One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Some American History most public schools ignore..
Page <<first <prev 3 of 10 next> last>>
Mar 14, 2014 22:12:26   #
Glaucon
 
docwill wrote:
Must regretfully decline your invitation to the self-f**gellation party.
Please review for non-sequiturs and false moral equivalence.


Doc,
Big words for a very little mind. Bite on that.

Reply
Mar 14, 2014 23:13:39   #
Brian Devon
 
Glaucon wrote:
Doc,
Big words for a very little mind. Bite on that.









Yeah, the "Doc" reminds me of the fact that David Duke, former Grand Wizard of the KKK, has a Ph.d.

Reply
Mar 14, 2014 23:43:13   #
Glaucon
 
Brian Devon wrote:
Yeah, the "Doc" reminds me of the fact that David Duke, former Grand Wizard of the KKK, has a Ph.d.


Bill OReilly has a Masters degree from Harvard, Geoge W. Bush has a degree from Yale and an MBA from Harvard. Dumb can be followed by a variety of letters, but it is still dumb. I think a debate with him on any subject would be amusing, but not very challenging.

Reply
Mar 14, 2014 23:51:20   #
Brian Devon
 
Glaucon wrote:
Bill OReilly has a Masters degree from Harvard, Geoge W. Bush has a degree from Yale and an MBA from Harvard. Dumb can be followed by a variety of letters, but it is still dumb. I think a debate with him on any subject would be amusing, but not very challenging.








I agree. Did you know that Pat Robertson and Fred Phelps, the leader of Westboro Baptist Church both have law degrees???

Reply
Mar 15, 2014 00:11:30   #
docwill
 
Brian Devon wrote:
I agree. Did you know that Pat Robertson and Fred Phelps, the leader of Westboro Baptist Church both have law degrees???


Right on cue...

Reply
Mar 15, 2014 00:18:10   #
Brian Devon
 
Glaucon wrote:
Our forefathers were thinking of a one shot, muzzle loading pistol, rifle, and cannon. They were thinking then and times have changed. They weren't referring to semi automatic, multiple shot, fast loading, machine guns, ground to air missles, etc for obvious reasons. Times change our thinking should also change accordingly.





Right on.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 15, 2014 07:39:29   #
Iggy Rat Loc: Lost in America
 
Glaucon wrote:
Our forefathers were thinking of a one shot, muzzle loading pistol, rifle, and cannon. They were thinking then and times have changed. They weren't referring to semi automatic, multiple shot, fast loading, machine guns, ground to air missles, etc for obvious reasons. Times change our thinking should also change accordingly.

You don't know what they were thinking. You're incapable of comprehending a mind as complex as Jefferson's. If you were literate, you could actually READ his writings and realize that, were Thom Jefferson alive today, he would be living in Idaho collecting assault rifles. He'd probably have brought his black wife and children with him.

Reply
Mar 15, 2014 07:41:00   #
Iggy Rat Loc: Lost in America
 
Iggy Rat wrote:
You don't know what they were thinking. You're incapable of comprehending a mind as complex as Jefferson's. If you were literate, you could actually READ his writings and realize that, were Thom Jefferson alive today, he would be living in Idaho collecting assault rifles. He'd probably have brought his black wife and children with him.


He wanted us to remain armed specifically to defend our rights from a corrupt government. That takes better guns.

Reply
Mar 15, 2014 07:51:14   #
skott Loc: Bama
 
Iggy Rat wrote:
You don't know what they were thinking. You're incapable of comprehending a mind as complex as Jefferson's. If you were literate, you could actually READ his writings and realize that, were Thom Jefferson alive today, he would be living in Idaho collecting assault rifles. He'd probably have brought his black wife and children with him.


You want Jefferson to mirror your thinking. Maybe you should try the other way around.

Does anyone serious think that if you dig a hole in Idaho and take your guns with you that you could beat the American army if they decide to take all your liberties away? Seriously? Will your AR or AK stop the air forces bombs. Or is just the thinking of David Koresh?

Reply
Mar 15, 2014 08:13:21   #
Iggy Rat Loc: Lost in America
 
skott wrote:
You want Jefferson to mirror your thinking. Maybe you should try the other way around.

