One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
North Korea launches at Guam, what would you do?
Page <<first <prev 6 of 11 next> last>>
Aug 13, 2017 03:38:20   #
PeterS
 
Docadhoc wrote:
You're sick for postulating such an asinine scenario.

The entire premise is that NK attacks. They launch first. Get it? It makes your entire list of posts nonsense. If you don't.get it, it's because you don't want to and you must have had a sheltered childhood. This trolling you're doing is over.

In war there is no such thing as a partial response. You don't decide how hard to hit back if you are attacked. You hit as hard as you can to make sure they don't get up and attack you again.

Peddle your nonsense somewhere else.

With.you in the WH we'd all die here while you try to figure out how hard to fight back.
You're sick for postulating such an asinine scenar... (show quote)

What part of "eliminate NKorea as a country" didn't you understand? Doc, it's clear you don't read my posts. So why don't you stop commenting on them and make it easy for everyone else...

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 05:11:52   #
Gatsby
 
So you would trust Kim Jong Un to launch only unarmed missiles at Guam?







PeterS wrote:
And how is upholding the right of self defense sick? Are you suggesting that we nuke NK without provocation or is a missile landing in the sea all that you Christian conservatives need? Personally that's what I call sick but to each their own correct!!!

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 05:27:12   #
PeterS
 
Gatsby wrote:
So you would trust Kim Jong Un to launch only unarmed missiles at Guam?

If he launches an armed missile than take him out. But if you take him out before he launches a missile you just started WWIII...

Your choice, what will it be...

Reply
 
 
Aug 13, 2017 05:42:51   #
Gatsby
 
North Korea's ballistic missile program has be BANNED by the U.N. on numerous occasions.
North Korea's nuclear arms programs has been BANNED by the U.N. on numerous occasions.
Yet North Korea now has both nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles capabale of delivering them.
But not to worry, the use of nuclear weapons would be the act of a madman.
Kim Jong Un is only a homocidal maniac, not a real madman.

PeterS wrote:
If he launches an armed missile than take him out. But if you take him out before he launches a missile you just started WWIII...

Your choice, what will it be...

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 08:23:43   #
Owl32 Loc: ARK
 
This is not a morality thing, This is showing someone he is not as bad of a badass as he thinks! You can out think this situation, it is the RESPONSE that counts, if those missles fly and donot blow up on NOKO stupid,
then he surly knows that multiple MOABs soon will land in his own yard. He is a puppet of the CHINESE>
PeterS wrote:
Careful, there are more than a few who think that their god no longer protects us because we granted homosexuals the same rights as other human beings.

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 10:45:46   #
Gener
 
PeterS wrote:
Turn the cheek is a Christian idea? Then why do so many Christians want to attack N Korea before they've even attacked us? Do you not trust in what Christ preached? It's not what I know that's in question but why you don't seem to trust that Christ knew what he was talking about...



Peter, you are not even in touch with reality. So there is no point in arguing with you or carrying on a conversation.

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 10:46:19   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Gatsby wrote:
If North Korea follows through on their threat to launch 4 ballistic missiles at Guam, and you were the POTUS, what would you do?


Kick ass!

If the skin head launches; his country is history.
China gave The USA the green light if that pimple is that dumb.
Maybe his generals can take him out, to save themselves and their country.

Reply
 
 
Aug 13, 2017 10:59:50   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
You are not a Christian so you have no credibility trying to decipher Chris's teachings. do you even know what "turn the other cheek"
meant in Jewish society? So shut up and quit making a fool out of yourself, on another subject you know nothing about.
PeterS wrote:
Turn the cheek is a Christian idea? Then why do so many Christians want to attack N Korea before they've even attacked us? Do you not trust in what Christ preached? It's not what I know that's in question but why you don't seem to trust that Christ knew what he was talking about...

