moonbeam Loc: hiding

To lie? His entire life from the crib to the man he is now is a lie. A good liar is that you have to come to believe that that lie really happened. He has apparently got that down to an art. He lied to get a Senate sear in Illinois. He lied about where he was born. All his Hope an Change was nothing but Hype and Blame. Even the Bushes did not overreach as he is doing. The only other President who had done this was LBJ, and he never dared to come out and say he would bypass Congress! Imagine a small boy, who knows the t***h. And then hear people telling him things that he knew to be lies. So he sold himself as they told him to do. He began to believe his lies. So what kind of man do we have with hubris and arrogance. A real sociopath like Mussolini. I have been comparing the two. And when you make the masses dependent on the powers that be, and cut job growth (like the Keystone Pipeline-He does not want it to start because it will give millions of Americans jobs and cut our dependence on foreign oil. He does not want people to have jobs. the more they depend on government, the easier it will be to control them and to have them as his s***es for or to the elitists.). That's is why under Obama, the food stamps have increased by almost 50%. They said I am eligible for food stamps and I make--not including my business--that I write off as a tax write off--make $1200.00/month in widow's benefits. They ARE NOT BENEFITS! So, I declined. I am on Medicare, they tell me I am also eligible for Medicaid! I declined and do not want their Medicaid. those are nothing more but entitlements to make the masses more dependent on them and less self-reliant. I've seen pictures in WWI of people carrying wheelbarrows of money to the breadlines to buy moldy bread. That was how deflated their currency was and how ours will be soon enough. Why is he saying Hamas and the other militant, terrorists' are on the run, when just yesterday four generals got up and repudiated that by saying, each in his own turn, "No they are not one the run." They are in the upper reaches of Africa and are quite convinced that they have the upper hand because they no longer have to have permission from their "Leader" bin Laden. 1/3 of the Country of Africa is ruled by Hamas. And we "have them on the run?" Really Mr. President? Another lie for the American people to swallow, but they are not swallowing. So, like Obamacare, he is shoving this down our throats as well! Lie Love from the great country of Texas. I am quite ashamed of my country about now, but proud of my state, state of Texas!We need many things, but the few most important of them are term limits and auditing the Fed and doing away with it and starting over. With honest men, who could be more honest than the citizens themselves? These are the men and women who should be having to do their fair share of volunteer politics, kinda like jury duty. Corruption would not have time to corrupt. They v**e the way the feel is the right way beca quote=Dave]Obama's mistake was to lie - your mistake is to be a blind faith believer no matter the evidence.[/quote]

Neal

Yeah! Right! I'm so famous for blind faith!!

I keep screaming for evidence and getting bulls**t . . .

madshark

There absolutely is.a huge difference between a mistake and a lie. The fact is, President Pookie's administration knew in 2009 that Pookiecare would force 40-80% of people buying their policies on the individual market out of their policies. So every time Pookie or one of his spokesmouths said,"if you like your policy you can keep it. If you like your doctor you can keep him." they knew they were lying. Now, I will do what you s**t for brains, l*****t i***ts cannot do. Provide a source for my statement. Oh, and try to say NBC News is a right wing opinion site. Make yourself look more stupid than you already have . It'll be hard, but I am sure you can do it.

BTW, what would be a mistake is for you to try to win a debate with me. You are too fucking stupid. Hahahahahahaha!!!!

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/obama-admin-knew-millions-could-not-keep-their-health-insurance-v21213547

And I can also source the same story at a credible news source. Although they are sourcing the sae NBC News story I gave above, so I cannot be sure.

http://nation.foxnews.com/2013/10/28/obama-admin-knew-millions-could-not-keep-their-health-insurance

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

Go back and read - there is plenty of evidence but it won't overcome your religous belief so keep on screaming and denying

