One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main
Another ACA lie exposed
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Feb 15, 2014 07:39:52   #
BoJester
 
You are too stupid to respond to. fartbreath, go play in traffic, overdose on drugs, or play russian roulette, you can't suffer any additional brain damage






madshark wrote:
No, BoAsshole, he has one of the most valid questions yet asked about this disastrous law. Where ARE the 30,000,000 newly insured this law was supposed to immediately insure? Where Bo, where? If that was a lie, then why do we need the law, Bo?

Now Bo, try to open your tiny little closed mind just a bit. If the law does not provide insurance for those it was supposed to insure, what is the point of the law. Obviously not insurance. Could it really be about controlling the people and money? Power?
No, BoAsshole, he has one of the most valid questi... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 07:42:10   #
BoJester
 
Ok child, why are you so determined to impose your perception and will on anyone else. Classic childish behavior, with the tendency to be a bully. But only until you get slapped down.

BTW, are you Incognito?

Just about as stupid.






stan3186 wrote:
Are you like 6 yrs old? On the playground calling people names? You prove my point, nothing intelligent to say. seesh.
You are like talking to a stubborn child, "why are you saying that?" reply of stubborn child "because". Have you ever admitted to being wrong about something. My guess is not because only adults are capable of such things. Spoiled little brat always getting there way grows up to be you.

You could use some grown up speak like:
"I don't know for sure but..."
"I could be wrong but..."
"If I'm not mistaken..."
"I'm not an expert but I think..."
You know Grown Up phrases. Children talk in absolutes always, grown ups will temper their comments.
Are you like 6 yrs old? On the playground calling ... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 07:48:56   #
stan3186
 
BoJester wrote:
Pay attention, even if it hurts that occluded brain of yours.

The GOAL is the let people without insurance have the opportunity to BUY insurance.

The fools at faux jumped on the number 7 million during the open enrollment period. The goal reached is 40%.

By the end of the first year, the total will be 10-12 million.

This is NOT A ONE YEAR PLAN, just like Medicare and Medicaid. People sign up EVERY YEAR. Most renew, some die, some new join.

Why are facts so hard for you to grasp?

The main reason for more people not signing up, is the i***t REPUBLICAN governors who have refuse to set up stte exchanges, denying millions of people easy, local access.
Pay attention, even if it hurts that occluded brai... (show quote)


Well, at least you made a reasonable attempt to make an intelligent comment, even though you are wrong and couldn't help yourself in calling me a name. Seriously, are you an adolescent meaning that your brain just hasn't matured enough to refrain from such childish speak? I hope so because if you are an adult chronologically speaking, then there is little to no hope for you.
you said "The main reason for more people not signing up, is the i***t REPUBLICAN governors who have refuse to set up stte exchanges, denying millions of people easy, local access." Do you have evidence of this via a legitimate source or are you just spewing your opinion. If you have a link, then provide it, if this is just your opinion, just state so like "In my opinion, or I think" or something like that. You know, the way grownups do.

Reply
 
 
Feb 15, 2014 08:12:00   #
BoJester
 
You claim such extensive knowledge of the failures of the ACA, so you should have that information at your finger-tips.

Either do your own research, or simply state that "in your opinion" the ACA is not working as planned






stan3186 wrote:
Well, at least you made a reasonable attempt to make an intelligent comment, even though you are wrong and couldn't help yourself in calling me a name. Seriously, are you an adolescent meaning that your brain just hasn't matured enough to refrain from such childish speak? I hope so because if you are an adult chronologically speaking, then there is little to no hope for you.
you said "The main reason for more people not signing up, is the i***t REPUBLICAN governors who have refuse to set up stte exchanges, denying millions of people easy, local access." Do you have evidence of this via a legitimate source or are you just spewing your opinion. If you have a link, then provide it, if this is just your opinion, just state so like "In my opinion, or I think" or something like that. You know, the way grownups do.
Well, at least you made a reasonable attempt to ma... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 08:13:33   #
madshark
 
BoJester wrote:
Pay attention, even if it hurts that occluded brain of yours.

The GOAL is the let people without insurance have the opportunity to BUY insurance.

The fools at faux jumped on the number 7 million during the open enrollment period. The goal reached is 40%.

By the end of the first year, the total will be 10-12 million.

This is NOT A ONE YEAR PLAN, just like Medicare and Medicaid. People sign up EVERY YEAR. Most renew, some die, some new join.

Why are facts so hard for you to grasp?

The main reason for more people not signing up, is the i***t REPUBLICAN governors who have refuse to set up stte exchanges, denying millions of people easy, local access.
Pay attention, even if it hurts that occluded brai... (show quote)


Not even a good try at answering the question. You are ignoring the January CBO report, which stated that there will still be over 30,000,000 uninsured by 2024, under Pookiecare. If your description of the scheme were accurate, surely ten years from now we could have everyone insured.

And what about the 2.3 million full time American jobs it will k**l by 2024.

So.cry, call names, attack me. That is what childen do when cornered and they have no answer. The problem you are having, Bo, is that you are trying to defend an indefensible thing. It is not increasing the number of insured. Thus far, it has reduced the number of insured. It will increase unemployment. Already proven. Don't try to argue. It will lower the quality of care while increasing costs. Again, already proven. Just a couple.of months in and Pookiecare has already proven to be a failure. But you go ahead and keep trying to defend it. We adults will continue to point out its failings and untimately get rid of it. Bye now, little one.

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 08:17:24   #
BoJester
 
Having trouble with both Spell-Check and lucid thoughts aren't you?









madshark wrote:
Not even a good try at answering the question. You are ignoring the January CBO report, which stated that there will still be over 30,000,000 uninsured by 2024, under Pookiecare. If your description of the scheme were accurate, surely ten years from now we could have everyone insured.

