V***r F***d, Photo ID's, & R****m - Part 1 (Page 2): The progressive left's constant push for no I.D, for v****g is fin one purpose and one purpose only, to c***t e******ns so they can...

vettelover Loc: Richmond Va

ACP45 wrote:

A number of OPP'ers have expressed an opinion that requiring photo id's, or requiring the identification of a person intending to v**e in a US e******n is r****t, and discriminates against minorities. To that end, I ask you to consider on the following:

The progressive left's constant push for no I.D, for v****g is fin one purpose and one purpose only, to c***t e******ns so they can maintain power.. if you are opposed to their free for all v****g, you are called bad names and accused of being a r****t N**i even though it's the left who are the N**i's.

The left and their treason needs to be eradicated from this country.

moldyoldy

Make it federal instead of each state making their own rules in order to control who gets to v**e. As much as you harp on v***r f***d, there have been 31 cases total out of billions of v**es in over twenty years.

debeda

4430 wrote:

Funny how those that are opposed to v**er ID get all bent out of shape when it's mentioned !

In part as it'd make it much harder for i******s and dead folks to v**e .

No matter what I do it is fact I need to show my ID so why not welfare / v****g for example .

RIGHT!! I've never understood the "r****m" of having ID to v**e. You can't get ANYTHING of substance here without ID. Is v****g yhat unimportant? Honestly it has to be about i******s and v***r f***d there's no other reason for this. That's why I fear for the midterms. The dems will have their bisload of v**ers out going from place to place v****g under numerous names. You know, the Democratic way- v**e early, v**e often.

moldyoldy

debeda wrote:

RIGHT!! I've never understood the "r****m" of having ID to v**e. You can't get ANYTHING of substance here without ID. Is v****g yhat unimportant? Honestly it has to be about i******s and v***r f***d there's no other reason for this. That's why I fear for the midterms. The dems will have their bisload of v**ers out going from place to place v****g under numerous names. You know, the Democratic way- v**e early, v**e often.

It is hard for you to understand, it seems like a no brainer until you see the road blocks thrown up.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/court-north-carolina-v**er-id-law-targeted-black-v**ers/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/getting-a-photo-id-so-you-can-v**e-is-easy-unless-youre-poor-black-latino-or-elderly/2016/05/23/8d5474ec-20f0-11e6-8690-f14ca9de2972_story.html

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/study-finds-v**er-id-laws-hurt-young-minorities-088773

http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/08/03/courts-are-finally-pointing-out-the-r****m-behind-v**er-id-laws/

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

moldyoldy wrote:

Make it federal instead of each state making their own rules in order to control who gets to v**e. As much as you harp on v***r f***d, there have been 31 cases total out of billions of v**es in over twenty years.

BS.

There are few cases prosecuted, because Democrats make sure there is no v**es ID laws so people can get away with it.

......

But you knew that.

Why do you think I being black makes you too stupid yo get an ID?

Gatsby

My father was born in the family farm home in 1916, no birth certificate was issued. In 1940 he relocated to southern Ca. to build aircraft.

In Ca., he needed a drivers licence, for the first time. He simply wrote a letter to the doctor that delivered him,

within a couple of weeks he recieved a notorized copy of a certificate of live birth, signed by the doctor that delivered him.

I always wondered what would have happened if that doctor had passed away prior to 1940?

As for those born at places other than medical facilities, without a doctor in attendance, can a mid-wife sign a birth certificate.

Can a family doctor issue a birth certificate for a birth that he did not attend? Does anyone out there know?

moldyoldy wrote:

Proof of birth or citizenship, I wonder what that means. Those people born at home, probably do not have a birth certificate.

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

Gatsby wrote:

My father was born in the family farm home in 1916... (show quote)

I'm pretty sure virtually all of these people either go to doctors, get welfare, get a driver's liscense, get a checking account, or many other things that require an ID.

How many people do you know without an ID?

Anyone?

moldyoldy

Gatsby wrote:

My father was born in the family farm home in 1916... (show quote)

Can a mid wife even write?

debeda

Super Dave wrote:

I'm pretty sure virtually all of these people either go to doctors, get welfare, get a driver's liscense, get a checking account, or many other things that require an ID.

How many people do you know without an ID?

Anyone?

And the clincher Dave!!! Can't cash a welfare check or open a bank account to have electronic deposit without an ID. Again, the "v**er ID is r****t" argument of the left is specious and self-serving. You're so right!!

moldyoldy

debeda wrote:

And the clincher Dave!!! Can't cash a welfare check or open a bank account to have electronic deposit without an ID. Again, the "v**er ID is r****t" argument of the left is specious and self-serving. You're so right!!

The courts have recognized the real intent of v**er ID. Some states will not accept a drivers license, some will accept an NRA ID, I wonder who has that?

Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

moldyoldy wrote:

The courts have recognized the real intent of v**er ID. Some states will not accept a drivers license, some will accept an NRA ID, I wonder who has that?

Would this be the same states that issue drivers liscenses to i*****l a***ns?

Imagine that...

PulletSurprise Loc: Columbus, GA

Are you against identification for the following:

Federal courts have held that certain stores may legally require you provide ID in order to make a return. You can also be legally required to show ID for the purchase of alcohol, tobacco, or even cold medicine.
Opening a bank account, and making deposits and withdrawals, etc.; food stamps; welfare; Medicaid/Social Security; Applying for unemployment, fishing or hunting license or a job; Rent/buying a house; Drive/buy/renting a car or video/game; boarding an airplane; Getting married or Divorce; buying a gun, cell phone ; Adopting a pet; Renting a hotel room; Picking up a prescription or going to the doctors;

Why be concern about theft of Your PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION; But PROMOTE AN ILLEGAL GOVERNMENT TO GOVERN YOUR WAY OF LIFE?

Why not dissolve U.S. if it doesn't mean anything?
Why don’t we cut to the chase and settle for Mexican citizenship?

One individual, one identification... one v**e... one nation, is this so difficult?

How can we afford DACA, but unable to fund cost of living increases for Social Security recipients to our elderly and total disabled?

debeda

PulletSurprise wrote:

Are you against identification for the following: ... (show quote)

DARN good points! This is one that will stop the trolls from talking. There's no bebate with them just defensiveness and snarking😂😂😂

moldyoldy

PulletSurprise wrote:

Are you against identification for the following: ... (show quote)

If you want v**er ID, make it universal, same for everybody, available for students and minorities without requiring excessive travel, and inconvenient times to get them, which are all problems created by those pushing v**er suppression.

vernon

moldyoldy wrote:

Make it federal instead of each state making their own rules in order to control who gets to v**e. As much as you harp on v***r f***d, there have been 31 cases total out of billions of v**es in over twenty years.

I give you a choice either you don't know what your talking about or you are a lair.In this last e;lection when hil got her recount remember Detroit that had so much graft they had to stop the count,the in cali one area that had 142% v****g.