JFlorio wrote:
Net Neutrality. Another great sounding disingenuous name. Washingtoneeze for more government interference.
As opposed to corporate control.
moldyoldy wrote:
As opposed to corporate control.
As opposed to government control.
JW wrote:
Pai is an Obama appointee.
Net neutrality is a must for a free internet. Otherwise government bigwigs will start regulating freedom of speech, what can be sold and bought on the net, determine prices and taxation will fall on the hapless internet user. And, yes. One will be charged an annual fee for internet access. The internet is self-regulating and should remain so.
moldyoldy wrote:
As opposed to corporate control.
A corporation unfriendly to it's customers can be replaced by one that serves its customers.
A poorly run government just hires more people and unionizes so they can't be fired for incompetence.
Super Dave wrote:
A corporation unfriendly to it's customers can be replaced by one that serves its customers.
A poorly run government just hires more people and unionizes so they can't be fired for incompetence.
We will wind up with state run media, fox faux news 24/7
moldyoldy wrote:
We will wind up with state run media, fox faux news 24/7
Yeah...
You'll save a fortune when we k**l all of the other channels and give you free one-channel service.
We'll force you to watch it 4 hours a day to get your rations of potatoes and mirky water.
It'll be great.
who benefits with the change?? Not me. Now we must all be treated equally. Remove the restrictions and the owners of the service providers will determine who gets what speed. They own the providership of service. Now and after a change if it is allowed. Only they will not be required to treat us all the same.
moldyoldy wrote:
OK, brain dead i***t, when Comcast and Verizon control the net, you only get what they allow.
ron vrooman wrote:
who benefits with the change?? Not me. Now we must all be treated equally. Remove the restrictions and the owners of the service providers will determine who gets what speed. They own the providership of service. Now and after a change if it is allowed. Only they will not be required to treat us all the same.
So you think that politicans will demand that service providers treat people fairly no matter how much $ the service providers offer them in donations?
Really?
Naive much?
the internet was created neutral it treated everyone the same trump wants control it so he's destroying it for us so he can give another gift to big business
D**gnet wrote:
Net Neutrality means Net Control. More government control means less, much less freedom.
you do not comprehend what the restrictions are and what will change. Just run off without comprehension. Think much???
Super Dave wrote:
So you think that politicans will demand that service providers treat people fairly no matter how much $ the service providers offer them in donations?
Really?
Naive much?
Lonewolf wrote:
the internet was created neutral it treated everyone the same trump wants control it so he's destroying it for us so he can give another gift to big business
You're not paying attention.
Net Neutrality puts Government in charge of the internet.
Trump as POTUS controls the internet now, but he's giving up control.
Try again, Troll-Boy.
No you do not comprehend. You think but reach the wrong conclusions.
Super Dave wrote:
You're not paying attention.
Net Neutrality puts Government in charge of the internet.
Trump as POTUS controls the internet now, but he's giving up control.
Try again, Troll-Boy.
JW wrote:
You really have no clue, do you... read this
http://www.businessinsider.com/simple-explanation-of-net-neutrality-2014-4The bottom line is you get what you pay for, nothing more. It has nothing to do with what you can access. It means competition will determine the marketplace. Eliminating competition was the reason no advancement in telephone technology happened for a hundred years. If one ISP refuses you access to a service, find a different provider who does.
That’s BS why should I be limited to what I have access to or what I want to see. This is all BS and you know it.
the website is correct. Not you.It is now equal to all customers of the service provider. Not what you pay for. Wh**ever you pay you get equal service once you access the web thru a provider. your cost has nothing to do with e******y of service.
JW wrote:
You really have no clue, do you... read this
http://www.businessinsider.com/simple-explanation-of-net-neutrality-2014-4The bottom line is you get what you pay for, nothing more. It has nothing to do with what you can access. It means competition will determine the marketplace. Eliminating competition was the reason no advancement in telephone technology happened for a hundred years. If one ISP refuses you access to a service, find a different provider who does.
ron vrooman wrote:
the website is correct. Not you.It is now equal to all customers of the service provider. Not what you pay for. Wh**ever you pay you get equal service once you access the web thru a provider. your cost has nothing to do with e******y of service.
I think you are attacking those who agree with you.
With net neutrality in place, internet service providers have little say on what passes through the mechanisms that are used by customers to access the internet. There are controls in place for illegal activities, but companies like Comcast or AT&T wouldn’t be able to change how a customer’s data is delivered to them. This means an ISP under net neutrality cannot block access, change services, or alter the flow of data simply because there is something that goes on which they don’t like. We can already see that the powers-that-be are trying to limit freedom of speech. We have to wise up and understand what's going on Especially with Trump in office. We have to be unwilling to hand over the keys to our freedom or risk becoming Germany of the 1940's.
Understand that innovation has to be protected at all cost. But only if the Internet remains neutral not only to innovation but also freedom of expression. Ask yourself who benefits from an Internet that is controlled by the few?
When the internet becomes a place where profitability is the primary concern, the idea of providing free internet access to those who cannot afford it goes away. Providers could charge wh**ever they wanted and restrict access to whomever they please. This could lead to demographic discrimination, socioeconomic discrimination, or prioritize content to the wealthiest who are willing to pay high prices for the fastest data streams.
https://tacticalsecret.com/.../cjones11112014-600x458.jpg
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.