One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Facebook Russian "ads" got over 126M views, with 41.7M likes and 58.3M shares
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Oct 30, 2017 19:48:37   #
rumitoid
 
These ads did not say, "Hi. I am Russian agitator looking to interfere in your e******n if favor of Trump. Please read distortions, misdirections, phony statistics, and f**e news below to help in our concerted effort to defeat Hillary. Pass it one." No, the "ads" ran under false sites with names like The American Conservative Journal, Young People For Trump, and The Institute for T***h in Government. Each ad was specifically designed to spread anger, d******eness, and confusion, as well as lies about and distrust in Hillary and the Dems. Story lines like these: "Proof of a Secret plan to ban guns if Hillary elected"; "Obama has made his inner circle pledge allegiance to Allah, a close aid discloses under threat of death"; "Coverup in Hillary's child porn ring." (I know at least ten people on OPP that would run with all those stories, making no effort to verify.) This would be followed by invented (and by nature then non-existent) evidence and testimony. It was a massive coordinated, determined, and focused attack to defeat Clinton. This also occurred on Twitter and instagram, but not nearly to the extent of Facebook. Did this propaganda attack from an American adversary have any effect on the e******n? By how v**es did Trump lose? (Sorry, forgot about the imaginary 3 to 5M fraudulent v**es...that have been proven false.)

The indictments tell us today there is a very definite Russian connection to the Trump campaign, but not tRump. It should be clear to any discerning person that these developments are troubling and need to be pursued. The fact that the Manafort indictment deals with activities two years before working for tRump does not mean that he wasn't hired for and did not help with his Russian connections. Even a cursory vetting of Manafort would have revealed his shady past. His criminal dealings with Russia may have been the stamp of approval to hire him on the tRump Campaign. That is total conjecture...but not outside the realm of plausible.

Reply
Oct 30, 2017 20:04:07   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
rumitoid wrote:
These ads did not say, "Hi. I am Russian agitator looking to interfere in your e******n if favor of Trump. Please read distortions, misdirections, phony statistics, and f**e news below to help in our concerted effort to defeat Hillary. Pass it one." No, the "ads" ran under false sites with names like The American Conservative Journal, Young People For Trump, and The Institute for T***h in Government. Each ad was specifically designed to spread anger, d******eness, and confusion, as well as lies about and distrust in Hillary and the Dems. Story lines like these: "Proof of a Secret plan to ban guns if Hillary elected"; "Obama has made his inner circle pledge allegiance to Allah, a close aid discloses under threat of death"; "Coverup in Hillary's child porn ring." (I know at least ten people on OPP that would run with all those stories, making no effort to verify.) This would be followed by invented (and by nature then non-existent) evidence and testimony. It was a massive coordinated, determined, and focused attack to defeat Clinton. This also occurred on Twitter and instagram, but not nearly to the extent of Facebook. Did this propaganda attack from an American adversary have any effect on the e******n? By how v**es did Trump lose? (Sorry, forgot about the imaginary 3 to 5M fraudulent v**es...that have been proven false.)

The indictments tell us today there is a very definite Russian connection to the Trump campaign, but not tRump. It should be clear to any discerning person that these developments are troubling and need to be pursued. The fact that the Manafort indictment deals with activities two years before working for tRump does not mean that he wasn't hired for and did not help with his Russian connections. Even a cursory vetting of Manafort would have revealed his shady past. His criminal dealings with Russia may have been the stamp of approval to hire him on the tRump Campaign. That is total conjecture...but not outside the realm of plausible.
These ads did not say, "Hi. I am Russian agit... (show quote)



Reply
Oct 30, 2017 20:14:25   #
vernon
 
rumitoid wrote:
These ads did not say, "Hi. I am Russian agitator looking to interfere in your e******n if favor of Trump. Please read distortions, misdirections, phony statistics, and f**e news below to help in our concerted effort to defeat Hillary. Pass it one." No, the "ads" ran under false sites with names like The American Conservative Journal, Young People For Trump, and The Institute for T***h in Government. Each ad was specifically designed to spread anger, d******eness, and confusion, as well as lies about and distrust in Hillary and the Dems. Story lines like these: "Proof of a Secret plan to ban guns if Hillary elected"; "Obama has made his inner circle pledge allegiance to Allah, a close aid discloses under threat of death"; "Coverup in Hillary's child porn ring." (I know at least ten people on OPP that would run with all those stories, making no effort to verify.) This would be followed by invented (and by nature then non-existent) evidence and testimony. It was a massive coordinated, determined, and focused attack to defeat Clinton. This also occurred on Twitter and instagram, but not nearly to the extent of Facebook. Did this propaganda attack from an American adversary have any effect on the e******n? By how v**es did Trump lose? (Sorry, forgot about the imaginary 3 to 5M fraudulent v**es...that have been proven false.)

