Seabird wrote:
You got the wrong guy lib. I'll answer without looking up the definitions. I did'nt ask the question
Morality is taught, it comes from those interested in the civility and progress of mankind as thru out history those without morals have been capable of almost anything including murder.
Those that have morals on occasion have returned to uncivilized behavior depending on the circumstance so just because you consider yourself of high morals does not mean you would'nt act against those morals, just that under the right conditions you retain and refer to them. Lots of our soldiers are taught not to k**l but they do it anyway so this goes against their supposed morality. Defining morality does not mean there is a god but it does mean that thru human history man has learned to make rules and regs and try to live within the boundries set. Christians that have a shotgun by their bed understand that in order to live morally they have to be alive.
It does'nt have to be written as in the bible but spoken and passed along. If there is a god, he has a weird sense of justice.
As far as judging someone's actions it is done every day all day by most people so if you're stating that libs don't judge people you are mistaken. My motto is judge them before you befriend them. I guess that makes me a somewhat smart suspicious person but those are my defenses. "Judge first lest you be judged by an i***t"
You got the wrong guy lib. I'll answer without l... (
show quote)
very well spoken. there are many times in many lives that a decision must be made in less than a half a second...another half would have been too late. sometimes, they're wrong but ye must carry on.
fom wrote:
What is your side kicks name you have to have one.
howabout...lesbian-boy and the crack-fart kid!!
rumitoid wrote:
As I am not personally acquainted with all Republicans in America, I feel it is fair to answer that question yes and no. How could anyone answer otherwise?
Most in Washington are in the game for what they can get out of it...just like most of the Democrats. We call them Progressives, or Establishment politicians if you like.
That is a personal opinionm shared by many but it is still a personal opinion
BigMike wrote:
Most in Washington are in the game for what they can get out of it...just like most of the Democrats. We call them Progressives, or Establishment politicians if you like.
Seabird wrote:
One thing you can be sure of is that a******n will always be on the slate regardless of whether there are any or not. Both parties use shiny objects to entice v**ers but you have to wonder how many a******ns are performed on republican women. The libs may be right on this issue as education seems to be bringing the number down. I would hope so as both dems and pubs find it distasteful.
Is this like the old joke... islam doesn't recognize Isreal, Jewish don't recognize Christians and baptists don't recognize each other in the liquor store? ;-) (It's just a joke, relax)
Oh and I agree... on both sides, people feel strongly enough about this one issue that many will be polarized with or against it to the extent that they don't notice all of the other issues they may or may not agree on with that candidate. Obama was pro-choice and many v**ed for him simply on that issue (no, I did not say everyone).
fom wrote:
That is a personal opinionm shared by many but it is still a personal opinion
It is also my personal opinion that gravity keeps me from falling into the sky. :roll:
BigMike wrote:
It is also my personal opinion that gravity keeps me from falling into the sky. :roll:
BigMike, you need to check out AuntiE's thread, "read a book"!
alex
Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa
BigMike wrote:
It is also my personal opinion that gravity keeps me from falling into the sky. :roll:
I think you have captured the gravity of the situation
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.