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 11:02:55   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
What I think we should worry about is N.Korea being allowed to obtain more and more nuclear capability. Kim Jung lard butt would try to hold the Asian countries basically hostage. You know, hard to fight a guy who isn't rational with a God complex.
Gatsby wrote:
North Korea's ballistic missile program has be BANNED by the U.N. on numerous occasions.
North Korea's nuclear arms programs has been BANNED by the U.N. on numerous occasions.
Yet North Korea now has both nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles capabale of delivering them.
But not to worry, the use of nuclear weapons would be the act of a madman.
Kim Jong Un is only a homocidal maniac, not a real madman.

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 11:23:25   #
Gener
 
Gener wrote:
Peter, you are not even in touch with reality. So there is no point in arguing with you or carrying on a conversation.



I will try to be nicer.

Turning the other cheek is a concept that is related to a certain extent to the idea of non resistance. The martial art of Tai Chi is built on that principle and it works very, very, effectively. However, nobody or almost nobody knows how to use it anymore and it takes at least 40 years of practice to make it work anyway. As far as N. Korea goes, these people don't seem to respond to anything. The last missile they fired just missed a commercial airline on its way down. This isn't showing much concern about what their missiles hit.

Now, all this being said, I still say, as I have so many times, the general public is only told what the powers that be wants them to know. What is really going on with N. Korea isn't necessarily what we are being told. Then again it may be. The public cannot know. When a country keeps talking belligerently though, there comes a point when something must be done. In this case it is not necessary for the security of the U.S. to take a preemptive strike, but it might be for the sake of Guam or Seoul. I still insist we have the technology to shoot missiles down even that close to the launching pad however. I have been told we have that technology. But who REALLY knows. The question is, are we operating out of love for our own people? Or out of a hatred of N. Korea? I contend that the American people for the most part are people of love and care about their own, and that would be the impetus for any attack on N. Korea. Not just to see death and destruction over there. Few people if any would get any kick out of that.

Could this lead to world war III? Yes, it could. But we are going there anyway, it is going to happen. There are international elite in all countries that want exactly that to bring down the world population. They have been building underground bunkers for years which they think will protect them. I think our responses to N. Korea have been very measured and will continue to be. Those who h**e Trump will criticize him no matter what he does. The key for them is to get rid of him, not t***h. They will lie or tell the t***h whichever, to get rid of Trump. These things are happening because they have been manipulated to happen behind the scenes. There is little the public can do about it except try as hard as possible to see what is going on behind the scenes and what the real story is.

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 11:24:22   #
Gatsby
 
China has been all over the board about their commitment to North Korea.

Those generals that Un even thought might oppose him are ashes.

We should tell both China and Russia to evacuate border regions now, for their own safety.
eagleye13 wrote:
Kick ass!

If the skin head launches; his country is history.
China gave The USA the green light if that pimple is that dumb.
Maybe his generals can take him out, to save themselves and their country.

Reply
 
 
Aug 13, 2017 14:48:57   #
RETW Loc: Washington
 
Ranger7374 wrote:
RETW you forget about our defense system. We can take out ballistic missiles before they hit us. With this weapon, we could wait out the verbal threat. However, we must put our defenses into position before any attack is made. No one wants nuclear war. But if N. Korea brings it, then we should show the power of fire we can use, and stop all of humanity from wielding this power.

It is like holding on to an effective weapon, not using it, the fear of that weapon is more effective than using the weapon.

That being said, North Korea better watch out. We appeased Hitler, we appeased Saddam Hussein, we appeased Isis, we shall not appease N. Korea or any other dictator any more. It has been proven that it will only get worse. This has nothing to do with liberal or conservative but for survival of the Human Race. Would we rather live in fear and s***ery, or shall we live in bravery and freedom? That is the question. It is our choice. And I choose bravery and freedom.
RETW you forget about our defense system. We can t... (show quote)





Hi ranger. Na, I didn't forget. I just saw no reason to explain it to this nut case.

This fool wants to just sit around on his fat ass, and wait for a nuke. I'm dam sure the folks on Guam wouldn't appreciate that much. I'll bet if he was living on Guam his tune would be different.