The indictments tell us today there is a very definite Russian connection to the Trump campaign, but not tRump. It should be clear to any discerning person that these developments are troubling and need to be pursued. The fact that the Manafort indictment deals with activities two years before working for tRump does not mean that he wasn't hired for and did not help with his Russian connections. Even a cursory vetting of Manafort would have revealed his shady past. His criminal dealings with Russia may have been the stamp of approval to hire him on the tRump Campaign. That is total conjecture...but not outside the realm of plausible.
These ads did not say, "Hi. I am Russian agit... (show quote)



You don't know what your talking about.Hell Manafort wasn't in the campaign but 3 months .If the indictments tell us anything it's that the dnc and the clintons were working together .

Reply
 
 
Oct 30, 2017 20:21:28   #
Lonewolf
 
What it tells us is Russia elected trump

quote=vernon]You don't know what your talking about.Hell Manafort wasn't in the campaign but 3 months .If the indictments tell us anything it's that the dnc and the clintons were working together .[/quote]

Reply
Oct 30, 2017 20:45:07   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
rumitoid wrote:
These ads did not say, "Hi. I am Russian agitator looking to interfere in your e******n if favor of Trump. Please read distortions, misdirections, phony statistics, and f**e news below to help in our concerted effort to defeat Hillary. Pass it one." No, the "ads" ran under false sites with names like The American Conservative Journal, Young People For Trump, and The Institute for T***h in Government. Each ad was specifically designed to spread anger, d******eness, and confusion, as well as lies about and distrust in Hillary and the Dems. Story lines like these: "Proof of a Secret plan to ban guns if Hillary elected"; "Obama has made his inner circle pledge allegiance to Allah, a close aid discloses under threat of death"; "Coverup in Hillary's child porn ring." (I know at least ten people on OPP that would run with all those stories, making no effort to verify.) This would be followed by invented (and by nature then non-existent) evidence and testimony. It was a massive coordinated, determined, and focused attack to defeat Clinton. This also occurred on Twitter and instagram, but not nearly to the extent of Facebook. Did this propaganda attack from an American adversary have any effect on the e******n? By how v**es did Trump lose? (Sorry, forgot about the imaginary 3 to 5M fraudulent v**es...that have been proven false.)

The indictments tell us today there is a very definite Russian connection to the Trump campaign, but not tRump. It should be clear to any discerning person that these developments are troubling and need to be pursued. The fact that the Manafort indictment deals with activities two years before working for tRump does not mean that he wasn't hired for and did not help with his Russian connections. Even a cursory vetting of Manafort would have revealed his shady past. His criminal dealings with Russia may have been the stamp of approval to hire him on the tRump Campaign. That is total conjecture...but not outside the realm of plausible.
These ads did not say, "Hi. I am Russian agit... (show quote)


Let's see some of these adds.

Reply
Oct 30, 2017 20:47:51   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
rumitoid wrote:
These ads did not say, "Hi. I am Russian agitator looking to interfere in your e******n if favor of Trump. Please read distortions, misdirections, phony statistics, and f**e news below to help in our concerted effort to defeat Hillary. Pass it one." No, the "ads" ran under false sites with names like The American Conservative Journal, Young People For Trump, and The Institute for T***h in Government. Each ad was specifically designed to spread anger, d******eness, and confusion, as well as lies about and distrust in Hillary and the Dems. Story lines like these: "Proof of a Secret plan to ban guns if Hillary elected"; "Obama has made his inner circle pledge allegiance to Allah, a close aid discloses under threat of death"; "Coverup in Hillary's child porn ring." (I know at least ten people on OPP that would run with all those stories, making no effort to verify.) This would be followed by invented (and by nature then non-existent) evidence and testimony. It was a massive coordinated, determined, and focused attack to defeat Clinton. This also occurred on Twitter and instagram, but not nearly to the extent of Facebook. Did this propaganda attack from an American adversary have any effect on the e******n? By how v**es did Trump lose? (Sorry, forgot about the imaginary 3 to 5M fraudulent v**es...that have been proven false.)

