RETW Loc: Washington

And you are in charge of what?

Fool


RETW

RETW Loc: Washington

And you would know for sure they would have no war heads right?


RETW

Gener

Peter just wants to blame Christians for all the ills of the earth. Of course, turn the other cheek is a Christian idea. But what does Peter know?

The right to self defense should be a right that isn't even questioned, but a lot of the elite of the liberals have suggested no one has the right to self defense. Key here is that if war breaks out, the public will never know the real reasons or who ultimately was responsible. It just isn't going to happen. Before Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, there were some, a few, in our military who knew the attack was coming. The public is never told the t***h. Never.

The fact is the general population knows very little about our military capabilities either conventional or nuclear. They just don't give out that information. Nor does the public know anything about who is saying what in private. What the newspapers report that leaders are saying is only what they say publicly, and even then, some of that isn't true.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Naval blockade.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

He can't be serious, unless he's from CA.

Gener

The Cuba situation was really a little different. Then again not that different. The world was tense as the Russian ships headed toward Cuba and refused to turn back. But then they did. Why? The story the public was told wasn't necessarily totally true. It was a little different situation back then. We had no defenses or a least little, against any kind of missile attack. The Russians had no defense against ours either. The difference was the Russian leaders were at least a LITTLE more rational than the NK regime. A blockade would be meaningless in this case, with NK, because we are talking about the firing of Nuclear missiles. The naval blockade around Cuba was to keep Russian ships from delivering missiles to Cuba. We weren't going to allow them in our back door. NK is not just threatening to send the missiles somewhere, they intend to actually use them. That is the difference.

I don't think NK by itself is that big a deal. The big deal is that if we are presumed in any way to be the aggressor, then we would be dealing with China and possibly Russia, and possibly Iran, and that is WWIII. If that happens, millions are likely to die. But we don't know. And any anxiety toward it is not going to help in anyway. We might as well go about our business, and just act normal. These things are beyond our control. (I'm talking about the population. The government should just do what has to be done.)

Some people want to blame Trump for this. The fact is Trump is as much caught in a bind as any of us. He can only do what he can do. And this would be happening no matter who is in the white house right now.

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

Understood. The question was how was the Cuban problem handled back then and the answer is naval blockade.

Gener

Yeah, I didn't mean to take anything away from that. You are definitely right. It was a naval blockade. I remember the situation very well.

PeterS

And how is upholding the right of self defense sick? Are you suggesting that we nuke NK without provocation or is a missile landing in the sea all that you Christian conservatives need? Personally that's what I call sick but to each their own correct!!!

PeterS

Turn the cheek is a Christian idea? Then why do so many Christians want to attack N Korea before they've even attacked us? Do you not trust in what Christ preached? It's not what I know that's in question but why you don't seem to trust that Christ knew what he was talking about...

PeterS

And is there a reason you would fire before they hit? Once they were in the air there would be no reason to fire until after they hit. If there was no warhead there would be no reason to respond. If there was a warhead then we remove North Korea from the face of the earth...

Docadhoc Loc: Elsewhere

You're sick for postulating such an asinine scenario.

The entire premise is that NK attacks. They launch first. Get it? It makes your entire list of posts nonsense. If you don't.get it, it's because you don't want to and you must have had a sheltered childhood. This trolling you're doing is over.

In war there is no such thing as a partial response. You don't decide how hard to hit back if you are attacked. You hit as hard as you can to make sure they don't get up and attack you again.

Peddle your nonsense somewhere else.

With.you in the WH we'd all die here while you try to figure out how hard to fight back.

RETW Loc: Washington

" Is there a reason you would fire before they hit?" That question, is why I'm so very glad, you're not in charge of anything military.

The little fat man has already said to the world he will fire on Guam. So your just going to sit around and watch him do it. What are you going to tell any survivors, oh sorry about that, but we had to be certain you
got nuked before we responded. So according to you, 50 to 75 thousand lives your willing to let die on a prevocational maybe. Your insane.

What in the name of hell do you think got us to this point in the first place? It was attitudes exactly like that stupid question of yours. ( your solution is to wait and see ) And then try to lead from behind?

So than, if there is a war head in them, your just going to go, oh hum de dumm de dumm. Ok, so now lets go nuke em.

You have confirmed for me, why they make asylums.



RETW

PeterS

Yeah, to put you fuking lunatic conservatives in them. You do understand that China has said they will side with the little fat man if we attack first. Anyone willing to start WWIII is a nut and deserves to be put away like one...

Ranger7374 Loc: Arizona, 40 miles from the border in the DMZ

RETW you forget about our defense system. We can take out ballistic missiles before they hit us. With this weapon, we could wait out the verbal threat. However, we must put our defenses into position before any attack is made. No one wants nuclear war. But if N. Korea brings it, then we should show the power of fire we can use, and stop all of humanity from wielding this power.

It is like holding on to an effective weapon, not using it, the fear of that weapon is more effective than using the weapon.

That being said, North Korea better watch out. We appeased Hitler, we appeased Saddam Hussein, we appeased Isis, we shall not appease N. Korea or any other dictator any more. It has been proven that it will only get worse. This has nothing to do with liberal or conservative but for survival of the Human Race. Would we rather live in fear and s***ery, or shall we live in bravery and freedom? That is the question. It is our choice. And I choose bravery and freedom.