yeah yeah , its a a brave new world order, aint cha ben listening?????
more likely to the insufferable charms(sic) of left wing liberal cry baby, pluck my heart strings to get your way with me, bleeding heart liberal progressives, I should think, but hey, I was wrong once,ONCE)!!!!take a good long look at the news today on Foxnews, yeah I know what a rightwing nut site that is, the only problem with that statement is you cannot deny the accuracy of their news, you can only berate it , denigrate it and deny it, the truth is friend, truth hurts, that's why we do all the off hand things to get as far away as possible from it, its human nature, you cant help it, so there's your excuse, keep on keepin on, friend...cant call em fags no mo, it hurts their widdle feelings, but hey kill all the christian's you please, no one will say anything, serves em right for preaching yeah, rape all the little girls you want, pedophilia is simply a lifestyle choice now eh?? kill all the babies but "goddamn" America for having anything to do with the killing of a baby seal or whale, O.M.G. unheard of in our enightend society of today, for shame, for shame, I know your name...HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHA you deserve everything you get...
and siggy once said
"LADIES, SOMETIMES A CIGAR IS SIMPLY A CIGAR"
I didn't make assertions on your charectour , why so you assault me with condemnation , without even knowing me? and remember "NO MATTER WHERE YOU GO, THERE YOU ARE" Joe was right , right on the nail head, all the lefties who were in bed with the media as well as those in whollywood got up in arms and convinced those whom they had financial influence over to do a hatchet job on him and that was the end of his career, same same now, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC , all in barry's pocket, SOROS money keeps it going and people like you aide in there traitorous behavior, you don't have to listen to me, you don't have to agree with me, you don't have to like, me, you don't have to have anything to do whatsoever with me, but damned if you can contest the truth of it, this nation is in the throws of a massive shit storm, and when the shit hits the rotary , you and those of your like minded ilk are going to be wearing a lovely shade of brown to match your kings color.......
Glaucon wrote:
Joe was right, extremely right wing, as you apparently are. However, Joe was very smart and crazy and I don't get the idea that you are very smart.
I don't have a bunch of links,
nor will I post a bunch of pages of info
this way or that,
to be totally truth full with you all,
as in Ya'll,
I'll just say this and let those who
feel the spirit comin on em to reply,
"I GUESS OLE JOE MC'CARTHY WAS RIGHT AFTER ALL EH"???????
So goodnight, and good luck!
well then this should settle the argument that "BALLS" have anything to do with being a man and standing up for yourself whether they be friendly or enemy, eh?? how metro-sexual of you all...
jjb2012 wrote:
Serious reply as soon as we reinstate the DRAFT and make it so every politicians son or daughter has to serve the you can come back and speak of "BALLS".
What exactly have we gained from Bush's' "BALLS" ??
And just the Mention of Warrens heritage in the manner you choose to word it shows your true nature. What will you say about Jeb's wife when he runs??
Sometimes when you have had enough and you decide to take a position and stand up for that position, you stand alone, one of our founding fathers stated it best IMHO, Ben Franklin once said during the deciding phase of whether or not we tackle the kings men and throw off their foolish and over bearing oppression of this United States
"We all hang together or we shall surely all hang one at a time" Kudos to her for having the brass to say what she really thinks and feels regardless of what the liberal bleeding heart mamby-pamby left wing progressives tell you whats PC in their minds.
Yes but you fail to realize that as our society has come to think of themselves as "progressive , and liberated" we have fooled ourselves into believing it as well, so as I said "that which you sow, shall you reap" there not just words but they are "just words" we have , or rather "women" have unleashed a beast of which they gave no forethought too whilst opening the gate, the liberation movement cut he moral and ethical obligations to men for taking responsibility for their action as well as allowing "I am women hear me roar" to do her own thing, however without any forethought the ultimate consequence for the night out on the town always falls to the female, men don't get preggger's so in this loose, free will, devil may care mindset we now ascribe to as the norm, men just don't have to worry about it any longer , why should we, you've given us leave et'al to do just as we wish, with regards to your "sow their seeds" line, I'm old school, I courted my wife, I asked her to marry me (3 times) she said yes, we've been married for 41 years now, thick or thin, full or flush, skinny and fat, hard and easy, tough time and easy times, once committed still committed, this gen (X) is lost and floundering , badly and I think a whole lot of hurts gonna come down in the not to distant future for them one way or another, until they finally wake up and smell the dung they've willingly chosen for themselves before it starts to swing back to a more moral and ethical frame of mind. Sorry but that's the way I see it, in truth I fear more for my grand kids than for myself or my kids, and the little ones now will be the hardest hit by the immorality of past gens choices as is the way of things.