The indictments tell us today there is a very definite Russian connection to the Trump campaign, but not tRump. It should be clear to any discerning person that these developments are troubling and need to be pursued. The fact that the Manafort indictment deals with activities two years before working for tRump does not mean that he wasn't hired for and did not help with his Russian connections. Even a cursory vetting of Manafort would have revealed his shady past. His criminal dealings with Russia may have been the stamp of approval to hire him on the tRump Campaign. That is total conjecture...but not outside the realm of plausible.
These ads did not say, "Hi. I am Russian agit... (show quote)


How does the Manifort indictment prove there was a definite connection btwn Trump and Russia.

Reply
Oct 30, 2017 21:20:05   #
rumitoid
 
Bad Bob wrote:


Thank you.

Reply
 
 
Oct 30, 2017 21:20:51   #
rumitoid
 
vernon wrote:
You don't know what your talking about.Hell Manafort wasn't in the campaign but 3 months .If the indictments tell us anything it's that the dnc and the clintons were working together .


Explain, while ignoring facts.

Reply
Oct 30, 2017 21:26:53   #
rumitoid
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Let's see some of these adds.


I gave examples. Facebook today made an official statement that Russia "ads" against Hillary got over 126m views. All of them were against Hillary. What you should be outraged about is this covert and concerted attack on our democracy by an adversary. tRump supporters seem to care nothing about this established fact.

Reply
Oct 30, 2017 21:29:27   #
rumitoid
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
How does the Manifort indictment prove there was a definite connection btwn Trump and Russia.


That is coming but it is the tRump aid Papadoulos confession that seals the deal. Read the indictment and confession.

Reply
Oct 30, 2017 21:53:25   #
PeterS
 
vernon wrote:
You don't know what your talking about.Hell Manafort wasn't in the campaign but 3 months .If the indictments tell us anything it's that the dnc and the clintons were working together .

Manafort lived in Trump Tower and was with the campaign for 5 months. And Clinton is a democrat--of course she was working with the DNC. Why would you need an indictment to tell you that?

Reply
 
 
Oct 30, 2017 21:55:02   #
PeterS
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
How does the Manifort indictment prove there was a definite connection btwn Trump and Russia.


Patience grasshopper, patience...

Reply
Oct 30, 2017 22:38:14   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
rumitoid wrote:
These ads did not say, "Hi. I am Russian agitator looking to interfere in your e******n if favor of Trump. Please read distortions, misdirections, phony statistics, and f**e news below to help in our concerted effort to defeat Hillary. Pass it one." No, the "ads" ran under false sites with names like The American Conservative Journal, Young People For Trump, and The Institute for T***h in Government. Each ad was specifically designed to spread anger, d******eness, and confusion, as well as lies about and distrust in Hillary and the Dems. Story lines like these: "Proof of a Secret plan to ban guns if Hillary elected"; "Obama has made his inner circle pledge allegiance to Allah, a close aid discloses under threat of death"; "Coverup in Hillary's child porn ring." (I know at least ten people on OPP that would run with all those stories, making no effort to verify.) This would be followed by invented (and by nature then non-existent) evidence and testimony. It was a massive coordinated, determined, and focused attack to defeat Clinton. This also occurred on Twitter and instagram, but not nearly to the extent of Facebook. Did this propaganda attack from an American adversary have any effect on the e******n? By how v**es did Trump lose? (Sorry, forgot about the imaginary 3 to 5M fraudulent v**es...that have been proven false.)

The indictments tell us today there is a very definite Russian connection to the Trump campaign, but not tRump. It should be clear to any discerning person that these developments are troubling and need to be pursued. The fact that the Manafort indictment deals with activities two years before working for tRump does not mean that he wasn't hired for and did not help with his Russian connections. Even a cursory vetting of Manafort would have revealed his shady past. His criminal dealings with Russia may have been the stamp of approval to hire him on the tRump Campaign. That is total conjecture...but not outside the realm of plausible.
These ads did not say, "Hi. I am Russian agit... (show quote)




No amount of this red herring made anyone v**e for Donald Trump...We already had solid reasons to v**e against the murderess...did Putin help in the primaries when our President Donald J Trump whipped a bus load of other Republican candidates??

Reply
Oct 30, 2017 22:47:41   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
rumitoid wrote:
I gave examples. Facebook today made an official statement that Russia "ads" against Hillary got over 126m views. All of them were against Hillary. What you should be outraged about is this covert and concerted attack on our democracy by an adversary. tRump supporters seem to care nothing about this established fact.


On OPP?

Reply
Oct 30, 2017 22:49:09   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
rumitoid wrote:
That is coming but it is the tRump aid Papadoulos confession that seals the deal. Read the indictment and confession.


He only plead to lying about it. I've read both.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.