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

It is useless - providing evidence to fools like this - even the left leaning Washington Post labeled Obama's lie as the lie of the year - but then I'm sure he considers that lefty rag as reactionary

moonbeam Loc: hiding

Finally, we have to show an ID in order to v**e. FINALLY this way entire graveyards won't be v****g with me! Live Love from the great country of Texas!quote=moonbeam]I agree and on his interview he "would not go there" approach and the same old lies about his the economy is on sure footing...sure footing, with companies laying off people because they are not going to pay for this mess, we the people are. Again, his raising of the minimum pay. do you honestly think that the companies are not going to charge the consumer with higher prices at the grocery stores? Texas is an exception, but other states he continues to intervene in their states because the states LET HIM. Our Gov. Perry (I never really cared for him until now) drew "a line in the sand" about sending Washington Bureaucrats into Texas to tell us how it's done. That may work in California, where their minds are blown from their heyday of past drug use and their children's parents past drug use has apparently gone to their heads. But they are paying for their support of him. He recently gave them the biggest tax hike in US history! They cannot even say anything about it because they supported him, now that they are waking up with fleas--it is their faults. But here in Texas, we have a balance budget, Hell we have a budget, ranchers patrolling the border and not screaming to the gov for more border security.We have "Help Wanted" signs on a lot of our businesses. We do it ourselves, because he would want something in return for his (our) border patrols. It's like an old movie I saw somewhere about the Civil War. You really don't believe that the Yankee Abolitionists really started that war. It was all about state's rights and they had a good reason--s***ery. We aren't crying for the Fed gov to help us, Hell, if we wanted to we could shut the entire border down from here to New Mexico all the way to Laredo. But these ranchers put their weekends aside, 10-12 men per truck, rifles and shotguns at the ready, We Texans take care of our own! They come from all over Texas, Hondo, Fredericksburg. Sequin, Sonora, El Paso, and when they catch them, they call in the Texas Rangers! Washington could learn a lot from us. BUT WE NEED TERM LIMITS, it will stifle corruption and they know that pretty soon they too will be constituents. Live Love from the great country of Texas![/quote]

moonbeam Loc: hiding

Obama knew and wanted(which was the purpose) for Obamacare to fail, so Obama could go in and nationalize all of the insurance co as well as the hospitals. Think of it: Obama National Hospital. Sounds great doesn't it. He will go in and say that the website was such an abysmal failure, he has no choice than to do this. Obamacare WAS MADE TO FAIL. We should have been asking the questions in is first race for Pres, where are his student records, where are his grades, were is his dissertation? Instead, the moment Rev. Sharpton opened his mouth--It was quickly shut, as was the financial on goings at ACORN. Remember that one. How about Whitewatergate remember that one. IRS was getting to near Hilary's dealings when her husband was running for Pres. She is as crooked as he is or even worse, She punishes her enemies to the point of breaking them financially and in every other way. She is a sociopath if she feels no remorse for Tyrone, Sean, Glen or Chris--remember them, the four Americans knowing they were going to die and sending SOS messages that somehow never was read? Like Paul says, "A cable from one of the roughest and dangerous places on the planet and you didn't think it of any importance to even READ it? Her answer?" What the hell does it matter now?" It matters to their families who still haven't gotten any news of whether there even was a demonstration going on. And it matters to Congress who wants to know (but only but AMERICANS who saw the so-called "demonstration?"But they are restrianed to speak to anyone because of the so-called "criminal investigation" so they cannot speak to anyone about what they saw. Not even Congress! Because they have subpoenas! Live Love from the Great country of Texas! quote=madshark]There absolutely is.a huge difference between a mistake and a lie. The fact is, President Pookie's administration knew in 2009 that Pookiecare would force 40-80% of people buying their policies on the individual market out of their policies. So every time Pookie or one of his spokesmouths said,"if you like your policy you can keep it. If you like your doctor you can keep him." they knew they were lying. Now, I will do what you s**t for brains, l*****t i***ts cannot do. Provide a source for my statement. Oh, and try to say NBC News is a right wing opinion site. Make yourself look more stupid than you already have . It'll be hard, but I am sure you can do it.

BTW, what would be a mistake is for you to try to win a debate with me. You are too fucking stupid. Hahahahahahaha!!!!

