Okay here goes:
Liberal Rag Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2013/11/15/the-consequences-of-an-affordable-care-act-failure/



Liberal leaning CBS Blog:
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/12/26/poll-americans-see-aca-as-both-obamas-biggest-failure-and-achievement/

American Spectator:
http://spectator.org/blog/56688/obama-blames-republicans-aca-failure

And on and on and on
Now let me see your research on conservative sites or sources that say it is working. There aren't any but the above links are mostly to Liberal sources who say it is NOT working as anticipated. So, now it's your turn. But you won't because all you do is spew liberal venom and rhetoric.

Pay attention, even if it hurts that occluded brain of yours.

The GOAL is the let people without insurance have the opportunity to BUY insurance.

The fools at faux jumped on the number 7 million during the open enrollment period. The goal reached is 40%.

By the end of the first year, the total will be 10-12 million.

This is NOT A ONE YEAR PLAN, just like Medicare and Medicaid. People sign up EVERY YEAR. Most renew, some die, some new join.

Why are facts so hard for you to grasp?

The main reason for more people not signing up, is the i***t REPUBLICAN governors who have refuse to set up stte exchanges, denying millions of people easy, local access.

Okay here goes:
Liberal Rag Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2013/11/15/the-consequences-of-an-affordable-care-act-failure/



Liberal leaning CBS Blog:
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/12/26/poll-americans-see-aca-as-both-obamas-biggest-failure-and-achievement/

American Spectator:
http://spectator.org/blog/56688/obama-blames-republicans-aca-failure

And on and on and on
Now let me see your research on conservative sites or sources that say it is working. There aren't any but the above links are mostly to Liberal sources who say it is NOT working as anticipated. So, now it's your turn. But you won't because all you do is spew liberal venom and rhetoric.

It amazes me just how little you know. Try doing some research before opening your pie hole. The fact is the woman's plan was a limited plan to $25,000 per year in treatment costs. It is known as a "mini-med" and is not a major medical plan, that is why it is so cheap.
The article referenced is also an ACA spin site. The fact is if the drugs she is required to have aren't on the "formulary" list, they will not be covered and won't even count toward the deductible of her health insurance plan under ACA. Guess what, a large number of the most expensive drugs are not on the formulary list and will not be paid for. This will amount to many thousands of dollars per year and won't count toward the deductible of her ACA plan.
So, nether story is completely accurate and is spun to suit the author's political agenda.

I saw an interview with some professional in the medical underwriting business. He said we could buy insurance policies for the 10 - 12 million Americans who can not afford coverage, plus create a pool of money to treat everyone wjth pre-existing conditions and it would cost $500 billion over ten years. What is the ten year cost of Pookiecare now estimated at, $3 trillion? $4 trillion?

This plan would cover every one that still won't be covered by Pookiecare. It won't cost 2.3 million full time jobs. It won't fkrce 120,000,000 Americans out of the insurance plans and away from the doctors they like. It is a win, win, win, win.

I don't know if you are familiar with Dr. Ben Carson. He makes the point that setting up health savings accounts instead of wasting money on web sites would be much more effective than this insurance s**m and also solve the problem of pre existing conditions. If you have a health savings account you pay for treatment from the accout. You do not have the complication of the third party and arguing over wether it is pre existing or if it is a coverd treatment.
I don't believe that Obama care ever had the intent of helping anyone.
Good
Of course we are allowing ourselves to be drug into an argument that should never be. The federal government has zero Constitutional authority to be involved in Americans healthcare, in any capacity.

It's about time that the fools at faux, fat limburg and the conservativeteapartyrepublicans stop lying about the ACA.

A woman with lupus bemoans the fact that her old plan only was costing her $57.00/mo. and was "perfect". And that is where her lie unravels.

After actually investigating, the "perfect plan" was a s**m that could have put the woman into bankruptcy.

The big mouth opponents of the ACA must have some ulterior motive that benefits them. Why else would they not want more citizens to have better insurance coverage?



http://finance.yahoo.com/news/dont-fooled-another-obamacare-horror-220000648.html

It amazes me just how little you know. Try doing some research before opening your pie hole. The fact is the woman's plan was a limited plan to $25,000 per year in treatment costs. It is known as a "mini-med" and is not a major medical plan, that is why it is so cheap.
The article referenced is also an ACA spin site. The fact is if the drugs she is required to have aren't on the "formulary" list, they will not be covered and won't even count toward the deductible of her health insurance plan under ACA. Guess what, a large number of the most expensive drugs are not on the formulary list and will not be paid for. This will amount to many thousands of dollars per year and won't count toward the deductible of her ACA plan.
So, nether story is completely accurate and is spun to suit the author's political agenda.