One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
President will not recertify Iran Nuclear deal.....
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Oct 14, 2017 08:30:12   #
meridianlesilie Loc: mars
 
PeterS wrote:
If they want to k**l us why did they sign the deal?

its called LYING !!!!

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 08:41:37   #
meridianlesilie Loc: mars
 
PeterS wrote:
And how have they not lived up to their agreement?

HERE look at this take it for what it is worth

http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/07/world/meast/irans-nuclear-capabilities-fast-facts/index.html
i do not know if you trust CNN
well how do we really know what they have ??they will not let us inspect anyway we can only take there word for it from what i hear
http://www.wnd.com/2015/08/military-experts-iran-already-has-nuclear-weapons/

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 08:46:51   #
meridianlesilie Loc: mars
 
PeterS wrote:
And how have they not lived up to their agreement?

and this to
http://patriotnewsdaily.com/bombshell-report-shows-why-iran-deal-is-not-workingat-all/

Reply
 
 
Oct 14, 2017 08:51:09   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
A couple points..

All indications are that Iran has complied with the agreement.. and that means it was effective in what it covered.

Without this agreement, most intelligence thinks Iran would have tested a bomb by now..

All other parties to the agreement remain and will not follow the lead of the US.

None of them will participate in sanctions.. the only thing that will happen is some business in the US will not sell to Iran.. Iran will continue with the rest of the world.

Most serious, whit the US withdrawing from an international agreement when the other parties are fulfilling the obligations of the agreement, we lose even more face to the rest of the world.

Are once great role as world leader gets dropped several steps down the ladder of respect..

No rational reason for the orange man to trash this agreement.

It was doing the job..

The EU, UK, France, Germany sent a joint letter urging the US to honor the agreement.

This has nothing but a down side..

It seems that with the failure of trumps 3 health plans and the coming fight over tax gifts, he can think of nothing else then to attack anything that President Obama was involed with..

Sounds like he would like to be on OPP, and fit right in..

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 08:54:29   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 




LOL,,, ha ha ha,

What should we believe, our own intell service, our own military, the other allied nations in the agreement,

Or the renowned (lol) "patriotnewsdaily? Posted from moms basement every day or almost..

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 09:09:18   #
meridianlesilie Loc: mars
 
permafrost wrote:
LOL,,, ha ha ha,

What should we believe, our own intell service, our own military, the other allied nations in the agreement,

Or the renowned (lol) "patriotnewsdaily? Posted from moms basement every day or almost..

well i like to live a little longer .so we have a right to know

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 09:11:32   #
meridianlesilie Loc: mars
 
permafrost wrote:
LOL,,, ha ha ha,

What should we believe, our own intell service, our own military, the other allied nations in the agreement,

Or the renowned (lol) "patriotnewsdaily? Posted from moms basement every day or almost..


i know why dont you go there & see

Reply
 
 
Oct 14, 2017 09:32:04   #
PeterS
 
meridianlesilie wrote:
its called LYING !!!!

None the less. If their objective was to k**l us they were in better shape to do that by not signing the deal. After all they had to give up enough uranium to make several bombs. It's hard to make a bomb when you don't have the uranium to do so...

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 09:41:51   #
PeterS
 
meridianlesilie wrote:
HERE look at this take it for what it is worth

http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/07/world/meast/irans-nuclear-capabilities-fast-facts/index.html
i do not know if you trust CNN
well how do we really know what they have ??they will not let us inspect anyway we can only take there word for it from what i hear
http://www.wnd.com/2015/08/military-experts-iran-already-has-nuclear-weapons/


WND isn't CNN and CNN doesn't corroborate what WND says. If Israel trusts that the deal is working why shouldn't we believe them? They have the best intelligence in the area and have far more to lose than anyone else/.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/obama-even-israel-now-says-we-were-right-on-iran-nuke-deal/

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 09:43:56   #
kenvrla Loc: East Tx Piney Woods
 
Peter thinks they have nukes that only k**l conservatives....