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/obama-admin-knew-millions-could-not-keep-their-health-insurance-v21213547

And I can also source the same story at a credible news source. Although they are sourcing the sae NBC News story I gave above, so I cannot be sure.

http://nation.foxnews.com/2013/10/28/obama-admin-knew-millions-could-not-keep-their-health-insurance[/quote]

moonbeam Loc: hiding

As A Sentinel for Heritage Action, we get our Monday eve Strategy Meetings and we pushed so hard for the end of the reauthorization of the EXIM "bank" it really isn't a bank, but it is much easier that way. I never had heard of this, so as I own an editing/writing/research company, I started researching. Created in 1934 to help small businesses trade goods overseas, it only gives to less than 2% of small businesses and Boeing only has to pick up a phone. When they put out their ads, their figures were ridiculously nowhere near to where my research took me (well what do you expect from a banking company who has no one overlooking their actions and are free to put out any type of figures they wish.) Senator Obama called it Corporate Welfare and President Obama used it for his failed Solyendra and Fast Solar and none of the masses even knew of its existence~!But, since the EXIM uses the taxpayer for collateral, guess who is on the hook? What comes after a trillion? They do not even have a word for it because there is not that much money or gold on the planet! So, during the last hearing, EXIM through out a figure and the Senator said, well, I know that due to the competitive nature between Delta and Boeing, and you will only lend to Boeing and deny Delta, they lost 17,000 workers last year. Now between your numbers that have no one overlooking them for "errors" I tend to go with the number I know, Delta's indisputable number of workers who were let go because the EXIM would not lend them money because Boeing would not have liked it. All Republicans are going to v**e against reauth of that entity, which our new minority leader said that the business sector could do a far better job and with some type of oversight that would prevent figures formed from out of the sky. And when the Democrats overwhelmingly v**e for it, they will be the party of cronyism and corporate welfare. If it were not for Sentinels working hours a day sending emails, faxes, petitions, (we just write the talking points, they fax, email it for us)for organizations like NumbersUSA, AmericanPac, and of course Heritage Action, we let our Senators and Reps know that we will be watching and if they do not v**e the way their constituents want them to v**e because, after all, they work for us and not the other way around, we let them know we are watching how they will v**e. And if it is shown to be just to much to the Liberal side, then we will be blind to their names at the b****t box! I would entreat every one of you to get the" Constitution 101" online free course from Hillsdale College, from Heritage Foundation. They have many other free online courses such as Economics, Great books, American History, etc. After all, if you do not know who wrote the Declaration of Independence, do not know who is the father of the Declaration of Independence and do not even know who our first Ambassador to France was, then you need to take it and take it quickly or else statements like the one Obama was wildly spewing that he knew the ignorance of the masses on the Constitution, "Ever since our founding, our Nation has always championed international law!" Chief Justice Roberts fired back saying,"that if we need a German judge to tell us what our own Constitution means, then no president accountable to the people ever elected that judge." All the founders were against doing anything with other countries except where commerce had to be undertaken. All of them. And the best statement I can give you is from George Washington and his Farewell Address, he died 5 days after he wrote this," The Great Rule of conduct for us, concerning other Nations is to have as little political connections as possible. As far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop!." He also wrote that,"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence(I conjure you to believe me, fellow citizens), the jealousy of a free people ought to be CONSTANTLY AWAKE; since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican Government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes their instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another, cause those whom they accentuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real Patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and the confidence of the people, in order to surrender their interests.) The US Constitution: A Reader."George Washington's Farewell Address, p149, Hillsdale, Hillsdale pub. co.,2014. There is a small donation for the book, but they have the lecture, Questions and Answers, Discussion, and the Quiz. They record your scores and you receive a degree in politics, not political science, because in their interpretation of politics, there are no graphs, polls, etc., just what did take place, and most of the reads in the book is against the Constitution! But as it plays out, you will see the right from the wrong. They even bring in today's problems and we, as Americans, are just going to have to make a choice, give up freedoms for some other "protections," when the Constitution protects us very well and what country can you give me that throughout the horrendous Civil War, we peacefully passed from one party to another? We are the longest running government in the history of mankind, even being one of the youngest countries. Look at South Korea, China, Viet Nam, and the Ukraine, those who have embrace the Western concept of free markets and commerce, are making a good living and in countries where we showed them how to do it. Although the founders would object today in our "Nation building," and that we have no business going to Sudan to save millions of starving people. They always wanted a strong defense so there would be no question if someone attacked us, who the victor would be. As I may have said before, every other country in the world teaches their students what their laws of their lands are, we do not. This course should be a must for every High School Senior in all of this country's schools. If not, we get what we have today, when we ask spring breakers who Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid is they cannot answer when their lives are the ones that are going to be the most effected by King Obama's massive redistribution of money from the rich to feed the poor. Now he is going to an international court to ask them what powers he has and which he doesn't, if he would put down his c****e books and his Koran long enough to read it. The problem is that he has read it and did not agree with the restrictions that are made on the President and his cabinet members. I guarantee you, you lock Lois Lerner up for contempt of court(as she answered 9 questions abjuring herself from any wrongdoing and for the 5th Amendment to be in affect, you cannot say a word. So she cannot take the fifth.) Give her amnesty and she will sing like a canary.! Sorry my post was so long, but most of you have not even read the Constitution. Put Obama' name in where the colonists put King George III's name in and you will see that he has done everything except billet troops in our homes and taken us hostage on the High Seas! That was my" King George IV Manifesto," but for making films, filmmakers have been audited and put in jail for erroneous reasons, so I will not publish it until he is impeached, tarred and feathered back in Chicago, or tried for treason with him and his minions and placed where he belongs, in Leavenworth! TEXAS JUST CALLED IN HER M*****A! Again, we will OWN that border and then we will bus the undesirables (as Mexico calls them because most have criminal records and can be tied to the drug cartels or the gang 13 who work for them) to Martha's Vineyards, The Hamptons, Palm Beach, hey, they should love it there. And any other state who v**ed for amnesty. Now they are quickly writing bills entitled," Not in My State!" Why not? It was good enough for AZ, NM, and Texas, and let me tell y'all people something, Texas can give as good as it gets! Live Love from the great Republic of Texas!

