been a major state sponsor of terrorism for decades – most recently by fueling the rise of ISIS (or one of the many other names for it) in Iraq and Syria.

You need to stop believing the propaganda of the US media.
And you call yourself an American.

Reply
Apr 14, 2018 07:12:18   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
And you call yourself an American.


One does not have to believe the corporate owned propagandizing media to be American.

Some now known facts contrary to what the US sheople were told:

The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950's to pose as C*******ts and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister.

The NSA admits that it lied about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 ... manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for the Vietnam war.

A U.S. Congressional committee admitted that - as part of its "Cointelpro" campaign - the FBI had used many provocateurs in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely blame them on political activists.

The U.S. falsely blamed Iraq for playing a role in the 9/11 attacks - as shown by a memo from the defense secretary - as one of the main justifications for launching the Iraq war. Even after the 9/11 Commission admitted that there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that the evidence is "overwhelming" that al Qaeda had a relationship with Saddam Hussein's regime, that Cheney "probably" had information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was not 'doing their homework' in reporting such ties. Top U.S. government officials now admit that the Iraq war was really launched for oil ... not 9/11 or weapons of mass destruction. Despite previous "lone wolf" claims, many U.S. government officials now say that 9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials have alleged that 9/11 was a false f**g operation by rogue elements of the U.S. government; but such a claim is beyond the scope of this discussion. The key point is that the U.S. falsely blamed it on Iraq, when it knew Iraq had nothing to do with it.).

Although the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says that the FBI was actually told to blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House officials (remember what the anthrax letters looked like). Government officials also confirm that the white House tried to link the anthrax to Iraq as a justification for regime change in that country.

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to d**g the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a f*****t dictatorship, or a parliament, or a c*******t dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
- Hermann Goering, N**i leader.

If you think you know for a fact that the official story of what happened on September 11, 2001 is the true account and that all conspiracy theories have been “debunked”, you are ignorant. If you think you know the precise details of how what really happened differs from the official story, you’ve spent way too much time diving down conspiracy theory rabbit holes and should probably ease off the weed. There’s no need to get all defensive and go bedding yourself down to one hard doctrine of certainty when the US power establishment has already discredited itself so thoroughly. It’s unnecessary to plunge deep into theory when these people’s track record is so firmly established in fact.

http://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/never-forget-the-us-government-has-a-known-history-of-using-false-f**gs-1e08d6543d0c

Reply
Apr 14, 2018 10:48:26   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
What difference does it make who used chemical weapons, against civilians or armed troops? This is a crime against humanity.

You are "s**k of war", but you'd best be prepared for it because there are a hell of lot of people on this planet who are not, and I'll bet you know who their primary targets are. Would you rather hold off and wait until those who h**e us bring it here, or would you prefer to do what every military captain in history--Sun Tsu, von Clauswitz, Jomini, Napoleon, Patton, to name a few--has stridently recommended as the way to protect your nation? And, win a war.

In the conclusion of his great series on WW2, Churchill wrote: The malice of the wicked was reinforced by the weakness of the virtuous, [the war came] due to the failure of the democratic states to act together before the monster was fully grown. In the beginning, when it counted most, leadership failed.

What Churchill means is that the Second World War may never have been fought if the free nations had acted decisively and swiftly to, shall we say, nip Hitler in the bud. The situation in the ME has already bloomed far beyond just a bud, it has the real potential of making the Second World War look like a boy scout jamboree. Technology has shrunk the world now, and what was impossible in WW2 or even Vietnam is entirely possible now, even probable given the circumstances.

There is no way to compare the Vietnam war with what is boiling in the ME and elsewhere.

Yes, war is a terrible thing, but it is a fact of life, for as long as humans have existed they have fought each other.

I don't care how the Paulbots, the isolationists, the conspiracy theorists, and the false f**g wavers want to spin it, Assad is a war criminal (one among many) and the idea that the United States is behind the chemical attacks is absolutely ridiculous. Apparently these fools don't give a damn how such foolishness could hurt us. Their incessant allegations that America is the perpetrator of all the strife in the world is the product of corrupted minds.
What difference does it make who used chemical wea... (show quote)


The difference is in who gets punished. And the US backs the guys I think did it.