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 10:39:41   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
PeterS wrote:
So what's your excuse? The list of generals who think Iran is in compliance reads like a who's who, and even Israel thinks that it is working to keep nukes out of Iranian hands. So if it's working whats to be gained by scuttling it? How are we better off with a nuclear Iran?

So again, what's your excuse for supporting evil?

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/351599-us-strategic-command-chief-iran-adhering-to-nuclear-deal
http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-pol-essential-washington-updates-pentagon-chief-says-keeping-iran-1507050067-htmlstory.html
http://www.theroot.com/why-scrapping-the-iran-deal-is-a-dumb-move-explained-1819225059
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congress/israeli-security-experts-question-reopening-iran-deal/2017/10/12/d40776ac-af81-11e7-9b93-b97043e57a22_story.html?utm_term=.32e5a125b8a1

And the list goes on and on?
So what's your excuse? The list of generals who th... (show quote)


News flash.

The current deal guarantees Iran to become a nuclear power. That's the whole point of it.

Obama also shocked out over $1Billion in cash to help then pay for it.

Reply
 
 
Oct 14, 2017 12:06:48   #
meridianlesilie Loc: mars
 
PeterS wrote:
None the less. If their objective was to k**l us they were in better shape to do that by not signing the deal. After all they had to give up enough uranium to make several bombs. It's hard to make a bomb when you don't have the uranium to do so...


really you missed what i put here a month ago
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/24/obama-iran-nuclear-deal-prisoner-release-236966 this and more
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/01/10/obama-approved-giving-iran-116-metric-tons-of-uranium-as-a-thank-you-gift/
so read these 2 stories he gave not took back

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 12:43:54   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
permafrost wrote:
A couple points..

All indications are that Iran has complied with the agreement.. and that means it was effective in what it covered.

Without this agreement, most intelligence thinks Iran would have tested a bomb by now..

All other parties to the agreement remain and will not follow the lead of the US.

None of them will participate in sanctions.. the only thing that will happen is some business in the US will not sell to Iran.. Iran will continue with the rest of the world.

Most serious, whit the US withdrawing from an international agreement when the other parties are fulfilling the obligations of the agreement, we lose even more face to the rest of the world.

Are once great role as world leader gets dropped several steps down the ladder of respect..

No rational reason for the orange man to trash this agreement.

It was doing the job..

The EU, UK, France, Germany sent a joint letter urging the US to honor the agreement.

This has nothing but a down side..

It seems that with the failure of trumps 3 health plans and the coming fight over tax gifts, he can think of nothing else then to attack anything that President Obama was involed with..

Sounds like he would like to be on OPP, and fit right in..
A couple points.. br br All indications are that... (show quote)

He is not pulling out of agreement,he is not re-certifying it..Big difference!! Do you really trust Iran that have been shouting " Death to America, Death to Israel??" Really??

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 12:57:41   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
proud republican wrote:
He is not pulling out of agreement,he is not re-certifying it..Big difference!! Do you really trust Iran that have been shouting " Death to America, Death to Israel??" Really??




correct on re certifying for now..

It is not Iran that I trust..

But I do trust the fact that all the other nations in the agreement, UK, France, Germany and EU, along with our intellegence agencies and the Military all say the agreement is working.

And that Iran is complying with the agreement..

We now have a mess with NK, no need to add even more to the worlds mess..

Reply
Oct 14, 2017 13:03:51   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
permafrost wrote:
correct on re certifying for now..

It is not Iran that I trust..

But I do trust the fact that all the other nations in the agreement, UK, France, Germany and EU, along with our intellegence agencies and the Military all say the agreement is working.

And that Iran is complying with the agreement..

We now have a mess with NK, no need to add even more to the worlds mess..

Seriously,Permafrost?? You trust the nations that are now opened their borders to terrorism???Iwouldnt trust them with 12 foot pole!!.....

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.