moonbeam Loc: hiding

This latest scheme of Obama's going to the UN to tell us what rights he does and doesn't have. They want five things from him for his crown that includes nothing less than our sovereignty! One week before the surge, he visited El Presidente. Now Hondurans, Guatemalans and San Salvadorans have always come into Mexico,but after his pow wow with Obama, he takes his % from each of them, puts them atop of his train's boxcars and they take the sometimes 1000 miles through Mexico's interior and to the US border! UN/OBAMA plan #1. Done! Free and open borders, Have your heard that recently the EPA took over all of the streams, rivers, wells on your own property and even the drinking water in you sink? Yep! Well Plan 2. is that the UN wants all resources and minerals from our international territorial waters.#2,Done. #3. A global tax, #4. All CIA agents have to immediately cease from interrogations of suspected terrorists! and #5. They want all of our military to be tried in an UN international law court for "War Crimes." Chief Justice is fighting back, however, he and Cliff Kincaid have an organization called THE NATIONAL COMMITTEE AGAINST THE U.N TAKEOVER: A PROJECT OF AMERICA'S SURVIVAL, INC. and can be reached at P.O. Box 96099 Washington, D.C. 20090-6099. Please write them or if you can find them online, see how you can help Kincaid help Chief Justice Roberts, one of the last of the true conservatives on the bench of the Supreme Court. Again, a repeat from the last post every senior in High School should have to study Constitution.The Liberal movement started with Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson's Administrations.And I believe before this next 2 years are up, we will have to decide, do we want to keep our Constitution that has worked so well for us in the past and is still going great today, despite the onslaught of criticism it has been getting. All this BS about guns. I wrote a tweet that went v***l. I said that"I live in Texas, I cannot even fix a cheap shotgun, the gun laws work, Jack the Ripper used a knife!" The question is, and I believe that we all know that if one of our freedoms go the rest will fall like a house of cards, do you want more "protections" and less freedoms, or your so-called freedoms and less protection? This question should not even be a question at all because the Constitution answers that for us. We AGREE to be governed as long as our government is working for us. We give our CONSENT to be governed and give up the criminal to the government to prosecuted. That is all we are really giving up, letting them take care of the violence. And no freedoms need to be let go of. But to hear Wilson, you would think you were living in a different world. If President Kennedy would have lived, we would have been having this debate then, instead of now. And, another point. Why do I have to contribute to a politician who is wanting to run for a government position? Why do I have to make a contribution to put my name on a petition and then they charge me? Answer, I don't they are all blood suckers.But we need them and they definitely need us. It is impossible to understand the fate of the Founder's principles in American Politics today without seeing how those principles have been replaced by those that animate today's administrative state. This state came out of the dominant political ideas of the Progressive Era. It arguments are many, but in its essence, it amounts to an arguments in favor of progressing, or moving beyond, the political principles of the national government for the purpose of responding to a set of economic and social conditions that, it was contended could not have been envisioned during the founding era.They believed that the historical contingency with a deep faith in historical progress, they believed that government was becoming less of a danger to the governed due to historical evolution, and was also becoming more capable of solving the great array of problems besetting the human race. They took aim at our Constitution, where the separation of powers inhibited the kind of activist central government that would be essential to reforming the Progressive agenda. The great enemy of individual liberty was thought to be government because of its tendency to encroach upon the innate liberties of individuals. This view was directed against levies on property made by rulers without authorization from the representatives of the people.Since governments are instituted to protect the natural rights of the person, they lose claim to obedience when they invade and destroy these rights instead of safeguarding them. In a sort of long way of ending this post, the whole temper of this philosophy is individualistic in the sense in which people are opposed to organized social action. It held to the primary of the person