I think you are attacking those who agree with you.

With net neutrality in place, internet service providers have little say on what passes through the mechanisms that are used by customers to access the internet. There are controls in place for illegal activities, but companies like Comcast or AT&T wouldn’t be able to change how a customer’s data is delivered to them. This means an ISP under net neutrality cannot block access, change services, or alter the flow of data simply because there is something that goes on which they don’t like. We can already see that the powers-that-be are trying to limit freedom of speech. We have to wise up and understand what's going on Especially with Trump in office. We have to be unwilling to hand over the keys to our freedom or risk becoming Germany of the 1940's.
Understand that innovation has to be protected at all cost. But only if the Internet remains neutral not only to innovation but also freedom of expression. Ask yourself who benefits from an Internet that is controlled by the few?
When the internet becomes a place where profitability is the primary concern, the idea of providing free internet access to those who cannot afford it goes away. Providers could charge wh**ever they wanted and restrict access to whomever they please. This could lead to demographic discrimination, socioeconomic discrimination, or prioritize content to the wealthiest who are willing to pay high prices for the fastest data streams. https://tacticalsecret.com/.../cjones11112014-600x458.jpg

I think you are attacking those who agree with you.

With net neutrality in place, internet service providers have little say on what passes through the mechanisms that are used by customers to access the internet. There are controls in place for illegal activities, but companies like Comcast or AT&T wouldn’t be able to change how a customer’s data is delivered to them. This means an ISP under net neutrality cannot block access, change services, or alter the flow of data simply because there is something that goes on which they don’t like. We can already see that the powers-that-be are trying to limit freedom of speech. We have to wise up and understand what's going on Especially with Trump in office. We have to be unwilling to hand over the keys to our freedom or risk becoming Germany of the 1940's.
Understand that innovation has to be protected at all cost. But only if the Internet remains neutral not only to innovation but also freedom of expression. Ask yourself who benefits from an Internet that is controlled by the few?
When the internet becomes a place where profitability is the primary concern, the idea of providing free internet access to those who cannot afford it goes away. Providers could charge wh**ever they wanted and restrict access to whomever they please. This could lead to demographic discrimination, socioeconomic discrimination, or prioritize content to the wealthiest who are willing to pay high prices for the fastest data streams. https://tacticalsecret.com/.../cjones11112014-600x458.jpg

I think you are attacking those who agree with you.

With net neutrality in place, internet service providers have little say on what passes through the mechanisms that are used by customers to access the internet. There are controls in place for illegal activities, but companies like Comcast or AT&T wouldn’t be able to change how a customer’s data is delivered to them. This means an ISP under net neutrality cannot block access, change services, or alter the flow of data simply because there is something that goes on which they don’t like. We can already see that the powers-that-be are trying to limit freedom of speech. We have to wise up and understand what's going on Especially with Trump in office. We have to be unwilling to hand over the keys to our freedom or risk becoming Germany of the 1940's.
Understand that innovation has to be protected at all cost. But only if the Internet remains neutral not only to innovation but also freedom of expression. Ask yourself who benefits from an Internet that is controlled by the few?
When the internet becomes a place where profitability is the primary concern, the idea of providing free internet access to those who cannot afford it goes away. Providers could charge wh**ever they wanted and restrict access to whomever they please. This could lead to demographic discrimination, socioeconomic discrimination, or prioritize content to the wealthiest who are willing to pay high prices for the fastest data streams. https://tacticalsecret.com/.../cjones11112014-600x458.jpg

*************************
You are correct except when the corporations merge and/or agree and are in total control. Note that the government has not and is not now involved in selling content. They don't have anything to gain except your freedom. President Obama worked hard to nix this idea and have it considered it a utility to be regulated by corporations. So many of you righties are so brainwashed that all you need is to hear the word "government" and, without understanding what is going on, you fools will decide on what is going against your own well being. It being considered a utility is what has kept the programming free up to this point. The "government" has been involved in nothing more than preventing overpricing.

1. The people that regulate the ISPs are the same ones that get $Millions from them in campaign contributions, and are likely to go working for them as lobbyists at hugely inflated salaries if they regulate them the way they want to be regulated.

2. Net Neutrality has only been in place 2 years. It was free before that.

3. Government price controls never work. All that does is k**l competition and lower innovations/improvements. Government can't decide what a product or service is worth, or what it costs the vendor to produce them. In a free market if an ISP doesn't serve the customers, someone else will. Price controls stop that from happening.

4. How would you feel if Trump regulated ISPs that didn't support him out business? Do you want him to have that power?

Freedom does not mean that the richest person gets to buy everything to the detriment of everyone else. Your freedom stops when it hurts me.

The liars, c***ts and crooks do, to, our detriment. Gates takes the heart out of the computer industry. He just buys out everything he can and trashes those he cannot. Unlimited power gives unlimited damage to those that oppose. Lockheed/Martin. I worked for Glenn L. Martin before it was Martin -Marietta. So, the military -industrial complex added congress and the judiciary they had the executive also. But T***p w*n.

The oligarchy does not want us to have a Constitutional Republic again. Look at all the socialists that want Bernie and still want HRC. Draining the swamp/pizzagate/p*******e/Bush/Clintons/obozo/pope/queen of UK/islam/religion (not a belief in a deity! ) BAR/ it is all a long string of snot.

Trump is not a graduate of FRC/CFR or Tri-Lateral. His Marines are better that the CIA/FBI/B*M/DHS.