Does anyone serious think that if you dig a hole in Idaho and take your guns with you that you could beat the American army if they decide to take all your liberties away? Seriously? Will your AR or AK stop the air forces bombs. Or is just the thinking of David Koresh?

Neither. The only alternative is to become a liberal, though; and I don't like sucking dick.

Reply
Mar 15, 2014 08:37:52   #
Snoopy
 
Skyhook wrote:
Hit a nerve, huh? Hey, time for your rapper rehearsal, isn't it?


Skyhook

Notice how Glaucon never hits the subject and goes right into the Attack Mode!

By the way they do not understand what the Attack Mode is either.

Snoopy

Reply
Mar 15, 2014 08:53:45   #
Skyhook
 
Snoopy wrote:
Skyhook

Notice how Glaucon never hits the subject and goes right into the Attack Mode!

By the way they do not understand what the Attack Mode is either.

Snoopy


I have noticed.
:thumbup:

I have also noticed the incredible lack of mature thought processes and am totally convinced he is an over-achieving 80 IQ bag of insulting loser material. Erase his insults and his junior high snide remarks and what have you- an empty metal drum with a few loose stones rattling about making incoherent, nasty noise.

That said, I wash my hands of him.

Reply
Mar 15, 2014 09:39:41   #
skott Loc: Bama
 
Iggy Rat wrote:
Neither. The only alternative is to become a liberal, though; and I don't like sucking dick.


No you seem more like someone that would prefer to be used as a woman.

Reply
Mar 15, 2014 10:51:51   #
Brian Devon
 
Iggy Rat wrote:
You don't know what they were thinking. You're incapable of comprehending a mind as complex as Jefferson's. If you were literate, you could actually READ his writings and realize that, were Thom Jefferson alive today, he would be living in Idaho collecting assault rifles. He'd probably have brought his black wife and children with him.




I will take a stab at what Jefferson might have been thinking. Try this.

I am an extremely wealthy man. Most of my wealth comes from buying and selling Africans, as if they were cattle. I could care less about the psychological scars I leave when I separate parent from child, husband from wife, at the s***e auctions.

It's sweet having unpaid labor work the plantation while I wax poetically about freedom and liberty.

I have a real problem though. There are so many more b****s than w****s here at Monticello. Some of them are quite burley and strong and more intelligent than I gave them credit for.

How am I going to control them? My fists? Yelling?

What if they stage an uprising? Wait...... a thought is coming to me. Why don't we use guns. They will come in handing for the local white "m*****as" when we are looking for runaway s***es.

Mental note to self: make sure that w****s are given free access to guns in this new nation.

How do I do that? I know. I will go to Patrick Henry. He's a man after my own heart, another s***e owner who likes throwing around words like "liberty" ....yeah, the "liberty" to own s***es (heh, heh).

Wait, the mail just arrived. Patrick says he will be the point man for "gun control...gun control of black people. He says he will do it through a new second amendment to the constitution. He said most people will think it is actually about self defense and deer hunting and won't realize our true motives.

Reply
Mar 15, 2014 11:08:52   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
One world government. Sounds like the old John Birch Society nonsense. I just don't see it. The nation-state is the way the world has been going since the bronze age. I see nothing that will change that simple fact.
Skyhook wrote:
Whether it's AlGore ManBearPig's environment ravings or Barack Hussein Obama's bungled, confused international policies, we all know there is a movement in the USA (Almost exclusively USA, by the way) for *One World* government. But that incredibly child-like movement is definitely not new. It seems to have become popular amongst the campus elite sometimes in the 1930s and grew into a sizable roar in 1944.
The Democrats (socialists by any other name) were often espousing the virtues of One World Government in the middle of WWII and Republicans of the day were for national identity and sovereignty for which the socialists called them 'Isolationists'.

So, this crap we see thrown into our faces by today's anti-American progressives is nothing new, is it? Open borders, turning over our military and our wealth to a world government seems to have been with us now for some eighty or ninety years. It's not some Big New Idea by any means. The concept is, like the children's crusade that ushered Obama into office, a movement of the immature and dream-driven children whom we adults must somehow guide without damage into the real world.

Wish us luck... we're going to need it as the soft demands of today have produced millions upon millions more of those children than ever before.
Whether it's AlGore ManBearPig's environment ravin... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.