Govt is not a business,,, is your problem, taxpayers are not customers, they are owners
The govt has NO money,, that they have not first taken,,,,, therefore "giving back" is your socialist mistake,,,,,,
The govt "returns" what it did not deserve or need,,,,, to the rightful owners,,,,
The govt "giving" the money to anyone is also a problem,,,,,,,,,, it increases "spending",,,, with money that did not belong to the govt in the first place,,, which then becomes "debt",,,, since it is technically "borrowed" (more like stolen)
Here is a simple test,,, even you might get a D+,,,, when your checkbook is at zero,,,, yet you have more checks left,,, can you keep writing checks and spending????
The govt does,,,,, with l*****t "programs",, where in it "feeds the Po",,,, like animals in a political zoo.. to v**e for them,, or the food ceases
PeterS wrote:
So if everyone was envious of what others were charged why didn't the beat up the four freeloaders to start with? And what was the purpose of the $20 cut to begin with? In economics one reduces prices to stimulate new business--only the government give back money for no reason--if this is a class in economic then how are new paying customers generated?