Reply
Apr 14, 2018 20:06:32   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Chill people! No additional troops are heading to Syria. No civilians k**led. Some of our missiles were shot down and we shot down some Syrian planes. No problems with Russia. Now both sides are spinning. The deep state and NWO cabal furnished the chlorine to the rebels. It was the rebels who used the chlorine, not Assad. We took out the rebel facilities and maybe an Iran arms depot or two. We didn't harm a hair on Assad's head or k**l any Russians. We didn't blow up the ports. Trump is colluding, he is colluding with Russia and China and many others to take down the NWO and bankster cabal. The End!

Reply
Apr 14, 2018 20:15:39   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Peewee wrote:
Chill people! No additional troops are heading to Syria. No civilians k**led. Some of our missiles were shot down and we shot down some Syrian planes. No problems with Russia. Now both sides are spinning. The deep state and NWO cabal furnished the chlorine to the rebels. It was the rebels who used the chlorine, not Assad. We took out the rebel facilities and maybe an Iran arms depot or two. We didn't harm a hair on Assad's head or k**l any Russians. We didn't blow up the ports. Trump is colluding, he is colluding with Russia and China and many others to take down the NWO and bankster cabal. The End!
Chill people! No additional troops are heading to ... (show quote)


Exactly,Peewee.......Totally agree with you!!

Reply
Apr 14, 2018 23:37:51   #
Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
proud republican wrote:
Exactly,Peewee.......Totally agree with you!!


Thanks, PR, Just make sure you tell people I didn't pay you to say that, ha.


Reply
Apr 15, 2018 14:26:03   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Peewee wrote:
Chill people! No additional troops are heading to Syria. No civilians k**led. Some of our missiles were shot down and we shot down some Syrian planes. No problems with Russia. Now both sides are spinning. The deep state and NWO cabal furnished the chlorine to the rebels. It was the rebels who used the chlorine, not Assad. We took out the rebel facilities and maybe an Iran arms depot or two. We didn't harm a hair on Assad's head or k**l any Russians. We didn't blow up the ports. Trump is colluding, he is colluding with Russia and China and many others to take down the NWO and bankster cabal. The End!
Chill people! No additional troops are heading to ... (show quote)


"Trump is colluding, he is colluding with Russia and China and many others to take down the NWO and bankster cabal. The End!" - Peewee
I wishthat were true, but it does not look like it. Trump just prolonged the "war" in Syria. Assad was wiping out ISIS.

US Bombs Syria To Cover Up Lack Of Evidence On Chem Attacks, Discredits Own Claims By Doing So
https://activistpost.us1.list-manage.com/track/click?u=3ac8bebe085f73ea3503bbda3&id=50fcde48eb&e=2d5b44f01d
By Brandon Turbeville
After yet another example of brazen Western aggression against Syria, the United States, UK, and France are once again demonstrating to the world who exactly is the biggest threat to world peace. The entire March 14 assault on Syria by the three powers has been justified by the West as a reaction to an alleged chemical weapons attack that allegedly took place in Douma weeks ago.
The word “allegedly” is incredibly important here because not only is it merely alleged that the Syrian military conducted a chemical weapons attack, it is also merely alleged that the attack even took place. More on that in a minute.
But during the debate about the chemical weapons attack – who conducted it and if it happened at all – the West has claimed to be one hundred percent sure with no doubt whatsoever that the Syrian military personally directed by Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons against civilians in a battle it was fighting and winning against terrorists at precisely the worst possible opportunity to do so. This is despite virtually all of the evidence to the contrary.

The Russian government maintained that not only was Assad innocent of the crime he was being accused of but that the West essentially fabricated the whole event.
So with that in mind, let us consider for a moment that the United States is correct that Assad used chemical weapons against his own people and thus still maintains chemical weapons. The United States claims it knows where these weapons stockpiles are and where research is being conducted on those weapons. Indeed, these are the very facilities targeted by the U.S., UK, and France during the March 14th operations....

Reply
Apr 16, 2018 13:05:49   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
buffalo wrote:
Radiance, how does/can China present such military/defense threat to the US when they will spend in 2018 US$174.5 BILLION compared to the US spending of over $1 TRILLION on military/defense? Could it be that the war drums you are hearing are from the propaganda machine that the US controls.

The real threat you and the rest of the US sheople are not being told is the threat China posses to the petrodollar and the loss of its hegemony in the global economy. You can partially thank America's crushing debt caused by US continual, illegal, unConstitutional, immoral warmongering to beneift big oil and the military industrial complex.
Radiance, how does/can China present such military... (show quote)


Wesley Clark Told The T***h
https://youtu.be/LAFHOHIiFZA
The Covert Origins of ISIS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMjXbuj7BPI&feature=player_detailpage

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.