And what about the 2.3 million full time American jobs it will k**l by 2024.

So.cry, call names, attack me. That is what childen do when cornered and they have no answer. The problem you are having, Bo, is that you are trying to defend an indefensible thing. It is not increasing the number of insured. Thus far, it has reduced the number of insured. It will increase unemployment. Already proven. Don't try to argue. It will lower the quality of care while increasing costs. Again, already proven. Just a couple.of months in and Pookiecare has already proven to be a failure. But you go ahead and keep trying to defend it. We adults will continue to point out its failings and untimately get rid of it. Bye now, little one.
Not even a good try at answering the question. You... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 08:28:09   #
madshark
 
BoJester wrote:
You claim such extensive knowledge of the failures of the ACA, so you should have that information at your finger-tips.

Either do your own research, or simply state that "in your opinion" the ACA is not working as planned


How.do.we.research a lie. The only sources supporting this lunatic ideaare left wing, nut job, opinion blogs. It is a fabrication of the left. BoAsshole cannot provide a real.source.because none exist.

Reply
 
 
Feb 15, 2014 08:29:52   #
madshark
 
BoJester wrote:
Having trouble with both Spell-Check and lucid thoughts aren't you?


WTF are you talking about? You cannot refute the argument so you say that? 0730 and BoAsshole has already lost touch with reality.

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 08:30:46   #
BoJester
 
And you wonder why I call you fartbreath and s**tferbrains?

Just can't help yourself with the name-calling, you little twerpchildmaggot teabagger.



madshark wrote:
How.do.we.research a lie. The only sources supporting this lunatic ideaare left wing, nut job, opinion blogs. It is a fabrication of the left. BoAsshole cannot provide a real.source.because none exist.

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 09:03:21   #
madshark
 
BoJester wrote:
And you wonder why I call you fartbreath and s**tferbrains?

Just can't help yourself with the name-calling, you little twerpchildmaggot teabagger.


I don't wonder. I know. You have no facts to support your opinions. The facts actually refute every opinion I have seen you post. Since your opinions are so easily proven wrong, you do what all l*****ts do, call names. It is no mystery. It is what your type does.

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 09:13:37   #
BoJester
 
And yet the first name called is ALWAYS by a frustrated conservative, who somehow thinks his opinion is more valid than anyone else's. Just keep in mind opinions are just that, opinions. If you don't like tht opinion, well, that is just too damn bad. Ignore it if you must, or engage in a reasonable discussion. But like facts, opinions eldom change.






madshark wrote:
I don't wonder. I know. You have no facts to support your opinions. The facts actually refute every opinion I have seen you post. Since your opinions are so easily proven wrong, you do what all l*****ts do, call names. It is no mystery. It is what your type does.

Reply
 
 
Feb 15, 2014 11:19:39   #
stan3186
 
madshark wrote:
Not even a good try at answering the question. You are ignoring the January CBO report, which stated that there will still be over 30,000,000 uninsured by 2024, under Pookiecare. If your description of the scheme were accurate, surely ten years from now we could have everyone insured.

And what about the 2.3 million full time American jobs it will k**l by 2024.

So.cry, call names, attack me. That is what childen do when cornered and they have no answer. The problem you are having, Bo, is that you are trying to defend an indefensible thing. It is not increasing the number of insured. Thus far, it has reduced the number of insured. It will increase unemployment. Already proven. Don't try to argue. It will lower the quality of care while increasing costs. Again, already proven. Just a couple.of months in and Pookiecare has already proven to be a failure. But you go ahead and keep trying to defend it. We adults will continue to point out its failings and untimately get rid of it. Bye now, little one.
Not even a good try at answering the question. You... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 11:26:38   #
bobgssc
 
CDM wrote:
This is chickenfeed. Lets address a larger ACA issue. Obama said the ACA will immediately, emphasis on immediately, provide healthcare to 30 million Americans who would otherwise not have access to it. He said that, multiple times.

Where are those 30 million? Why are they not clamoring for admission to the greatest plan in the history of mankind? Where are they?

Take your lupus and your all your other defensive, excuse making crap and choke on it. Address this one, simple question; where are the masses that were promised free health care? Registration, by p**********l promise should exceed 30 million today. Where are they?

Answer the question or shut the **** up.
This is chickenfeed. Lets address a larger ACA is... (show quote)


I mentioned that I know a woman who was able to quit her job to stay home and raise her babies because of ACA. Of course, her husband is unemployed and doesn't qualify for unemployment so they'll end up on welfare but isn't that good for the economy (based on Oblabba's own logic only)?

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 11:40:09   #
madshark
 
bobgssc wrote:
I mentioned that I know a woman who was able to quit her job to stay home and raise her babies because of ACA. Of course, her husband is unemployed and doesn't qualify for unemployment so they'll end up on welfare but isn't that good for the economy (based on Oblabba's own logic only)?


The only thing it is good for is expanding the democrat power base.

Reply
Feb 15, 2014 12:25:45   #
stan3186
 
BoJester wrote:
You claim such extensive knowledge of the failures of the ACA, so you should have that information at your finger-tips.

Either do your own research, or simply state that "in your opinion" the ACA is not working as planned


Okay here goes:
Liberal Rag Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2013/11/15/the-consequences-of-an-affordable-care-act-failure/



Liberal leaning CBS Blog:
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/12/26/poll-americans-see-aca-as-both-obamas-biggest-failure-and-achievement/

American Spectator:
http://spectator.org/blog/56688/obama-blames-republicans-aca-failure

And on and on and on
Now let me see your research on conservative sites or sources that say it is working. There aren't any but the above links are mostly to Liberal sources who say it is NOT working as anticipated. So, now it's your turn. But you won't because all you do is spew liberal venom and rhetoric.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.