Singularity wrote:
Ah, thanks. I too, believe abortion should be a rare choice. But the slut shaming makes me angry! (Not you, just generally.)
The SOWER of the seed, is off 'plowing new fields,' leaving the harvest for others to deal with.
Men "thinking with their dicks" is just as much at the root of the abortion issue as "sluts spreading their legs."
For every 'slut' shamed, there was a "prick" involved as well. No?
As far as all of us paying, alas, abortion is cheaper for the government than paying for child care. And abortion is medically safer than continuing a pregnancy and the subsequent childbirth.
Ah, thanks. I too, believe abortion should be a ra... (
show quote)
I thank you, and I do.
I have been a long standing proponent of firearms ownership, its not a privilege its a right, but not a right to be taken lightly, we should all be educated and trained to handle and use a firearm for the proper purpose of such, just as in knowing which side of the knife goes down on the cutting board...nuff said on my behalf.
jasfourth401 wrote:
You can do what ever you want sparky. I don't give a rat's rear if you waddle around looking like Yosemite Sam. Not my problem. You want to own them? Fine. Own them. But be serious about owning them. Because gun owners are twice as likely to die by gun than those who don't own them. Statistical fact. No way around it. I, on the other hand will take my chances. And my chances of getting blown away are 0.0001%. And that's with the millions of stupid people wandering around this country who shouldn't own a weapon. But of course, you're not in that category. You take gun ownership seriously as shown in your response. You don't make light of owning a gun. No sir-ee.
You can do what ever you want sparky. I don't giv... (
show quote)
SO if that's the case,
and were just funnin here,
since from your last comment I take it there's
no real stats being posted.
How bout this for a rational, logical thesis,
A) if it saves one child's life, let me carry a firearm,
B) if it saves my life from a wicked person intent on bodily harm to my person, let me carry my firearm,
C) if it would save some poor person being violently harrangued by a criminal perp, let me carry my firearm,
last but not least since this one seems to garner all kinds of support from some of the most intelligent and intellectual people on the planet,
D) FOR THE POLAR BEARS DADDY....
jasfourth401 wrote:
Too late. 40% of democrats own guns. I don't believe in taking them away.
You also overlooked the more than one million people that have been blown to smithereens over the time period you cite above. Selective statistical citation doesn't further your argument. It simply categorizes this post as (slightly) humorous...nothing more.
FYI: Back in the day, I cannot remember which firearms manufacturer it was but I'm sure if you did some research on it you could even at this late date find out exactly who it was, or which one it was, after a shooting of heinous proportion filed a brief of sorts that they were offering a 50,00$$ reward for anyone in the world who could capture and bring to justice the dreaded of all criminals "LONE GUN" who was running around indescrimanantly shooting people and causing all kinds of havoc with regards to firearms incidents. To date as far as I know, its never been claimed, due in large part to the immutable fact that firearms in and of themselves cause "NO DAMAGE" to anyone or anything in the world on this planet, without "HUMAN" intervention...
Apparently according to the posting,
"Democrats With Guns shoot people"
why do people always blame the firearm,
if you set off a bomb they blame the bomber,
not the bomb,
yet when it comes to a firearm related incident
"its dem damn guns, dats what it is"??????????
archie bunker wrote:
That is a pretty narrow minded set of facts you listed.
Democrats don't shoot people, guns shoot people!
:lol: :lol: Have you not been paying attention to our democrat friends here? They know...we don't.
pretty much all of it, but most assuredly with regard to "ABORTION" the need for this should be so rare that the feds should have a harder time counting rather than forcing us to pay for it all than condone it and the women who rampantly show up for this due to their behavioral inclinations from the society which has raised them to be that way, via all of the loose and immoral media that bombards us on a now 24/7/365 basis and portrayed it as the norm or casual, is the in response too, thanks for asking.
Singularity wrote:
Hello!
In response to?
As you sow, shall you reap!