I remember well the Cuban crises. And personally, speaking only for myself, I still believe, if it wasn't for Bobby Kennedy, John Kennedy would never have done the right thing, and put up a blockade of ships, and told .... and than at that time in history .... another little fat man by the name of Nikita S. Khrushchev .... Don't do it.

I believe this is a much more dangerous situation. Than, there were other powerful leaders in Russia that put a stop to Khrushchev. Now however, there doesn't appear to be any sort of constraints .

This is very concerning. Its almost like we are between a rock and a hard place.

But the good news is we now have some one at the helm, that will take advice from our military

The next week or so will tell the tail. I pray for us all.

We can not live under the constant threat of holocaust.

Have a good day my friend.

RETW

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 14:57:33   #
Gener
 
RETW wrote:
Hi ranger. Na, I didn't forget. I just saw no reason to explain it to this nut case.

This fool wants to just sit around on his fat ass, and wait for a nuke. I'm dam sure the folks on Guam wouldn't appreciate that much. I'll bet if he was living on Guam his tune would be different.

I remember well the Cuban crises. And personally, speaking only for myself, I still believe, if it wasn't for Bobby Kennedy, John Kennedy would never have done the right thing, and put up a blockade of ships, and told .... and than at that time in history .... another little fat man by the name of Nikita S. Khrushchev .... Don't do it.

I believe this is a much more dangerous situation. Than, there were other powerful leaders in Russia that put a stop to Khrushchev. Now however, there doesn't appear to be any sort of constraints .

This is very concerning. Its almost like we are between a rock and a hard place.

But the good news is we now have some one at the helm, that will take advice from our military

The next week or so will tell the tail. I pray for us all.

We can not live under the constant threat of holocaust.

Have a good day my friend.

RETW
Hi ranger. Na, I didn't forget. I just saw no rea... (show quote)




We have a President, whether a good one or a bad one, actually cares about the U.S. and not just the g*******t world agenda. Therefore he is willing to stand up for the country and actually do something. This has been a long time coming and because of that is now at a crisis point. This situation HAS to be dealt with. We cannot stick our head in the sand anymore. It is now half past midnight.

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 15:09:42   #
RETW Loc: Washington
 
PeterS wrote:
If he launches an armed missile than take him out. But if you take him out before he launches a missile you just started WWIII...

Your choice, what will it be...




Do you really live on this planet? ( " if he launches armed missiles? " )


And just tell us all, how in the hell would you know if they were armed?


You really need to go lay down and take a long nap, say 5 or 6 years.


RETW

Reply
Aug 13, 2017 15:32:09   #
Gatsby
 
The biggest difference is, thanks to the vision of President Reagan, we now have a functional missile defense system.

The next big difference is that North Korea has a few dozen nukes, Russia had a few thousand of them!

RETW wrote:
Hi ranger. Na, I didn't forget. I just saw no reason to explain it to this nut case.

This fool wants to just sit around on his fat ass, and wait for a nuke. I'm dam sure the folks on Guam wouldn't appreciate that much. I'll bet if he was living on Guam his tune would be different.

I remember well the Cuban crises. And personally, speaking only for myself, I still believe, if it wasn't for Bobby Kennedy, John Kennedy would never have done the right thing, and put up a blockade of ships, and told .... and than at that time in history .... another little fat man by the name of Nikita S. Khrushchev .... Don't do it.

I believe this is a much more dangerous situation. Than, there were other powerful leaders in Russia that put a stop to Khrushchev. Now however, there doesn't appear to be any sort of constraints .

This is very concerning. Its almost like we are between a rock and a hard place.

But the good news is we now have some one at the helm, that will take advice from our military

The next week or so will tell the tail. I pray for us all.

We can not live under the constant threat of holocaust.

Have a good day my friend.

RETW
Hi ranger. Na, I didn't forget. I just saw no rea... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.