Military Time (Page 2): Don't worry, now that everybody is switching to Soy products all will be estrogen loaded and think like women. I suspect that is the problem with our congress...

larry

Brian Devon wrote:

You are on the right track. Testosterone poisoning, the joy of the NRA, is not such a good thing. Looking at the organized slaughters (wars) initiated by men, giving a woman the presidency might be a good thing.First, though, check for an Ann Coulter or Margaret Thatcher type Adam's apple!

Don't worry, now that everybody is switching to Soy products all will be estrogen loaded and think like women. I suspect that is the problem with our congress at the moment, They are eating too much tofu for lunch. Women are more vicious than men, that's why we don't want them to be in the Military as a fighter, They aren't trying to measure their "size" by their actions. They go for the gonads every time. "There is no fury like a woman scorned. "

Brian Devon

larry wrote:

Don't worry, now that everybody is switching to Soy products all will be estrogen loaded and think like women. I suspect that is the problem with our congress at the moment, They are eating too much tofu for lunch. Women are more vicious than men, that's why we don't want them to be in the Military as a fighter, They aren't trying to measure their "size" by their actions. They go for the gonads every time. "There is no fury like a woman scorned. "

You are h*****g out with the wrong women. Might want to raise your standards a little. The only women I have ever met, who went for the gonads, did it with affection...not malice!

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Brian Devon wrote:

You are on the right track. Testosterone poisoning, the joy of the NRA, is not such a good thing. Looking at the organized slaughters (wars) initiated by men, giving a woman the presidency might be a good thing.First, though, check for an Ann Coulter or Margaret Thatcher type Adam's apple!

So you haven't watched the Madcow woman on MSNBC?

Brian Devon

oldroy wrote:

So you haven't watched the Madcow woman on MSNBC?

I like Rachel Maddow. She has a longer attention span than most of the people in her business. She also is on the lookout for weasel words. Good critical thinking sk**ls......wait...wait...something is coming up on my crystal ball...you are about to make a h********c remark, which you think is the height of funny cleverness...

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Brian Devon wrote:

I like Rachel Maddow. She has a longer attention span than most of the people in her business. She also is on the lookout for weasel words. Good critical thinking sk**ls......wait...wait...something is coming up on my crystal ball...you are about to make a h********c remark, which you think is the height of funny cleverness...

Is she or isn't she? We both know so I won't say more than that. I can't watch her because she is on opposite Megyn Kelly who has three kids and who I love to hear talk about lefties. Also, Kelly wears dresses on her show.

Brian Devon

Megyn was hired because she is pretty and can read a teleprompter. Rachel was hired for her critical thinking sk**ls.

USpatriot77 Loc: USA

Brian Devon wrote:

Megyn was hired because she is pretty and can read a teleprompter. Rachel was hired for her critical thinking sk**ls.

Really? She was hired to fill the Obama "minority quota" and because she fit in with the company line-plain and simple!

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Brian Devon wrote:

Megyn was hired because she is pretty and can read a teleprompter. Rachel was hired for her critical thinking sk**ls.

There is a perfect example. Megyn must be correct because she's pretty and Rachel must be wrong because she's a d**e. We can sure tell which head Oroy is thinking with. Problem is, that head has no brains. Hmm, that explains a LOT of things doesn't it?

jay-are

lpnmajor wrote:

There is a perfect example. Megyn must be correct because she's pretty and Rachel must be wrong because she's a d**e. We can sure tell which head Oroy is thinking with. Problem is, that head has no brains. Hmm, that explains a LOT of things doesn't it?

What brain are you thinking with to say that Rachel must be right because she is a d**e and Megyn must be wrong because she is pretty? That is just as empty headed.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

jay-are wrote:

What brain are you thinking with to say that Rachel must be right because she is a d**e and Megyn must be wrong because she is pretty? That is just as empty headed.

Do you not understand sarcasm? BTW, you can't insult me unless I allow it - I do not.

Brian Devon

lpnmajor wrote:

There is a perfect example. Megyn must be correct because she's pretty and Rachel must be wrong because she's a d**e. We can sure tell which head Oroy is thinking with. Problem is, that head has no brains. Hmm, that explains a LOT of things doesn't it?

Winning the "looks" lottery is not a criteria for political genius. If it was, Sarah Palin and Dan Quayle would be carved on Mt. Rushmore. Being that they're not, there must be some other characteristics that make a person worthy of being taken seriously.

No one will mistake Ann Coulter for Eleanor Roosevelt.

jay-are

lpnmajor wrote:

Do you not understand sarcasm? BTW, you can't insult me unless I allow it - I do not.

Mirror. That comment bounces off and right back at you.

jay-are

Brian Devon wrote:

Winning the "looks" lottery is not a criteria for political genius. If it was, Sarah Palin and Dan Quayle would be carved on Mt. Rushmore. Being that they're not, there must be some other characteristics that make a person worthy of being taken seriously.

No one will mistake Ann Coulter for Eleanor Roosevelt.

Certainly only an endorsement from Brian Devon will do the trick.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Brian Devon wrote:

Megyn was hired because she is pretty and can read a teleprompter. Rachel was hired for her critical thinking sk**ls.

You very obviously have never watched Megyn Kelly. You just take your info from MM and run with it. Do you even know what color Megyn's hair is or that she always wears a dress? How many kids does she have? Won't MM tell you things like this?

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Brian Devon wrote:

Winning the "looks" lottery is not a criteria for political genius. If it was, Sarah Palin and Dan Quayle would be carved on Mt. Rushmore. Being that they're not, there must be some other characteristics that make a person worthy of being taken seriously.

No one will mistake Ann Coulter for Eleanor Roosevelt.

True, too many people won't be able to get beyond the looks though. We've been conditioned to it. You would think that after the brainlessness of Quale and Palin, they'd know better. I suspect not. We might have to go back to radio.