over the state not only in time but in moral authority. Later Liberalism inherited this conception of a natural antagonism between ruler and ruled, interpreted as a natural opposition between the person and the organized society. In closing, if this apprehension of the facts be correct, and the documentary evidence would appear to verify it, then certain conclusions are bound to follow. A spring will cease to flow if its source is dried up; a tree will wither if the roots be destroyed. In its main features, the Declaration of Independence is a great spiritual document. It is a declaration not of material but of spiritual conceptions, e******y, liberty,popular sovereignty, the rights of man--these are not elements which we can see and touch. They are not Ideals. They have their source in their roots of religious convictions. They belong to the unseen world. Unless the faith of the American people in these religious convictions is to endure, the principles of our Declaration will perish.We cannot continue to enjoy the result if we neglect and abandon the cause. We are too prone to overlook another conclusion. Governments do not make ideals, but ideals make governments. This is both historically and logically true. Of course the government can help sustain ideals and can create institutions through which they can be better observed, but their source is in the people. The people must bear their own responsibilities. There is no method by which that burden can be shifted to the government. It is not the enactment, but the observance of the laws, that create the character of a nation. Finally, there is a finality about the Declaration that is exceedingly restful. It is often asserted that the world has made a great deal of progress since 1776, that we have had new thought and new experiences which have given us a great advance over the people of that day, and that we may therefore very well discard their conclusions for something more modern. BUT THIS REASONING CANNOT BE APPLIED TO THIS GREAT CHARTER. If all people are created equal, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond this proposition. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their t***h or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no e******y, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress, they are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers. If there is anything established beyond question, it is the right to self-governance. The rights of the people are held sacred and protected by constitutional guarantees, which even the Government itself is bound not to violate. If there is any one thing among us that is established beyond question, it is self-government--the right of the people to rule. If there is any failure in respect to any of these principles, it is because there is a failure on the part of the people to observe them. We hold that the duly authorized expression of the will of the people has a divine sanction(which just rankles some people). Ours is a government of the people. It represents their will. Its officers may sometimes go astray, but that is not a reason for criticizing the principles of our institutions. the real heart of the American Government depends upon the heart of the people. It is from that source that we all must look for all genuine reform. It is to that cause that we must ascribe all our results.Our failings is to the Constitution itself. There is a large portion that is not well informed. In my opinion very little of just criticism can attach to the theories and principles of our institutions. There is far more danger of harm than there is hope of good in any radical changes. We do need a better comprehension and understanding of the and founding a better knowledge of the foundations of government in general, our Forefathers came to certain conclusions and decided upon certain courses of action which have been a great blessing to the world. Before we can understand their conclusions, we must go back and review the course which they followed. We must think the thoughts they thought. Their intellectual life centered around the meeting house. They were intent upon religious worship. While there were always around them men of deep learning, and later those who had comparatively large possessions, the mind or the pole was not so much engrossed in how much they knew, or how much they had, as in how they were going to live.If we are to maintain the great heritage that has been bequeathed to us, we must be like-minded as the fathers who created it. We must not sink into a pagan materialism. We must cultivate the reverence which they had for the things that are holy. We must follow the spiritual and moral leadership which they sowed. We must keep replenished, that they may glow with a more compelling flame, the altar fires before they worshiped.