emarine

Your quote... After those wop-wop, scenery-wreckers are running for, say, twenty years then we'll get some accurate figures.. but do not expect accurate reporting of costs, etc., to come from GE or the Climwop-wop, scenery-wreckersate Change hysterical media.[/quote]


Is this all you have to offer for debate?... Maybe you could read some & say something intelligent ...http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/renewable-energy/wind-energy.html

Morgan

Bahahah

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Interesting article that includes the fact that many countries that use wind are having difficulty in achieving their goals....

The growing share of wind power in the electricity mix presents unique operational challenges to grid operators. Because of the unreliability of wind power, adding more wind generation capacity to the grid increases the need to boost the percentage of overall plant capacity set aside to provide ancillary services. The variability of wind was demonstrated in the data for Europe last year, with several countries, including Germany, France, Denmark, the UK and Sweden, suffering declines in annual wind power generation...

I guess its the baby steps of the future being molded..? Or the advantage of the c*****e c****e seen before our eyes in why so many are pushing it.. The almighty dollar at work again...

A lot of information about BP which shows they see the trend shift and are taking advantage to remold their company....

They too have a big chunk of money invested in the renewables or alternatives....

BP Sustainability~~
The energy we produce serves to power economic growth and lift people out of poverty. In the future, the way heat, light and mobility are delivered will change. We aim to anchor our business in these changing patterns of demand, rather than in the quest for supply.
We have a real contribution to make to the world’s ambition of a low carbon future...

S. Maturin

Using quotes from others to feign intellect is old.

If you had an original thought, it would be lonely.

emarine

Your quote... After those wop-wop, scenery-wreckers are running for, say, twenty years then we'll get some accurate figures.. but do not expect accurate reporting of costs, etc., to come from GE or the Climwop-wop, scenery-wreckersate Change hysterical media.[/quote]



I provided a non bias link from BP to help you understand your "original thought" of wop-wop scenery-wrecker problem... you obviously didn't choose to read it or comprehend it if you did... wop-wop, scenery-wreckers is a bit shallow for reasonable debate...

Morgan

E, this poster never has a "reasonable " debate, him posting "if you ever had an original thought" is quite ironic don't you think. LOL

S. Maturin

Touching.

emarine

This is the third round of useless reply's from this poster in a short period of time... he asks lots of irrelevant questions then disappears ...

emarine

Thanks LJ you obviously read the link... I thought it answered many of his questions in a very unbiased way coming from the oil industry & not any pro greenie or for profit manufacturer like GE...

S. Maturin

Nice little whine fest you two have. Ya ken wipe yer noses on each other's sleeves.. crying towels are locked up in Hillary's closet.

emarine

Is this but another of your original thoughts?... How about you read the link that I provided just for you... This way you don't have to remain ignorant while replying & can actually contribute in open debate without being such an ass whole...

S. Maturin

You think science is to be generated and validated through politics and you consider my responses invalid?

You resort to name calling that would disgust the lowest-achieving fourth grader and you think my responses vulgar?

Have you ever heard of t***sference?

Never mind, I do not have the time or inclination to explain that to such an ignoramus are yourself.

emarine

Why do you bother?...you just offer ignorance in your reply's when failing to read the information provided... that's if you're even on topic to begin with... Since you're a constant pest following my reply's with nothing but off topic BS... simply buzz off or offer something worthy of my time to debate ...

S. Maturin

"..buzz off.." how incredibly BRILLIANT!

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

I must admit I read it as a for profit oil company who is pushing a good bit of it because they have invested heavily .....
Results not being what was expected given the inherant issues of wind being dictated by Mother Nature they don't want to loose their butts later...

I think renewables are great but still believe oil will be for some time to come...

Yes, a f****l f**l but one that stands the test of time......

Please remember I am not a climate control believer, I believe the earth does what she does and we meddling in that is what will cause problems later or very well could....Example, altering the wind that may have an adverse effect causes the earth to cool quicker than it would naturally and not knowing how to correct it..Or the aresols we think need to be sprayed into the atmosphere to correct the heating of areas'....Didn't we get rid of aresols because they were so bad??
Is one any better than the other I don't know, what I do know is I will leave all that to the good Lord and Mother Nature and will do my part by screaming pollutants need to be addressed in keeping this beauiful Earth of ours clean and protecting our air, land and water through natural means, not fabricated by anyone.....